Bug#316247: marked as done (python-apt has missing dependencies)

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:57:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316247: python-apt has missing dependencies has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#316323: FTBFS: internal errors: lower_stmt error and segmentation fault

2005-06-30 Thread Falk Hueffner
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am trying to compile gcc-4.0 on Ubuntu, so I can recompile the > latest openoffice.org2 package. > > However, I get different errors each time. This is nearly always a hardware problem. Can you reproduce it on a different machine? -- Falk --

Processed: FTBFS bug is RC

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package samba Ignoring bugs not assigned to: samba > severity 315955 serious Bug#315955: samba package build fails; DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM is 'linux-gnu' now Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#196590: (no subject)

2005-06-30 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Hi Jamie, I've read your email about #196590 only now, sorry. Anyway, you are right and closing that bugreport was a mistake. Thanks to Martin to dealing with my it (reopening and tagging wontfix + help). -- Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.''`. Proud Debian GNU/L

Bug#316348: sqlite3: Timeout does not expire on SQLLITE_BUSY

2005-06-30 Thread Paul Beardsell
Package: sqlite3 Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable 1st session: $ sqlite3 db begin transaction; update tabfoo set colbar = 'y'; Now leave the transaction uncommitted and go to 2nd session: $ sqlite3 db .timeout 3

Processed: your mail

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 316276 security update Bug#316276: New upstream release Changed Bug title. > severity 316276 serious Bug#316276: security update Severity set to `serious'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Bug#311264: kwiki 0.36-1 uninstallable due to missing libkwiki-perl

2005-06-30 Thread Nick Phillips
Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2005, Jan Niehusmann wrote: # apt-get install kwiki [...] The following packages have unmet dependencies: kwiki: Depends: libkwiki-perl (>= 0.36-2) but it is not installable E: Broken packages I have just tried to have a look at this on

Bug#316362: security problem with drupal

2005-06-30 Thread Aleksey I Zavilohin
Package: drupal Version: 4.5.3-2 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole See http://drupal.org/files/sa-2005-002/advisory.txt Drupal security advisory DRUPAL-SA-2005-002

Processed: severity of 316209 is normal

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 316209 normal Bug#316209: flwm sometimes "loses" windows Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Bug#315123: marked as done (implicitly converted pointer)

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:02:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315123: fixed in gtkdialog 1:0.58.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#316362: drupal: fixes

2005-06-30 Thread Aleksey I Zavilohin
Package: drupal Version: 4.5.3-2 Followup-For: Bug #316362 Here .patch fro 4.5.3 http://drupal.org/drupal-4.6.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE

Bug#315914: Priority really changed?

2005-06-30 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:03:54AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > On C??ad, 2005-06-29 at 09:58 -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > As of Wednesday, the priority of libslang2 is still standard, which > > prevents pbuilder from creating a chroot. Is this bug really fixed or > > does an

Bug#316383: problem installing ia32-libs_1.4_amd64.deb

2005-06-30 Thread moret
Package: ia32-libs Version: 1.4 Severity: grave When I attempt to install ia32-libs, I get the following error: (Reading database ... 121750 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking ia32-libs (from ia32-libs_1.4_amd64.deb) ... dpkg-divert: `diversion of /usr/bin/ldd to /usr/b

Processed: glade

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 275423 Bug#275423: FTBFS: accesses non-existent directory 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processin

Bug#316402: Security issue discovered in wordpress (< 1.5.1.3)

2005-06-30 Thread Daniel Leidert
Package: wordpress Version: 1.5.1.2-1 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The release notes for the new Wordpress upstream release 1.5.1.3 tell about an important security issue they found. There is no public information available about this issue, so I set the severity

Bug#76918: Cable Guy - Filters here

2005-06-30 Thread Jacques Edwardsd
Good day to you sir, This works great for your cable.. Now pay nothing for PPV, I mean it ! ---*--**-- Check the below site: http://aspiring.click4net.info ---*--**-- E

Bug#315322: jpilot: crashes when clicking over "Restore Handheld"

2005-06-30 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Le Tuesday 21 June 2005 à 18:46:17, Justin Pryzby a écrit: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:04:09AM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote: > > Package: jpilot > > Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre9-1 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > When trying to restore the palm pilot, jpilot sim

Processed: Re: Bug#316301: gdesklets not installable

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 316301 normal Bug#316301: gdesklets not installable Severity set to `normal'. > merge 316301 313419 Bug#313419: gdesklets: please rebuild for libgtop2-5 Bug#316301: gdesklets not installable Merged 313419 316301. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#316301: gdesklets not installable

2005-06-30 Thread Sebastien Bacher
severity 316301 normal merge 316301 313419 thanks Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 00:38 +0200, [ATR]Dj-Death a écrit : > Package: gdesklets > Severity: serious > Justification: unknow > > > Please fix dependency problem (libgtop2-5 instead of libgtop2-2). The BTS already has a bug about this ...

Bug#316402: marked as done (Security issue discovered in wordpress (< 1.5.1.3))

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:05:07 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Uploaded new package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#316455: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4

2005-06-30 Thread Pascal Giard
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11-amd64-generic Version: 2.6.11-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system (Sorry if this is a dupe, i had filled it against kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic). Since kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't boot. The fi

Bug#316453: kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4

2005-06-30 Thread Pascal Giard
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic Version: 2.6.11-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Since 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't boot. The first error message says something like: " Can't load shared object file libc.so.6 " The second error message says it can't find

Processed: also happens installing build-dependancies

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package pbuilder Ignoring bugs not assigned to: pbuilder > tags 316281 sid Bug#316281: pbuilder create fails to install build-essential There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > severity 316281 grave Bug#316281: pbuilder create fails to install build-

Bug#242682: marked as done (FTBFS: assertion failure)

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:12:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Processed: proposed NMU patch

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package pbuilder Ignoring bugs not assigned to: pbuilder > tags 316281 + patch Bug#316281: pbuilder create fails to install build-essential Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#316281: proposed NMU patch

2005-06-30 Thread Blars Blarson
package pbuilder tags 316281 + patch thanks Attached is a patch to work around the changes to apt. If this hasn't been fixed in 10 days I may upload it as an NMU. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft,

Bug#316281: proposed NMU patch

2005-06-30 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 06:14:36PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > Attached is a patch to work around the changes to apt. If this hasn't > been fixed in 10 days I may upload it as an NMU. IMHO the right fix would be to use --allow-unauthenticated instead of --force-yes ... Gruesse, -- Frank Licht

Bug#316281: proposed NMU patch

2005-06-30 Thread Blars Blarson
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:27:23AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 06:14:36PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > > Attached is a patch to work around the changes to apt. If this hasn't > > been fixed in 10 days I may upload it as an NMU. > > IMHO the right fix would be to use

Bug#316281: proposed NMU patch

2005-06-30 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:20:16PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:27:23AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 06:14:36PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > > > Attached is a patch to work around the changes to apt. If this hasn't > > > been fixed in 10

Processed: apt-move uninstallable

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package apt-move Ignoring bugs not assigned to: apt-move > severity 316207 serious Bug#316207: needs repackaging for apt 0.6 Severity set to `serious'. > tags 316207 + sid Bug#316207: needs repackaging for apt 0.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: s

Bug#316466: bpalogin must not be stopped during upgrade

2005-06-30 Thread kk87
Package: upgrade-reports Severity: serious Method: aptitude over ssh Upgrade date: Sat July 11th 2005 (started, not finished until the following week) uname -a: Linux tyreth.homelinux.org 2.4.26 #1 Mon Jul 26 17:03:33 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux I tried to upgrade a computer from Woody to Sarge remote

Bug#315923: Workaround

2005-06-30 Thread Everett Lipman
Here is a workaround that appears to solve all of the problems I mentioned in the initial report. This is necessarily specific to a Dell Dimension 8400 with similar BIOS (mine is version A01 of 07/17/04). 1. Before booting the install disk, enter the BIOS "System Setup". 2. Using the menu, se

Processed: reassign 316466 to bpalogin

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 316466 bpalogin Bug#316466: bpalogin must not be stopped during upgrade Bug reassigned from package `upgrade-reports' to `bpalogin'. > End of message, stopping processing he

Bug#316476: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4

2005-06-30 Thread Pascal Giard
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11 Version: 2.6.11-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system (Sorry if this is a dupe, i had filled it against kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic). Since kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't boot. The first error message s

Bug#316455: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4)

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2005 02:08:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Was a mistake has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Processed: Re: Bug#316476: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4

2005-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 316476 kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic Bug#316476: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.11' to `kernel-image-2.6.11-amd

Bug#316476: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4

2005-06-30 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 316476 kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic merge 316476 316453 thanks On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote: > Package: kernel-source-2.6.11 > Version: 2.6.11-4 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > (Sorry if this is a dupe, i had filled it

Bug#316477: apache2-mpm-worker fails to execute any CGIs!

2005-06-30 Thread andy
Package: apache2-mpm-worker Version: 2.0.54-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable With mpm-worker and cgid, CGIs can't execute, because somewhere compiled into the code is that path /var/run/cgisock which is quite different from the /var/run/apache2/cgisock that comes specifie