Bug#304549: slapd: The newest Version 2.2.23 instantly dies when a process tries to access it.

2005-04-14 Thread silvio_schmidt
Well, in spite of the lack of detail, I have been able to reproduce this crash when running slapd on an alpha with a 2.6 kernel. I'm currently working on rebuilding openldap with debugging symbols so I can get a sensible backtrace. Well, sorry for the lack of detail. I have just upgraded slapd fro

Processed: reopening 304405

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reopen 304405 Bug#304405: geneweb: prerm alters random files on the filesystem Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: tagging 304405

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 304405 security woody Bug#304405: geneweb: prerm alters random files on the filesystem There were no tags set. Tags added: security, woody > End of message, stopping processing

Bug#304549: slapd: The newest Version 2.2.23 instantly dies when a process tries to access it.

2005-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:24:17AM +0200, Silvio Schmidt wrote: > Package: slapd > Version: 2.2.23 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > The newest Version 2.2.23 instantly dies when a process tries to access > it. Well, in spite of the lack of detail, I have been able to

Bug#206467: build against libavcodec-dev & libavformat-dev

2005-04-14 Thread ms419
I built avifile on powerpc against libavcodec-dev & libavformat-dev with only a few changes - see attached patch I'm scarcely familiar with gnu maketools, but it works : ) Thanks again! Jack patch Description: Binary data

Bug#304735: slapd 2.2.23 database corruption

2005-04-14 Thread Christian Balzer
Steve Langasek wrote: >On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:30:33PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: [backend used] >> See above, LDBM (whatever actual DB that defaults to these days). > >Sorry, I missed that. I would strongly encourage you to switch to BDB, >which is the recommended backend for OpenLDAP 2.2

Bug#304735: slapd 2.2.23 database corruption

2005-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:30:33PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > >On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:09:19PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: > > >> Changes are generated by ldifsort.pl/ldifdiff.pl and then applied with > >> ldapmodify for a low impact and smooth operation,

Bug#304735: slapd 2.2.23 database corruption

2005-04-14 Thread Christian Balzer
Steve Langasek wrote: >On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:09:19PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: >> Changes are generated by ldifsort.pl/ldifdiff.pl and then applied with >> ldapmodify for a low impact and smooth operation, using ldbm as >> backend. > >The previous version of slapd *also* had corruption

Bug#304735: slapd 2.2.23 database corruption

2005-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:09:19PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: > This is basically the same as #303826 (why this got classified as normal > and 2.2.23 got pushed into sarge is beyond me). > I have a LARGE (>60k users) users/mailsettings database in LDAP, > on two identical servers running sar

Bug#304735: slapd 2.2.23 database corruption

2005-04-14 Thread Christian Balzer
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-1 (sarge) Severity: critical This is basically the same as #303826 (why this got classified as normal and 2.2.23 got pushed into sarge is beyond me). I have a LARGE (>60k users) users/mailsettings database in LDAP, on two identical servers running sarge. They h

Bug#302866: marked as done (qemu: FTBFS in sarge: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lartsc)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:52:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line qemu: FTBFS in sarge: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lartsc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#302517: marked as done (dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:37:41 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#273871: libsilc package policy violations (bug #273871)

2005-04-14 Thread Robert McQueen
Tamas SZERB wrote: > once upon a time, I closed this bug. then the submitter reopened it, > so currently I don't give it a f*ck. Our opinion are different, so if > you feel any ambition to get the both sides together, feel free to > volunteer. :) This package's violation of Debian policy on the pa

Bug#304687: kernel-package: same think here

2005-04-14 Thread Csillag Kristof
Package: kernel-package Version: 8.131 Followup-For: Bug #304687 The same thing happens here, too. (I just tried to rebuild my kernel, and stumbled on this.) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i6

Bug#303238: marked as done (kpdf fix for CAN-2005-0064 (bug 291251) was incomplete)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:02:26 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303238: fixed in kdegraphics 4:3.3.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#303324: file conflicts in freebsd-sendpr arla

2005-04-14 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:15:42PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:15:16AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > You may want to add conflicts to one or more of the packages or > > take other actions to allow the parallel installation of the packages. > > > > Please clone an

Processed: tagging 303326

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 303326 sid Bug#303326: file conflicts in libcgi-dev cgilib There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#290100: crystalspace build problem is actually in sprcal3d

2005-04-14 Thread Christian BAYLE
Thanks for the tip, feel free to NMU or to provide me a patch I'll try to deal with this ASAP Le jeudi 14 avril 2005 à 05:10 -0700, Daniel Schepler a écrit : > Looking through my build log, I found the following: > > ... > g++ -c -o ./out/linuxx86/optimize/plugins/mesh/sprcal3d/object/sprcal3

Bug#254680: crystalspace_0.98-20040623-2.1(alpha/unstable): affects alpha, ia64, and hppa as well

2005-04-14 Thread Christian BAYLE
The problem is that some part of the code is loadable code, so should be compiled with -fPIC but this code is linked with library not having dynamic version The non dynamic version are non -fPIC 3 solutions -obtain dynamic version for all concerned lib, nothing oblige this -obtain

Bug#304468: this is CAN-2005-1102

2005-04-14 Thread Joey Hess
Please refer to CAN-2005-1102 in the changelog entry when fixing this security hole. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#304629: marked as done (callgrind: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:17:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304629: fixed in callgrind 0.9.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#289561: nvidia-kernel-2.4.27-2-k7: 2.4.27-2-k7 does not work either

2005-04-14 Thread Jan Heitkoetter
Package: nvidia-kernel-2.4.27-2-k7 Version: 1.0.7167+1 Followup-For: Bug #289561 Hi Steve, sorry for answering so late, but unfortunately my spam filter ate your mail. I switched to 2.6.8 recently, but nevertheless I installed the current 2.4.27-2-k7 and the corresponding nvidia kernel package.

Processed: tagging 304633

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 304633 sid Bug#304633: fpc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#297269: marked as done (type-handling build-depends on itself)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:48:24 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297269: fixed in type-handling 0.2.9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#206467: libavcodec & powerpc

2005-04-14 Thread ms419
Anyone working on avifile on powerpc - or building against ffmpeg packages in Debian? I just tried building avifile from CVS on powerpc & got the attached error - though libavcodec-dev is already available in Debian - Many thanks for your work on free AV tools! Jack [...] Making all in ppc make

Bug#300851: marked as done (libdb version check)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:32:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300851: fixed in openldap2.2 2.2.23-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#304691: siproxd: Seg faults systematically at first received message

2005-04-14 Thread Marc Poulhies
Package: siproxd Version: 1:0.5.10-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I tried with the 'testing' version before trying the unstable one, but both have the same behavior. I simply install the package, edit the config file without changing a lot (in/out iface and register ne

Bug#304588: marked as done (gnome-games in experimental depends on libhowl)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:45:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bah has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the B

Bug#303897: Bug #303897: python-imaging: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends

2005-04-14 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:04:27PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello Matthias, > > Given I feel slightly responsible of this bug, I offer to do a NMU to > fix it, if you like. Hello Matthias, I have prepared an NMU. I will upload it soon, unless you told me otherwise. Please find the patch be

Bug#304687: kernel-package: errors in script

2005-04-14 Thread Alberto Maurizi
Package: kernel-package Version: 8.131 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Two errors found: 1. during clean (but also during fistr stage of build) /usr/bin/make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/rules real_stamp_clean /bin/sh: line 0: [: /usr/src/kernel-patches/i386: binary oper

Bug#304633: fpc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-04-14 Thread Carlos Laviola
On 4/14/05, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I add libgpmg1-dev and libncurses5-dev to the Build-Depends, then > the build fails later with errors building the docs. I'm aware of it and working on the problem; I'm just facing some hardware problems that should be ironed out soon. T

Processed: Fixed in upload of gnome-games 1:2.10.1-2 to experimental

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 304588 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#304588: gnome-games in experimental depends on libhowl Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Processed: Upping severity on this, since i believe it is needed for woody-> sarge migration.

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 264839 grave Bug#264839: initrd-tools: mkinitrd should include keyboard modules (i8042, atkbd) in case an early fsck interaction is needed Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#304660: marked as done (gnome-session: gnome-settings-daemon fails)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:25:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304660: gnome-session: gnome-settings-daemon fails has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#304666: zorp: FTBFS: Link errors in zorp binary

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: zorp Severity: serious Version: 2.0.9-9 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -O2 -Wall -W -g -D_GNU_SOURCE -o zorp main.o ../lib/libzorp.la -lpython2.3 -lutil -ldl -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lm -lnsl -pthread -Wl,--export-dyna

Bug#304653: marked as done (don't force overwrite)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:04:24 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304653: don't force overwrite has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#304023: marked as done (mailman: woody->sarge upgrade breaks)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:32:12 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304023: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#304607: php4-pgsql: Error reloading apache

2005-04-14 Thread Administrador DyR
ATENCION: Por motivos de seguridad, este mensaje ha sido alterado por el programa MIMEDefang del servidor mailhost.dyr.es. A continuacion se ofrecen indicaciones acerca de los cambios efectuados. Para mas informacion sobre nuestra politica de seguridad, contacte con Desarrollo y Recursos S.L. <[EMA

Bug#304665: xmms-wmdiscotux: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: xmms-wmdiscotux Severity: serious Version: 1.3-2 Tags: patch >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/xmms-wmdiscotux-1.3' gcc -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -fPIC `glib-config

Bug#304663: ximian-connector: FTBFS: Cannot find evolution libs

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: ximian-connector Severity: serious Version: 2.0.3-1 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot (so all the build dependencies were satisfied, including evolution-dev and evolution-data-server-dev): ... checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... mawk checking whether make sets

Bug#302282: gtk-engines-mac2_1.0.3-2(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken libtool.m4

2005-04-14 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I tried to fix this bug, but apparently there is no configure.{ac,in} in the source package? Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCXoN95UTeB5t8Mo0RAlQQAJ9uLmhvRmeMOPZrDQs1uofHlqRwFQCfU1rd OfXs0rhO8y4p

Bug#274225: Security patch in latest version affects woody?

2005-04-14 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
tags 274225 wontfix thanks This bug can't be fixed for woody version. If you can't risk the login/password leakage, you have to upgrade to the package from sarge. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#284960: marked as done (modutils - includes /etc/modutils/*.chandev in /etc/modules.conf)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:02:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#284960: fixed in modutils 2.4.27.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#304661: superkaramba: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: superkaramba Version: 0.35-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX i386-linux-g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -DN

Bug#304660: gnome-session: gnome-settings-daemon fails

2005-04-14 Thread Keith Blow
Package: gnome-session Version: 2.6.1-5 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-kjb9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Ve

Processed: Re: Security patch in latest version affects woody?

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 274225 wontfix Bug#274225: Security patch in latest version affects woody? Tags were: security woody Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#304653: don't force overwrite

2005-04-14 Thread Olleg Samoylov
Package: aptitude Version: 0.2.15.9-2 Severity: grave When install package with aptitude in interactive mode it force overwrite for all files. In spite of in command line mode exist option to prevent this. This can lead to significant data lost in unstable distrib. For instance, package ia32l

Bug#301650: marked as done (Please rebuild gdal against a newer version of xerces for sarge)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:32:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301650: fixed in gdal 1.2.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#301710: marked as done (gdal: please depend upon xerces26 instead of xerces21)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:32:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301650: fixed in gdal 1.2.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#304646: libgnome-java: FTBFS: Cannot find gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: libgnome-java Severity: serious Version: 2.8.3.1-1 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... make all-am make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libgnome-java-2.8.3.1' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/java/gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar', needed by `src/java/org/gnu/g

Bug#304647: libgdamm1.3-1: Uninstallable in sid

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: libgdamm1.3-1 Severity: grave Version: 1.3.0-4 Tags: sid frobnitz:/var/cache/pbuildd# apt-get install libgdamm1.3-1 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you

Bug#233181: marked as done (liboro-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:17:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233181: fixed in liboro-java 2.0.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#304643: libgconf-java: FTBFS: Cannot find gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: libgconf-java Severity: serious Version: 2.8.3.1-1 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... make all-am make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libgconf-java-2.8.3.1' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/java/gtk2.6-2.6.0.jar', needed by `src/java/org/gnu/g

Bug#304559: More info

2005-04-14 Thread C.Y.M
The problem appears to be that the links are created incorrectly when the package is built (they are pointing to a non existing directory): dpkg --contents postfix* lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-04-14 05:50:50 ./usr/lib/libpostfix-dns.so.1 -> debian/postfix/usr/lib/libpostfix-dns.so.1.0.1 l

Bug#304638: grub2: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: grub2 Severity: serious Version: 0.6+20050203-2 Tags: patch >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... gcc -Iutil -I./util -I. -Iinclude -I./include -Wall -W -DGRUB_DATADIR=\"/usr/share/grub/i386-pc\" -g -O2 -DGRUB_UTIL=1 -c -o grub_emu-util_console.o util/console.c uti

Bug#304634: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: gibraltar-bootcd Severity: serious Version: 0.50 Tags: patch >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... dpkg-source: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1234) dpkg-source: extracting coreutils in coreutils-5.2.1 tar: bzip2: Cann

Bug#304633: fpc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: fpc Severity: serious Version: 1.9.6-2 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... /usr/bin/make fpc_all make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/fpc-1.9.6/ide' /tmp/buildd/fpc-1.9.6/compiler/ppc386 -Xs -OG2p3 -n -Sg -Fu/tmp/buildd/fpc-1.9.6/rtl/units/i386-linux -Fu/tmp/b

Bug#304629: callgrind: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: callgrind Severity: serious Version: 0.9.11-1 Tags: patch >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... checking for valgrind installation... in /usr checking for valgrind version... valgrind-2.4.0 checking for CFLAGS to use for valgrind tools... ./configure: line 3584: pkg-

Bug#290100: crystalspace build problem is actually in sprcal3d

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
Looking through my build log, I found the following: ... g++ -c -o ./out/linuxx86/optimize/plugins/mesh/sprcal3d/object/sprcal3d.o -I. -I./include -I./include -Wall -Wno-unknown-pragmas -pipe -fno-exceptions -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math plugins/mesh/sprcal3d/object/sprcal3d.cpp plu

Processed: webmin bugs

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 299223 normal Bug#299223: webmin-firewall: not functional module Severity set to `normal'. > tag 299223 unreproducible Bug#299223: webmin-firewall: not functional module There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > owner 290516 [EMAIL

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ia32-libs 1.2

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 304408 + fixed Bug#304408: ia32-libs: Version 1.1 .deb file has /bin and /usr which would overwrite ia64 binaries Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#304559: postfix: upgrade doesn't work cleanly

2005-04-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:29:53AM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > postalias: warning: inet_protocols: IPv6 support is disabled: Address > > family not supported by protocol > > postalias: warning: inet_protocols: configuring for IPv4 support only >

Bug#303142: marked as done (phpmyadmin: Cross-Site-Scriping vulnerability in convcharset)

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:39:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line phpmyadmin: Cross-Site-Scriping vulnerability in convcharset has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Processed: tagging 304412

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # fixed for sid (1.1.3-9) > tags 304412 - sid Bug#304412: CAN-2005-0941: "OpenOffice DOC document Heap Overflow" Tags were: sid pending experimental sarge security Bug#304469: openoffice.org: Invalid range checking in DOC header parsing leading to pos

Bug#304607: php4-pgsql: Error reloading apache

2005-04-14 Thread Adam Conrad
DyR system manager said: > > Whenever I try to reload apache (or restart it gracefully, with > apachectl graceful), and php4-pgsql is installed and enabled in php4 > config, apache process kill all old childs, but fails in spawning new > ones, rendering apache process unusable. A few questions: 1

Processed: Fixed in upload of nano 1.3.7-0 to experimental

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 301384 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#301384: nano: experimental: missing build-dep on libglib*-dev ? Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tra

Bug#304559: TLS problems

2005-04-14 Thread C.Y.M
After upgrading postfix (with integrated tls), I am having the same upgrade/installation problems mentioned in this thread. Also, when the server attempts to accept mail, I get the following error: Apr 14 02:46:54 nofear postfix/tlsmgr[28480]: fatal: unsupported transport type: fifo Apr 14 02:46:

Bug#304607: php4-pgsql: Error reloading apache

2005-04-14 Thread DyR system manager
Package: php4-pgsql Version: 4.3.10-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Whenever I try to reload apache (or restart it gracefully, with apachectl graceful), and php4-pgsql is installed and enabled in php4 config, apache process kill all old childs, but fails in spawning ne

Bug#304408: tags 304408 patch

2005-04-14 Thread Kaare Hviid
tags 304408 patch thanks This appears to take care of the issue: diff -Naur ia32-libs-1.1/debian/rules ia32-libs-1.1.fixed/debian/rules --- ia32-libs-1.1/debian/rules 2005-04-12 11:40:01.0 +0200 +++ ia32-libs-1.1.fixed/debian/rules2005-04-14 11:04:46.017973835 +0200 @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@

Processed: tags 304408 patch

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 304408 patch Bug#304408: ia32-libs: Version 1.1 .deb file has /bin and /usr which would overwrite ia64 binaries Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#304438: marked as done (libphysfs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'automake-1.7')

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:47:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304438: fixed in libphysfs 1.0.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#280901: vdkxdb: [PATCH]

2005-04-14 Thread Andreas Jochens
tags 280901 +patch thanks The attached patch changes the Build-Depends from 'libvdk1-dev' to 'libvdk2-dev'. It also replace s/vdk-config/vdk-config-2/ in 'aclocal.m4' and 'configure' and it uses the new VDKTextView instead of VDKText in vdkxmemo.{h,cc}. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-o

Bug#304539: slapd 2.2 fails to recognize limits line that worked in 2.1

2005-04-14 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Joy, On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:30:29PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Apparently the upstream authors of OpenLDAP decided that > > limits user size=100 > > is no longer accepted, meaning slapd fails to start after upgrade. It was never acceptable but the parser had a bug which caused undefine

Processed: vdkxdb: [PATCH]

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 280901 +patch Bug#280901: vdkxdb: FTBFS: Build-Depends on 'libvdk1-dev' cannot be satisfied Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Processed: severity of 304539 is wishlist

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 304539 wishlist Bug#304539: slapd 2.2 fails to recognize limits line that worked in 2.1 Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#304559: postfix: further information on upgrade doesn't work cleanly

2005-04-14 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
Package: postfix Version: 2.2.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #304559 I wanted to provide additional information on this bug. I received many of the same messages that Adrian Bunk did although I have ipv6 in my kernel, so I don't get the ipv6 messages. One thing that I wanted to try was to do a --reinsta

Bug#300953: marked as done (nice: FTBFS: halts on "nice.tools.compiler.console: parsing")

2005-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:32:39 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300953: fixed in nice 0.9.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#304588: gnome-games in experimental depends on libhowl

2005-04-14 Thread David Weinehall
Package: gnome-games Version: 1:2.10.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental gnome-games depends on libhowl0 which is going to be moved to non-free. Regards: David Weinehall -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~ // Diamo