Processed: severity of 308428 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 308428 grave Bug#308428: New rsync completely breaks systemimager-server Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.

reassign 307900 kernel-source-2.6.8 tag 307900 + pending tag 307900 + security thanks On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:02:44PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > > Proof of consept: http://www.frsirt.com/e

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

> The bug is in slapd for including this text in its debconf template: > > "The default is /var/backups/slapd-VERSION" > > This comes under the heading of not referring to debconf UI in a > template. Just as you don't know how debconf will choose to present a > yes/no question and thus "say ye

Processed: Re: Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 307900 kernel-source-2.6.8 Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are easiably locally rootable. Exploit included. Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'. > tag 307900

Bug#308428: New rsync completely breaks systemimager-server

Package: rsync Version: 2.6.4-5 Severity: critical I am filing this bug as critical for 2 reasons: 1) the package in question breaks the systemimager-server package and 2) it causes data loss (in my case, a nightly backup scheduled by cron failed to complete). The new rsync package causes the sys

Processed: severity of 308417 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 308417 normal Bug#308417: freefem3d: ..was kickedout on a libopts9 dep conflict with "a" libopts... Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Processed: tagging 306141

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 306141 - sarge Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply() and env_opt_add() Tags were: sarge woody security patch Tags removed: sarge > End of

Bug#308420: libwxgtk2.4-python: File '/usr/bin/helpviewer' conflicts with wxpython2.5.3

severity 308420 important thanks On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:41:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Upon upgrade, I receive the following message in Synaptic's terminal > window: > -- > (Reading database ... 132666 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to replace libwxgtk2.

Processed: Re: Bug#308420: libwxgtk2.4-python: File '/usr/bin/helpviewer' conflicts with wxpython2.5.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308420 important Bug#308420: libwxgtk2.4-python: File '/usr/bin/helpviewer' conflicts with wxpython2.5.3 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#308421: Ten-song submissions limit loses data

Package: xmms-scrobbler Version: 0.3.8.1asd1 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Upstream's attempt to work around the 'not all request variables set' bug by limiting song submissions to ten items[0] has the very unfortunate side effect of losing a lot of data. The righ

Bug#308420: libwxgtk2.4-python: File '/usr/bin/helpviewer' conflicts with wxpython2.5.3

Package: libwxgtk2.4-python Version: 2.4.2.6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.3 Upon upgrade, I receive the following message in Synaptic's terminal window: -- (Reading database ... 132666 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libwxgtk2.4-python 2.4.2.6 (usi

Bug#307574: marked as done (Built with wrong OCaml version)

Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 00:17:33 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307574: fixed in perl4caml 0.3.15-2sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#308417: freefem3d: ..was kickedout on a libopts9 dep conflict with "a" libopts...

Package: freefem3d Version: ..the latest one for Sid. Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable ...the looong story below sys info, but first the short story: On standard apt-get -u update, freefem3d and 2 depends (libopts9 libopts9-dev) was kicked out, so after I was done, I di

Processed: tagging 308408

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 308408 sarge Bug#308408: missing dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Processed: reopening 308408

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reopen 308408 Bug#308408: missing dependency Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#308408: marked as done (missing dependency)

Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308408: fixed in sident 3.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#308402: marked as done (missing dependency)

Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308402: fixed in node 0.3.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#308408: missing dependency

Hi Russ, On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:31:46PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Package: sidentd > > Severity: normal > > Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem > > Setting up sidentd (3.4-2) ... > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/s

Bug#308402: missing dependency

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:17:22AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Package: node > Severity: serious > > Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error: > Setting up node (0.3.2-3) ... > /var/lib/dpkg/info/node.postinst: line 27: update-inetd: command not found > dpkg: err

Bug#308408: missing dependency

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: sidentd > Severity: normal > Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem > Setting up sidentd (3.4-2) ... > /var/lib/dpkg/info/sidentd.postinst: line 10: update-inetd: command not found > dpkg: error processing s

Processed: tagging 308408

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308408 pending Bug#308408: missing dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#306851: marked as done (postfix: pid files doesnt get removed when stopping)

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2005 21:12:50 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306851: postfix: pid files doesnt get removed when stopping has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:50:05AM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote: > I still don't see how your uploading libopts25 for powerpc fixes a > bug on i386. packages.debian.org is probably out of date, and I > guess will soon have powerpc on its list of architectures that > libopts25 is available for

Processed: severity of 308408 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > # uups > severity 308408 serious Bug#308408: missing dependency Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Bug#308410: fails to uninstall

Package: pdns-backend-mysql Severity: serious When installing and then deinstalling the package in a clean chroot I get the following error: Removing pdns-backend-mysql ... sed: can't read -: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing pdns-backend-mysql (--purge): subprocess post-removal sc

Bug#308411: fails to uninstall

Package: ttf-tmuni Severity: serious If installing the package in a clean chroot and then immediatly uninstalling it, the following problem occours: Removing ttf-tmuni ... W: truetype: Category not found. dpkg: error processing ttf-tmuni (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exi

Bug#308409: missing dependency

Package: pdns-server Severity: serious Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem: Selecting previously deselected package pdns-server. Unpacking pdns-server (from .../pdns-server_2.9.17-11_i386.deb) ... Creating user and group pdns.../var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line

Bug#308254: londonlaw: Depends on non-existent package: wxpython

This sounds like you need a sponsor to upload? Do you have a regularly scheduled sponsor? Have you checked to see if the package works with the libwxgtk2.4-python dependency? If so, I may be able to upload. Micah Reinhard Tartler schrieb am Monday, den 09. May 2005: > > wxwidgets2.5 has been r

Bug#308406: missing dependency

Package: musixtex-slurps Severity: serious Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem: Setting up musixtex-slurps (92a-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex-slurps.postinst: line 22: /usr/bin/mktexlsr: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing musixtex-slurps (--c

Bug#308405: missing dependency

Package: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar Severity: serious Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error: Setting up mozilla-firefox-locale-ar (0.2-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-locale-ar.postinst: line 11: update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found dpkg: error

Processed: severity of 301370 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 301370 serious Bug#301370: quota postrm fails due to missing dependency Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

Hi Russ, Thanks for this. I don't think it should be grave. sorry about this. Any decent sys admin would make sure eveyrthing was shutdown before doing a hard reboot. Perhaps important or serious in sid, is the best level? -Phil Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Philip J Clark <[EMAI

Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

Philip J Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: openafs-client > Version: 1.3.81-5 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > Openafs wont shutdown. Using Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.12-rc3 and > openafs-modules-source 1.3.81-5. Also, for Philip and for those reading the

Bug#308402: missing dependency

Package: node Severity: serious Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error: Setting up node (0.3.2-3) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/node.postinst: line 27: update-inetd: command not found dpkg: error processing node (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned e

Processed: Debian Kerberosish: r1880 - openafs/trunk/openafs/debian

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308399 pending Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3 Tags were: sid Tags added: pending > tags 304040 pending Bug#304040: openafs-client: fails to stop afs-client There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > than

Processed: reassign 308400 to kftgt

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 308400 kftgt Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd Warning: Unknown package 'kfgtd' Bug reassigned from package `kfgtd' to `kftgt'. > End of message, stopping proc

Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

tags 308399 sid thanks Philip J Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: openafs-client > Version: 1.3.81-5 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > Openafs wont shutdown. Using Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.12-rc3 and > openafs-modules-source 1.3.81-5. Is your kernel bui

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

Steve Langasek wrote: > reassign 308234 debconf > thanks > > Hi guys, > > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:20:23AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > > > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:21:32AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote: > > > > While I have upgraded my system, slapd upgrade asked some questions, > > >

Bug#308401: Missing dependency

Package: uw-imapd Severity: serious Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error: Setting up uw-imapd (2002edebian1-9) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/uw-imapd.postinst: line 21: update-inetd: command not found dpkg: error processing uw-imapd (--configure): subprocess post-install

Processed: Re: Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308399 sid Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#308330: kcdlabel: not fit for release

This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said: > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:50:08AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > I do not want to see it release with sarge in this state of > > maintainership. > > Hinted for removal from testing. Thank you for keeping an eye - I was planning to contact you t

Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd

Package: kfgtd Version: 1.6-2 Severity: serious You use update-inetd in your maintainer scripts but you don't depend on any of the packages providing this script. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (

Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

Package: openafs-client Version: 1.3.81-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Openafs wont shutdown. Using Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.12-rc3 and openafs-modules-source 1.3.81-5. There is a thread on the openafs-devel list about it:- https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openaf

Bug#308398: missing dependency on adduser and wrong assumptions in postrm

Package: irmp3 Severity: serious 1.) You don't depend on adduser even though you use it in the postinst. Since adduser is not essential, this is an serious bug 2.) You unconditionally call deluser in postrm, however "the postrm cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present du

Processed: tagging 307655, closing 307655

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 307655 - fixed Bug#307655: gtodo: Segmentation fault Tags were: fixed pending Tags removed: fixed > close 307655 Bug#307655: gtodo: Segmentation fault 'close' is deprecated; see

Processed: severity of 308395 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 308395 important Bug#308395: smbldap-groupmod does not correctly handle adding users to new groups Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: Upgrading bug severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 307571 grave Bug#307571: gnomebaker: Gnomebaker fails to start Severity set to `grave'. > tags 307571 +sarge Bug#307571: gnomebaker: Gnomebaker fails to start There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > thanks Stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#308233: marked as done (file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin)

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 20:02:26 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308233: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:31:25AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > > I've uploaded an NMU for doc++ which fixes the FTBFS bug (#292337) along > > with some minor issues. Patch attached. > > Approved Hmm, seems I missed the reopening

Bug#308395: smbldap-groupmod does not correctly handle adding users to new groups

Package: smbldap-tools Version: 0.8.7-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Since updating smbldap-tools I have been unable to add more than one user to newly created groups user smbldap-modify. Adding to existing groups succeeds as does adding to the group by using ldapmodi

Bug#301968: marked as done (lsh-server fails to create the hostkey)

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2005 19:55:24 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lsh-server fails to create the hostkey has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386

severity 308391 important thanks On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:11:43AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Package: crosshurd > Version: 1.7.13 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: Renders package unusable > Second stage of native-install on hurd-i386 aborts with the following > error: > cp

Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > I've uploaded an NMU for doc++ which fixes the FTBFS bug (#292337) along > with some minor issues. Patch attached. Approved Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Processed: Re: Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308391 important Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#308233: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Niels Möller wrote: > Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with > > sexp-conv. > > Another alternative is not including the nettle-lfib-stream program at > all in the lsh package. F

Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386

Package: crosshurd Version: 1.7.13 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Renders package unusable Second stage of native-install on hurd-i386 aborts with the following error: cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/sysvinit/inittab': No such file or directory This is before fstab is setup and all.

Bug#308282: [phpbb2 #308282] upstream patch

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > Find attached a diff made against 2.0.15 and our last sid version. > > | + $text = preg_replace('#(script|about|applet|activex|chrome):#is', > "\\1:", $text); > > It looks like this patch can be applied to close the bug. Ok, bas

Bug#300859: marked as done ([CAN-2005-0366] Minor cryptographic flaw in the OpenPGP protocol)

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 19:02:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300859: fixed in gnupg 1.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#299814: marked as done (GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys)

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 19:02:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299814: fixed in gnupg 1.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#308390: protocol error

Package: libgimp-perl Version: 2.0.dfsg-4 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable any example using libgimp-perl fails with a "protocol error" message, as shown in 2 other bug reports. Gimp/Config.pm contains a line: GIMP => q[], Net/Net.pm contain

Bug#307299: Perl taint error on TWiki diffs page after twiki/apache upgrade

Hello Sven Thank you for the response. When I click "Diffs" on any topic I open a link that looks like: https://twiki/cgi-bin/twiki/rdiff/Systems/SystemData?rev1=1.29&rev2=1.24 Assuming you have taint checking turned on, this sort of link will always produce the error with the original RDiff.pm

Bug#308358: fails to install

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:35:23PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > > S'està seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prèviament no seleccionat. > > S'està desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ... > > dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar > > /net/debian/pool/main/w/wesnoth/wesn

Processed: tagging 308358

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 308358 sid Bug#308358: fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bu

Bug#308330: kcdlabel: not fit for release

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:50:08AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > This package has a (mostly) dead upstream, and my c++ is just not good > enough to take over being upstream. I do not want to see it release > with sarge in this state of maintainership. I have had an offer of > comaintainership, and

Bug#308385: recommends common-lisp-controller but depends on it

Package: cl-cclan Severity: serious cl-cclan uncoditionally calls programs from common-lisp-controller in both its postinst and prerm. It only recommends it though, so the installation may fail with: Setting up cl-cclan (1.86-2) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/cl-cclan.postinst: line 27: /usr/sbin/registe

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:43:27AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Otherwise I'll try to figure out how to re-queue it on the sparc buildd > (I've been meaning to learn how to do this for some time). By emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] But that isn't going to do any good, the sparc autobuilder is *not

Bug#307574: Built with wrong OCaml version

Hi Mike, Does fixing this bug actually require the new upstream version? If so, it will have to be removed from sarge. If not, would you like to upload an 0.3.15-3 version of the package to testing-proposed-updates that has the proper dependencies? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programm

Bug#305530: marked as done (Add dependency to libpt sound plugin)

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305530: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

El dom, 08-05-2005 a las 20:48 -0700, Rick Younie escribiÃ: > reopen 292337 > thanks > > doc++ builds ok but segfaults when run > during libupnp_1.2.1-1 build. This bug arises from time to time, depending on the m68k buildd being used. I am not sure that the problem is in the package itself, or

Bug#308374: doesn't clean up properly

Package: libapache-mod-encoding Severity: serious Tags: patch libapache-mod-encoding.prerm contains the following code: for i in apache apache-ssl apache-perl; do if [ -e /etc/$i/httpd.conf ]; then modules-config $i enable mod_encoding fi done You s

Bug#308283: also breaks Apache in general

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:53:20PM +0100, Daniel Hulme wrote: > After upgrading to 1.999.23-1, apt tried to restart Apache and died with > the error: > [Mon May 09 17:47:26 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC > contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /u > sr/local/share/perl/5

Processed: severity of 297706 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > # removal bugs are RC > severity 297706 serious Bug#297706: package-removal fails due to failure of post-removal script Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping process

Bug#303352: marked as done (conflicting file: /usr/bin/tea also in package dak)

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 15:49:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303352: fixed in tea 9.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#308283: also breaks Apache in general

Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 Version: 1.999.23-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid After upgrading to 1.999.23-1, apt tried to restart Apache and died with the error: [Mon May 09 17:47:26 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /u sr/local/share

Bug#308225: python-id3lib: It seems this still exists

Package: python-id3lib Version: 0.5.1-3 Followup-For: Bug #308225 My installation gives this error: Unpacking replacement python-id3lib ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python-id3lib_0.5.1-4_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyid3lib.so',

Processed: reopening 308225

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reopen 308225 Bug#308225: python-id3lib: uninstallable Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Bug#308358: fails to install

On Monday, 9 de May de 2005 20:05, Jordi Mallach wrote: > You probably miss some replaces somewhere. Yes, it misses a Replaces: wesnoth-data << 0.9.1, I will fix it soon. -- Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgp6OMZs5j

Bug#308358: fails to install

On Monday, 9 de May de 2005 20:05, Jordi Mallach wrote: > S'està seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prÃviament no seleccionat. > S'està desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ... > dpkg: s'ha produÃt un error en processar > /net/debian/pool/main/w/wesnoth/wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_al

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> >> Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. >> > > Still no change: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32 > ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-g

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xosd 2.2.14-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 307794 + fixed Bug#307794: xosd: FTBFS: X11 not threadsafe Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#308358: fails to install

Package: wesnoth-ei Version: 0.9.1-1 Severity: serious When I upgraded today: S'està seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prÃviament no seleccionat. S'està desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: s'ha produÃt un error en processar /net/debian/pool/main/w/wesnoth/wesn

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libcgicc 3.2.3-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302854 + fixed Bug#302854: libcgicc-doc: Cannot install -doc: cannot create .dhelp file Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. > Still no change: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32 ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install ia32-libs Reading Package Lists... Done Buildin

Bug#298294: marked as done (non-free icons)

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 13:32:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298294: fixed in baghira 0.6f-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: tag 308282 security

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308282 security Bug#308282: phpbb2: Security issue in url/bbcode Tags were: patch Tags added: security > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian B

Processed: Fixed in NMU of phpdoc 20030911-1.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 282274 + fixed Bug#282274: phpdoc: FTBFS: openjade keeps running. Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#308233: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Niels Möller wrote: > Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with > > sexp-conv. > > Another alternative is not including the nettle-lfib-stream program at > all in the lsh package. W

Bug#298939: marked as done (xlibs: new buffer overflow security hole (CAN-2005-0605))

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 12:02:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298939: fixed in xfree86 4.1.0-16woody6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#308246: file conflicts in uniconf-tools, fonty-rg

Hi Radovan, Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead? In UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in fonty-rg, it's used just for switching console-fonts. Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Bug#308233: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin

This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with sexp-conv. Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308254: londonlaw: Depends on non-existent package: wxpython

wxwidgets2.5 has been removed from debian and no other package is providing wxpython. I've created an updated package at http://siretart.tauware.de/debian/londonlaw, which depends on libwxgtk2.4-python, as you suggested. Gruesse, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#308257: doesn't clean up properly due to syntax error in postrm

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308257 grave Bug#308257: doesn't clean up properly due to syntax error in postrm Severity set to `grave'. > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.

tags 308232 + pending thanks Bug closed in the SVN repository: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-bugzilla/trunk/bugzilla-2.18/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 I now use /var/lib/bugzilla for the root dir of every "data" files, which is FHS compliant. Thanks for the report. Regards. --

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.3.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ... > Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-1) ... > Setting up ia32-libs (1.3.0.0.1.gcc4) ... Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#306261: #306261 and sarge

Hello, according to bugzilla this bug is fixed in version 2.4.3-20050321+2, but debian sarge still has version 2.4.3-20050321+1 affected by this bug. Could you please upload a fixed version to sarge? Maxi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: Re: Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308232 + pending Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share. Tags were: confirmed sid Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261

On Monday 09 May 2005 07:32, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:16:45AM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote: > > I also have tripped over this bug. It doesn't really effect > > anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go > > to completion. > > > > I am curious as to how th

Bug#308330: kcdlabel: not fit for release

Package: kcdlabel Version: 2.13-KDE3-3 Severity: grave Tags: sarge This package has a (mostly) dead upstream, and my c++ is just not good enough to take over being upstream. I do not want to see it release with sarge in this state of maintainership. I have had an offer of comaintainership, and i

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

Hi, Can you do me a favor and upload the illuminator package you built? Otherwise I'll try to figure out how to re-queue it on the sparc buildd (I've been meaning to learn how to do this for some time). Thanks. On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 23:08 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Blars Bl

Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:16:45AM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote: > I also have tripped over this bug. It doesn't really effect > anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go to > completion. > > I am curious as to how this proposed fix of yours is going to > work. All 3 repo

  1   2   >