Bug#318337: marked as done (asterisk: FTBFS. channel.c:64: error: static declaration of 'uniquelock' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318337: fixed in asterisk 1:1.0.9.dfsg-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#319304: marked as done (FTBFS: conflicting declarations of uniquelock)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318337: fixed in asterisk 1:1.0.9.dfsg-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#319227: marked as done (asterisk: ftbfs [sparc] static declaration of 'uniquelock' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318337: fixed in asterisk 1:1.0.9.dfsg-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#320401: Uninstallable, depends on experimental glibc

Package: sidplay-libs Version: 2.1.1-3 Severity: grave Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have

Bug#308266: swf-player: Still fails to play

Package: swf-player Version: 0.3.4-3 Followup-For: Bug #308266 Neither the previous version of swf-player I tried, nor this one, overcomes this error. The error appears to be exactly what the bug-filer describes previously. And so swf-player is still completely useless for me. I almost forget wha

Bug#297848: marked as done (xevil: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297848: fixed in xevil 2.02r2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#317739: marked as done (XSS in phpbb2 (MS IE only) [CAN-2005-2161])

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:02:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317739: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.13+1-6sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: taggn

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 319929 = fixed-in-experimental experimental Bug#319929: nsis: Included DLLs and stubs leads to crashes on Windows Tags were: pending confirmed experimental Tags set to: fixed-in-experimental, experimental > tag 319936 = fixed-in-experimental experi

Processed: tagging 320393

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 320393 sid Bug#320393: isakmpd is uninstallable There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 320393 ! Bug#320393: isakmpd is uninstallable Changed Bug submitter from "This should be pretty easy to fix." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Bug#320393: isakmpd is uninstallable

Package: isakmpd Severity: grave isakmpd is uninstallable on all architectures since it depends on libgmp3, which is no longer in the archive. This package needs a rebuild. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture:

Processed: severity of 320391 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 320391 important Bug#320391: gdb: internal-error : unknown ptrace event 5 Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#319019: marked as done (popularity-contest: New HTTP uploader do not follow CGI specification)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:17:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319019: fixed in popularity-contest 1.31 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#320391: gdb: internal-error : unknown ptrace event 5

Package: gdb Version: 6.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable when running a (heavily) threaded program I get an internal error causing dbg to fail. session trace : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:.../Server$ gdb AP_BNPeer GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Bug#320389: FTBFS: Cannot find HTML documentation

Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.38-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch e2fsprogs fails to build because it cannot find the HTML documentation because recent versions of texi2html place it in a subdirectory: > install -p /tmp/buildd/e2fsprogs-1.38/debian/BUILD-STD/doc/libext2fs_*.html \ > > /tmp/bui

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 318692 xlibs-dev Bug#318692: xlibs-dev: compat package doesn't depend on libs formerly in xlibs-static-dev Bug reassigned from package `bookmarkbridge' to `xlibs-dev'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 320218 Bug#320218: bookmarkbridge: FTBFS: Missing build dependency? Bug#318692: xlibs-dev: compat package doesn't depend on libs formerly in xlibs-static-dev Disconnected #320218 from all other report(s). > thanks Stopping processing here. Pl

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 318692 xlibs-dev Bug#318692: xlibs-dev: compat package doesn't depend on libs formerly in xlibs-static-dev Bug#320218: bookmarkbridge: FTBFS: Missing build dependency? Bug reassigned from package `xlibs-dev,bookmarkbridge' to `xlibs-dev'. > r

Bug#292999: marked as done (jigit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'find_file_in_md5_list' differ in signedness)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:02:40 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#292999: fixed in jigit 1.15-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#318728: marked as done (mozilla-thunderbird: Multiple security problems)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:03:02 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318728: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: Fixed in upload of anjuta 2.0.1-2 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 319642 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#319642: anjuta: experimental version doesn't depend on experimental anjuta-common Tags were: pending experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: bug for this problem has already been filed against 3ddesktop

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 318692 xlibs-dev,bookmarkbridge Bug#318692: xlibs-dev: compat package doesn't depend on libs formerly in xlibs-static-dev Bug#320218: bookmarkbridge: FTBFS: Missing build dependency? Bug reassigned from package `xlibs-dev,bookmarkbridge,3ddesk

Processed: tagging 319120

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 319120 - sid Bug#319120: FTBFS: Unable to find libXxf86vm Tags were: sid pending patch Tags removed: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#319120: build deps after xorg transition

reassign 318692 xlibs-dev, bookmarkbridge reassign 320218 xlibs-dev, bookmarkbridge tags 319120 + sid thanks Bug #318692 and #320218 are duplicates of #319120. #320218 sais we have to build-depend on libxinerama-dev. Best regards Mathias Weyland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: build deps after xorg transition

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 318692 xlibs-dev, bookmarkbridge Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 320218 xlibs-dev, bookmarkbridge Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 319120 + sid Bug#319120: FTBFS: Unable to find libXxf86v

Bug#320376: nntp: FTBFS: errno: TLS definition in /lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS reference in get_tcp_conn.o

Package: nntp Version: 1.5.12.1-18 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, When building your on some arches (ia64 and amd64) you get the following error: cc -O2 -s -I../libdbz -o nntpxmit nntpxmit.o remote.o llist.o get_tcp_conn.o xmitauth.o fakesyslog.o strcasecmp.o ../libdbz/dbz.o ../libdbz/dbzdbm.

Bug#318525: FTBFS: Memory inputs not directly addressable

tags 318525 + confirmed thanks I've confirmed the bug still exists with the current GCC 4.0.1 in a sid chroot. The error is identical to that reported by Matt in the original report. Regards, Roger -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/

Bug#317404: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'calloc'

I have made an NMU to fix this RC bug. The patch is identical to the patch I sent last week. Please apply the patch and acknowledge it in your next maintainer upload. Regards, Roger -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ Debia

Bug#287494: lopster: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have made an NMU to fix this RC bug. The patch is identical to the patch I sent last week. Please apply the patch and acknowledge it in your next maintainer upload. Regards, Roger - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://

Processed: Re: FTBFS: Memory inputs not directly addressable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 318525 + confirmed Bug#318525: FTBFS: Memory inputs not directly addressable There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#76918: Infection by Spyware. EBay bidder to pay $351,100 for Buffett lunch

Hi 76918, You are INFECTED. With Spyware that can't be deleted by your Anti-Virus. Download our award winning Anti-Spyware Software. http://exhaustible.ekillspyware.com/ad/ Check if you're infected Find out right now with our FREE Spyware Scan. But I do know one thing though.! First thing

Bug#320375: conquest-gl: fail to start (Assertion `window->Window.VisualInfo != ((void *)0)' failed.)

Package: conquest-gl Version: 8.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I try to start conquestgl on my sarge installation, I only get an assertion error. This render the package completely useless. As I suspect this will be the case for all users of the package, I set

Processed: tagging 320348

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 320348 sid Bug#320348: akode: dependency package libjack0.80.0-0 removed from repository There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#320371: sooperlooper: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'wxListCtrl*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision

Package: sooperlooper Version: 1.0.5-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on all 64 bit arches with the following error: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..-I.. -I/usr/lib/sigc++-1.2/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-1.2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/lib/wx/include/

Bug#309964: "drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)" and linux hangs

Maximilian Attems wrote: > the kernelversion of the dmesg you posted and the initial bugreport > are different. the dmesg seems to be selfcompiled. Oh that can be but it's the same problem with a selfcompiled kernel and a debian kernel. > did you try latest 2.6.12 from unstable? > did it help? y

Processed: Fixed in NMU of evolver 2.23-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 317404 + fixed Bug#317404: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'calloc' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs da

Processed: Fixed in NMU of lopster 1.2.0.1-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 287494 + fixed Bug#287494: lopster: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#320363: libapache-miniwiki-perl: Can't locate object method "boot" via package "mod_perl", with apache2

Package: libapache-miniwiki-perl Version: 0.92-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing the package, when i try to access http://localhost/wiki/, i get this error in apache2 log: [Thu Jul 28 22:01:41 2005] [error] [client 151.38.102.156] failed to resolve handler

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gtkhtml 1.1.10-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 260151 + fixed Bug#260151: gtkhtml: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Processed: Fixed in NMU of dircproxy 1.0.5-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 285626 + fixed Bug#285626: dircproxy: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#320252: marked as done (bigloo: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on gcj)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:49:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320252: bigloo: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on gcj has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#317703: marked as done (xsupplicant: Should not write username/password info to log file)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:32:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317703: fixed in xsupplicant 1.0.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#320361: rt2500-source: can't installed compiles package with linux-image-2.6.12

Package: rt2500-source Version: 1.1.0+cvs20050710-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When you compile the module with linux-image-2.6.12-1 and the linux-headers-2.6.12-1, the rt2500 module package can't be installed. The compiled packet depend on kernel-image-2.6.12 and the

Bug#319150: marked as done (wmsmpmon: ftbfs [sparc] execvp: debian/debstd: Permission denied)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:32:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319150: fixed in wmsmpmon 2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#320200: marked as done (stripclub depends on obsolete libfltk1.1c102)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320200: fixed in stripclub 0.9.1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#320357: [pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in stable and possibly oldstable

Helge Kreutzmann wrote, On 28/07/05 15:43: > Package: fetchmail > Version: N/A; reported 2005-07-28 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > Hello, > I see that you close CAN-2005-2335 in 6.2.5-16 in unstable, but I > could not find a bug report for tracking sarge

Bug#320017: Woody and Sarge still missing

reopen 320017 tags 320017 + sarge, woody thanks dude Please close once woody and sarge are dealt with. If woody is not vulnerable, then remember to add CAN-2005-2368 to http://www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-woody Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMA

Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in stable and possibly oldstable

Package: fetchmail Version: N/A; reported 2005-07-28 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hello, I see that you close CAN-2005-2335 in 6.2.5-16 in unstable, but I could not find a bug report for tracking sarge and woody. Please close this bug when both are dealt with.

Bug#320355: swt-gtk: FTBFS on the autobuilders with gcj (>= 4.0)

TYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) Automatic build of swt-gtk_3.0+3.1M4-3 on bode.aurel32.net by sbuild/i386 1.170.5 Build started at 20050728-2027 ** Checking available source versions...

Bug#320356: trang: FTBFS on the autobuilders with gcj (>= 4.0)

F-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) Automatic build of trang_20030619-3 on bode.aurel32.net by sbuild/i386 1.170.5 Build started at 20050728-2027 ** Checking available source versions... Fetch

Processed: Woody and Sarge still missing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 320017 Bug#320017: vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 320017 + sarge, woody Bug#320017: vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines Tags were: patch security Tags added: sarge, woody > thanks

Bug#318990: marked as done (Libgeos-dev not installable due to dependency glitch)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:17:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318990: fixed in geos 2.1.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#320351: Dependency (kernel-patch-acl) about to be removed from the archive

Package: kernel-patch-exec-shield Severity: serious Hi, A dependency of this package, kernel-patch-acl, is about to be removed from the archive. Considering the state of this package (new upstream for more than 15 months without maintainer response, doesn't apply to any kernel in Debian at the mo

Bug#320348: akode: dependency package libjack0.80.0-0 removed from repository

Package: akode Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Package libjack0.80.0-0 which akode package depends on was replaced with package libjack0.100.0-0. So akode needs a rebuild against the new libjack to be installable again. -- System Information: Debian Release: sid APT pr

Bug#318429: ia64 b0rkage

thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

debian-bugs-rc@lists.debian.org

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:02:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297944: fixed in vgrabbj 0.9.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#319411: nmu patch

Adeodato Simó wrote: I can't see this patch in your NMU diff, and it doesn't seem to be in the uploaded package either (as found on gluck_delayed/DONE). Just mentioning in case it can be useful. Bah, you are absolutely right. Sorry about that. I prepared the package and then my chroot br

Bug#320161: ipy: ftbfs [sparc] python: command not found

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:56:09AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > Package: ipy > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > ipy failed to build on the sparc buildd and all other buildds, duplicated > on sparc pbuilder. > > cd . && python setup.py build --build-base="./bui

Bug#318429: libc6.1-dev: failure with g++-4.0 caused by ucontext.h

On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 07:42:04PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:06:00 +0200, > Daniel Kobras wrote: > > Upstream has fixed the compile-time breakage in sys/ucontext.h with g++ > > 4.0 in ia64 in 2.3.4, so the 2.3.5 packages in experimental are not > > affected. The attached

Bug#290365: marked as done (ircii-pana: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'toc_fd' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:02:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#290365: fixed in ircii-pana 1:1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#317075: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot find anthy-kyuri.el)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317075: fixed in anthy 6724-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#320017: marked as done (vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320017: fixed in vim 1:6.3-085+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#316729: marked as done (bashism in the init script)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:47:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316729: fixed in dhcp3 3.0.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: severity of 318340 is grave, merging 318340 317762

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 318340 grave Bug#318340: openoffice.org: Broken dependency Severity set to `grave'. > merge 318340 317762 Bug#317762: openoffice.org-bin: broken dependencies with libmyspell3 and libwpd8 Bug#318340: openoffice.org: Broken dependency Bug#320047

Bug#298177: marked as done (dvi2ps: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): )

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298177: fixed in dvi2ps 3.2j-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#320325: tdiary: [dummy] Wait for the next release.

Package: tdiary Version: 2.0.2+20050720-1 Severity: serious Justification: "unknown" This bug is dummy in order to keep the package from promoting to testing. As of this version a few modules have been removed because of a license issue on the upstream. It might be inconvenient for current tDia

Bug#309819: marked as done (gtk-gnutella: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: vmsg.c:1189: error: duplicate case value)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:47:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309819: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.95.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#317215: marked as done (libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:32:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317215: fixed in qjackctl 0.2.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in NMU of cruft 0.9.6-0.7

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 319490 + fixed Bug#319490: FTBFS in experimental Tags were: pending experimental Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Bug#320312: Taking LVM snapshots can lead to an unuseable system

Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 Version: 2.6.8-16 Severity: critical In sarge I was unable to take any lvm snapshots until I manually loaded the dm-snapshot kernel module with modprobe. I took a snapshot of my /usr filesystem, but didn't remove the snapshot with lvremove before rebooting. Afte

Bug#316272: w3m-img: does not display images on console

Package: w3m-img Version: 0.5.1-4 Followup-For: Bug #316272 Whileas w3m-img works in xterm as intended, it does not display images inline on plain console using framebuffer (vesafb-tng). Tested with: % w3m -config /dev/null grml.org No problems with w3m/w3m-img 0.5.1-3, problem appeared with

Bug#319661: marked as done (sgid games program can write to any file writable by games group)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:35:56 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319661: fixed in xemeraldia 0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: reopening 320192

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reopen 320192 Bug#320192: ethereal: Multiple problems in protocol dissectors Bug#320183: ethereal: Multiple security issues in various dissectors Bug reopened, originator not changed.

Bug#319481: marked as done (faust: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'flex')

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:02:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319481: fixed in faust 0.9.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#318003: marked as done (electricsheep: segfaults on powerpc)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318003: fixed in electricsheep 2.6.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#319218: marked as done (postgresql-8.0: ftbfs [sparc] initializing pg_shadow ... sh: line 1: 22871 Bus error)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:47:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319218: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#303865: marked as done (polyxmass-bin: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): duplicate 'unsigned')

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:35:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303865: fixed in polyxmass-bin 0.8.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#297247: marked as done (wavemon: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:35:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297247: fixed in wavemon 0.4.0b-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#319209: marked as done (postgresql-7.4: ftbfs [sparc] pg_regress: initdb failed)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:47:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319209: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.8-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#319229: marked as done (flightgear: ftbfs [sparc] undefined references)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:47:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319229: fixed in simgear 0.3.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#319974: marked as done (FTBFS: Needs to be compiled with -falign-functions=4)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:32:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319974: fixed in clisp 1:2.34-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Reopen, problem exists in Sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 320192 0.10.10-2sarge2 Bug#320192: ethereal: Multiple problems in protocol dissectors Bug#320183: ethereal: Multiple security issues in various dissectors Bug marked as found in version 0.10.10-2sarge2. > tags 320192 sarge Bug#320192: ethereal: M

Bug#319564: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot find postgresql header)

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:47:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319564: fixed in flow-tools 1:0.68-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#319674: marked as done (aspell-de-alt: Needs repackaging for latest aspell)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319674: fixed in aspell-de-alt 2.1-1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#318783: marked as done (orbit2: FTBFS (i386): `./debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/liborbit2-dev/ORBit2': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318783: fixed in orbit2 1:2.12.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#320014: marked as done (ClamAV library heap overflows)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:30 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320014: fixed in clamav 0.86.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#285469: marked as done (aria: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285469: fixed in aria 1.0.0-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#319973: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to find libpq-fe.h)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319973: fixed in courier 0.47-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#318783: marked as done (orbit2: FTBFS (i386): `./debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/liborbit2-dev/ORBit2': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318584: fixed in orbit2 1:2.12.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#319530: marked as done (aview: FTBFS: Please Build-Depend on 'libaa1-dev' instead of 'aalib1-dev')

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:47:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319530: fixed in aview 1.3.0rc1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#319861: marked as done (contact-lookup-applet: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libkrb5-dev')

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:31:47 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#317853: marked as done (clamav and libgmp3 dependency)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:30 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317853: fixed in clamav 0.86.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#297249: marked as done (mplayerplug-in: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:18:53 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297249: fixed in mplayerplug-in 3.01-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#318796: marked as done ("gq: segfaults when loading the config file, creating a new one, etc")

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:18:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318796: fixed in gq 1.0beta1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#319675: marked as done (aspell-de: Needs repackaging for latest aspell)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:17:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319675: fixed in aspell-de 0.60-20030222-1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#297862: marked as done (xlogmaster: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void**' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297862: fixed in xlogmaster 1.6.0-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#318729: marked as done (FTBFS with new texi2html)

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:17:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318729: fixed in avrdude 4.4.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#320053: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686: Installing it with sarge leads to failing at booting next time

reassign 298623 kernel-source-2.6.8 reassign 320053 kernel-source-2.6.8 severity 320053 normal merge 298623 320053 thanks On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:40:59PM +0200, stefan wrote: > hi thx for your answer... > > i don't see why this bug is related to me... > another developer just mailed me and sho

Bug#319543: marked as done (new kernel-package creates ridiculous symlinks in /boot)

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319543: fixed in kernel-package 9.004 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#320256: (kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k6: FTBFS on its intended target) : more info

I tried to build this kernel on a newer PIV. This dos *not* build with gcc 4.0 or gcc 3.4, but *does* build with gcc 3.3 I'll try this on the target machine, and let you know. -- Emmanuel Charpentier[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

  1   2   >