Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... > and now the problem is a SIGILL that > occurs a few instructions later when calling __umoddi3 from > libgcc_s.so.2. ... > It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if > > fldw -10(,sp),fr23 > >

Bug#344688: marked as done (ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val')

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:00:25 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#343216: marked as done (Package not installable in unstable - missing asc-data=1.16.2.0-2+b1)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:32:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343216: fixed in asc 1.16.2.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#344731: libgtk2.0-0: the menus of gtk applications are black

Package: libgtk2.0-0 Version: 2.8.9-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade the libgtk2.0-0 from version 2.6.10-2 to 2.8.9-2, the background of the menus of GTK applications are black. When you move the mouse cursor above the menu items, the application generates t

Bug#344730: cduce: FTBFS: build-depends on old version of ocaml

Package: cduce Version: 0.3.92-1 Severity: serious The cduce package build-depends on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 and ocaml-compiler-libs-3.08.3. 3.08.3 is no longer the current version of ocaml in unstable, and as a result cduce fails to build as seen at

Bug#328674: Still planning to upload slsc?

Doing some late-night QA work, and noticed that you were planning to upload this in September. It does need an upload badly. Alternatively, you could orphan it or ask for it to be removed (your choice). It's already been kicked out of 'testing' so it won't be in the next release of Debian un

Processed: remove freecdb

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 272127 RM: freecdb (RoM, RoQA, RoUpstream, dead upstream, superseded > by tinycdb) Bug#272127: freecdb: does not provide a shared library Changed Bug title. > tags 272127 -sarge-ignore Bug#272127: RM: freecdb (RoM, RoQA, RoUpstream, dead upstr

Bug#223774: Home Loans Are Easy To Get

Guess What ? you have been approved for your next home lone just click the link http://www.mortmen.com/?d=dr_reboot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339061: marked as done (FTBFS (alpha): test suite fails: ERROR CODE 0x8b for test/drt1)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:25:39 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line FTBFS (alpha): test suite fails: ERROR CODE 0x8b for test/drt1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#344726: libdb4.4-java: Crash in Java_com_sleepycat_db_internal_db_1javaJNI_initDbEnvRef0

Package: libdb4.4-javaVersion: 4.4.16-3Severity: graveJustification: renders package unusableThere is an optimization bug in gcc 4.0 that causes this library to beunusable.See http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.dbxml.general/1766?set_lines=10Stack: [0xbfa8e000,0xbfc8e000), sp=0xbfc89a18,

Bug#344652: marked as forwarded (libsmbios - FTBFS: architecture specific)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:31:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #344652, regarding libsmbios - FTBFS: architecture specific to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system ad

Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11

This one time, at band camp, Alexis Sukrieh said: > * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > > > I'm a bit confused, because even if I add "libx11-6" in my > > > build-dependencies (which provides libX11.so.6) I still get the error. > > > > Er, you need the package that provides *libX11.so*

Bug#344712: gstreamer0.8-gtk: file conflict with older gstreamer package

Package: gstreamer0.8-gtk Version: 0.8.11-3 Severity: serious Selecting previously deselected package gstreamer0.8-gtk. Unpacking gstreamer0.8-gtk (from .../gstreamer0.8-gtk_0.8.11-3_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gstreamer0.8-gtk_0.8.11-3_i386.deb (--unpack): tryin

Bug#344711: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc: Can't install

Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc Version: 2.6.14-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Configuring hangs on GET mkvmlinuz/bootloaders. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Arch

Processed: #321644 is not unreproducible

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 321644 - unreproducible Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: mozilla 1.7.10 version crashes almost immediately and all other browsers that use the mozilla core crash with similar frequency Tags were: upstream unreproducible patch Bug#336441: galeon: Crash

Processed: #321644 is severity: grave, since we have no working mozilla in amd64, and this since August.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Severity 321644 grave Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: mozilla 1.7.10 version crashes almost immediately and all other browsers that use the mozilla core crash with similar frequency Bug#336441: galeon: Crashes on specific actions/page combinations on amd6

Bug#342925: missing ide-generic

On Saturday 24 December 2005 04:32, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote: > > please try the attached patch, > > should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up: > > Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow) The patch

Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11

* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > > I'm a bit confused, because even if I add "libx11-6" in my > > build-dependencies (which provides libX11.so.6) I still get the error. > > Er, you need the package that provides *libX11.so*, not libX11.so.6. You > should be build-depending on libx1

Bug#244158: Vicky wants you to join us

Private Invite Please join this site so that that we can chat live http://www.Vicky Thanks Vicky -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243227: Private Invite From Kristy Please join us

You have been invited to join our dating network by Kristy http:// -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344699: libaws: ftbfs [sparc] file "sinfo.ads" not found

Package: libaws Version: 2.0p-8 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source libaws failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. gnatmake ada2wsdl-main -j2 -Pada2wsdl.gpr -XOBJ_DIR=obj-shared \ -o ada2wsdl -largs -L. gnatgcc -c -o /build/buildd/libaws-

Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11

On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:24:57PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > tags 344653 + help > tags 344653 + confirmed > thanks > * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 > > > collect2: ld returned 1

Bug#147314: Heather Is looking for you

Heather Has invited you to join our dating network http:// -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344690: marked as done (3.1r1 netinst is uninstallable with kernel 2.6)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:06:42 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344690: 3.1r1 netinst is uninstallable with kernel 2.6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#231923: Private Invite From Sara Please join us

Sara Has invited you to join our dating network http:// -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344654: marked as done (jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:09:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344654: jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Processed: control

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package flashplugin-nonfree Ignoring bugs not assigned to: flashplugin-nonfree > found 341238 7.0.61-1 Bug#341238: flashplugin-nonfree: Installer cannot install manually downloaded file Bug#305568: Wrong archive filename in postinst; right filename in

Bug#344654: jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve

Something must've broken on the s390 and arm buildds, as this used to work fine. raptor% ping localhost ping: unknown host localhost Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: jnettop > Version: 0.11.0-2 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > >>Automatic b

Bug#344690: 3.1r1 netinst is uninstallable with kernel 2.6

package: debian-installer severity: critical version: 3.1r1 Hi, I have tried this image http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r1/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r1-i386-netinst.iso with parameters, kernel26 acpi=off noacpi nolacpi However, it gave a error "no installable kernel found" during "Install

Processed: Re: Bug#344614: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 344614 -1 Bug#344614: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' Bug 344614 cloned as bug 344688. > reassign -1 lablgl Bug#344688: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' Bug reassigned from packag

Bug#340103: Bug#344614: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'

clone 344614 -1 reassign -1 lablgl thanks Hi, Blars Blarson wrote: ocamlodbc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. This seems to be the same error as 344463, so is probably in a dependant package. Some other architectures are still failing to build due to what lo

Bug#332631: pppstatus crashes with segfault

> on my ibook pppconfig segfaults on start with Segmentation fault Can you reproduce this and/or give more information? I do not have access to hardware to test it on. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Bug#296370: additional informations

Hi. I just tested two machines with the same file: http://hope-2000.org/smo/rumpel/unixland.jpg On peoluca: sarge machine i586, with debian stock kernel, it seems working correctly (it loads also files bigger than 100k). peoluca:~# dpkg -l boa debconf libc6 logrotate mime-support +++-===

Bug#300788: marked as done (lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'wget')

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#300788: marked as done (lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'wget')

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#300829: marked as done (lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#300829: marked as done (lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: apt

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 343701 apt Bug#343701: apt-get: Unable to configure a package that failed to install, config.dat locked by frontend Warning: Unknown package 'apt-get' Bug reassigned from package `apt-get' to `apt'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please cont

Bug#344413: kernel-package hooks transition

Oh well, messed up the bug email addresses :/ On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 09:19:36AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In the recent 10.X series, kernel package has started > > producing image packages whose maintain

Bug#335827: marked as done (FTBFS: asis-implementation.adb must be recompiled)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:50:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line FTBFS: asis-implementation.adb must be recompiled has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#344354: marked as done (avahi-utils: contains arch-dependany binaries)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:49:53 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344354: ahh... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Processed: fisg bug #329212

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 329212 patch Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks dude Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#329212: fisg bug #329212

tag 329212 patch thanks dude Hi there, the segmentation fault reported in this bug happens because the log fails to be parsed, hence, there is no user list, and it tries to index NULL. This happens because the number of users is checked, but too late. There is a simplish patch attached that fixes

Bug#344672: pointless installs python extensions into /usr/share

Package: pointless Severity: serious See http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=pointless&version=unstable&arch=i386 the whole usr/share/pointless/lib directory should be removed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Processed: Re: Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 344653 + help Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11 There were no tags set. Tags added: help > tags 344653 + confirmed Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11 Tags were: help Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping pro

Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11

tags 344653 + help tags 344653 + confirmed thanks * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Indeed, I reproduced that with my pbuilder... I'm a bit confus

Bug#344658: vim - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such file or directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: vim > Version: 1:6.4-006+1 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Yes, we've seen that and are investigating why it goes wrong at those 3 architectures and not at the other

Bug#344481: Mysterious crash in php4-rrdtool

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:21:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Break on rrd_graph_options, step into getopt_long, run bt to see what lib it > says it's in. Well, I should tell it earlier. It looks like getopt_long comes from glibc, backtrace follows. Breakpoint 1, 0xb7d085b6 in getopt_long () f

Bug#344657: marked as done (tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344657: fixed in tix 8.4.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)

Martin Schulze wrote: > Yes. I've copied it into the private security archive. > > Next steps: > > a) what about woody Woody is vulnerable as well, the vulnerable code is present in syncshadowdb:164 Alexis, you can download the Woody sources through packages.debian.org. Cheers, Morit

Processed: tagging 329387

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 329387 security Bug#329387: Bugzilla: Unsafe use of temporary files in the syncshadow script Tags were: patch sarge woody Tags added: security > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Bug#344661: slib - not installable

Package: slib Version: 3a2-3 Severity: serious slib conflicts with versions in unstable, makes it impossible to install. > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > slib: Conflicts: libguile9 (<= 1:1.4-26) but 1:1.4-26 is to be installed > Conflicts: guile-1.6-libs (<= 1.6.7-1.1

Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)

* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > Do you happen to know about the package in woody? Well, I don't know. Where can I grab woody's source packages? > a) what about woody As soon as I know where to fetch woody's sources, I will tell you. > b) what about sid Sid is not affected, th

Bug#344658: vim - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such file or directory

Package: vim Version: 1:6.4-006+1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of vim_1:6.4-006+1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > dh_install -X.svn > cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such file or directory > dh_install: comm

Bug#344657: tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found

Package: tix Version: 8.4.0-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of tix_8.4.0-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev (>= 8.4.1), debhelper (>= 4.2)

Processed: severity of 344523 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 344523 serious Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 340103 Bug#340103: ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory Bug reopened, originator not changed. > found 340103 2.10-2 Bug#340103: ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or dire

Bug#340103: ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory

reopen 340103 found 340103 2.10-2 thanks > Automatic build of ocamlodbc_2.10-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > mkdir -p unixodbc > cp -f libocamlodbc.a ocamlodbc.cmi ocamlodbc.cma META unixodbc/ > cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory > make[1]: *** [unixodbc] Error

Bug#344654: jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve

Package: jnettop Version: 0.11.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of jnettop_0.11.0-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > checking if "localhost" resolves... no > configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost

Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11

Package: electricsheep Version: 2.6.4-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of electricsheep_2.6.4-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libjpeg62-dev, libexpat1-dev, > libpng12-dev, dpatch, libxv-d

Processed: severity of 344524 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 344524 serious Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Bug#344652: libsmbios - FTBFS: architecture specific

Package: libsmbios Version: 0.10.6-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of libsmbios_0.10.6-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > COMPILING C++ (shared) : libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.lo > libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:23:20: er

Bug#344651: smtpguard - FTBFS: undefined reference to `yywrap'

Package: smtpguard Version: 1.1.2-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of smtpguard_1.1.2-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] > s390-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -DFG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -o > .libs/smtpguard-daemon symtbl.o smtpguard-dae

Bug#326327: NMU to fix this RC bug in 7 day delayed queue

An NMU to fix this bug has been made to the 7 day delay queue. You can override this NMU by making a maintainer upload between now and then. The interdiff of the NMU is attached. Don Armstrong -- LEADERSHIP -- A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with autodestructive imaginations in

Processed: Re: libdevice-serialport-perl still tries to find serial port

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 324877 important Bug#324877: libdevice-serialport-perl: FTBFS: Trying to find a serial port for testing... Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#326352: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:00:44 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This bug was fixed in 0.20.14-7.2 by Luk Claes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#324877: libdevice-serialport-perl still tries to find serial port

severity 324877 important thanks Hi Daniel, You reported that you were able to reproduce this build failure with libdevice-serialporl-perl 1.002-0.2, but this version has successfully built on all archs (except s390 where it shouldn't be). At this point, the package is *not* running make test, b

Bug#344571: marked as done (cheops-ng_0.2.3-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep: flex)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:17:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344571: fixed in cheops-ng 0.2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#344416: marked as done ([powerpc] kernel-package breaks mkvmlinuz, rendering 2.6.14-6 kernels uninstallable on powerpc)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 344416 Bug#344416: [powerpc] kernel-package breaks mkvmlinuz, rendering 2.6.14-6 kernels uninstallable on powerpc Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reopen 344413 Bug#344413: [powerpc] k-p 10.00x breaks debconf based /etc/kernel/*.d script

Processed: retitle 340174 to libcwd0: FTBFS with g++-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > retitle 340174 libcwd0: FTBFS with g++-4.0 Bug#340174: libcwd0: built with gcc-3.4 instead of gcc-4.0? Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#326353: NMU to fix the RC bug on gphoto2 uploaded to 7-day delay queue

I have just made an NMU to the 7 day delayed queue to fix this bug. If you wish to override this NMU, you will need to make a maintainer upload between now and then. Please find the interdiff for the NMU attached. Don Armstrong -- Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find thems

Bug#344615: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error

Hi, Blars Blarson wrote: missinglib failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Please note that some buggy code that casts structures used to work no longer works due to changes in gcc. ./runtests Ran: 56 tests i

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails

[cc:ed to the hppa porters individually, as well as to debian-hppa; please let me know if you prefer to get such mail just via the list in the future.] Are the hppa porters aware of bug #342545 in libgcc2, which is affecting builds of most Qt-related packages on hppa today? I had suggested to LaM

Bug#328534: Adaptec 2005S Hangs

the bug your reported at the beginning of your bug report regarding initramfs-tools was a timing bug by udev, which is fixed since long. please retest against latest 2.6.14 in unstable usinig initramfs-tools? thanks for your feedback. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Bug#344401: firefox: Confirmation

Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #344401 Hello, I can confirm this bug. My papersize is A4 by default on my system. My CUPS works in A4 mode for most applications. When i try to print anything with firefox and CUPS, i get an error about papersize. I have also tried to change

Processed: reassign 344515 to linux-2.6

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 344515 linux-2.6 Bug#344515: kernel module ip2100 crashes when loading firmware on amd64-system Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8' Bug reassigned from p

Processed: New version of bandwidthd available, waiting for sponsors approval/upload.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 343921 + pending Bug#343921: bandwidthd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed package libgd2-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 328576 + pending Bug#328576: Bash'ism in /etc/init.d/bandwidthd Tags were: patch Tags added: pending >

Bug#342925: missing ide-generic

On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote: > > please try the attached patch, > > should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up: > > Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow, I've > also tested it o

Processed: Fixed in NMU of poppler 0.4.2-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 342288 + fixed Bug#342288: libpoppler0c2: source taken from xpdf may introduce heap-overflow vulnerabilities Tags were: patch security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#344416: marked as done ([powerpc] kernel-package breaks mkvmlinuz, rendering 2.6.14-6 kernels uninstallable on powerpc)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:15:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line retrigger a binNMU build for powerpc with new kernel-package ? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#343037: marked as done (Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:07:58 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package explicitly build-depends on g++-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is