Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> merge 318816 321326
Bug#318816: Needs repackaging for latest aspell
Bug#321326: aspell-ru: Package uninstallable.
Merged 318816 321326.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:33:24AM +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> reopen 318728
> tags 318728 sarge
> thanks
>
> Thunderbird 1.0.6 compiles, installs and runs well, when source package
> is upgraded from 1.0.2-2.
>
> Though the orig.tar.gz structure seems quite
> strange and uupdate doesn't work a
Hi,
Noèl Köthe wrote:
Package: gthumb
Version: 3:2.6.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
libexif10 was removed from sid but your package depends on it and
now its not installable anymore.
libexif12 is now in sid. A rebuild with the latest libexif-dev (0.6.12-2)
forwarded 321209 kaffe@kaffe.org
tags 321209 + upstream
thanks
I forwarded the bug upstream but it was already disscussed:
http://www.mail-archive.com/kaffe@kaffe.org/msg10651.html
--
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
reassign 321313 xutils
merge 321313 319410
thanks
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:04:14PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: login.app
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
>
> trying to recompile login.app in a sid chroot leads to the following
> error:
>
> c++ -o Login.app -g -O2 -fno-strict-alia
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:33:24AM +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> reopen 318728
> tags 318728 sarge
> thanks
>
> Thunderbird 1.0.6 compiles, installs and runs well, when source package
> is upgraded from 1.0.2-2.
>
> Though the orig.tar.gz structure seems quite
> strange and uupdate doesn't work a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 321313 xutils
Bug#321313: FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux
Bug reassigned from package `login.app' to `xutils'.
> merge 321313 319410
Bug#319410: imake assumes availability of selinux
Bug#321313: FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 321209 kaffe@kaffe.org
Bug#321209: kaffe: ftbfs [sparc] static declaration of 'argcount' follows
non-static declaration
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tags 321209 + upstream
Bug#321209: kaffe: ftbfs [
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 274088 + fixed
Bug#274088: lxdoom: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 297718 + fixed
Bug#297718: lxdoom: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'segtextured'
follows non-static dec
Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:57:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libxine1: uninstallable due to g++ 4.0 transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 01:10:02AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> tags 279030 + patch
> stop
>
> I propose the attached patch to clear up the conflict between the
> debconf settings and the conffile. I believe this follows the
> consensus of the discussion so far. Unless there are ov
Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:57:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libxine1: uninstallable due to g++ 4.0 transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.3
> severity 320317 grave
Bug#320317: xine-lib source package depends on aalib1-dev
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 320317 sid
Bug#320317: xine-lib source package depends on aalib1-dev
Th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.3
> # build failure, not an installability problem
> severity 320317 serious
Bug#320317: xine-lib source package depends on aalib1-dev
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stoppi
On Aug 5, 2005, at 12:52 AM, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
I've been waiting a lng time for a
whiteboarding application.
Problem is known, the dependencies are still awaiting ftp-master's
approval. Please follow the instructions in the install guide[1],
which involve adding my person
tag 269916 + fixed
thanks
Hi,
Please find attached the diff of the NMU.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel3
* Kurt Roeckx:
> Your package is missing a build dependency on ssl-dev, resulting
> in the following error:
> cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER="mozilla-sha1/sha1.h"' -c -o epoch.o epoch.c
> epoch.c:14:24: error: openssl/bn.h: No such file or directory
For licensing reasons, the build dependency
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 181494 etch-ignore
Bug#181494: GNU Free Documentation License is non-free
Tags were: sarge-ignore sid sarge woody
Tags added: etch-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:48:48 Andreas Jochens wrote:
>Package: net-tools
>Version: 1.60-15
>Severity: serious
>When building 'net-tools' on unstable,
>I get the following error:
>cc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wall -I. -idirafter ./include/ -Ilib
-I/net-tools-1.60 >-idirafter /net-tools-1.60/include-c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.3
> # this is not an ignorable bug for etch
> tags 181494 - etch-ignore
Bug#181494: GNU Free Documentation License is non-free
Tags were: etch-ignore sarge-ignore sid sarge woody
Tags rem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
After applying the patch (Xgsm::DeviceHelper::onDeviceEvent set to
public) the following FTBFS occurs:
i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/gnome-1.0
- -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include
- -I/usr/include/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 315038 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#315038: tomcat5: Tomcat5 doesn't start after installation
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320963: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320963: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317674: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317674: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315793: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315198: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315198: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313404: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313404: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313219: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320240: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312406: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320240: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315793: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313219: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312406: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318963: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318956: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318963: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318956: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318429: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317946: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317946: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314855: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:17:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297287: fixed in snes9x 1.42-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 19:15:42 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bugs tagged as woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317674: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: evince
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Evince seems to be compiled using libjvulibre 14 but the actual state of
the libjvulibre library is 15.
Here are my local information :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ evince
evince: error while loading shared librar
Hello,
attached is a patch for a NMU (not uploaded yet) that uses Florian's
proposed solution to fix this bug. Manoj, I would like to get this
issue fixed during this weekend's BSP. If you had plans for uploading
yourself soon, or see any problems with the proposed patch, please let
me k
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319958: fixed in inkscape 0.42-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318963: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318429: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317946: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:29:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318956: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:32:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265526: fixed in mysql++ 1.7.40-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 03:32:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291281: fixed in mysql++ 1.7.40-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: mypasswordsafe
Version: 0.0.20041004-2
Severity: critical
I am using MyPasswordSafe for a long time. By accident I took a look to
my default passwordsafe-file "~/.passwörter.xml" and was scared because
all passwords are safed in cleartext! No encryption!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 318536 + pending
Bug#318536: texi2html: Chokes on gnugo.texi
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 315986 patch
Bug#315986: xine-lib: please build against libslang2
Tags were: patch
Bug#315868: libxine: please build against libslang2
Tags added: patch
> tags 320317 patch
Bug#320317: xine-lib source package depends on aalib1-dev
Tags were: sid
T
tags 318536 + pending
thanks
I'm now maintaining this package and I have found the problem that
causes this bug.
The authors of the code have made a simple, yet bad spelling mistake
in a call to the function. Replacing the s for a z.
Will be fixed on my first upload of texi2html
--
N Jones
Pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 321406 djvulibre
Bug#321406: evince: libdjvulibre dependency problem
Bug reassigned from package `evince' to `djvulibre'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
reassign 321406 djvulibre
thanks
Le vendredi 05 août 2005 à 12:31 +0200, Didrik Pinte a écrit :
> Evince seems to be compiled using libjvulibre 14 but the actual state of
> the libjvulibre library is 15.
This is a djvulibre bug, reassigning to it with the bunch of other
duplicates.
Cheers,
Se
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 04:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321280: fixed in nbd 1:2.7.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 05:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321261: fixed in nautilus 2.10.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 05:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320138: fixed in nautilus 2.10.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-6
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
Attempting to install tetex-base results in the following
Setting up tetex-base (3.0-6) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst: line 406: update-language: command not f
dpkg: error pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 304432 +unreproducible +sid +help
Unknown tag/s: +sid, +help.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 304432 +moreinfo
Bug#304432: plucker_1.8-4(mips/unstable): FTBFS with -rsudo
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
tags 304432 +unreproducible +sid +help
thanks
Are you still being hit by this?
--
.''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll)
: :' :
`. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.11 Ext3)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
tags 304432 +moreinfo
thanks
--
.''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll)
: :' :
`. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.11 Ext3)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 304432 unreproducible sid help
Bug#304432: plucker_1.8-4(mips/unstable): FTBFS with -rsudo
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
Tags added: unreproducible, sid, help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
tags 304432 unreproducible sid help
thanks
--
.''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll)
: :' :
`. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.11 Ext3)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gconfmm2.0 (2.0.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
* GCC 4.0 transition (Closes: #286496, #317690)
-- Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:54:34 +0200
Patch attached.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> submitter 318164 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318164: CXX 4.0 transition
Changed Bug submitter from Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stopping proce
Sebastien,
Could I trouble you to recompile and dupload evince against
libdjvulibre1 (>= 3.5.14-6) to deal with soname change? Evince is the
only package that uses the lib, so that will clear the issue.
I'm not sure if the API has changed in a fashion that justifies a
chance in soname. Upstream
Le vendredi 05 août 2005 à 06:49 -0600, Barak Pearlmutter a écrit :
> Sebastien,
>
> Could I trouble you to recompile and dupload evince against
> libdjvulibre1 (>= 3.5.14-6) to deal with soname change? Evince is the
> only package that uses the lib, so that will clear the issue.
Hi,
What about
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Kurt Roeckx:
>
> > Your package is missing a build dependency on ssl-dev, resulting
> > in the following error:
> > cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER="mozilla-sha1/sha1.h"' -c -o epoch.o
> > epoch.c
> > epoch.c:14:24: error: openssl/bn.h: No such file
* Sebastian Kuzminsky:
> epoch uses openssl for the bignums, not for the SSL. We already got
> rid of all the SSL stuff by using the Mozilla SSL implementation.
> Getting rid of this last openssl dependency will require significant
> changes (reimplementation or feature removal).
A patch to repl
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321174: fixed in vic 1:2.8ucl1.1.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 317863 + pending
Bug#317863: Loops forever processing bbdb.texinfo
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tags 317863 + pending
thanks
Bug fixed and bbdb should be able to be built after this next (coming) upload.
--
N Jones
Proud Debian & FOSS User
Debian Maintainer of: html2ps, ipkungfu, dvorak7min & windowlab
Problem is what does "fix djvulibre" mean here?
Fix it to generate the old soname, thus losing soname compatibility
with upstream?
Fix it to generate a different library name, perhaps libdjvulibre15?
Fix it by asking upstream to stop changing the soname for no reason?
Fix it by convincing anyon
This is a follow-up to my previous mail
On 8/5/05, Török Edvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:48:48 Andreas Jochens wrote:
> >Package: net-tools
> >Version: 1.60-15
> >Severity: serious
>
> >When building 'net-tools' on unstable,
> >I get the following error:
>
> >cc -D_GNU_S
Package: flpsed
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
flpsed depends on libfltk1.1c102 that is no longer available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: easytag
Version: 1.99.7-1
Severity: serious
easytag depends on libid3-3.8.3 that is no longer available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dosemu
Version: 1.2.1-3
Severity: serious
dosemu depends on slang1 that is no longer available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: k3blibs
Version: 0.12.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have this error:
monk:~# apt-get install k3blibs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible s
Le vendredi 05 août 2005 à 07:16 -0600, Barak Pearlmutter a écrit :
> Problem is what does "fix djvulibre" mean here?
>
> Fix it to generate the old soname, thus losing soname compatibility
> with upstream?
>
> Fix it to generate a different library name, perhaps libdjvulibre15?
>
> Fix it by as
Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:52:32 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line net-tools: FTBFS: field 'gen' has incomplete type
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.15-2
Severity: serious
Architecture: s390
Hi,
on s390 (but not on any other debian arch) the new version of gs-gpl
fails when converting a (specific) file with fig2dev:
| [sid] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tor/tor-0.1.0.12/doc/design-paper$ fig2dev -L pdf
cell-struct.fig cell-
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297924: fixed in ode 1:0.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi,
I had this very same crash in 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 (both taken from on alioth) on
i386.
I cannot try to change jukrc: my first reflex was to delete it to come back to
the defaults (didn't help either).
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Yes, all true.
I will upload a rev which generates libdjvulibre15. When that comes
down the pike, please recompile evince against it.
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
the package op-showimg-fb seems to have been removed for some time from
the archive, so this big can probably be closed now.
Regards,
Regis
--
"While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to be an engineer" Erik
Zapletal
If you have libtunepimp2 0.3.0-4 installed, please downgrade it to
0.3.0-3 available from:
http://packages.debian.org/testing/libs/libtunepimp2
HTH.
* Nicolas DEGAND [Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:06:46 +0200]:
> Package: juk
> Version: 4:3.3.2-1
> Severity: grave
> I upgraded some packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 320925 patch
Bug#320925: leaks dpkg.log filedescriptor to child processes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
tags 320925 patch
thanks
I have made a patch that sets close-on-exec. Tell me if this is what
you expected, and if my patch really fixes what you meant.
Also please test if dpkg still works correctly
diff -Nru ./intl/log.c ../dpkg-1.13.11/intl/log.c
--- ./intl/log.c 2005-06-06 07:33:19.0 +
Package: gcc-snapshot
Severity: serious
To the best of my understanding, gcc-snapshot is not intended to be ever
released with a stable Debian release. This bug is intended to serve as
a marker bug to make sure gcc-snapshot won't enter testing.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL P
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
