On Saturday 02 July 2005 05:39 pm, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I can't reproduce this error on either unstable or testing.
I don't know why it would be occurring for me, then - ethereal and all its
dependencies are from official Sid sources. Unfortunately, I haven't used it
for months, so I can't be
Hi,
> > > Something I found on the Ubuntu site suggested to solve this problem
> > > by setting apt up to install a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d to set
> > > APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated to 1. I think this would be better
> > > than either using --force-yes or trying to determine whether
> > > -
hi,
i've prepared a new version which addresses both the previous issues
addressed in sarge0 and the new hardened-php reported issues:
deb http://people.debian.org/~seanius/cacti/sarge ./
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~seanius/cacti/sarge ./
version: 0.8.6c-7sarge2
note the sources have chan
Package: dbus
Version: 0.23.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
The build attempt on the sparc buildd failed due to unavalable
dependancies. The builds on all other buildds also failed.
Building on my sparc pbuilder I get the following error:
checking for
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2005 18:35:10 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309966: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:42:45PM +0200, Alexander Klink wrote:
> After todays upgrade, windowmaker does not allow me to resize windows
> anymore. Whenever I click in the bottom right corner of a window and
> start to drag, the window decorations disappear and reappear again
> (just like in c
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:37:37PM +0300, Jarkko Suontausta wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2005 19:54, Itai Seggev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:53, Itai Seggev wrote:
> > Yes, you're right. It seems the problem was that
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2005 18:35:10 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309966: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:36:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line arch removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jul 2005 19:07:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306381: fixed in python-cherrypy 2.0.0f-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jul 2005 19:04:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315556: fixed in gst-plugins0.8 0.8.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316671 sid
Bug#316671: darkice: FTBFS: Still build depends on libjack0.80.0-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Package: darkice
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it still build depends
on libjack0.80.0-dev which has just been replaced by
libjack0.100.0-dev. You will needs to change your build
dependencies accordingly.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:20:30AM -0400, Adam Aube wrote:
> Package: ethereal
> Version: 0.10.11-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> When starting ethereal, the following error message occurs:
> $ ethereal
> (ethereal:6757): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316664 sid
Bug#316664: icon: FTBFS with new dpkg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316657 sid
Bug#316657: haddock: FTBFS with current ghc6
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 19:54, Itai Seggev wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:53, Itai Seggev wrote:
> > > Package: kdm
> > > Version: 4:3.3.2-1
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Tags: experimental
> > > Justification: renders packag
Package: icon
Severity: serious
Version: 9.4.2-2.2
>From my build log:
...
test -f src/icont/tmem.c -a -f debian/rules
/usr/bin/make X-Configure name=linux-gnu
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/icon-9.4.2'
:
: To configure Icon, run either
:
: make Configure name= [for no gra
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jul 2005 13:32:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315879: fixed in ardour 0.9beta29-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: haddock
Severity: serious
Version: 0.6-2
Tags: patch
>From my pbuilder build log (this is in an i386 chroot, with gcc ->
gcc-3.3 as usual):
/usr/bin/ghc -o haddock.bin -H16m -O -package network -fglasgow-exts -cpp
Binary.o BlockTable.o Digraph.o FastMutInt.o HaddockDB.o HaddockHH.
Hello Tzafrir,
(I readded the bug log)
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:05:22PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 07:57:44AM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Please keep this bug open until a DSA for sarge has been issued.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Greetings
>
> What is it exactly you w
Package: ethereal
Version: 0.10.11-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When starting ethereal, the following error message occurs:
$ ethereal
(ethereal:6757): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion
`G_IS_OBJECT(object)' failed
(ethereal:6757): Pango-CRITICAL **:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:04:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> --force-yes seems to be a quick and handy workaround;
> it's the chroot and I don't think it would be so disastrous
> to break it with --force-yes.
>
> --allow-unauthenticated requires some conditionals,
> we may try to work towar
hi yoann,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:15:50AM +0200, yoann wrote:
> A full sarge server was compromised by this vulnerability
> is the patch will be availbale soon for debian stable ?
it's hard to tell. unfortunately 3 *more* vulnerabilities were
released yesterday, so i see one of two things hap
Cyril Bouthors wrote:
> Tony, if you are not able to reproduce the bug, please check that you
> have the exact same version of the package and its deps.
I have the exact same versions of the package and all of the
dependencies listed in the bug report, and cannot reproduce the bug.
However, your
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2005 16:28:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315739: about bug 315739
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:36:51 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 12:17:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Wait one second...
> > Of course excision is possible, but is it really a good idea?
> > I don't think so.
>
> That's not d-legal's decision, or the DPL's. It's the mainta
I forgot to mention that uxterm has always been working with cssh
before my last upgrade.
--
Cyril Bouthors
pgpBkjuFeeUu9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 1 Jul 2005, tony mancill wrote:
> Correction to my previous response: uxterm doesn't background
> itself, it simply calls the first xterm in the path and not
> /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm explicitly.
This bug has nothing to do with my configuration since I'm able to
reproduce it with this minimal conf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 315083 normal
Bug#315083: libgtk2.0-0: breaks mozilla-firefox on amd64
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
severity normal
thanks
On !amd64 these are only warning, your setting change is not
appropriate.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 12:20:52PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> On !amd64 these are only warning, your setting change is not
> appropriate.
According to one of the bug reports this affected i386 too. And
if it affects amd64, it's very likely that it atleasts affects
other 64 bit arches too.
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> It seems the bug got fixed in later kernel versions upstream: I tested
> kernel-2.6.11.5 and kernel-2.6.12.1 and there are no problems.
>
just to be sure could you please test the debian kernel-image for 2.6.11?
thanks for your feedback.
--
maks
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6c-7
Followup-For: Bug #315703
A full sarge server was compromised by this vulnerability
is the patch will be availbale soon for debian stable ?
thanks
Yoann
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: LANG=C
severity 316578 important
tags 316578 + unreproducible
thanks
works for the buildd's and me.
Matt Kraai writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.0ds1-11
> Severity: serious
>
> When I tried to rebuild gcc-4.0, it failed as follows:
>
> baseline_name=`basename
> /tmp/buildd/gcc-4.0-4.0.0ds1/s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 316578 important
Bug#316578: FTBFS: No rule to make target current_symbols.txt
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 316578 + unreproducible
Bug#316578: FTBFS: No rule to make target current_symbols.txt
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unrepr
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:10:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Something I found on the Ubuntu site suggested to solve this problem
> > by setting apt up to install a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d to set
> > APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated to 1. I think this would be better
> > than either using
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Something I found on the Ubuntu site suggested to solve this problem
>> by setting apt up to install a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d to set
>> APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated to 1. I think this would be better
>> than either using --force-yes or trying t
38 matches
Mail list logo
