Bug#311357: Upgrade of 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel breaks via-rhine

2005-06-08 Thread Horms
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:50:37AM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2005-06-07 17:48+0900 Horms wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: severity 311357 grave thanks * Alan W. Irwin wrote: This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module

Bug#241297: marked as done (prboom: Kills display when run in X)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:33:51 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Only affected Woody has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#312454: ntpdate: Bug #294636 needs fixing in sarge

2005-06-08 Thread Richard Lamont
Package: ntpdate Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The clocks on my sarge boxes are drifting because the fix for bug #294636 *still* hasn't found its way into sarge. Any other box without an IPv6 route to the ntp server may have the same problem.

Bug#249205: Bug #249205 - gettyps: no right to modify

2005-06-08 Thread browaeys . alban
I found this copyright notice (non free because it forbids commercial usage). Though with previous permission given by the second copyright owner it may become at least distriutable . Hope it helps decipher the issue if one is interested in gettyps (it looks like an interesting getty for

Processed: your mail

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 303324 arla Bug#303324: file conflicts in freebsd-sendpr arla Bug reassigned from package `freebsd-sendpr,arla' to `arla'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#312472: Moroccan Debian mirror should be remoived from list of mirrors

2005-06-08 Thread Gerasimos Melissaratos
Package: mirrors Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) The Moroccan mirror (something like casa.callbright.com) reports most

Processed: Re: Bug#312472: Moroccan Debian mirror should be remoived from list of mirrors

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package mirrors Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mirrors severity 312472 important Bug#312472: Moroccan Debian mirror should be remoived from list of mirrors Severity set to `important'. retitle 312472 callbright.com mirror out-of-date/stale

Bug#297055: marked as done (should not enter sarge)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line can enter testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#297054: marked as done (should not enter sarge)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line can enter testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#270914: marked as done (libgdiplus build-depends on package not in sarge)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line can enter testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#304299: pdftk just segfaults - whatever operation is attempted

2005-06-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, It has been a long time since this bug has been reported. As I am unable to reproduce the problem (and to be honest, I doubt the bug is in pdftk, it works well on all machines I have seen), could you please try again after an upgrade to see if the problem has disappeared? Maybe a library has

Bug#272853: marked as done (libgdiplus: can't fulfill the build dependencies on sarge)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line can enter testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#296609: really a blocker, duplicate of archived #234787

2005-06-08 Thread David Balazic
Quoting Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 296609 serious tags 296609 +sarge thanks This bug (fam: can not unmount floppy) seems to be a duplicate of the archived bug #234787. David, can you confirm that the fam package in unstable fixes this issue? No. I don't have Debian

Processed: bugs fixed in etch :-)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308391 -etch Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386 Tags were: etch sarge patch Tags removed: etch tags 299623 -etch Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed Tags were: etch sarge

Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server

2005-06-08 Thread Martin Kos
Package: winbind Version: 3.0.10-1 Severity: grave After upgrading the server to sarge the access from windows clients to the samba server stopped working. all the samba packages have been upgraded from 3.0.10-1 to 3.0.14-a. in the logfile i get [2005/06/08 15:24:31, 1]

Bug#312512: cgiemail: sendmail not found

2005-06-08 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Package: cgiemail Version: 1.6-26 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, sh: line 1: sendmail not found (the above line is from my memory) If I use `strings /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgiemail` I cannot find any location for sendmail compiled in. Probably you rely on a proper

Bug#308879: endless loop on startup

2005-06-08 Thread Thomas Oppel
This code snippet taken from tinyca 0.7.0 fixes it, too. Cheers, T.O. --- tinyca-0.6.8/lib/OpenSSL.pm 2005-02-20 22:03:03.0 +0100 +++ tinyca-0.6.8/lib/OpenSSL.pm 2005-06-08 15:47:30.0 +0200 @@ -497,7 +497,10 @@ # get revoked certs $tmp-{'LIST'} = []; - for($i = 0;

Bug#312525: xmms-jack depends on xmms-dev

2005-06-08 Thread Romain Chantereau
Package: xmms-jack Version: 0.14-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 Hi ! I just noticed that there is a missing dependency for xmms-jack, or worse. In fact, I do not know where the problem really is, but as this is with this package I found it, I report here. If xmms-dev is not

Bug#312267: t1lib-old: This package should not be released in next stable (etch)

2005-06-08 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:19:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:44:18PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: The t1lib 1.3.x is na old and upstream unsupported version of library. This package will be - sooner or later - scheduled for remove from Debian. Is there a

Bug#277074: Useless without 'abuse' or 'abuse-sdl' packages

2005-06-08 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, this bug seems to be already fixed: $ apt-cache show abuse-lib Package: abuse-lib [...] Version: 2.00-16 [...] Depends: abuse (= 1:0.7.0-1) I think this bug can be closed. Greetings, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam

Bug#310244: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:473

2005-06-08 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, do you have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled in your kernel config? If yes, try to disable it. The preemption stuff is not stable on certain platforms (eg. AMD64). Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :

Bug#279243: marked as done (samba: libsmbclient.a must not be compiled with -fPIC.)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:18:01 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#279243: fixed in samba 3.0.14a-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#277074: Useless without 'abuse' or 'abuse-sdl' packages

2005-06-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:55:43PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: this bug seems to be already fixed: $ apt-cache show abuse-lib Package: abuse-lib [...] Version: 2.00-16 [...] Depends: abuse (= 1:0.7.0-1) I think this bug can be closed. The claim that it's obsolete still seems to

Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server

2005-06-08 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Martin Kos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [2005/06/08 15:24:31, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(265) make_server_info_from_pw failed! when a user from a windows-client (that is member of the domain, btw samba is configured as member of the domain too - net ads join). i

Bug#312358: kdm crashes on startup

2005-06-08 Thread Itai Seggev
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote: On Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:53, Itai Seggev wrote: Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable I think the title says it all. :) I've upgraded all my kde

Processed: tag sarge

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package ntpdate Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ntpdate tags 312454 sarge Bug#312454: ntpdate: Bug #294636 needs fixing in sarge There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#306193: marked as done (openoffice.org-l10n-de 1.1.4-2 not installable with openoffice.org 1.1.4-2)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 03:04:52 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306193: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#312552: Obsolete package

2005-06-08 Thread Wiesiek
Package: unrar-free Version: 1:0.0.1-2 Severity: serious Hi This package should be removed from debian. It is unusable. This unrar use unrarlib from http://www.unrarlib.org Unrar-free is very simple port to use these library. If you see on download http://www.unrarlib.org/download.html then

Bug#312556: debian-installer partition bugs

2005-06-08 Thread Alexander Perlis
Package: debian-installer Severity: grave This concerns a bug in the partition portion of the debian-installer for Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r0. At the bottom of this report are also two feature requests. 1) I start with a single 80 GB hard disk. 2) Clear the partition table. 3) Create a couple 20 GB

Bug#76918: Software cds $15 and $99 get al software in 1 cd

2005-06-08 Thread Rosemary
Photos, drawings, graphics...learn to create them...then share them all... http://dwci.6valr5oh3yovlp6.tapetiec.com There is a fullness of all things, even of sleep and love. When you're through changing, you're through. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#312569: electricsheep prevent any X client to connect when launched from xscreensaver

2005-06-08 Thread Clement Hermann
Package: electricsheep Version: 2.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, When launching electricsheep from xscreensaver, Xlib will refuse any connection to the X server until xscreensaver is killed. Removing electricsheep resolve the problem. I'm not sure wether this

Bug#302643: marked as done (synaptic: FTBFS in experimental)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#306383: marked as done (synaptic/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: undeclared variable)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#312512: marked as done (cgiemail: sendmail not found)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:40:17 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line cgiemail + sendmail has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Processed: Re: amd: Dummy package still needed?

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308718 serious Bug#308718: amd: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: alsaplayer: Dummy package still needed?

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308715 serious Bug#308715: alsaplayer: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: lilypond1.3: Dummy package still needed?

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308709 serious Bug#308709: lilypond1.3: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: freetype2: Dummy package still needed?

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308708 serious Bug#308708: freetype2: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: rplay: Dummy package still needed?

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308703 serious Bug#308703: rplay: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: removing ipfwadm

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308705 serious Bug#308705: ipfwadm: Shouldn't this package be removed? Severity set to `serious'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: Re: mdctl: Dummy package still needed?

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308702 serious Bug#308702: mdctl: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#312578: Dummy package should be removed?

2005-06-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Package: raidtools2 Severity: serious As this is a dummy transitional package for Sarge, and upgrades skipping a stable release are not supported, I think this package should be removed from unstable and that way from etch, in order to reduce package bloat. Please do reassign this bug to

Bug#173779: marked as done (RM: gtoaster/woody -- Uninstallable due to removal of cdrtoaster)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:03:04 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gtoaster is not installable in Debian 3.0r1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#152857: marked as done (RM: freeamp/woody -- Trademark issues, obsolete)

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:17:03 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Severity of trademark problems] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#104394: Unable to Contact - Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:18:22 -0600

2005-06-08 Thread Ryan
Financial Update: Client ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daily Earned Income: 200$ - 2000$ Since you are apart of our growing Financial Community we have information on how to make 200$ - 2000$ daily. About 80% of our clients succeed with this opportunity. Give me a call anytime to find out how.

Bug#258060: marked as done (Please move ebook-dev-ggad and ebook-dev-alp in non-free (OPL 1.0))

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:38:08 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Please move ebook-dev-ggad and ebook-dev-alp in non-free (OPL 1.0) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#312584: librsvg2-bin: current version of package depends on packages outside unstable

2005-06-08 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Package: librsvg2-bin Version: 2.8.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Latest unstable librsvg2-bin (2.9.5-3) depends on: - libgnomeprint2.2-0 (= 2.10.2) - libgnomeprintui2.2-0 (= 2.10.0) but latest version of those packages in unstable are: 2.8.2-1 and 2.8.2-2. --

Bug#308709: lilypond1.3: Dummy package still needed?

2005-06-08 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think etch should really no longer ship this dummy package that's obsolete this long. Please upon next upload of lilypond, stop building this dummy package to get it removed. I agree. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Processed: tagging 312584

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 312584 sid Bug#312584: librsvg2-bin: current version of package depends on packages outside unstable There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing

Processed: your mail

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 312292 + security Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang There were no tags set. Tags added: security tags 312292 + sarge Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a

Processed: Re: Processed: your mail

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 312292 -fixed Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang Tags were: fixed sarge security Tags removed: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#312292: Processed: your mail

2005-06-08 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 312292 -fixed thanks On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:48:07PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: tags 312292 + sarge Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang Tags were: security Tags added: sarge tags 312292 + fixed

Bug#312292: Processed: your mail

2005-06-08 Thread Kai Hendry
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:56:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: tags 312292 -fixed thanks Surely, this last tag was wrong; fixed refers to NMUs, which there hasn't been for this package, and sarge doesn't have version 1.0.28 anyway. Sorry my mistake. I thought fixed referred to if the

Bug#309143: xserver-xfree86: xserver does not work

2005-06-08 Thread Matthew Marino
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Followup-For: Bug #309143 -- Package-specific info: Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster: xserver-xfree86 /etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum. X server symlink status: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-06-08

Processed: subversion Debian ci: r307 - in trunk/debian: . patches

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308777 pending Bug#308777: python2.3-subversion: leaves byte-compiled files after removal in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/{lib,}svn/ There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#311808: marked as done (dpkg in experimental preinst checks for dselect using ps )

2005-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 06:22:53 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in 1.13.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to