Bug#316637: newt: Etch is expected to be fully Unicode-compliant so fribidi should be in Depends, not Recommends

2005-11-21 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Martin-Éric Racine wrote: su, 2005-11-20 kello 18:14 -0800, Steve Langasek kirjoitti: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:43:47PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: su, 2005-11-20 kello 10:16 -0800, Steve Langasek kirjoitti: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:29:

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mantis 0.19.2-4.1

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 330682 + fixed Bug#330682: mantis: Several vulnerabilities in Mantis Tags were: fixed pending security Tags added: fixed > tag 335938 + fixed Bug#335938: mantis: Mantis "t_core_path" File Inclusion Vulnerability Tags were: fixed pending security Ta

Bug#337461: marked as done (toshutils: FTBFS: Unrecognized command line option "-fwritable-strings")

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:02:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337461: fixed in toshutils 2.0.1-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#327597: qgis uninstallable on unstable

2005-11-21 Thread Mark Robinson
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qgis_0.7.4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/qgis/georefplugin.so', which is also in package qgis-plugin-georeferencing piwakawaka:~# aptitude install qgis Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading

Bug#339200: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:53:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing #339200: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Processed: reassign 328969 to libroken16-kerberos4kth, merging 328969 281893

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > reassign 328969 libroken16-kerberos4kth Bug#328969: please move away from libdb4.1 Bug reassigned from package `krb4' to `libroken16-kerberos4kth'. > merge 328969 281893 Bug#281893: l

Processed: your mail

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 339891 with 339981 Bug#339891: evms: corrupts RAID-5 volumes when running in degraded mode Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 339981 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#340214: marked as done (uninstallable, needs rebuild)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:58:35 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line uninstallable, needs rebuild has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#339281: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)

2005-11-21 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 07:57:34AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > This bug report is filed against the source package which builds > a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing > *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either > g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (

Bug#339891: marked as done (evms: corrupts RAID-5 volumes when running in degraded mode)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:05:40 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing #339891 again has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#340207: marked as done (gmsh not installable on i386)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:53:49 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340207: gmsh not installable on i386 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: severity of 328969 is grave, merging 328969 281893

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > severity 328969 grave Bug#328969: please move away from libdb4.1 Severity set to `grave'. > merge 328969 281893 Bug#281893: libroken16-kerberos4kth is uninstallable because of libdb4.

Processed: severity of 281893 is grave, merging 281893 340208

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > severity 281893 grave Bug#281893: libroken16-kerberos4kth is uninstallable because of libdb4.1 removal Severity set to `grave'. > merge 281893 340208 Bug#281893: libroken16-kerberos4k

Bug#340169: marked as done (qgis: segfaults on startup)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:32:56 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340169: qgis: reinstall fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#340208: uninstallable, needs rebuild

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 340208 libroken16-kerberos4kth 1.2.2-11.3 Bug#340208: uninstallable, needs rebuild Bug reassigned from package `samba' to `libroken16-kerberos4kth'. > severity 340208 grave Bug#340208: uninstallable, needs rebuild Severity set to `grave'. > t

Bug#340208: uninstallable, needs rebuild

2005-11-21 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 340208 libroken16-kerberos4kth 1.2.2-11.3 severity 340208 grave thanks On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:16:02PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote: > The samba package is currently uninstallable, because the package > libdb4.1 is removed from the archive. But samba does not *depend* on libdb4.1; it

Processed: Re: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 326355 + patch Bug#326355: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#310690: sarge patch?

2005-11-21 Thread Geoff Crompton
Is sarge affected by this bug? -- Geoff Crompton Debian System Administrator Strategic Data +61 3 9340 9000 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326355: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency

2005-11-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
tags 326355 + patch thanks Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (02/09/2005): > The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version > will be removed from the archive in the near future. > Please change your build dependencies to > > libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev Hello, I was able

Bug#339416: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot find pgxs.mk)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:51:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339416: fixed in plr 1:0.6.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#331541: marked as done (gnupg-doc: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1] includes non-free documents)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:58:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331541: fixed in gnupg-doc 2003.04.06-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#338436: marked as done (sylpheed-claws: Buffer overflow in LDIF/pine/mutt import)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338436: fixed in sylpheed-claws 1.0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#340213: marked as done (uninstallable, needs rebuild)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:49:23 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line uninstallable, needs rebuild has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#340212: marked as done (uninstallable, needs rebuild)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:49:23 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line uninstallable, needs rebuild has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#340210: marked as done (uninstallable, needs rebuild)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:49:23 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line uninstallable, needs rebuild has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#340185: marked as done (coq: FTBFS: implementation doesn't match interface: parsing/pcoq*)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:48:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340185: fixed in coq 8.0pl2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#340102: marked as done (asterisk - FTBFS: Tries to build a i386 assembler file)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:47:28 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340102: fixed in asterisk 1:1.2.0.dfsg-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#338049: marked as done (Broken dependency - uninstallable in sid.)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:50:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338049: fixed in polygen 1.0.6.ds1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#333072: marked as done (pike7.6_7.6.33-2 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: glibc aborts in free())

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:50:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333072: fixed in pike7.6 7.6.51-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#339344: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339344: fixed in belpic 2.3.13.full-5)

2005-11-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:11:49PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > reopen 339344 > thank > > >* Fix unsigned int/size_t confusion in eidlib/CertifManager.cpp (Closes: > > #339344). > > This was only one occurance of this conversion. I was afraid you'd do that :-) Could you please install

Processed: libroken16-kerberos4kth is uninstallable

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 281893 serious Bug#281893: libroken16-kerberos4kth: Please link to libdb4.2 Severity set to `serious'. > retitle 281893 libroken16-kerberos4kth is uninstallable because of libdb4.1 > removal Bug#281893: libroken16-kerberos4kth: Please link to

Bug#340207: gmsh not installable on i386

2005-11-21 Thread Christophe Prud'homme
[ Monday 21 November 2005 22:09 ] | Package: gmsh | Version: 1.60.1-2 | Severity: serious | Justification: Policy 2.2.1 | | Christophe, | | It looks like you have gcc 4.1 from experimental installed on your | build system, and thus libgcc1 and libstdc++6 dependencies cannot | be satisfied on i386/u

Bug#340169: qgis: reinstall fixed

2005-11-21 Thread James Umbanhowar
Package: qgis Version: 0.7.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #340169 I purged then reinstalled and have no problems. sorry for the false alarm -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /

Bug#263235: maybe 4.3 instead of 4.2

2005-11-21 Thread Noèl Köthe
Hello, maybe use libdb4.3 instead of the older libdb4.2. -- Noèl Köthe Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#337496: basilisk2: Always crashes when starting up (home-built version does too)

2005-11-21 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
Hi, Basilisk II V1.0 by Christian Bauer et al. Reading ROM file... WARNING: Cannot open /dev/fd0u1440 (No such file or directory) WARNING: Cannot open /dev/fd1u1440 (No such file or directory) *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x082daef8 *** Aborted Please tell me whe

Bug#340214: uninstallable, needs rebuild

2005-11-21 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: python2.4-gnome2 Version: 2.10.0-4 Severity: serious Hi The package needs to be rebuild, because the package libdb4.1 is removed from the archive and now your package is uninstallable. Greetings Steffen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable A

Bug#340213: uninstallable, needs rebuild

2005-11-21 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: sound-juicer Version: 2.10.1-3 Severity: serious Hi The package needs to be rebuild, because the package libdb4.1 is removed from the archive and now your package is uninstallable. Greetings Steffen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT p

Bug#340212: uninstallable, needs rebuild

2005-11-21 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: totem-xine Version: 1.0.5-1 Severity: serious Hi The package needs to be rebuild, because the package libdb4.1 is removed from the archive and now your package is uninstallable. Greetings Steffen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT poli

Bug#340210: uninstallable, needs rebuild

2005-11-21 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: yelp Version: 2.10.0-3 Severity: serious Hi The package needs to be rebuild, because the package libdb4.1 is removed from the archive and now your package is uninstallable. Greetings Steffen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (

Bug#340208: uninstallable, needs rebuild

2005-11-21 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: samba Version: 3.0.20b-2 Severity: serious Hi The samba package is currently uninstallable, because the package libdb4.1 is removed from the archive. Greetings Steffen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Archite

Bug#340207: gmsh not installable on i386

2005-11-21 Thread Denis Barbier
Package: gmsh Version: 1.60.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Christophe, It looks like you have gcc 4.1 from experimental installed on your build system, and thus libgcc1 and libstdc++6 dependencies cannot be satisfied on i386/unstable. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libunit++ 1.2.3-3.1

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 331501 + fixed Bug#331501: build with ancient c++ library There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs da

Bug#340204: ftbfs [sparc] Applying patch debian/patches/./000_libgail-gnome-debian-libtool.patch failed!

2005-11-21 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: libgail-gnome Version: 1.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source libgail-gnome failed to build on a sparc buildd. It also failed on all other buildds. Extracting upstream tarball ../libgail-gnome_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz gunzip: /build/buildd/libgail-gnome-1.1.2/.

Bug#340202: udev: Failure to create /dev/input/ on 2.6.15-rc1+

2005-11-21 Thread Marco d'Itri
severity 340202 normal thanks On Nov 21, Ryan Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When running Linux 2.6.15-rc1+, the new nested class devices used by the > input class prevent /dev/input/ from being created, rendering X > unusable. Other people tried 0.074-3 and reported that it works for them

Processed: Re: Bug#340202: udev: Failure to create /dev/input/ on 2.6.15-rc1+

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 340202 normal Bug#340202: udev: Failure to create /dev/input/ on 2.6.15-rc1+ Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Bug#340202: udev: Failure to create /dev/input/ on 2.6.15-rc1+

2005-11-21 Thread Ryan Anderson
Package: udev Version: 0.074-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system When running Linux 2.6.15-rc1+, the new nested class devices used by the input class prevent /dev/input/ from being created, rendering X unusable. -- Package-specific info: -- /etc/udev/rules.d/: /etc/udev/r

Bug#340185: coq: FTBFS: implementation doesn't match interface: parsing/pcoq*

2005-11-21 Thread Samuel Mimram
Hi, Roland Stigge wrote: Package: coq Version: 8.0pl2-3 Severity: serious Hi, building the package coq in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: [...] This issue was already raised on the coq-club mailing-list and a patch was given. I'll integrate it soon. Che

Bug#339777: can't read "errorCode": no such variable

2005-11-21 Thread Wolfgang Faber
Dear all, I hope this is the right way to communicate my thoughts on this bug. > I'm sad to report that tkdiff still seems broken. This is on a diff of > a subversion file. > > Error in startup script: can't read "errorCode": no such variable I have the same problem when using tkdiff from tkcv

Bug#340197: ivritex: FTBFS: TINE (there is no elatex)

2005-11-21 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: ivritex Version: 1.1.1-4 Severity: serious Hi, building the package ivritex in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] of your studies [24] [25] **

Bug#340195: postman: FTBFS: xstrdup undeclared

2005-11-21 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: postman Version: 2.0-10 Severity: serious Hi, building the package postman in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not define

Processed: Re: Bug#340174: libcwd0: built with gcc-3.4 instead of gcc-4.0?

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 340174 serious Bug#340174: libcwd0: built with gcc-3.4 instead of gcc-4.0? Severity set to `serious'. > tags 340174 help confirmed Bug#340174: libcwd0: built with gcc-3.4 instead of gcc-4.0? There were no tags set. Tags added: help, confirmed

Bug#340192: commons-pool: FTBFS: New, more restrictive coreutils cp

2005-11-21 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: commons-pool Version: 1.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, building the package commons-pool in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 4 seconds to

Bug#340191: gnat-gps: FTBFS: gnatmake: INTERNAL ERROR (CONSTRAINT_ERROR)

2005-11-21 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: gnat Version: 3.15p-16 Severity: serious Hi, building the package gnat-gps 2.1.0-5 in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] i486-linux-gnu-gcc -c -g -O2 -I/usr/include/python2.3

Bug#338418: marked as done (zaptel_1:1.0.9.2-1_m68k: FTBFS: E: reference to entity "REFENTRY" for which no system identifier could be generated)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:04:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338418: zaptel_1:1.0.9.2-1_m68k: FTBFS: E: reference to entity "REFENTRY" for which no system identifier could be generated has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#329084: marked as done (zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:08:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329084: zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Processed: S-P-U: gnome-cpufreq-applet

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 313457 + patch Bug#313457: gnome-cpufreq-applet: package includes patches, but doesn't actually use them Tags were: pending sarge Tags added: patch > tags 251155 + patch Bug number 251155 not found. > tags 308362 + patch Bug number 308362 not fo

Bug#340173: marked as done (alleyoop fails to install with gconf2 version 2.10.1-1)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340173: fixed in alleyoop 0.9.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#340185: coq: FTBFS: implementation doesn't match interface: parsing/pcoq*

2005-11-21 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: coq Version: 8.0pl2-3 Severity: serious Hi, building the package coq in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] OCAMLCinterp/coqlib.mli OCAMLCinterp/coqlib.ml OCAMLClibr

Processed: reassign + severity downgrade

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 328846 xfce4-panel Bug#328846: xfce4-systray: Cannot use the Systray plugin Bug reassigned from package `xfce4-systray' to `xfce4-panel'. > severity 328846 important Bug#328846: xfce4-systray: Cannot use the Systray plugin Severity set to `imp

Processed: Re: Bug#340173: alleyoop fails to install with gconf2 version 2.10.1-1

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 340173 serious Bug#340173: alleyoop fails to install with gconf2 version 2.10.1-1 Severity set to `serious'. > tags 340173 + pending Bug#340173: alleyoop fails to install with gconf2 version 2.10.1-1 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending

Bug#340184: Missing build-depend on gtkhtml3.8

2005-11-21 Thread Sjoerd Simons
Package: evolution Version: 2.4.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, As the subject says, evolution misses a build-depend on gtkhtml3.8.. Evolution fails to build without it because it's missing /usr/share/gtkhtml-3.8/Editor.idl Sjoer

Processed: Re: Bug#339344 acknowledged by developer (Bug#339344: fixed in belpic 2.3.13.full-5)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 339344 Bug#339344: belpic - FTBFS: invalid conversion from 'unsigned int*' to 'size_t*' Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thank Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#339344: acknowledged by developer (Bug#339344: fixed in belpic 2.3.13.full-5)

2005-11-21 Thread Bastian Blank
reopen 339344 thank >* Fix unsigned int/size_t confusion in eidlib/CertifManager.cpp (Closes: > #339344). This was only one occurance of this conversion. Bastian -- Many Myths are based on truth -- Spock, "The Way to Eden", stardate 5832.3

Processed: not pending

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 339955 - pending Bug#339955: sysv-rc: /etc/init.d/*.sh should be sourced in runlevel S Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:33:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Loic Minier wrote: > > Anyway, your preferred option seems saner, and quite doable given the > > limited amount of API / ABI changes as listed by mdz. > > Other symbols removed since 2.1.7

Bug#340177: CVE-2004-2541: Buffer overflows in parsing file names from #include statements

2005-11-21 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: cscope Version: 15.5+cvs20050816-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Source code with overly long file names in #include statements may trigger a buffer overflow and permit arbitrary code execution. Please see http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=de

Processed: severity of 340164 is minor

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > severity 340164 minor Bug#340164: zope2.8: files under Zope-2.8.3-final/lib/python/ZServer/medusa/ fail DFSG #1 Severity set to `minor'. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#340164: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#340164: zope2.8: files under Zope-2.8.3-final/lib/python/ZServer/medusa/ fail DFSG #1

2005-11-21 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi, and thanks for the quick reply. On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > I think you are wrong: > http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/1998-December/084122.html Ok, good to know that medusa is indeed free software. > In this case, the files contained within the z

Bug#339837: http://www.debian.org/security/ seriously misleading about security infrastructure performance

2005-11-21 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña a écrit : On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:03:13PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Hi Javier, I'd like to be sure about which claim you refer to. The current claim is the one that says that Debian *does* issue fixes for most problems under 48 hours, right? I'm askin

Bug#326354: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency

2005-11-21 Thread Florian Ernst
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:52 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version > will be removed from the archive in the near future. > Please change your build dependencies to > > libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev > > Please raise the severity of this

Bug#340169: qgis: segfaults on startup

2005-11-21 Thread James Umbanhowar
Package: qgis Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Below is the output from console: Loaded /usr/lib/qgis/copyrightlabelplugin.so Loaded /usr/lib/qgis/delimitedtextplugin.so Loaded /usr/lib/qgis/delimitedtextprovider.so Loaded /usr/lib/qgis/georefplugin.so Load

Bug#339718: Bug fix

2005-11-21 Thread Clément Stenac
tag 339718 +pending thanks Hello, I have a fix (or a workaround, rather:) for this bug but can't build it in a pbuilder right now as gnome is not installable at the moment in unstable. I'll upload it asap. -- Clément

Bug#340164: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#340164: zope2.8: files under Zope-2.8.3-final/lib/python/ZServer/medusa/ fail DFSG #1

2005-11-21 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Il giorno lun, 21/11/2005 alle 15.14 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors ha scritto: > Package: zope2.8 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.1 I think you are wrong: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/1998-December/084122.html In this case, the files contained within the zope tarball have a wro

Processed: Re: Bug#340081: gpsd: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `floor'

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 340081 pending Bug#340081: gpsd: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `floor' There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#340081: gpsd: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `floor'

2005-11-21 Thread Tilman Koschnick
tags 340081 pending thanks On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 11:15 -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > Package: gpsd > Version: 2.30-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > > gpsd failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Thanks for your report. This will b

Bug#340052: marked as done (nevow: FTBFS: missing build dependencies)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:17:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340052: fixed in nevow 0.6.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#242117: should cabot be removed?

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 242117 Should cabot be removed? Bug#242117: should not enter testing Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Will Newton
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:35, Steve Langasek wrote: > - restore ABI compatibility with libfreetype6 to freetype 2.1.10, in > cooperation with upstream > - restore ABI compatibility with libfreetype6 to freetype 2.1.10, without > upstream's cooperation :/ > - downgrade to a compatible versi

Bug#242117: should cabot be removed?

2005-11-21 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
retitle 242117 Should cabot be removed? thanks Hello all, I propose to remove cabot from Debian for the following reasons: * Has been orphaned for nearing four months now. * Has never been part of stable or testing. * Is not maintained upstream. * Functionality is provided by caff from the signi

Bug#340164: zope2.8: files under Zope-2.8.3-final/lib/python/ZServer/medusa/ fail DFSG #1

2005-11-21 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: zope2.8 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 Zope-2.8.3-final/lib/python/ZServer/medusa/docs/README.html states that Medusa is Copyright 1996-1997, Sam Rushing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Medusa is

Bug#340163: 3ddesktop: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

2005-11-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: 3ddesktop Version: 0.2.9-5 Severity: grave The 3ddesktop package currently depends on libfreetype6, but it does not use it. This dependency is being pulled in via imlib2-config --libs, which works as designed but is *not* a correct tool for getting a list of libs to link against on a GNU

Bug#337047: gobby segfaults on the second running for me too.

2005-11-21 Thread Philipp Kern
On Nov 9, 2005, at 00:47, Helen Faulkner wrote: What information can I provide that might help? (Please give me specific instructions - I'm not very experienced with tracing the causes of such things.) Could you please check if ~/.gobby/config.xml is empty? If so please delete it, rerun G

Bug#338993: ia32-libs conflict with libg2c0-dev

2005-11-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I've experienced the same error with libg2c0-dev 1:3.4.4-9 ia32-libs 1.5 I could remove libg2c0-dev to install ia32-libs, and reinstall libg2c0-dev afterwards. Trying to re-install ia32-libs again fails. I tried to reproduce it within fresh pbuilder, with apt-get install g77 apt-get i

Processed: Re: Bug#340033: fetchmail-ssl does not install on Woody

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 340033 Bug#340033: fetchmail-ssl does not install on Woody Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#340033: fetchmail-ssl does not install on Woody

2005-11-21 Thread Christoph Berg
reopen 340033 thanks Re: Steve Langasek in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > > fetchmail-ssl: Depends: fetchmail-common (= 5.9.11-6.2) but 5.9.11-6.3 > > is to be installed > > fetchmail-common 5.9.11-6.3 doesn't come from the Debian archive;

Bug#340159: linuxconf-1.26r4/diajava/XColorNames.java fails DFSG #1

2005-11-21 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 Source file linuxconf-1.26r4/diajava/XColorNames.java includes the following banner: /* * Copyright (c) 1996 by Jan Andersson, Torpa Konsult AB. * * Permission to use, copy, and distribute this software for * NON

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Loic Minier wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This procedure should be avoided except in cases where the library is > > important enough to keep around for binary compatibility with software > > external to Debian. I don't have reaso

Bug#339955: sysv-rc: /etc/init.d/*.sh should be sourced in runlevel S

2005-11-21 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:34:11AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: >Brendan O'Dea wrote: >> Note: I believe that "return" should work to exit from a script both >> when sourced and when executed but perhaps someone with a copy of POSIX >> could confirm. > > >Disconfirmation: > >$ cat /tmp/s >#!/bin/bash

Bug#339955: sysv-rc: /etc/init.d/*.sh should be sourced in runlevel S

2005-11-21 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:55:22AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: >Brendan O'Dea wrote: >> there are quite a few instances in /etc/init.d/*.sh scripts where "exit" is >> called. > >All the exit commands are either (1) at the end of usage exception sections, >or (2) preceded by colons ':'. Testing sugge

Bug#340154: marked as done (zope-cmfcore1.4: Installation failure)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:15:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#340154: zope-cmfcore1.4: Installation failure has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Loic Minier
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > This procedure should be avoided except in cases where the library is > important enough to keep around for binary compatibility with software > external to Debian. I don't have reason to believe this is the case for > libfreetype; do you? I'm not su

Bug#340154: zope-cmfcore1.4: Installation failure

2005-11-21 Thread Giannis Stoilis
Package: zope-cmfcore1.4 Version: 1.4.7-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Trying to install plone, installation fails on this packages. Output follows: linapp6:~# apt-get install plone Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done plone is already the newes

Bug#314385: Agreement?

2005-11-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:54:50AM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote: > without checking the exported symbols, I synced 2.1.10-1 into Ubuntu. > Feeling slightly guilty, I felt responsible to work on getting the > situation 'fixed'. To solve this problem, (I read that it'll be a long > way to freetype 2.

Bug#340151: maxima: fail to start

2005-11-21 Thread Jean-Paul Vincent
Package: maxima Version: 5.9.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable maxima fail to start getting "segmentation fault" on two ibooks (ppc NewWorld) one is 750FX ibook 2 rev 2. copy of "strace maxima" at the first fault: rt

Bug#340149: guile-1.6-slib has a wrong dependency

2005-11-21 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: guile-1.6-slib Severity: serious Hi The package depends on slib, but slib conlicts with guile-1.6-slib. The changelog entry of the slib maintainer is: * Conflict with libguile9 <= 1:1.4-26 and guile-1.6-libs <= 1.6.7-1.1. These both contain a "slib.scm" (which is their version of the sli

Bug#316637: newt: Etch is expected to be fully Unicode-compliant so fribidi should be in Depends, not Recommends

2005-11-21 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
su, 2005-11-20 kello 18:14 -0800, Steve Langasek kirjoitti: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:43:47PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > su, 2005-11-20 kello 10:16 -0800, Steve Langasek kirjoitti: > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:29:00PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > > Given how Unicode compl

Bug#340082: marked as done (ftp: Should depend on netbase)

2005-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340082: fixed in netkit-ftp 0.17-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#339955: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#339955: sysv-rc: /etc/init.d/*.sh should be sourced in runlevel S

2005-11-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I'm not sure how this could happen, but when I enabled sourcing of the .sh scripts in rcS.d/, the boot failed because /etc/rcS.d/S01glibc.sh uses 'exit 0' at the end of the script, and thus terminates the S runlevel. This script was added in glibc version 2.3.5-5 uploaded 2005-08-27. The strange

Bug#340147: /etc/init.d/glibc.sh must use ': exit 0' instead of 'exit 0'

2005-11-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.5-5 Severity: serious The script /etc/init.d/glibc.sh can not be sourced, as it contain 'exit 0' at the end of the script. This is against policy, specifying that all .sh scripts in /etc/rcS.d/ will be sourced. I discovered this while fixing sysv-rc (bug #339955), as

Bug#340033: [pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#340033: fetchmail-ssl does not install on Woody

2005-11-21 Thread Loic Minier
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005, Sebastian Niehaus wrote: > Version: 5.9.11-6.2 > Possibly broken dependencies in fetchmail-ssl, thanks for the effort > narcotic:/home/niehaus# apt-get install fetchmail-ssl > fetchmail-ssl: Depends: fetchmail-common (= 5.9.11-6.2) but 5.9.11-6.3 Can you please send a

  1   2   >