Processed: BTS

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 324302 grave Bug#324302: mindi image broken with libc6 2.3.4 Severity set to `grave'. merge 324302 329246 Bug#324302: mindi image broken with libc6 2.3.4 Bug#329246: mondoarchive failing when booting in compare mode Mismatch - only Bugs in

Bug#333254: animal-dev: not installable in sid

2005-10-11 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Package: animal-dev Version: 0.14.3-1 Severity: grave Hi, animal needs to be recompiled with a more recent libmagick: # apt-get install animal-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an

Bug#333260: paintlib-dev: not installable in sid

2005-10-11 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Package: paintlib-dev Version: 2.6.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install paintlib-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an

Processed: tagging 332729

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 332729 - experimental Bug#332729: curl_7.14.1-3(experimental/mips/sigrun): FTBFS - autoconf error Tags were: experimental Tags removed: experimental End of message, stopping

Bug#333259: libraptor1-dev: not installable in sid

2005-10-11 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Package: libraptor1-dev Version: 1.4.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install libraptor1-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested

Bug#332850: deskbar-applet python 2.3 compatability patch

2005-10-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 19:52 +0200, Raphael Slinckx wrote: I've applied the fixes (at least the missing ones some were already fixed) to deskbar-applet CVS ! Cool. Also, this is a great applet, but the startup time is a little long :/ Being worked on.. Cool. Also, I get heaps of these

Processed: Re: Bug#333119: gcc-4.0: Segfaulting code generated for gtkboard-0.11pre0

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 333118 gtkboard Bug#333118: gcc-4.0: Segfaulting code generated for gtkboard-0.11pre0 Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `gtkboard'. severity 333118 grave Bug#333118: gcc-4.0: Segfaulting code generated for gtkboard-0.11pre0 Severity

Bug#331050: ..

2005-10-11 Thread akira yamada
Michael Ablassmeier wrote: please note that the patch does still not prevent raggle from crashing: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# raggle Raggle: Loading config... Raggle: Loading feed list... /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `transfer': allocator undefined for Bignum (TypeError) from

Bug#332322: htp segmentation fault

2005-10-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:31:39AM -0500, Diego Escalante wrote: Well, the concrete problem is that it seg faults while trying to parse a 60Kb~ text (I guess that all-at-once). Since I don't have a s390 nor programming skills, I found the problem. StreamPrintF (src/streams.c) used a va_list

Bug#333265: mozilla-thunderbird: infinite loop at start-up

2005-10-11 Thread Marty Patrick
Package: mozilla-thunderbird Version: 1.0.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable thunderbird goes in a infinite loop at start-up : the GUI doesn't start and the following messages are printed in the terminal : mozilla-thunderbird selected

Processed: closing 329839

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 close 329839 2.2.10-1 Bug#329839: buffer overflow security fix 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.2.10-1, send

Bug#331050: ..

2005-10-11 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
hi akira, On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:30:46PM +0900, akira yamada wrote: Michael Ablassmeier wrote: please note that the patch does still not prevent raggle from crashing: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# raggle Raggle: Loading config... Raggle: Loading feed list...

Bug#333151: upgrade-reports: X broken after apt-get upgrade

2005-10-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:50:28AM -0700, Arthur Barlow wrote: Package: upgrade-reports Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just did an update of packages with aptitude. After I rebooted X could not be brought up, and the error log did not list any information.

Bug#333271: rpm - missing build-dependency against python

2005-10-11 Thread Bastian Blank
on python.) make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051011-0408 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#333265: mozilla-thunderbird: infinite loop at start-up

2005-10-11 Thread Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
severity 333265 important thanks as long as this is not reported happening to anyone, I guess it is unreproducible. Can you please try if latest from unsable solves your problem? - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g.

Processed: Fixed in NMU of cogito 0.12.1+20050730-1.1

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 324382 + fixed Bug#324382: installs files into user's home directory while building Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#333265: mozilla-thunderbird: infinite loop at start-up

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 333265 important Bug#333265: mozilla-thunderbird: infinite loop at start-up Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libabz 0.6.1.1

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327610 + fixed Bug#327610: libabz: FTBFS: iptables.h:49: error: 'iptables_add' aliased to external symbol 'batch_add' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#333024: gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed

2005-10-11 Thread Steve Langasek
retitle 333024 gco: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package gdk-imlib1-dev retitle 333035 gtk-engines: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package gdk-imlib1-dev retitle 333047 xzgv: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package gdk-imlib1-dev retitle 333038 mozart-gtk: FTBFS:

Processed: severity of 263252 is grave, merging 263252 328343

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 severity 263252 grave Bug#263252: gnome-iconedit: links to older libpng2 package Severity set to `grave'. merge 263252 328343 Bug#263252: gnome-iconedit: links to older libpng2

Bug#333019: marked as done (eboard: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333018: marked as done (cronosii: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333022: marked as done (fidelio: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 333024 gco: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package gdk-imlib1-dev Bug#333024: gco: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev) Changed Bug title. retitle 333035 gtk-engines: FTBFS: versioned build-dep on virtual package

Bug#333026: marked as done (gkrellm: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333028: marked as done (glimmer: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333025: marked as done (gfpoken: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333029: marked as done (gmgaclock: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333031: marked as done (gnome-pilot: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333032: marked as done (gnome-pilot-conduits: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333027: marked as done (gkrellweather: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333033: marked as done (gnome-pim: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333037: marked as done (ircii-pana: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333041: marked as done (qiv: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333023: marked as done (fvwm: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333045: marked as done (unixodbc: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333044: marked as done (transcalc: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333043: marked as done (smilutils: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#333036: marked as done (gtkgo: FTBFS (Build-Depends on imlib1-dev or gdk-imlib1-dev))

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:21:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gdk-imlib1 installable again in unstable, gdk-imlib11-dev provides gdk-imlib1-dev: no rebuilds needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#327477: Breaks /dev/stdin, stdout, and stderr with UDEV.

2005-10-11 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
Hi, for the faulty behaviour of bash test -e I added a workaround for udev without having to install /bin/dash. The bug is only present when HAVE_DEV_STDIN is not defined, which is the case when /dev/std{in,err,out} is not present at build time. The build logs all define HAVE_DEV_STDIN - except

Bug#332729: marked as done (curl_7.14.1-3(experimental/mips/sigrun): FTBFS - autoconf error)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332729: fixed in curl 7.14.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#332758: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#332758: openssl: FTBFS: Still uses asm/$arch.o for some arches.

2005-10-11 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Kurt, I don't think that your patch is correct. There are asm files for some of the architecture. The change is, that they do not reside anymore in the asm/ directory. I try to make the correct patch and commit it to svn. Christoph Kurt Roeckx schrieb: Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8-1

Bug#332840: tetex-bin: FTBFS: quilt: command not found

2005-10-11 Thread Frank Küster
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-7 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: dh_clean Strange that I didn't find it in my pbuilder runs. You added a Build-Depends-Indep on quilt, but you're

Processed: Fixed in NMU of cabber 0.4.0-test5-2.1

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328364 + fixed Bug#328364: incorrect debian/copyright file Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#318590: marked as done (libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:16:12 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing because fixed in unstable... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#333217: discover1: ftbfs [sparc] error: too few arguments to function 'init_lst'

2005-10-11 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:20:27AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Hi On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:37:50PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: discover1 Version: 1.7.14 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source discover1 failed to build on a sparc buildd,

Bug#327305: marked as done (davfs2: FTBFS (amd64): /usr/include/linux/coda.h:762: error: variable or field '__user' declared void)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 03:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327305: fixed in davfs2 0.2.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#330191: klibc: ftbfs [sparc] redefinition of 'struct __new_sigaction'

2005-10-11 Thread Maximilian Attems
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:14:59PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: The culprit is clearly the only Debian patch included in the 1.1.1-2 klibc source package (debian/patches//klibc-sparc64-signals.diff). It looks like it's just a leftover from some previous version, at least the patch header

Bug#333197: linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8-smp: Cannot keep ide-scsi from loading

2005-10-11 Thread Frederik Schueler
severity 333197 important thanks Hello, On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:02:54PM +0200, Karsten Voss wrote: With kernel 2.6.12 the module ide-scsi is always loaded and takes over the DVD Burner. This makes the drive unusable. iso9660 CD-ROMs or DVDs cannot be mounted. Which version of udev are

Bug#333217: discover1: ftbfs [sparc] error: too few arguments to function 'init_lst'

2005-10-11 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:42:09AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:20:27AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Hi On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:37:50PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: discover1 Version: 1.7.14 Severity: serious Justification: no longer

Bug#324302: Why the first patch doesn't work for me

2005-10-11 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Hi Thierry, all First of all, thanks a lot for the further information you provide. Now, I've looked into the issue with calling mindi directly specifying the FAILSAFE kernel, and can vonfirm there is an issue. I attach patch TryToBeCleverAboutInitrd_BTS324302.diff that fixes the problem for

Bug#333328: metalog: group should be adm

2005-10-11 Thread Wilfried Goesgens
Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: group should be adm. i've earlier submitted a bug here, regarding the belongings of the logfiles, which afaik led to metalog not making it into sarge. the cheap solution looks the following: in the post-install

Bug#303888: FTBFS

2005-10-11 Thread Gürkan Sengün
I'm waiting for the new gnustep upstream tarball release to enter sid, and that'll be the moment these will also be fixed (partly also with new upstream versions of the software). That'll also fix the libfreetype FTC problem that currently exists in sid. Yours, Gürkan

Bug#324302: Just one sed command...

2005-10-11 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Hi Thierry again Thanks a lot for sending this through! It's one call of sed and that's it, so that's cool. However running it, we get e.g. for 'ldd /bin/grep'): libc.so.6 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 which means that things appear effectively twice for every row.

Bug#329468: debootstrap: woody installation fails

2005-10-11 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 329468 important thanks Being able to debootstrap woody chroots is certainly not a release-critical issue for etch; woody will drop off the Debian mirror network well before etch is released anyway. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS

Processed: Re: debootstrap: woody installation fails

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329468 important Bug#329468: debootstrap: woody installation fails Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: tagging 330893

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 330893 sarge etch Bug#330893: eric: Arbitrary code execution when generating documentation for a malicious project file There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge, etch End of

Processed: tagging 329564

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 329564 sid Bug#329564: epiphany: cannot be installed There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#313457: gnome-cpufreq-applet: package includes patches, but doesn't actually use them

2005-10-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Andrew, What is the status of this bug? You've tagged the bug sarge and referred to a post requesting sponsorship of an upload to proposed-updates, but this bug affects all of sarge, etch, and sid and the archive will not accept an upload of a package to proposed-updates newer than the version

Bug#324302: mindi image broken with libc6 2.3.4

2005-10-11 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Hi Rogério, all There will be an upload soon, don't worry. I would just like to make sure that the problem is addressed properly and without regressions. I noticed that you tried to merge bugs 324302 and 329246. You can only merge bugs that are assigned to the same package which is not the case

Bug#332366: depends on removed package

2005-10-11 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
Frank == Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Frank Package: xezmlm Severity: serious Frank xezmlm depends on ezmlm which was recently removed from Frank unstable. While this is not in itself an RC bug, because Frank xezmlm is in contrib, you need to make provisions that

Bug#332919: No

2005-10-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Ulf Harnhammar wrote: No, you don't need to set up a rogue CDDB server, as CDDB servers let anyone add or modify information about records. But according to the freedb.org FAQs every submission is reviewed before being applied to the database. So it seems quite unlikely submissions of crafted

Bug#231483: marked as done (gnome-spell woody package depends on packages not in woody)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:57:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gnome-spell woody package depends on packages not in woody has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#285025: imlib1: CAN-2004-0817 is not fixed

2005-10-11 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 285025 imlib1 1.9.14-2woody2 close 285025 1.9.14-16.2 thanks This is a security bug that was reported against the version of imlib1 in woody. The corresponding bug against imlib11 was already fixed for sarge, and imlib11 was not included in woody. If this bug still exists at all, it

Processed: Re: imlib1: CAN-2004-0817 is not fixed

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 285025 imlib1 1.9.14-2woody2 Bug#285025: imlib1: CAN-2004-0817 is not fixed. Bug reassigned from package `imlib11' to `imlib1'. close 285025 1.9.14-16.2 Bug#285025: imlib1: CAN-2004-0817 is not fixed. 'close' is deprecated; see

Bug#332481: mozilla-thunderbird: Segfault in [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-10-11 Thread Martin Sarsale
Is this reproducible (e.g. all the timesyou click on that entry?)? If I click on a new message, it segfaults if I click on an already red msgs, it sooner or later crashes Does this happen with a fresh profile too? (e.g. with a new unix-account)? I moved .mozilla-thunderbird away and it

Bug#333197: linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8-smp: Cannot keep ide-scsi from loading

2005-10-11 Thread Karsten Voss
Which version of udev are you using? I suspect this is causing ide-scsi to get loaded. Version: 0.070-2 Thanks -- Karsten Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ICQ#: 129656852; AIM: karstenek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#333349: openssl: Must either version symbols or conflict with ALL libraries linked to previous version

2005-10-11 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software OpenSSL does not version symbols. This means all applications that somehow end up linked to both openssl 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 segfault or behave otherwise erratically (which would be a critical bug by

Bug#333173: marked as done (postgresql-8.0 fails to install correctly on sparc platform)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:06:54 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#333173: postgresql-8.0 fails to install correctly on sparc platform has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#332481: mozilla-thunderbird: Segfault in [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-10-11 Thread Martin Sarsale
I guess this might be the same as ffox bug #319336. I see they backported a patch, do you know if there's one available for tb? -- Martin Sarsale - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333354: gpdf doesn't show pdf files but remains empty

2005-10-11 Thread CAiRO
Package: gpdf Version: 2.8.2-1.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I try to open a pdf file in gpdf, it fails with the following message on console: (gpdf:8780): Bonobo-CRITICAL **: bonobo_control_frame_control_activate: assertion `frame-priv-control !=

Processed: merging related bugs

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 330867 critical Bug#330867: libssl0.9.7 g series break pam_pgsql Severity set to `critical'. merge 330867 49 Bug#330867: libssl0.9.7 g series break pam_pgsql Bug#49: openssl: Must either version symbols or conflict with ALL libraries

Bug#326997: marked as done (FTBFS: Can't find module IO in user directories)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:12:59 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#326997: FTBFS: Can't find module IO in user directories has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#332901: marked as done (iczech: Problem with post-installation script)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332901: fixed in ispell-czech 20040229-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#329686: Processed: Re: Bug#329686: FTBFS: fails to detect libkrb5

2005-10-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi Sam! Sam Hartman [2005-10-09 16:56 -0400]: Hi. I cannot reproduce this. My desktop is a powerpc machine and I build all my packages (including ones that depend on krb5) on it just fine. Odd. Then why is postgresql-8.0 on powerpc building fine on Ubuntu, but not on the Debian buildds? Do

Bug#323512: FTBFS: Unable to find libstdc++.a.2.10.0

2005-10-11 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
debian/rules.defs: DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM) debian/rules2: ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux) lib_arlib = libstdc++-$(LIBSTDCXX_IF)$(LIBC_IF)$(CXX_IF)-$(lib_version).a lib_marlink =

Bug#333354: gpdf doesn't show pdf files but remains empty

2005-10-11 Thread Filip Van Raemdonck
severity 54 normal thanks On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:02:12PM +0200, CAiRO wrote: When I try to open a pdf file in gpdf, it fails with the following message on console: (gpdf:8780): Bonobo-CRITICAL **: bonobo_control_frame_control_activate: assertion `frame-priv-control !=

Bug#332561: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to access /usr/share/misc/postal.codes.gz)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332561: fixed in dict-gazetteer2k 1.0.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#332366: depends on removed package

2005-10-11 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:46:27PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: Frank == Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Frank Package: xezmlm Severity: serious Frank xezmlm depends on ezmlm which was recently removed from Frank unstable. While this is not in itself an RC bug,

Bug#332481: mozilla-thunderbird: Segfault in [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-10-11 Thread Martin Sarsale
I have no amd system to test. If you feel comfortable to test the patch on your own, I can send you brief instructions on howto do it. please, go ahead :) -- Martin Sarsale - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333389: debian-installer: ftbfs [sparc] cannot stat `./tmp/sparc64_netboot-2.6/tree/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-1-sparc64'

2005-10-11 Thread Joey Hess
Blars Blarson wrote: debian-installer failed to build on my sparc pbuilder: (it failed on a sparc buildd due to /proc not being mounted) if [ -d ./tmp/sparc64_netboot-2.6/tree/etc/udev ] || [ -d ./tmp/sparc64_netboot-2.6/tree/etc/hotplug ]; then \ find

Bug#332481: mozilla-thunderbird: Segfault in [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-10-11 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:24:31PM -0300, Martin Sarsale wrote: I have no amd system to test. If you feel comfortable to test the patch on your own, I can send you brief instructions on howto do it. please, go ahead :) OK, 1. use apt-get source mozilla-thunderbird to get the source 2.

Bug#333217: discover1: ftbfs [sparc] error: too few arguments to function 'init_lst'

2005-10-11 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Please try the attached patch and see if the generated binary works. Compiles and runs fine on my Ultra 10. Output of old and new versions attached. Cheers, FJP Reading PCI hardware database... Reading PCI hardware database... Reading

Bug#332481: mozilla-thunderbird: Segfault in [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-10-11 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:35:42PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:24:31PM -0300, Martin Sarsale wrote: I have no amd system to test. If you feel comfortable to test the patch on your own, I can send you brief instructions on howto do it. please, go ahead :)

Bug#332215: marked as done (uw-imapd: [CAN-2005-2933] Buffer overflow in Netmailbox Name Parsing)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:17:39 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332215: fixed in uw-imap 7:2002edebian1-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#327926: marked as done (ace: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:17:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327926: fixed in ace 5.4.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#333419: dutch - fails to build

2005-10-11 Thread Bastian Blank
nl_NL.myaff cd wl cp dutch.munchlist nl.wl prezip nl.wl gzip nl.cwl /bin/sh: prezip: command not found make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 ** Build finished at 20051011-1544 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian

Bug#333239: spamassassin 3.1.0 log changes break mailgraph

2005-10-11 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
severity 333239 important thanks * Douglas F. Calvert wrote: The most recent spamassassin v3.1.0 changed the format of the loglines that mailgraph reads. Mailgraph no longer thinks that the machine is receiving or identifying any spam. This patch was included in mailgraph cvs last week: ---

Processed: Re: Bug#333239: spamassassin 3.1.0 log changes break mailgraph

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 333239 important Bug#333239: spamassassin 3.1.0 log changes break mailgraph Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#333421: gnome-icon-theme-gartoon: Should depend on librsvg2-common

2005-10-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: gnome-icon-theme-gartoon Version: 0.5-1 Severity: serious gnome-icon-theme relies on librsvg2-common (which contains the SVG plugin for GTK+) for applications to read the SVG files, but doesn't depend on it. Currently, librsvg2-2 depends on librsvg2-common, which masks the issue, but

Bug#325726:

2005-10-11 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, can you give linux-image-2.6.13-1-amd64-k8 from experimental a try? Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#333419: dutch - fails to build

2005-10-11 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
** Build finished at 20051011-1544 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian I am aware of this bug, but according to policy my package is ok: it lists in Build-Depends-Indep the packages it depends for (in this case aspell) for the build target (policy 7.6

Bug#332322: htp segmentation fault

2005-10-11 Thread Diego Escalante
Thank you so much for your help Bastian. I'm uploading a new htp later. -- First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win -Ghandi La primavera llega con dificultad http://diegoe.blogspot.com

Bug#332322: marked as done (htp_1.15-2 (unstable): fails to build)

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:57:19 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug

Bug#324302: Why the first patch doesn't work for me

2005-10-11 Thread thierry lathuille
Hi Andree and all, Now, I've looked into the issue with calling mindi directly specifying the FAILSAFE kernel, and can vonfirm there is an issue. I attach patch TryToBeCleverAboutInitrd_BTS324302.diff that fixes the problem for me. Note that you need to have a 2.4 kernel _running_ when using the

Bug#332322: acknowledged by developer ()

2005-10-11 Thread Bastian Blank
reopen 332322 thanks This bug have been closed without a reason. Bastian -- There is an order of things in this universe. -- Apollo, Who Mourns for Adonais? stardate 3468.1 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#333419: dutch - fails to build

2005-10-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:26:21PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: I am aware of this bug, but according to policy my package is ok: it lists in Build-Depends-Indep the packages it depends for (in this case aspell) for the build target (policy 7.6 explicitly allows this) that the buildd is

Bug#332955: scalapack: FTBFS, test linking with libf2c is missing MAIN__()

2005-10-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 332955 patch thanks On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 14:58 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Package: scalapack Version: 1.7-9 Severity: serious Greetings, scalapack is failing to build on arm and PPC. On arm, the error is: gcc -o /home/hazelsct/scalapack-1.7/TESTING/xigemr pigemrdrv.o -L

Processed: Re: scalapack: FTBFS, test linking with libf2c is missing MAIN__()

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 332955 patch Bug#332955: scalapack: FTBFS, test linking with libf2c is missing MAIN__() There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Re: Bug#332322 acknowledged by developer ()

2005-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 332322 Bug#332322: htp_1.15-2 (unstable): fails to build Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

  1   2   >