Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:17:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304687: fixed in kernel-package 8.132
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
reassign 304549 libc6.1
retitle 304549 LinuxThreads thread stack sizes don't stay set on alpha
thanks
Hi folks,
I'm sorry to be reassigning this to glibc before I have a reproducible test
case, but I have been over the OpenLDAP 2.2 code and all creation of new
threads in the code is done with a s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 304549 libc6.1
Bug#304549: slapd: The newest Version 2.2.23 instantly dies when a process
tries to access it.
Bug reassigned from package `slapd' to `libc6.1'.
> retitle 304549 LinuxThreads thread stack sizes don't stay set on alpha
Bug#30454
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 302462 howl
Bug#302462: RM: howl -- license issues (APSL 2.0)
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `howl'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:43:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290838: catdoc 0.91.5-1.woody4 (in
woody-proposed-updates): depends on libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), which is not in
woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:43:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290838: catdoc 0.91.5-1.woody4 (in
woody-proposed-updates): depends on libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), which is not in
woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means tha
Package: migrationtools
Version: 46-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Debian Woody's schema files for openldap do not provide the objectClass
"kerberosSecurityObject", but migrationtool's migrate_passwd.pl script
create an ldif file containing
objectCla
Your message dated Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:33:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line "scsh moving to non-free in woody - update overrides
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 23:13 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Package: hostap-modules-i386
> Version: 1:0.3.7-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> building the package hostap-modules-i386 in a clean sid build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
>
I can't reproduce this at all. Can you p
Package: gtkhtml3.1
Severity: serious
This package being the only one of the six versions of gtkhtml in Debian
at the moment not being used by any package, I suggest not releasing
this version with sarge (it was not in woody either).
Please reply if you disagree.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
-- System Info
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:40:59AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Well, in spite of the lack of detail, I have been able to reproduce this
> >crash when running slapd on an alpha with a 2.6 kernel. I'm currently
> >working on rebuilding openldap with debugging symbols so I can get a
> >sensibl
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:29:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252885: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:30:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240941: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:25:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258921: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 285762 + fixed
Bug#285762: tempname() in web-lib.pl does not create a temp file
Tags were: fixed wontfix woody patch
Bug#289464: webmin-core: Scheduled Cron Jobs doesn't show nothing
Tags added: fixed
> tag 289464 + fixed
Bug#289464: webmin-core: S
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 303897 + fixed
Bug#303897: python-imaging: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 286905 + fixed
Bug#286905: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree makes setuid
Tags were: fixed woody security
Bug#286922: perl-modules: File::Path::rmtree removes arbitrary
Tags added: fixed
> tag 286922 + fixed
Bug#286922: perl-modules: File::Path::rmt
Package: libjpeg62-dev
Version: 6b-10
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
libjpeg6b should not enter testing before openscenegraph (>=0.9.8-3) and
python-imaging (>= 1.1.4-3.1) are in testing, else they will FTBFS in
testing.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
T
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:19:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280233: fixed in mm 1.1.3-6.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:19:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280233: fixed in mm 1.1.3-6.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:19:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280233: fixed in mm 1.1.3-6.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:32:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298163: fixed in docbook-dsssl 1.79-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:32:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298163: fixed in docbook-dsssl 1.79-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:46:19PM +0100, Brian Campbell wrote:
> The ARM erlang builds seem to have started failing when -fPIC was
> introduced. Taking a quick look at gcc-3.3 bugs, I notice #285238
> mentions problems with -fPIC and -O3 on ARM. Unfortunately, progress on
> that appears to have
Hi,
The ARM erlang builds seem to have started failing when -fPIC was
introduced. Taking a quick look at gcc-3.3 bugs, I notice #285238
mentions problems with -fPIC and -O3 on ARM. Unfortunately, progress on
that appears to have stalled, but perhaps reducing the optimisation
level might help?
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 304758 + fixed
Bug#304758: gnomoradio: broken dependency - libvorbis0 instead of libvorbis0a
in > woody
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:04:24AM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> (Hand typed from screen)
Uargh, that's a lot of work for this. Thanks! Bug is known, please move
the ldabdb directory from /var/backups back to /var/lib/ldap:
# /etc/init.d/slapd stop
# rm /var/lib/ldap/*
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:08:29PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> This is on i386.
> I had a similar problem.
> The solution was to remove ldapi:/// from the startup option.
> With that option it dies with the following in syslog:
> Apr 15 19:32:12 bixbite slapd[29436]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.2.
Package: hostap-modules-i386
Version: 1:0.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package hostap-modules-i386 in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
from include/linux/
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
On today's apt-get upgrade slapd fails and left with an empty directory.
The Directory was backed up by dpkg to /var/backups/$BASE_DN-2.2.23-1.ldapdb.
But dpkg fails to move it back to /var/lib/ldap:
B
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:02:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304314: fixed in gtk-sharp 1.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 304803 sid
Bug#304803: elinks: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libperl-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:02:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304755: fixed in gforge 3.1-30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
The problem is that we're calling make clean instead of make dist-clean. The
reason for doing this is that the upstream packages wrongly (I think) delete
configure and makefile.in on make dist-clean, and hence the package is no longer
buildable after it is cleaned. I've not had chance to work out e
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:14:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304790: Not able to install blam
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:32:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296052: fixed in doodle 0.6.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:32:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303321: fixed in uim 1:0.4.6final1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Hello
This is on i386.
I had a similar problem.
The solution was to remove ldapi:/// from the startup option.
With that option it dies with the following in syslog:
Apr 15 19:32:12 bixbite slapd[29436]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.2.23 (Apr 1 2005
18:55:21) $ [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/home/torsten/pack
Version 4.3.10-1 got accidentally linked against the embedded database library
libfbembed. The embedded database probably tried to load the configuration file
and failed when that didn't work.
Version 4.3.10-2 which will be in unstable shortly is properly linked against
libfbclient. Could you v
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:50:16 -0700
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package is building here and should be uploaded shortly.
Thx!
Cheers,
Remco
pgpxg88O7MhNV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Is there some reason why you filed three copies of this report?
MEDIAFOREST Technical Contact wrote:
> I installed the default kernel (2.2.x) version of the new debian,
> without other problem that my ethernet card wasn't recognized.
> But as there is only a driver module for this card for kernels
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 304782 normal
Bug#304782: impossible to install debian 3.0 r4 with bf24 kernel
Bug#304779: impossible to install debian 3.0 r4 with bf24 kernel
Bug#304780: impossible to inst
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:16:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303904: 303904
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:17:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273525: fixed in ldmud 3.2.12.718-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:17:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304809: fixed in ruby1.9 1.9.0+20050412-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hello
I have seen that this bug is RC #275825. If you do not complain
I will NMU this and provide the dependencies described.
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTEC
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:47:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302447: fixed in webmin-extra 1.180-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: kernel-package
Version: 8.131
Followup-For: Bug #304687
Take a look at the output of the following template, which is used for
debian/rules:
$ grep -n '[[:space:]]\+$' /usr/share/kernel-package/rules
Run the following command to fix it:
$ sed -i -e 's/[[:space:]]\+$//' /usr/share/kernel-
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:21:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304808: openoffice.org: Security vulnerability in opening
.doc files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:17:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#161394: fixed in ledcontrol 0.5.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:17:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#147008: fixed in ledcontrol 0.5.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:17:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#264353: fixed in ledcontrol 0.5.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:53:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Package: php4-interbase
Version: 4.3.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
ibase_connect doesn't work in php scripts.
I found that the problem is missing configuration file for firebird.
Syslog information:
Apr 15 17:25:14 net2004 php4: Missing configuration file:
/usr/lib/
Package: ruby1.9
Severity: serious
Version: 1.9.0+20050412-1
>From my build log, reproduced in an i386 chroot with pbuilder:
...
dh_movefiles -plibopenssl-ruby1.9 \
usr/lib/ruby/1.9/drb/ssl.rb \
usr/lib/ruby/1.9/net/https.rb \
usr/lib/ruby/1.9/webrick/ssl.rb
install -d
/tmp/buildd/ru
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.3-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
Recently, SecurityFocus announced a vulnerability in OpenOffice version
1.1.4 and all prior versions. (http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/395516)
This allows a mallicous DOC file to
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 05:15:56PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Adding libperl-dev to the Build-Depends allows the package to build
> again.
Ohh, please! Tell me libperl is not a runtime dependency for this.
Really, ELinks does not n
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, MEDIAFOREST Technical Contact wrote:
Package: kernel
Version: 3.0 r4
Severity: critical
[...]
I am trying to use the last Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r4 and I'm a bit surprised
that the default kernel is still a 2.2
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r4 is the new revision of the STABLE (woody) rele
Package: elinks
Severity: serious
Version: 0.10.4-1
Tags: patch
>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot (the error message
is different on amd64 for some reason, but the fix is the same):
...
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN
-fno-strict-alia
To complete the description of the problem,
Here's the result of lshw on my machine :
ns2.mimizan.com
description: Desktop Computer
product: P4U800-X
vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
version: 1.XX
serial: 123456789000
width: 32 bits
capabilities: smbios-2.3 dmi-2.3
conf
Hi.
I'm sure the package is installable. Could you acknowledge it? May I close the
bug?
--
.''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Package: libcdaudio
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
CAN-2005-0706 describes a buffer overflow in grip CDDB response parsing that
can potentially be exploited to execute arbitrary code.
libcdaudio contains the vulnerable code as well. Attached you can find
a
Package: blam
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I am not able to install blam. When I try 'apt-get install blam', I get
this
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
blam: Depends: libgnome-cil (>= 1.0) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
Trying
Package: junkbuster
Version: 2.0.2-0.2
Severity: grave
Tags: security, woody
Justification: user security hole
According to
http://lwn.net/Alerts/131964/
JunkBuster is vulnerable to a heap corruption vulnerability, and under
certain configurations may allow an attacker to modify settings.
Impa
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:17:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304766: fixed in kfreebsd5-source 5.3-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:42:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this bug doesn't happen anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:02:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303871: fixed in php4-kadm5 0.2.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300573 help
Bug#300573: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin: FTBFS on various arches: outdated
libtool and PIC issues.
Tags were: sid
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 304779 installation-reports
Bug#304779: impossible to install debian 3.0 r4 with bf24 kernel
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `installation-reports'.
> reassign 304780 installation-reports
Bug#304780: impossible to install debian 3.0 r
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301430: fixed in openmosixview 1.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # raising severity to be able to merge - also, it FTBFS on all
> # architectures, so that's not a problem
> package zynaddsubfx
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zynaddsubfx
> severity 303436 serious
Bug#303436: zynaddsubfx: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): FL/fl_a
Package: cdrom
Version: 3.0 r4
Severity: Critical
I installed the default kernel (2.2.x) version of the new debian,
without other problem that my ethernet card wasn't recognized.
But as there is only a driver module for this card for kernels >= 2.4, I
tried to install
the debian 3.0 r4 with bf24 co
Package: kernel
Version: 3.0 r4
Severity: critical
I installed the default kernel (2.2.x) version of the new debian,
without other problem that my ethernet card wasn't recognized.
But as there is only a driver module for this card for kernels >= 2.4, I
tried to install
the debian 3.0 r4 with bf24 c
Package: install
Version: 3.0 r4
Severity: critical
I installed the default kernel (2.2.x) version of the new debian,
without other problem that my ethernet card wasn't recognized.
But as there is only a driver module for this card for kernels >= 2.4, I
tried to install
the debian 3.0 r4 with bf24
Package: installation
Version: 3.0 r4
Severity: critical
I installed the default kernel (2.2.x) version of the new debian,
without other problem that my ethernet card wasn't recognized.
But as there is only a driver module for this card for kernels >= 2.4, I
tried to install
the debian 3.0 r4 with
Package: installation-reports
Version: 3.0 r4
Severity: critical
I installed the default kernel (2.2.x) version of the new debian,
without other problem that my ethernet card wasn't recognized.
But as there is only a driver module for this card for kernels >= 2.4, I
tried to install
the debian 3.0
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:17:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303835: fixed in quantlib-ruby 0.3.8.rc.20050407-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
also sprach Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.15.1415 +0200]:
> I'll package that tomorrow, ETA 14.00 +0100.
>
> Martin, I'd be happy if you could upload for me once more as this
> is urgent and I haven't read the dput/dupload/... docs yet.
Sure. I should be there. Just send mail.
>
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:02:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304293: fixed in php4-interbase 4.3.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:07:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line octave-epstk: FTBFS: Can't satisfy build dependencies in sarge.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On Friday 15 April 2005 14.03, martin f krafft wrote:
> wenn ich bis morgen nichts von dir hÃre, dann kÃmmere ich mich drum.
I'll package that tomorrow, ETA 14.00 +0100.
Martin, I'd be happy if you could upload for me once more as this is urgent
and I haven't read the dput/dupload/... docs yet.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:56:20PM +0200, Remco Seesink wrote:
> Would you consider sponsoring the php4-interbase package again?
> Changes are small, I corrected a build dependency, which caused
> the RC bug I mailed about.
> The new package (4.3-10-2) can be found here:
> http://217.114.97.127/de
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:19:50 -0700
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is probably due to .deps directories referring to the old jar
> file cluttering up the source package.
Same thing here on powerpc. I'd like to submit a patch but I don't know
how the .deps directory is generated :'(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 304758 sid
Bug#304758: gnomoradio: broken dependency - libvorbis0 instead of libvorbis0a
in > woody
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processin
Package: kfreebsd5-source
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:58:06AM +, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> =
> FreeBSD-SA-05:04.ifconf
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 06:18:01 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303218: fixed in libgnumail-java 1.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2005 06:17:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301684: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.87
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:45:37AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:03:16AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:18:20PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > tags 301684 patch
> > > thanks
> >
> > This patch looks generally OK to fix problem but I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tried to compile the kernel, and located part of the problem with the
last cp command, where
cp arch /boot/xx zz is issued instead of
cp arch/boot/xx zz.
In the debian/rules file in the kernel source, the arch variable is
appended by a space or tab
Resolved!
The problem occured because of hw problemes. A new cd player fixed it.
Thanx to Joey Hess.
Arve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-2
Followup-For: Bug #302629
I have a similar problem when updaeting from 2.2.23-1 to 2.2.23-2. The
output
Setting up slapd (2.2.23-2) ...
Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.conf in /var/backups/slapd-2.2.23-1... done.
Moving old database directories to /var/backups:
Package: gnomoradio
Version: 0.15.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=libvorbis0
->woody
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact
Hello,
just a quick reply to the 3 mails from Torsten.
a) will try to ride this out with BDB and slapd 2.2.23 for the moment
and make the call if this is working or not on Monday. So far no
corruption, but also just a few modify actions. If it fails as well,
I might indeed need an old package
severity 304129 normail
tag 304129 unreproducible
stop
unreproducible for me.
tested with
evolution 2.2.2-2
e-d-s 1.2.2-2
gtk2-engines-gtk-qt 0.60-1
--
Takuo KITAME
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 17:45 +1100, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Hrm, on my system, I got the segv even with a more minmal config (I can
> remove the vhost, log_module, and dir_module, and it still dies).
Interesting, I definitely need those directives in the config file to
cause a segfault.
> If I rever
Am Freitag, 18. März 2005 20:30 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> Attached is a preliminary patch for docbook-dsssl to make it so that
> fontconfig can be built with both jade and openjade. Before today I did
> not know any DSSSL so this may be wildly incorrect. The resulting PDF
> for fontconfig (doc/font
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 304129 normail
Severity level `normail' is not known.
Recognized are: critical, grave, serious, important, normal, minor, wishlist,
fixed.
> tag 304129 unreproducible
Bug#304129: Evolution crashes upon startup when using gtk2-engines-gtk-qt
T
Package: gforge-ldap-openldap
Version: 3.1-29
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The new LDAP packages in testing no longer accept DNs with regular
expressions in them, it seems. Using something
access to dn=".*,ou=People,dc=localhost,dc=localdomain"
in slapd.conf, as th
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:09:19PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> I urge you (in case this can't be fixed in a time frame of 1-2 days)
> to back out this "update" and revert to the previous version.
Not easy to do after this has propagated to testing.
> If this LDAP DB would be the canonical o
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:57:48PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> I will monitor this over the weekend and see if the problem persists,
> goes away or (heavens forbid) mutates.
Thanks.
> Not matter the outcome of this though, the severity of this bug report
> remains the same.
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo