Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 324302 grave
Bug#324302: mindi image broken with libc6 2.3.4
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 324302 329246
Bug#324302: mindi image broken with libc6 2.3.4
Bug#329246: mondoarchive failing when booting in compare mode
Mismatch - only Bugs in
Package: animal-dev
Version: 0.14.3-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
animal needs to be recompiled with a more recent libmagick:
# apt-get install animal-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an
Package: paintlib-dev
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install paintlib-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
tags 332729 - experimental
Bug#332729: curl_7.14.1-3(experimental/mips/sigrun): FTBFS - autoconf error
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
End of message, stopping
Package: libraptor1-dev
Version: 1.4.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install libraptor1-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 19:52 +0200, Raphael Slinckx wrote:
I've applied the fixes (at least the missing ones some were already
fixed) to deskbar-applet CVS !
Cool.
Also, this is a great applet, but the startup time is a little long :/
Being worked on..
Cool.
Also, I get heaps of these
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 333118 gtkboard
Bug#333118: gcc-4.0: Segfaulting code generated for gtkboard-0.11pre0
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `gtkboard'.
severity 333118 grave
Bug#333118: gcc-4.0: Segfaulting code generated for gtkboard-0.11pre0
Severity
Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
please note that the patch does still not prevent raggle from crashing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# raggle
Raggle: Loading config...
Raggle: Loading feed list...
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `transfer': allocator undefined for
Bignum (TypeError)
from
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:31:39AM -0500, Diego Escalante wrote:
Well, the concrete problem is that it seg faults while trying to parse
a 60Kb~ text (I guess that all-at-once). Since I don't have a s390 nor
programming skills,
I found the problem. StreamPrintF (src/streams.c) used a va_list
Package: mozilla-thunderbird
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
thunderbird goes in a infinite loop at start-up : the GUI doesn't start
and the following messages are printed in the terminal :
mozilla-thunderbird
selected
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
close 329839 2.2.10-1
Bug#329839: buffer overflow security fix
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.2.10-1, send
hi akira,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:30:46PM +0900, akira yamada wrote:
Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
please note that the patch does still not prevent raggle from crashing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# raggle
Raggle: Loading config...
Raggle: Loading feed list...
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:50:28AM -0700, Arthur Barlow wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just did an update of packages with aptitude. After I rebooted X
could not be brought up, and the error log did not list any information.
on python.)
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20051011-0408
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
severity 333265 important
thanks
as long as this is not reported happening to anyone, I guess it is
unreproducible.
Can you please try if latest from unsable solves your problem?
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 324382 + fixed
Bug#324382: installs files into user's home directory while building
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 333265 important
Bug#333265: mozilla-thunderbird: infinite loop at start-up
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 327610 + fixed
Bug#327610: libabz: FTBFS: iptables.h:49: error: 'iptables_add' aliased to
external symbol 'batch_add'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
retitle 333024 gco: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package gdk-imlib1-dev
retitle 333035 gtk-engines: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package
gdk-imlib1-dev
retitle 333047 xzgv: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package
gdk-imlib1-dev
retitle 333038 mozart-gtk: FTBFS:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
severity 263252 grave
Bug#263252: gnome-iconedit: links to older libpng2 package
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 263252 328343
Bug#263252: gnome-iconedit: links to older libpng2
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 333024 gco: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package
gdk-imlib1-dev
Bug#333024: gco: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev)
Changed Bug title.
retitle 333035 gtk-engines: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev
provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi,
for the faulty behaviour of bash test -e I added a workaround for
udev without having to install /bin/dash.
The bug is only present when HAVE_DEV_STDIN is not defined, which is
the case when /dev/std{in,err,out} is not present at build time.
The build logs all define HAVE_DEV_STDIN - except
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:47:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332729: fixed in curl 7.14.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Kurt,
I don't think that your patch is correct. There are asm files for some
of the architecture. The change is, that they do not reside anymore in
the asm/ directory.
I try to make the correct patch and commit it to svn.
Christoph
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.8-1
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
dh_clean
Strange that I didn't find it in my pbuilder runs.
You added a Build-Depends-Indep on quilt, but you're
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 328364 + fixed
Bug#328364: incorrect debian/copyright file
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:16:12 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing because fixed in unstable...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:20:27AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:37:50PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
Package: discover1
Version: 1.7.14
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
discover1 failed to build on a sparc buildd,
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 03:32:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327305: fixed in davfs2 0.2.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:14:59PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
The culprit is clearly the only Debian patch included in the 1.1.1-2
klibc source package (debian/patches//klibc-sparc64-signals.diff). It
looks like it's just a leftover from some previous version, at least the
patch header
severity 333197 important
thanks
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:02:54PM +0200, Karsten Voss wrote:
With kernel 2.6.12 the module ide-scsi is always loaded and takes over
the DVD Burner. This makes the drive unusable. iso9660 CD-ROMs or DVDs
cannot be mounted.
Which version of udev are
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:42:09AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:20:27AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:37:50PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
Package: discover1
Version: 1.7.14
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer
Hi Thierry, all
First of all, thanks a lot for the further information you provide.
Now, I've looked into the issue with calling mindi directly specifying
the FAILSAFE kernel, and can vonfirm there is an issue. I attach patch
TryToBeCleverAboutInitrd_BTS324302.diff that fixes the problem for
Package: metalog
Version: 0.7beta-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: group should be adm.
i've earlier submitted a bug here, regarding the belongings of the logfiles,
which afaik led to metalog not making it into sarge.
the cheap solution looks the following:
in the post-install
I'm waiting for the new gnustep upstream tarball release
to enter sid, and that'll be the moment these will also
be fixed (partly also with new upstream versions of the
software).
That'll also fix the libfreetype FTC problem that currently
exists in sid.
Yours,
Gürkan
Hi Thierry again
Thanks a lot for sending this through!
It's one call of sed and that's it, so that's cool. However running it,
we get e.g. for 'ldd /bin/grep'):
libc.so.6 /lib/tls/libc.so.6
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-linux.so.2
which means that things appear effectively twice for every row.
severity 329468 important
thanks
Being able to debootstrap woody chroots is certainly not a release-critical
issue for etch; woody will drop off the Debian mirror network well before
etch is released anyway.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 329468 important
Bug#329468: debootstrap: woody installation fails
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
tags 330893 sarge etch
Bug#330893: eric: Arbitrary code execution when generating documentation for a
malicious project file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, etch
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
tags 329564 sid
Bug#329564: epiphany: cannot be installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Andrew,
What is the status of this bug? You've tagged the bug sarge and referred
to a post requesting sponsorship of an upload to proposed-updates, but this
bug affects all of sarge, etch, and sid and the archive will not accept an
upload of a package to proposed-updates newer than the version
Hi Rogério, all
There will be an upload soon, don't worry. I would just like to make
sure that the problem is addressed properly and without regressions.
I noticed that you tried to merge bugs 324302 and 329246. You can only
merge bugs that are assigned to the same package which is not the case
Frank == Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frank Package: xezmlm Severity: serious
Frank xezmlm depends on ezmlm which was recently removed from
Frank unstable. While this is not in itself an RC bug, because
Frank xezmlm is in contrib, you need to make provisions that
Ulf Harnhammar wrote:
No, you don't need to set up a rogue CDDB server, as CDDB servers let anyone
add or modify information about records.
But according to the freedb.org FAQs every submission is reviewed before being
applied to the database. So it seems quite unlikely submissions of crafted
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:57:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gnome-spell woody package depends on packages not in woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
reassign 285025 imlib1 1.9.14-2woody2
close 285025 1.9.14-16.2
thanks
This is a security bug that was reported against the version of imlib1 in
woody. The corresponding bug against imlib11 was already fixed for sarge,
and imlib11 was not included in woody. If this bug still exists at all, it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 285025 imlib1 1.9.14-2woody2
Bug#285025: imlib1: CAN-2004-0817 is not fixed.
Bug reassigned from package `imlib11' to `imlib1'.
close 285025 1.9.14-16.2
Bug#285025: imlib1: CAN-2004-0817 is not fixed.
'close' is deprecated; see
Is this reproducible (e.g. all the timesyou click on that entry?)?
If I click on a new message, it segfaults
if I click on an already red msgs, it sooner or later crashes
Does this happen with a fresh profile too? (e.g. with a new unix-account)?
I moved .mozilla-thunderbird away and it
Which version of udev are you using? I suspect this is causing ide-scsi
to get loaded.
Version: 0.070-2
Thanks
--
Karsten
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ICQ#: 129656852; AIM: karstenek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.8-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
OpenSSL does not version symbols. This means all applications that somehow
end up linked to both openssl 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 segfault or behave otherwise
erratically (which would be a critical bug by
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:06:54 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333173: postgresql-8.0 fails to install correctly on sparc
platform
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I guess this might be the same as ffox bug #319336.
I see they backported a patch, do you know if there's one available for tb?
--
Martin Sarsale - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gpdf
Version: 2.8.2-1.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I try to open a pdf file in gpdf, it fails with the following message on
console:
(gpdf:8780): Bonobo-CRITICAL **: bonobo_control_frame_control_activate:
assertion `frame-priv-control !=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 330867 critical
Bug#330867: libssl0.9.7 g series break pam_pgsql
Severity set to `critical'.
merge 330867 49
Bug#330867: libssl0.9.7 g series break pam_pgsql
Bug#49: openssl: Must either version symbols or conflict with ALL libraries
Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:12:59 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326997: FTBFS: Can't find module IO in user directories
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:17:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332901: fixed in ispell-czech 20040229-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi Sam!
Sam Hartman [2005-10-09 16:56 -0400]:
Hi. I cannot reproduce this. My desktop is a powerpc machine and I
build all my packages (including ones that depend on krb5) on it just
fine.
Odd. Then why is postgresql-8.0 on powerpc building fine on Ubuntu,
but not on the Debian buildds? Do
debian/rules.defs:
DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM)
debian/rules2:
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux)
lib_arlib =
libstdc++-$(LIBSTDCXX_IF)$(LIBC_IF)$(CXX_IF)-$(lib_version).a
lib_marlink =
severity 54 normal
thanks
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:02:12PM +0200, CAiRO wrote:
When I try to open a pdf file in gpdf, it fails with the following message on
console:
(gpdf:8780): Bonobo-CRITICAL **: bonobo_control_frame_control_activate:
assertion `frame-priv-control !=
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:47:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332561: fixed in dict-gazetteer2k 1.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:46:27PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Frank == Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frank Package: xezmlm Severity: serious
Frank xezmlm depends on ezmlm which was recently removed from
Frank unstable. While this is not in itself an RC bug,
I have no amd system to test. If you feel comfortable to test the
patch on your own, I can send you brief instructions on howto do it.
please, go ahead :)
--
Martin Sarsale - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blars Blarson wrote:
debian-installer failed to build on my sparc pbuilder:
(it failed on a sparc buildd due to /proc not being mounted)
if [ -d ./tmp/sparc64_netboot-2.6/tree/etc/udev ] || [ -d
./tmp/sparc64_netboot-2.6/tree/etc/hotplug ]; then \
find
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:24:31PM -0300, Martin Sarsale wrote:
I have no amd system to test. If you feel comfortable to test the
patch on your own, I can send you brief instructions on howto do it.
please, go ahead :)
OK,
1. use apt-get source mozilla-thunderbird to get the source
2.
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Please try the attached patch and see if the generated binary works.
Compiles and runs fine on my Ultra 10.
Output of old and new versions attached.
Cheers,
FJP
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:35:42PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:24:31PM -0300, Martin Sarsale wrote:
I have no amd system to test. If you feel comfortable to test the
patch on your own, I can send you brief instructions on howto do it.
please, go ahead :)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:17:39 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332215: fixed in uw-imap 7:2002edebian1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:17:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327926: fixed in ace 5.4.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
nl_NL.myaff
cd wl cp dutch.munchlist nl.wl prezip nl.wl gzip nl.cwl
/bin/sh: prezip: command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
**
Build finished at 20051011-1544
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
severity 333239 important
thanks
* Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
The most recent spamassassin v3.1.0 changed the format of the
loglines that mailgraph reads. Mailgraph no longer thinks that the
machine is receiving or identifying any spam.
This patch was included in mailgraph cvs last week:
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 333239 important
Bug#333239: spamassassin 3.1.0 log changes break mailgraph
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: gnome-icon-theme-gartoon
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: serious
gnome-icon-theme relies on librsvg2-common (which contains the SVG
plugin for GTK+) for applications to read the SVG files, but doesn't
depend on it.
Currently, librsvg2-2 depends on librsvg2-common, which masks the issue,
but
Hello,
can you give linux-image-2.6.13-1-amd64-k8 from experimental a try?
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
**
Build finished at 20051011-1544
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
I am aware of this bug, but according to policy my package is ok: it
lists in Build-Depends-Indep the packages it depends for (in this case
aspell) for the build target (policy 7.6
Thank you so much for your help Bastian.
I'm uploading a new htp later.
--
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you,
then they fight you, then you win -Ghandi
La primavera llega con dificultad
http://diegoe.blogspot.com
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:57:19 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
Hi Andree and all,
Now, I've looked into the issue with calling mindi directly specifying
the FAILSAFE kernel, and can vonfirm there is an issue. I attach patch
TryToBeCleverAboutInitrd_BTS324302.diff that fixes the problem for me.
Note that you need to have a 2.4 kernel _running_ when using the
reopen 332322
thanks
This bug have been closed without a reason.
Bastian
--
There is an order of things in this universe.
-- Apollo, Who Mourns for Adonais? stardate 3468.1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:26:21PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I am aware of this bug, but according to policy my package is ok: it
lists in Build-Depends-Indep the packages it depends for (in this case
aspell) for the build target (policy 7.6 explicitly allows this) that
the buildd is
tags 332955 patch
thanks
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 14:58 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Package: scalapack
Version: 1.7-9
Severity: serious
Greetings,
scalapack is failing to build on arm and PPC. On arm, the error is:
gcc -o /home/hazelsct/scalapack-1.7/TESTING/xigemr pigemrdrv.o -L
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 332955 patch
Bug#332955: scalapack: FTBFS, test linking with libf2c is missing MAIN__()
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 332322
Bug#332322: htp_1.15-2 (unstable): fails to build
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo