Package: login
Version: 1:4.0.3-39
Followup-For: Bug #330338
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/login_1%3a4.0.12-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/de/man1/login.1.gz', which is also in
package manpages-de
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 222384 - security
Bug#222384: mason: Mason does not setup /etc/rc.* links
Tags were: patch sarge security
Tags removed: security
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:47:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326493: fixed in showimg 0.9.4.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:47:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327973: fixed in kuake 0.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:47:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328021: fixed in kbiff 3.7.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330373: fixed in dvbtune 0.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 329642 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#329642: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on ppc
There were no tags set.
Bug#330015: FTBFS: [powerpc] udefined reference to memcpy@@GLIBC_2.0 in libxpt.a
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Thanks! This is ready for next upload whenever that happens, already
had uploaded /u+x (which appears to be working).
Take care,
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2005-09-26 Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Sat, Sep 24
Package: rails
Version: 0.13.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ rails /tmp/test
/usr/share/rails/railties/bin/../lib/../../activesupport/lib/active_support/clean_logger.rb:13:in
`remove_const': constant Logger::Format not defined (NameError)
from
/usr/share/rails/rail
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > adding cc to debian-kernel to investigate the mips/mipsel failure:
> > E: Couldn't find package linux-headers-2.6.12-1
>
> The mips/mipsel packages are only in experimental ATM. I hope to
> prepare an unstable upload t
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:21:10PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > severity 330191 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >
> > > klibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> > > pbuilder. It also failed on some othe
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:31:59AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> Dalibor Topic's latest mail states that kaffe should be fixed. Can this
> subversion bug be closed?
No. kaffe is *not* portable to all architectures; it should be possible to
build kaffe on arm with the latest version, but a) this hasn'
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327320: fixed in swscanner 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328006: fixed in swscanner 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:56:20AM -0500, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:34:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > found 325286 1.2-1
> > thanks
> > This bug is still present in tagcolledit 1.2-1:
> > Source: tagcolledit
> > Section: misc
> > Priority: optional
> > Maintainer: Enri
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 17:51 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:29:49AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: no longer builds from source
> >
> >
> > Seems like 2.6.12-10 fails to build on sparc
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 318176 + fixed
Bug#318176: imagemagick in combination with transcode fails (amd64)
There were no tags set.
Bug#325651: ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or
directory.
Bug#325720: File read error
Tags added: fixed
> tag
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:20:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324568: fixed in pari 2.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 327969 + patch pending
Bug#327969: knetfilter: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: pending sid
Tags added: patch, pending
>
End of message, stopping
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:25:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304758: fixed in gnomoradio 0.15.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:25:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323065: fixed in sqlxx 2.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:27:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328075: fixed in tagcoll 1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:26:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329894: fixed in strutilsxx 0.7.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Thx.
I have uploaded a fixed version to my sponsor, but he has not yet
uploaded to main arch.
I think this fix will be fine in the interim.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
> Attached the patch for the version
Adeodato Simó wrote:
>Hi, Adeodato:
>
>Hello,
>
> I plan on uploading NMUs for the above bugs very soon. The packages are:
>
>[snip]
>kwirelessmonitor 0.5.91-1.1
>[snip]
>
I have had *enormous trouble* recompiling kwirelessmonitor with the new
toolchain... any "incantation" to make it
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:30:51PM -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
>Package: cdrecord
>Version: 4:2.01+01a03-2
>Severity: grave
>Justification: renders package unusable
>
>With latest version of cdrecord, k3b, gnomebaker and cdrecord command
>line fail to allocate a scsi buffer and fail.
Can you plea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 328244
Bug#328244: Most of imlib+png2 uninstallable (depends on removed libpng10)
Bug is not marked as being merged with any others.
> reassign 328244 gcc-h8300-hms
Bug#328244: Most of imlib+png2 uninstallable (depends on removed libpng10)
Bug
Yes, this was a typo -a missing '\n' in the control file. I committed a
fix last night.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mondo
Version: 2.04-6
I've made a few more experiments with mindi :
I tried to downgrade mondo, mindi, mindi-busybox (back to sarge versions) and
syslinux (even back to woody...) and the problem remained !
So, I tried the other way : I started with a pure sarge, upgraded mindi,
mindi
Hi Luk,
thank you for the NMU. I debianised a new upstream version
of qtdmm that accomodates your patch in
http://public.pzr.uni-rostock.de/~moeller/debian/qtdmm/
and informed my sponsor Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about
its existance.
Cheers,
Steffen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:59:37 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
* Daniel Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Alexander Sack wrote:
> > You still fail to give reasons why MPL is non-free. I don't see that.
> >
> > Yes, its not gpl-compatible, but again, that is not the same as non-free.
>
> debian-legal has some problems with the license, it is not clearly
>
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327964: fixed in icomlib 1.0.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317577 important
Bug#317577: libapache-mod-php4: php_value specified in within a
virtualhost-section may spread to other v-hosts
Severity set to `important'.
> severity 330419 important
Bug#330419: php4: Random open basedir restrictions as de
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package
Severity: serious
The problem:
* linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 build-depends on kernel images.
* build daemons install packages in noninteractive mode
* the kernel images do not install successfully in noninteractive mo
> No, I don't have a personal desire, though I can orphan the package for
> you if you want...
That would be great. Thanks Luk.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System
---
K3b Version: 0.12
KDE Version: 3.4.2
QT Version: 3.3.5
Kernel: 2.6.11-1-k7
Devices
---
LITE-ON DVDRW LDW-451S GSB6 (/dev/hdc, ) at /cdrom [CD-R; CD-RW; CD-ROM;
DVD-ROM; DVD-RW; DVD+R; DVD+RW] [DVD-ROM; DVD-R Sequential; DVD-RW
Restricted
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.82
Severity: serious
sh-3.00# dpkg -P --pending
(Reading database ... 8535 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing initrd-tools ...
Purging configuration files for initrd-tools ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/initrd-tools.postrm: line 7: update-modules: comma
I had prevented myself from upgrading to the latest version of dovecot
due to this grave bug. I've upgraded and haven't had a problem with
Maildir delivery.
mike
--
Michael R Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: http://www.suppressingfire.org/~burner/gpg.key.txt (ID 0x9932A319)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
tags 330446 + pending
thanks
I've comitted the following patch to svn.
--- debian/initrd-tools.postrm (revision 4292)
+++ debian/initrd-tools.postrm (working copy)
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
if [ "$1" = purge ]; then
rm -rf /etc/mkinitrd
- update-modules
+ if [ -x /sbin/update-module
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330446 + pending
Bug#330446: fails to purge if module utilities are not installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
reassign 330445 kernel-package
thanks
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> Package:
> linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package
> Severity: serious
>
> The problem:
> * linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 build-depends on kernel images.
> * build d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 330445 kernel-package
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
Bug reassigned from package
`linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package' to
`kernel-package'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
severity 330445 normal
merge 330445 115884
thanks
Hi,
This is not really a serious bug:
,[ Policy document ]
| 6.3. Controlling terminal for maintainer scripts
|
|
| The maintainer scripts are guaranteed to run with a controlling
severity 330445 serious
thanks
> The fact that kernel-package does not have these image
> packages use debconf is a bug (a normal bug, so far), and I am thus
> merging this report with the other "use debconf" reports.
http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
Point 4, Autobuilding.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 330445 normal
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 330445 115884
Bug#115884: using debconf
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
Bug#247782: does not install no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 330445 serious
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
Bug#115884: using debconf
Bug#247782: does not install non-interactively
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Eric Dorland wrote:
> If there was no final decision/consensus, isn't it a bit premature to
> start filing bugs against packages?
Well, I first thought there is no 'license-mix' at the code-base, so
there is just a wrong/incomplete debian/copyright which can easily be
corrected.
Now that I know
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 329642 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#329642: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on ppc
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Bug#330015: FTBFS: [powerpc] udefined reference to memcpy@@GLIBC_2.0 in libxpt.a
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental
> close 329642 1.4.99+1.5
Hi,
Sounds to me that the package in question is getting ahead of
policy and deciding that the debconf transition is over. Well, is it
just powerpc debian installer that build depends on kernel-images?
Why? I am not sure that merely making this go over to debconf is
going to change th
severity 324470 normal
thanks
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael R Head wrote:
I had prevented myself from upgrading to the latest version of dovecot
due to this grave bug. I've upgraded and haven't had a problem with
Maildir delivery.
Thanks for the report Mike.
Olivier, can you confirm if 1.0.a
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk
space available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:10:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs: package no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:10:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs: package no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 324470 normal
Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd: Fails to copy new mails from new to cur directory
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:48:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330338: login: Same Problem with
man-pages in german
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Hi Christian!
Debian Bug Tracking System [2005-09-26 11:33 -0700]:
> > - as you stated in your next mail, it doesn't seem that sarge/4.0 is
> > affected. - sarge doesn't carry a 5.0 version
> > - thus all sid versions should be okay too.
>
> After checking the advisory I would say that Sean is
This built fine for me in a fresh sid pbuilder chroot. I've uploaded
the result of that build.
--
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
> build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk
> space available.
Thanks for that information. I think Dannf was plaining to
do a binary-upload. B
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:33:02 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line worked for me too
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
101 - 160 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
