> Personally, I feel that this could be better:
> * Just use GPL in Debian for these images (solve problem immediately).
> * Work out what programs use texi2html with the images (I do not
> believe very many do).
These images are not to be automatically used, they are there only for the
conven
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:04:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Done a long time ago
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: openhackware
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: Serious
I tried to build openhackware on i386 (well, actually on amd64 inside a
chroot), but did not succeed. I attached the build log.
--
Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - GnuPG Id: 945348A4
Fingerprint = 9300 5DC2 7E87 6C37 ED7B CA9A 980
On 10/08/05, Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Personally, I feel that this could be better:
> > * Just use GPL in Debian for these images (solve problem immediately).
> > * Work out what programs use texi2html with the images (I do not
> > believe very many do).
>
> These images ar
Package: bbpager
Version: 0.3.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Bbpager is unusable since the following happens all the time:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:44:46 ~> bbpager
Could not open blackbox style file
Cannot connect to window manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:45:03 ~>
(Note
Package: lsb-core
Version: 3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
lsb-core depends on glibc (>= 2.3.5), where the appropriate package is
libc6 (and libc6.1 on alpha).
Simple patch:
diff -urN lsb-3.0-old/debian/rules lsb-3.0/debian/rules
--- lsb-3.0-old/debian/rules2005-07-20 05:14:28.0
> no, it's not fakeroot, it's make segfaulting ...
[...]
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 16911)]
> 0x4091fd20 in __canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x4091fd20 in __canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare
Index: src/winime.cpp
===
--- src/winime.cpp (revision 45)
+++ src/winime.cpp (working copy)
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@
if (p == (char *) 0x)
found = false;
-p = (unsigned int) p + mpText;
+
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 322089 openldap2,libgnutls-dev
Bug#322089: openldap2: Please switch to libgnutls12
Bug reassigned from package `openldap2/2.1.30-11,libgnutls-dev/1.2.5-3' to
`openldap2,libgnutls-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:52:19PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I might be able to debug it better if you send me the contents
> of /var/lib/apt, /var/lib/aptitude, and /var/lib/dpkg/info/status.
The first two were found and tarred plus gzipped in a .tgz
/var/lib/dpkg/info/status was not fo
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 03:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309677: fixed in asc 1.16.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 302565 + fixed
Bug#302565: realtimebattle: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit specialization of
'const ListIterator& ListIterator::operator++(int)' must be introduced by
'template <>'
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 313822 + fixed
B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 319758 [CAN-2005-2536] pstotext: arbitrary postscript code execution
Bug#319758: pstotext: arbitrary postscript code execution
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
> tag 319758 - sid
Bug#319758: [CAN-2005-2536]
Package: pdns
Version: 2.9.17-13sarge1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.5.4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-mornir-smp-1.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages pdns depends on:
ii pdns-recurs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 322070 -moreinfo
Bug#322070: gksu: sigsegv at startup with -u root option
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
Tags removed: moreinfo
> tag 322070 -unreproducible
Bug#322070: gksu: sigsegv at startup with -u root option
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:05:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Em Qua, 2005-08-10 às 08:02 +0200, Christoph Thomas escreveu:
> After upgrading gksu from 1.3.3-1 to 1.3.2-2 I get only a Segfault when
> I start gnome-terminal via gksu -u normal-user gnome-terminal.
Take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/322070. I believe they're the same
problem. There are two
Package: alltraxclock
Version: 2.0.2-0
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'gnats' on unstable,
I get the following error:
# apt-get source alltraxclock
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 8634B of source archives.
Get:1 http://192.168.2.3 uns
Package: nxtvepg
Version: 2.7.5-0
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'nxtvepg' on unstable,
I get the following error:
# apt-get source nxtvepg
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 1244kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://192.168.2.3 unstable/m
Package: gnats
Version: 4.1.0-0
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'gnats' on unstable,
I get the following error:
# apt-get source gnats
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 1323kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://192.168.2.3 unstable/main gn
Package: crossfire-client-images
Version: 20050204
Severity: serious
When trying to build 'crossfire-client-images' on unstable,
I get the following error:
# apt-get source crossfire-client-images
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 1889kB of source archives
Package: jhcore
Version: 20050204
Severity: serious
When trying to build 'jhcore' on unstable,
I get the following error:
# apt-get source jhcore
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 649kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://192.168.2.3 unstable/main jhcore 2005
Package: lambdacore
Version: 20040517
Severity: serious
When trying to build 'lambdacore' on unstable,
I get the following error:
# apt-get source lambdacore
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 661kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://192.168.2.3 unstable/main
Package: libnasl
Version: 2.2.5-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
As part of the update to debhelper compatibility version 4, a
libnasl-dev.install file was added to the package.
Unfortunately, an error was made in this file, leading to the header files
being installed in /usr/include/include/nessus, rather
Package: libbakery-2.3-dev
Severity: serious
Hi,
# LANG=C apt-get install libgconfmm-2.6-1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribut
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 322359 dpkg 1.13.10
Bug#322359: gnats: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number
ending with '-0'
Bug reassigned from package `gnats' to `dpkg'.
> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unknown command or malformed argu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300670 + fixed
Bug#300670: mpeg2dec should be built with gcc 3.4 or above
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 320880 + fixed
Bug#320880: aalib transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 321548 + fixed
Bug#321548: mpeg2d
Package: webmin-ldap-netgroups
Version: 0.17
Severity: serious
When trying to build 'webmin-ldap-netgroups' on unstable,
I get the following error:
# apt-get source webmin-ldap-netgroups
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Need to get 25.5kB of source archives.
Get:1 ht
merge 223904 322361
thanks
I somehow did not recognize #223904 before I filed my report.
Please also s/gnats/alltraxclock/ in the first line of my report.
Sorry for the confusion.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 322371 1.7.0
Bug#322371: crossfire-client-images: FTBFS: unpacking fails
Bug marked as found in version 1.7.0.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: beagle
Version: 0.0.12-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After installing beagle and all it's dependencies (including libmono0),
I get the following error message when starting beagled:
(beagled:13581): libebook-WARNING **: Can't find installed BookFactory
that h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322368 grave
Bug#322368: libbakery-2.3-dev is uninstallable
Severity set to `grave'.
> reassign 322368 libbakery-2.3-11
Bug#322368: libbakery-2.3-dev is uninstallable
Bug reassigned from package `libbakery-2.3-dev' to `libbakery-2.3-11'.
> th
severity 322368 grave
reassign 322368 libbakery-2.3-11
thanks
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:54:28PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Package: libbakery-2.3-dev
> Severity: serious
Hmm, all of libbakery-2.3-dev's direct dependencies are present in unstable
-- I think it's more appropriate to assign t
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321312: fixed in eog 2.10.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 302608
Bug#302608: siptoolbox: FTBFS: Build stops with "!--error 241"
usr/lib/scilab/man/eng/programming/whatis.htm does not exist
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> reassign 322359 dpkg-dev
Bug#322359: gnats: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number
ending with '-0'
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `dpkg-dev'.
>
End of me
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318200: fixed in mailutils 1:0.6.90-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
reopen 302608
thanks
> Changes:
> siptoolbox (0.3.99rc2alpha3-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* new upstream version
>* added Build-Depends: scilab-doc, closes: #302608
There is still no Build-Depends on scilab-doc and the bug is still
there.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> reassign 322361 dpkg-dev
Bug#322361: alltraxclock: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version
number ending with '-0'
Bug reassigned from package `alltraxclock' to `dpkg-dev
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> dpkg-source: error: unrecognised file suffix `-0.diff'
> Unpack command 'dpkg-source -x gnats_4.1.0-0.dsc' failed.
> E: Child process failed
>
> This is because the new dpkg does not accept a version ending with '-0'.
Which is a b
> > no, it's not fakeroot, it's make segfaulting ...
> [...]
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 16911)]
> > 0x4091fd20 in __canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare () from
> > /lib/libpthread.so.0
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x4091fd20 in __canonicalize_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> merge 322361 322359 322362
Bug#322359: gnats: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do not use a version number
ending with '-0'
Bug#322361: alltraxclock: FTBFS: unpacking fails - Please do
On 05-Aug-10 15:29, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > dpkg-source: error: unrecognised file suffix `-0.diff'
> > Unpack command 'dpkg-source -x gnats_4.1.0-0.dsc' failed.
> > E: Child process failed
> >
> > This is because the new dpkg
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:18:50PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-Aug-10 15:29, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > dpkg-source: error: unrecognised file suffix `-0.diff'
> > > Unpack command 'dpkg-source -x gnats_4.1.0-0.dsc' f
Confirmed. We are passing a function pointer with a value of -2 into
__cffc, which should not happen...
Is -2 a special signal number?
I don't think so. in any case, others have observed that if they use an
older glibc, this problem does not happen.
randolph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:22:39AM +0800, 肖盛文 Faris Xiao wrote:
> Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 06:54:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >[...]
> >If this does happen w/ 2.6.12, then a backtrace would be useful.
> >Hit ctrl-alt-sysrq-t to get a dump of all processes on the system; tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 320048 SECURITY: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl (CAN-2005-1268)
Bug#320048: Security: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 316173 SECURITY: HTTP proxy responses with both Transfer-Encoding and
> Content-Length headers (CAN
> >>Confirmed. We are passing a function pointer with a value of -2 into
> >>__cffc, which should not happen...
> >
> >
> > Is -2 a special signal number?
>
> I don't think so. in any case, others have observed that if they use an
> older glibc, this problem does not happen.
Not sure this is r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> # reassign these back with lesser severity until we're sure that was an
> intentional change in dpkg-dev
> reassign 322367 lambdacore
Bug#322367: lambdacore: FTBFS: unpacking fails
B
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322070: fixed in gksu 1.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322070: fixed in gksu 1.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322280: fixed in gksu 1.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322280: fixed in gksu 1.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: phpldapadmin
Version: 0.9.6c-4
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Even if you deny anonymous login with disable_anon_bind anyone could
access your LDAP server.
As I can see this option only hide checkbox from the input page, but
anyone can create workaround hack:
==example form t
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: revelation
Followup-For: Bug #318012
Please mark this bug as unfixed. Indeed, a correction is in order, Revelation
can't
be installed because python2.3-crypto can't be installed. This is using
sid.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT pol
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 320548 + fixed
Bug#320548: libsdl-perl: dependency problem
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Package: python2.3-crypto
Followup-For: Bug #318055
Bastian, Please just upload this now. I have had this bug open for
almost a month without even a response from the maintainer. That is more
than enough time for the maintainer to express interest in fixing this
bug.
-- System Information:
Debia
Il giorno mer, 10/08/2005 alle 19.35 +0400, Alexander Gerasiov ha
scritto:
> Package: phpldapadmin
> Version: 0.9.6c-4
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
>
> Even if you deny anonymous login with disable_anon_bind anyone could
> access your LDAP server.
>
> As I can see this option only hide c
Hi there,
This is now fixed in the new upstream version (1.2.20050306)
Could you please package this version?
If it's not been done with a week, I'll prepare an NMU.
Cheers,
Neil McGovern
--
__
.Ž `. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' !
`. `Ž gpg: B345BDD3
`- Please don't c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 285080 + fixed
Bug#285080: allegro4.1: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for
function 'shutdown_single_menu'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 317177 + fixed
Bug#317177: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required
Tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 319929 fixed-in-experimental
Bug#319929: nsis: Included DLLs and stubs leads to crashes on Windows
Tags were: pending experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 320557 fixed-in-experimental
Bug#320557: nsis: Modern UI with languagefile Lu
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322316: fixed in lsb 3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:15:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nsis bugs fixed in 2.08-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322423: fixed in phpldapadmin 0.9.6c-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294288: fixed in config-manager 0.1p83-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: libapache-request-perl
Version: 1.1-0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
The package is unusable because it is linked incorrectly. The error
message is:
Can't load '/usr/lib/perl5/auto/Apache/Request/Request.so' for module
Apache::Request: libapreq.so
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258581: fixed in config-manager 0.1p83-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
I found http://wiki.debian.net/?HowToGetABacktrace and did a backtrace.
---
# MALLOC_CHECK_=2 gdb synaptic
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
are
welcome t
Package: python-cherrypy
Version: 2.0.0f-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'python-cherrypy' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
cd . && python setup.py build --build-base="./build"
/bin/sh: python: command not found
make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127
Please
Package: snes9x
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
current snes9x (1.43-1) fails to build on powerpc, however adding
--without-assembler to ./configure does the trick.
also, dpkg --print-gnu-architecture is no longer supported, please
consider this debian/rules snipp
Package: snes9x
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
there are two missing build dependencies from snes9x: libxxf86dga-dev
and libxxf86vm-dev
thanks,
filippo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unstable
Hi,
You'll have to forgive my initial incredulity here, but this
patch appears to be some 2+ years old. Why exactly has no one
run into this and/or reported it before now?
thanks,
Ron
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:34:26AM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> Package: libapache-request-perl
> Version
This package only works on ppc as it contains ppc assembler code. The
architecture field in debian/control should therefor be
Architecture: powerpc
Cheers,
Peter (p2).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> severity 322383 serious
Bug#322383: beagle daemon fails to start: BookFactory Error?
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> reassign 322383 libevolution-cil
Bug#322383: beagle daemon fails to start: BookFactory Error?
Bug reassigned from package `beagle' to `libevolution-cil'.
>
End of message, stopping pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> merge 322383 321649
Bug#321649: Not installable (e-d-s depends are outdated)
Bug#322383: beagle daemon fails to start: BookFactory Error?
Bug#321806: beagle is uninstallable
Merged 321
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 321832 grave
Bug#321832: Applications linked to libpango1.0-0 SIGSEGV
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 321832 experimental
Bug#321832: Applications linked to libpango1.0-0 SIGSEGV
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
> thanks
Stopp
Ok. I'm going to presume the best course of action here is to
get 1.33 uploaded, which I would hope also fixes it. I think
Ivan Kohler is already looking into doing that at present...
cheers,
Ron
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:07:03PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 04:27 +
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-31
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: can result in disk consumption and ultimately lead to a denial
of service condition.
Just a reminder,
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14529/info
Ubuntu^1 already fixed the xpdf packages. I guess we're affected too,
Tags: unreproducible
---snip---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/netperf-2.4.0$ ls -lrt ..
total 1664
-rw-r--r-- 1 erik Debian 1136837 May 29 19:47 netperf_2.4.0.orig.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 erik Debian 566 Aug 10 22:24 netperf_2.4.0-2.diff.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 erik Debian 359 Aug 10 22:24 netperf_2.4.0-2.d
Package: gksu
Version: 1.3.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After the latest upgrade gksu has stopped working. It gives a segfault
when called with a command to run specified
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (9
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:15:38 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line problem was already fixed in the upload done today
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 322423 grave
Bug#322423: $servers[$i]['disable_anon_bind'] = true doesn't prevent anonymous
to access ldap directory
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping pro
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:00:23PM -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
> Package: revelation
> Followup-For: Bug #318012
> Please mark this bug as unfixed. Indeed, a correction is in order, Revelation
> can't
> be installed because python2.3-crypto can't be installed. This is using
> sid.
And that is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 320891 +pending
Bug#320891: libmpich1.0: libpmpich++.so.1.0 is not linked against the libraries
it depends on
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tag 321052 +pending
Bug#321052: mpich: clean target does not undo all the effects of build
Tags we
tag 320891 +pending
tag 321052 +pending
tag 321093 +pending
tag 321158 +pending
thanks
> As the diff is sort of big, I will wait a bit before making the upload
> despite being in 0-day NMU policy; I'd really like to upload (or not)
> after having heard from you, but note that I can't wait in
Hi,
Torsten Landschoff:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:44:42AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Sigh. This is not supposed to happen...
> >
> > Do you have a build log?
>
> Attached.
>
OK, I have looked at the sources. The problem is that the X509 data
structures and functions have been moved t
I too confirm this bug. When it crashes there is no output. Strace
output also appeared to not be very useful. The fix mentioned above
does work:
If you are running Sid and have the kdelibs4 and kdelibs-bin version 3.3.2-7
installed:
1. go to snapshot.debian.net
(http://snapshot.debian.net/arc
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Followup-For: Bug #309308
Just noticed this bug in the testing-security list. I don't know if the
below patch has been slurped into the Debian patches for 2.6.8, but the
error posted looks like the same error I suffered when hitting this bug.
Patch from http:
Package: ifstat
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
ifstat doesnt work if you have libsnmp5 5.2.1.2-1 installed.
It does work if you have 5.1.2-6.1 installed.
$ ifstat -i FastEthernet3/1 -s [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ifstat: snmpgetnext(interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 322467 security
Bug#322467: [CAN-2005-2097] Loca Table Verification Remote Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Tags were: patch
Tags added: security
>
End of message, stopping proce
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:33:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322166: fixed in vlc 0.8.4-svn20050810-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
