On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:26:30PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:09:21PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Um, sure, but it _is_ a bug, right? That is, if apt moves to unstable
> > >> in the current state (ABI change, no ver
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:09:21PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Um, sure, but it _is_ a bug, right? That is, if apt moves to unstable
> >> in the current state (ABI change, no version change), then it will be
> >> officially broken.
> > It will be br
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Um, sure, but it _is_ a bug, right? That is, if apt moves to unstable
>> in the current state (ABI change, no version change), then it will be
>> officially broken.
>
> It will be broken *only* with respect to packages in experimental.
I don't underst
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: darcs
> Version: 1.0.4-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
>
> darcs failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
Didn't you already file this bug yesterday:
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 12:57:06PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> That sounds like a (serious) bug with apt...
> >> Maybe the right thing is to re-assign the bug to apt.
> > Not really. If experimental breaks, you keep both pieces.
> Um, sure, but it
severity 340900 important
thanks
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 12:23:43AM +, Graham Seaman wrote:
> Hi
>
> The problem is the same as the one described in:
>
> http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20051107.085343.c796bd46.en.html
>
> and the 'solution' is the same: after a second calendar has been
Hi,
This problem did still exist for me on the AMD64 client, but I was able to
fix it. I did it by altering the debian/rules to include these options
to ./configure:
CFLAGS="-m64" CXXFLAGS="-m64" CPPFLAGS="-m64"
There are three places in the script where ./configure can be invoked,
and I altered
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 341516 kernel
Bug#341516: wpasupplicant: kernel panic on start with hostap driver
Bug reassigned from package `wpasupplicant' to `kernel'.
> severity 341516 grave
Bug#341516: wpasupplicant: kernel panic on start with hostap driver
Severity set
reassign 341516 kernel
severity 341516 grave
thanks
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 06:18:43AM +0100, Koos Beens wrote:
> Package: wpasupplicant
> Version: 0.4.6-0.2
> Severity: critical
> It happens from stable to testing on my ppc with prismII in cs. From 2.6 -
> 2.6.14. I think you might be interested
Package: fbdesk
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
fbdesk is linked against the shared library libXft.so.1. But it does not
depend on the libxft1 package. Beside that, it seems that libxft1 is not
available in Sid anymore.
Thanks,
Gregor
-- System Infor
Package: darcs
Version: 1.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
darcs failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
ghc -cpp -package parsec -package unix -O -funbox-strict-fields -Wall
-Werror -package util -I. -DHAVE_CURSES -DHAVE_CURL -c
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.4.6-0.2
Severity: critical
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329709: fixed in krb5 1.4.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339734 pending
Bug#339734: libpam-krb5: ChallengeResponse with openssh-server fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That sounds like a (serious) bug with apt...
>
>> Maybe the right thing is to re-assign the bug to apt.
>
> Not really. If experimental breaks, you keep both pieces.
Um, sure, but it _is_ a bug, right? That is, if apt moves to unstable
in the current
Package: libsqldbc76-dev
Version: 7.6.00.12-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 0.0 postinst must not fail
Hi,
here is the problem:
Setting up libsqldbc76-dev (7.6.00.12-1) ...
cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/libsqldbc76-dev/html/.dhelp': No such
file or directory
dpkg: error pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339226 patch
Bug#339226: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
tags 339226 patch
thanks
Hi Chris,
I've prepared an NMU to fix this bug in libxml++2.6. The patch for the NMU
is attached, and I'll be uploading the package shortly to the NEW queue. If
you disagree with any of the changes made, please make a maintainer upload
in its place.
Cheers,
--
Steve L
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:15:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341504: libapt-pkg-perl: dependency on
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.10 out of date
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 339166 + fixed
Bug#339166: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> tags 338485 - patch
Bug#338485: mozilla-locale-it: Uninstallable due to versioned dep on old
mozilla-browser
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:39:35AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is likely because the soname of apt in unstable is identical to the
> > soname of apt in experimental, but they present different ABIs. I don't
> > think I can do anything to fix th
Package: slony1
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package fails to build from source due to a failing configure
check:
| Automatic build of slony1_1.1.2-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051130-1744
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is likely because the soname of apt in unstable is identical to the
> soname of apt in experimental, but they present different ABIs. I don't
> think I can do anything to fix this for you.
FWIW, I installed "apt" from experimental (version 0.6.4
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is likely because the soname of apt in unstable is identical to the
> soname of apt in experimental, but they present different ABIs. I don't
> think I can do anything to fix this for you.
That sounds like a (serious) bug with apt...
Maybe the
Package: fbdesk
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
fbdesk is linked against the shared library libXft.so.1. But it does not
depend on the libxft1 package. Beside that, it seems that libxft1 is not
available in Sid anymore.
Thanks,
Gregor
-- System Infor
On 13:13 Wed 30 Nov 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Have you personally verified that this version of mozilla-locale-it *works*
> with mozilla-browser up to 1.7.11? My understanding is that the locale
> interfaces frequently change in mozilla point releases and require new
> upstream versions of the
Package: libapt-pkg-perl
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.10 no longer exists making libapt-pkg-perl
uninstallable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686
Package: gnunet-gtk
Version: 0.7.0a-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
For some reason, gnunet-gtk's control file specifies a hard-coded list
of (binary) dependencies; although this is technically legal, it's
prone to get out of date when transitions (such as libextractor's
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:09:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Old bug fixed in NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:09:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Old bug fixed in NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:09:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Old bug fixed in NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:09:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Old bug fixed in NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:09:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Old bug fixed in NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:09:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Old bug fixed in NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:09:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Old bug fixed in NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Hi
The problem is the same as the one described in:
http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20051107.085343.c796bd46.en.html
and the 'solution' is the same: after a second calendar has been created
the events in the first calendar suddenly get displayed.
Graham
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On
I admit I have forgotten about local installation and such, which was
dumb. As for static linking, I had a good look at enlightenment CVS,
and this seems never to be supported anyway by imlib2-config, as you
suspected, so it is not a direct issue (I do not restrain nor extend
portability by igno
This is bug 208198 in nvidia-glx.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Package: mazeofgalious
Version: 0.62-1
Severity: serious
Justification: violates section "2.3 Copyright considerations" of the debian
policy
The first thing the game does after being started is to display a spash
screen with the Konami name and logo:
/usr/share/games/mazeofgalious/graphics/n
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:08:33 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333213: fixed in libflash 0.4.13-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, November 30, 2005 18:02, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> CVE-2005-3418: Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities
> - 1. error_msg parameter to usercp_register.php
> - 2. forward_page parameter to login.php
> - 3. list_cat parameter to search.php
> - Only relevant when register_globals i
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:01:24 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339195: fixed in libbonobouimm1.3 1.3.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:00:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328086: fixed in libpanelappletmm2.6 2.6.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 339163 + fixed
Bug#339163: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:59:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339208: fixed in libgnomeuimm2.6 2.10.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:00:48 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339182: fixed in gtkmm2.0 2.2.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:00:58 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339181: fixed in gtkmm 1.2.10-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:49:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337604: fixed in acovea 5.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> block 317435 with 328707
Bug#317435: FTBFS (gcc change) and numerous security holes
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 328707
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 340646 lispinit.mem missing on SPARC, IA64
Bug#340646: mcvs: ftbfs [sparc] [spvw_memfile.d:834] errno = ENOENT: No such
file or directory.
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 340646 clisp
Bug#340646: lispinit.mem missing on SPARC, IA64
Bug reassigne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 340360 grave
Bug#340360: libapache2-mod-auth-kerb: GSSAPI fails with "Request is a replay"
under krb5 1.4.3
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
MCVS usually happens to be the canary in the coal mine for any packaging
errors in clisp since it is one of the few packages in Debian that uses
it; in this case it fails to build from source due to an error in the
latest clisp packages. It appears thet clisp-dev does not depend on clisp
for (at le
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:15:43AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I'm afraid that applying this patch upstream *does* have a portability
> >impact; the patch will do the right thing on systems that use the GNU
> >linker
> >or a linker with similar features, but there are other Unices that don
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:32:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341437: fixed in drupal 4.5.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hello,
unless you provide more information, that is the specific problem, on this
bug, it'll probably get closed.
*t
--
Tomas Pospisek
http://sourcepole.com - Linux & Open Source Solutions
---
Hi,
I have done a new amule package with a nex split. This package should
fix your bug. You can test it before I upload it. It is available on my
personnal repository, at http://gunnm.org/~soda/debian/
You can try those packages and let me know if you encounter bugs.
Thanks,
--
Julien
--
To
Hi,
I have done a new amule package with a nex split. This package should
fix your bug. You can test it before I upload it. It is available on my
personnal repository, at http://gunnm.org/~soda/debian/
You can try those packages and let me know if you encounter bugs.
Thanks,
--
Julien
--
To
Package: mazeofgalious
Version: 0.62-1
Severity: grave
When running the game I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:tmp$ mog
Configuration: /home/tpo/.mog
Data: /usr/share/games/mazeofgalious/
Initializing SDL video subsystem.
SDL driver used: x11
SDL video subsystem initialized.
Initializing SDL audio subsyst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> tags 340777 + confirmed pending
Bug#340777: libfile-mimeinfo-perl has missing dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 339734 libpam-krb5
Bug#339734: openssh-server: Kerberos tickets are not saved (pam_krb5)
Bug reassigned from package `openssh-server' to `libpam-krb5'.
> severity 339734 serious
Bug#339734: openssh-server: Kerberos tickets are not saved (pam_k
Greetings!
Just a note that I have managed to reproduce and fix this on escher.
cvs head now builds on alpha at the moment. gcl cvs is in a state of
flux these days -- do you need a resolution soon? Would prefer to
postpone the package upload until a bit more work has gone into the
source. Nice
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 338485 patch
Bug#338485: mozilla-locale-it: Uninstallable due to versioned dep on old
mozilla-browser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:32:18PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> It seems to work. Thanks.
Great. I've just uploaded 4.2.26 to sourceforge with this fix.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.or
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:50:07PM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On 16:22 Thu 10 Nov 2005, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Package: mozilla-locale-it
> > Severity: grave
> > Version: 1.7.5-3
> > Hi
> > mozilla-locale-it is not installable as it depends on mozilla-browser <<
> > 2:1.7.5.1, but testing h
Package: jpilot
Version: 0.99.8-2
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Steps to reproduce:
1. Click "Sync your palm to the desktop and then do a backup".
2. Use the Palm as normal -- add, remove, and modify data on both the Palm
and the desktop, and sync to the de
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:48:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 333434 + patch
Bug#333434: [hppa] Cannot compile simple program linked against libglew
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> severity 333434 serious
Bug#333434: [hppa] Cannot compile simple program linked against libglew
Severity set to `ser
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.0-3experimental2
Followup-For: Bug #341347
reported bug is still present, I've just upgraded to experimental version
and this bug showed up.
thanks
Rudy
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),
Hi
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:43:53AM +0100, Martin Lohmeier wrote:
> Graham Seaman wrote:
> > Apologies for this. I fired off that email too quickly. The file does
> > exist, it's just gzipped.
> > Please cancel the other bugreport you made for this.
> >
> > Sorry...
> > Graham
>
> Let the repo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> clone 341450 -1
Bug#341450: tulip: dependency problem, tlprender requires libOSMesa.so.6
Bug 341450 cloned as bug 341479.
> reassign -1 mesag3
Bug#341479: tulip: dependency problem, t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 341378 important
Bug#341378: kernel 2.6.12 and 2.6.14 crash on boot loading usb drivers on a sis
chipset
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
severity 341378 important
thanks
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:39:41AM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:05:26AM +0100, giorgiove wrote:
> > Package: kernel
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks the whole system
> >
>
> hmm as it works for others that severity s
Ignoring the possible issue of "making a similar game" being somehow an
infringement independent of actual copying of game data, the far more
blatant and relevant issue is that the game data still directly uses
material copyrighted and trademarked by Konami. The maintainer
mentioned in the changel
On 16:22 Thu 10 Nov 2005, Luk Claes wrote:
> Package: mozilla-locale-it
> Severity: grave
> Version: 1.7.5-3
>
> Hi
>
> mozilla-locale-it is not installable as it depends on mozilla-browser <<
> 2:1.7.5.1, but testing has already mozilla-browser 2:1.7.12-1
Attached file should fix this RC. If th
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Maurice Massar wrote:
> inspecting dokuwiki.postrm shows that the postrm script assumes
> if /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf exists, that apache-ssl is installed.
> This is not true. Either because apache-ssl is removed but not purged,
> or because the admin cr
Upstream agreed to license the whole source (including the formerly CC
licensed files) under GPL. I'm closing this bug in the next revision.
-Matti
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:47:12PM +0100, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
> device-mapper: one of name or uuid must be supplied, cmd(9)
> device-mapper ioctl cmd 9 failed: Invalid argument
Also, what kernel are you running?
The new code relies on a patch I sent upstream a year ago.
Date:
Package: trustedqsl
Version: 1.11-3
Severity: grave
ObSeverity: builds forever or at least till the logfile fills up the disk
On 4, if not 5 of Debian's architectures the build of trustedqsl went
into an infinite loop, the ad-nauseam section of the build log looks
like this:
| make[1]: Entering d
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:47:12PM +0100, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
> After upgrading to lvm2 2.02.00-1 and the required
> libdevmapper1.02, the system was unable to complete booting,
You should find that bug was fixed by libdevmapper 1.02.01 with lvm2 2.02.01.
Alasdair
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: pmp-common
Version: 3
Followup-For: Bug #333838
Hi,
on a daily updated sid pmp-common doesn't work anymore.
Only root can access the iriver player. Trying to access
it as user "Device is busy" is reported.
Johannes
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> severity 341437 grave
Bug#341437: drupal: Security update breaks functionality
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Hi
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
As the submitter doesn't tell us what his dpkg-divert --list output
looks like, there is not much we can do except close the bug.
Sorry for the lack of response.
I can confirm that this was a bad divert and nothing to do with the
ia32-libs package. Remo
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 21:22:37 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> So on architectures with native-code, there should be a dependency on
> libxmu-dev. (Maybe this depends on whether the X installation is xfree
> or xorg? I'm not sure.)
>
This dependency is needed on all arches because ocamlc -custom d
* Sven Mueller:
> http://www.dyadsecurity.com/webmin-0001.html
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341394
>
> If this is considered a possible remote root compromise, the spampd bug
> I reported a while ago to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see also bug
> #332259) is also a possible remote comp
Package: genext2fs
Version: 1.3-8
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Only debian/rules is automatically chmoded after unpacking. You need to
chmod +x clean.sh before you try to execute it.
> Automatic build of genext2fs_1.3-8 on caballero by sbuild/ia64
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:50:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:50:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:49:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug in ia32-libs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:49:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug in ia32-libs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> severity 336128 grave
Bug#336128: liblablgl-ocaml-dev: missing dependency on libxmu-dev
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 336128 + pending
Bug#336128: liblablgl-ocaml-dev: missing depen
Package: mazeofgalious
Version: 0.62-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.00-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Problem description:
---
After upgrading to lvm2 2.02.00-1 and the required
libdevmapper1.02, the system was unable to complete booting,
as no LVs were reachable: the system was unusable and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
> merge 317882 338993
Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install
Bug#338993: ia32-libs: conflicts with libg2c0-dev
Merged 317882 338993.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Lawrence Walton wrote:
Jason Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: evolution-exchange-storage crashes constantly
Package: evolution-exchange
Version: 2.2.3-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When using evolution with an exchange backend, I constantly receive the
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 20:52 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Packages for 2.0.18 for sid are nearly ready, we only need some code to
> add a new database table. Jeroen is working on this, and will upload as
> soon as this is fixed.
Packages for sid have been uploaded. CVE-names were not present bef
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 336582 2.0.13+1-6
Bug#336582: New round of security issues
Bug#336587: phpbb2: phpbb 2.0.18 released with lots of security fixes
Bug marked as found in version 2.0.13+1-6.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
http://www.dyadsecurity.com/webmin-0001.html
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341394
If this is considered a possible remote root compromise, the spampd bug
I reported a while ago to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see also bug
#332259) is also a possible remote compromise (though not root
comp
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341297: fixed in xoscope 1.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: quagga
Version: 0.98.3-7
Severity: grave
quagga in sarge segfault when it acts on an event on an interface with
vlans. here's a log+bt
2005/11/26 21:20:21 OSPF: Packet[DD]: Neighbor x.x.x.212 Negotiation
done (Slave).
2005/11/26 21:20:21 OSPF: nsm_change_state(x.x.x.212, Exchange -> Full
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
