Bug#273338: adding to Testing

Hello, if you think that the license issues are clarified (and I do so), please add the new stuff to the copyright file, upload the new version, close the bugs, wait few days and ask the release guys to add it to Testing. And please do it RSN. Regards, Eduard. -- _rene_ .oO ( herr, wirf hirn

Bug#306299: postfix: fails to install

Hi Oliver, What does the output of /usr/sbin/postconf alias_database alias_maps show on this system? And the output of ls -l /etc/aliases*? Does the problem persist if you run dpkg --configure --pending? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Processed: tagging 306141

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306141 security Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply() Tags were: patch Tags added: security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: Re: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 306184 sid Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

tags 306184 sid thanks From what I can see, this bug does not affect the version of the package currently in sarge. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#304968: gnustep-base should not enter in sarge now

Hi Eric, gnustep-base 1.10.2 should stay in sid untill gnustep-gui and gnustep-back are ready to enter in sarge and all gnustep apps are successfully tested or rebuilt. We want to keep sarge clean. It looks to me like gnustep-gui and gnustep-back are ready to go. Does this bug still apply?

Bug#306620: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: Please remove wxwidgets2.5, licence problems)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 05:34:07 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306620: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Processed: Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-imaging 1.1.4-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 303897 python-imaging Bug#303897: python-imaging: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends Bug reassigned from package `python-imaging,libjpeg62-dev' to `python-imaging'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#306363: snes9express: built for all architectures, but uninstallable on most

Hi Agney, Since your sponsor hasn't uploaded this yet after four days, do you want to put the source package on-line somewhere that others can get to them? I'd be happy to sponsor an upload for this bugfix. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#305971: f2c: segfaults on m68k

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:20:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:42:43PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: Hi, the new new version of f2c does not cut it either on m68k: Setting up f2c (20020621-3.3) ... (unstable)[EMAIL

Bug#307171: tela: FTBFS (sarge): Blas not found!

Package: tela Version: 2.0-8 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'tela' in a clean chroot on i386/testing, I get the following error: checking for completion_matches in -lreadline... yes checking for ddot in -lblas2... no configure: error: Blas not found! make: *** [configure-stamp]

Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege escalation

Package: affix-source Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Inproper bounds checking in affix_sock_register() may allow local privilege escalation. Please see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraqm=111445064725591w=2 for details. Upstream patch available at

Bug#305971: f2c: segfaults on m68k

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:58:34PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:20:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:42:43PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: Hi, the new new version of f2c does not cut it either on m68k: Setting up f2c

Bug#306980: marked as done (phpgroupware-projects: packages does not appear in menu)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 14:43:43 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306980: phpgroupware-projects: packages does not appear in menu has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#307183: linda: FTBFS: test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred

Package: linda Version: 0.3.13 Severity: serious When building 'linda' in a clean chroot on i386/testing, I get the following error: self.assertEqual(expected.intersection(output), expected) File /usr/lib/python2.3/unittest.py, line 302, in failUnlessEqual raise self.failureException,

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kodos 2.4.5-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 306112 + fixed Bug#306112: kodos must be rebuilt with a recent pyqt-tools Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'

Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, I get the following error: /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69 -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69/octave -O2 gpc_create.cc -o

Bug#306957: marked as done (libaqhbci: FTBFS: checking for AqBanking version =1.0.9.0... found 1.0.8.0)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 09:32:17 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306957: fixed in libaqhbci 1.0.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#305971: f2c: segfaults on m68k

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:07:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: The new version that was uploaded was -3.4, not -3.3. So you haven't really tested anything, since the version you just showed output from was the same you reported on earlier. :) Ok, it is getting better. However, the problem

Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can build aegis from source on i386 in a sid chroot using dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot, but not with fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc or sudo pbuilder build. When the builds fail, I see either of these kinds of errors. Because I'm new to

Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'

[Cc: to debian-release] * Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-01 15:16]: Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, I get the following error: /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC

Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Walter Franzini wrote: Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can build aegis from source on i386 in a sid chroot using dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot, but not with fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc or sudo pbuilder build. When the

Bug#304299: pdftk just segfaults - whatever operation is attempted

Hi I suppose that you have upgraded your computer running unstable since our last mail exchange. Do you still have the same problem with pdftk? I should admit that I don't know what to do, as I am unable to reproduce the bug on at least 4 machines. By the way, I have uploaded a new package of

Processed: severity of 304915 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 304915 grave Bug#304915: libsary-ruby1.8: Uninstallable. Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#307208: blackbox_0.70.0-2(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: unneeded versioned build-depends on build-essential packages

Package: blackbox Version: 0.70.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of blackbox_0.70.0-2 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 27 Build started at 20050429-1528 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: autoconf,

Bug#307210: nufw_1.0-2(alpha/unstable): assumes sa_restorer is part of sigaction

Package: nufw Version: 1.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of nufw_1.0-2 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 27 Build started at 20050404-2338 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (=

Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);, inherited from type org.xml.sax.Attributes, is not implemented in the non-abstract class cz.kosek.CatalogXMLReader.

Package: saxon-catalog Version: 20020210-0.2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'saxon-catalog' on i386/testing, I get the following error: dpkg-buildpackage: source package is saxon-catalog dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 20020210-0.2 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is amd64

Processed: Re: Bug#306980: phpgroupware-projects: packages does not appear in menu

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 306980 Bug#306980: phpgroupware-projects: packages does not appear in menu Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#306756: Try this patch

This is the way I have found fairly reliably builds KDE packages on Debian. It's ugly, but it should fix the FTBFS. Works fine here in a pbuilder chroot. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | |

Bug#301782: This, perhaps?

I see that the segfault is happening in the call gst_element_set_state (data-sink, GST_STATE_NULL); (goobox-0.9.90/src/dlg-ripper.c:471) The only relevant change I see between 0.72 and 0.90 (after admittedly only cursory looking) that affects this call is this change: @@ -258,7 +260,7 @@

Bug#307214: ctrlproxy: FTBFS: /usr/include/tdb.h:150: error: parse error before '*' token

Package: ctrlproxy Version: 2.6.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package ctrlproxy in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] checking for uname... yes checking for dup2... yes

Bug#299624: marked as done (dstooltk: Crashes when printing plots)

Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2005 21:18:48 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line dstooltk removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#307208: marked as done (blackbox_0.70.0-2(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: unneeded versioned build-depends on build-essential packages)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 15:32:44 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307208: fixed in blackbox 0.70.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#304124: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-depends)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 15:33:01 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304124: fixed in unison 2.10.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#301782: This, perhaps?

On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:07 -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: - data-sink = gst_element_factory_make (filesink, filesink); + data-sink = gst_element_factory_make (gnomevfssink, filesink); Perhaps change it back and see if the segfault goes away? Oh, sure. Stupid me forgot to add a dependency on

Bug#301782: This, perhaps?

This one time, at band camp, Dan Korostelev said: On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:07 -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: - data-sink = gst_element_factory_make (filesink, filesink); + data-sink = gst_element_factory_make (gnomevfssink, filesink); Perhaps change it back and see if the segfault goes

Bug#306653: This bug is caused by a broken rules file

tags +patch thanks The latest upload introduced some broken make definitions in debian/rules. DEB_HOST_ARCH was never defined, and DEB_BUILD_ARCH is more useful for cross compilation, which isn't supported in the package. This causes the 64bit tar to be used on at least some 32bit architectures.

Processed: Bleh, control bot syntax

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 306653 +patch Bug#306653: oo2c: ftbfs [sparc] make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Tags were: sid Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#306756: Try this patch

This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said: + # Going to remove this in clean I realized I forgot to send you the patch for the clean target as well. It should also contain: -rm -f config.h config.status config.cache config.log build-stamp config-stamp debian/debiandirs configure

Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]'

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: [Cc: to debian-release] * Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-05-01 15:16]: Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, I get the following

Processed: Done

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301782 = pending Bug#301782: goobox: Ripping to ogg causes segfault Tags were: help Tags set to: pending -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: tagging 307208

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307208 sid Bug#307208: blackbox_0.70.0-2(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: unneeded versioned build-depends on build-essential packages There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of

Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);, inherited from type org.xml.sax.Attributes, is not implemented in the non-abstract class cz.kosek.CatalogXMLReader.

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 08:21:38PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: saxon-catalog Version: 20020210-0.2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'saxon-catalog' on i386/testing, I get the following error: dpkg-buildpackage: source package is saxon-catalog dpkg-buildpackage:

Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);, inherited from type org.xml.sax.Attributes, is not implemented in the non-abstract class cz.kosek.CatalogXMLReader.

Hi, On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: And classpath is going nowhere fast, because the current version of gjdoc depends on kaffe, which is not built on arm. Note that the gjdoc dependency is only needed when you want to generate the documentation as published on

Processed: Fixed in NMU of multisync 0.82-5.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 304050 + fixed Bug#304050: libmultisync-plugin-evolution: doesn't work with evolution anymore Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#297605: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)

Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2005 18:58:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing 297605 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Processed: tagging 307167

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307167 security Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege escalation There were no tags set. Tags added: security End of message, stopping

Processed: CAN-2005-1345: fix for woody

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 305605 + security fixed pending Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS from aborted connections Tags were: woody Tags added: security, fixed, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: Wrong bug...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 305605 - fixed pending Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS from aborted connections Tags were: pending fixed security woody Tags removed: fixed, pending tags 307132 + woody fixed pending Bug#307132: CAN-2005-1345 (Unexpected access control

Bug#248853: Illegal code distribution from http://people.debian.org/~cowboy/debian/x3270/

(-admin dropped; nothing in this reply needs to go there) On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 01:34:32AM +0100, Andrew Saunders wrote: On Mon, 11 April 2005, Richard A Nelson wrote: It seem to me the the situation can be cleared by sending few emails and instead the pacage was removed. You've only

Bug#208117: marked as done (python-gtkextra: Need to update depends for pygtk transition)

Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 21:02:07 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#208117: fixed in python-gtkextra 0.22-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#307241: gcc-3.4: FTBFS: doxygen segfault processing libstdc++v3 headers

Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.3-12 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi Matthias, This bug is the mirror of bug #304659, doxygen segfaulting during the build of gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12. There appears to be an invalid use of '@var' without a corresponding variable declaration in

Processed: gcc-3.4 NMU in progress

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 302995 patch Bug#302995: fastjar: postinst does not check for errors There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Re: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306562 important Bug#306562: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup Severity set to `important'. tags 306562 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#306562: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo

Bug#307241: gcc-3.4 NMU in progress

tags 302995 patch thanks Hi Matthias, NMU in progress for these two bugs. Barring any explosions, the attached patch is the one that will be uploaded. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#306562: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup

severity 306562 important tags 306562 unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hi, I couldn't reproduce this bug also. P.S I won't be available for any further comment/clues untill this Friday (6th of may) as I'll be on a visit to another city, so please don't close the bug because of no activity from

Bug#305971: f2c: segfaults on m68k

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 03:54:10PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:07:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: The new version that was uploaded was -3.4, not -3.3. So you haven't really tested anything, since the version you just showed output from was the same

Bug#307244: tela_2.0-9 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Package: tela Version: 2.0-9 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: no longer builds from source The current version of tela adds a build-dependency on atlas3-base-dev and fails to build from source on arm because this package is unavailable: [...] Build-Depends: debhelper, g77, libhdf4g-dev

Bug#306363: snes9express: built for all architectures, but uninstallable on most

On Sun, 1 May 2005 03:15:07 -0700 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Agney, Since your sponsor hasn't uploaded this yet after four days, do you want to put the source package on-line somewhere that others can get to them? I'd be happy to sponsor an upload for this bugfix.