Processed: severity of 349120 is grave, merging 349120 349442

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 349120 grave Bug#349120: dpkg: assertion failure after failing to configure a package Severity set to `grave'. > merge 349120 349442 Bug#349120: dpkg: assertion failure afte

Bug#346734: marked as done (hanterm-xf: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:15:23 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in hanterm-xf 1:3.3.1p18-9.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#346662: marked as done (dfm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in dfm 0.99.7-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Processed: Re: Bug#349442: dpkg: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed (abort).

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 349120 serious Bug#349120: dpkg: assertion failure after failing to configure a package Severity set to `serious'. > merge 349120 349442 Bug#349120: dpkg: assertion failure after failing to configure a package Bug#349442: dpkg: Assertion `depe

Bug#349442: dpkg: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed (abort).

severity 349120 serious merge 349120 349442 thanks Quoting Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.13.11 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I get the following error: > > ay:/home/lefevre# dpkg --configure -a > dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:191

Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app

On 2006-01-22 (sunday), at 23:38:21 Justin Pryzby wrote: > Does memprof work with xterm? It is the only program I have tried so > far that actually ran.. Hmm that's something new. It "works" with xterm, however there is no information in memproof's main window. At least it doesn't hnag-up. This s

Bug#349295: memprof bug

Justin Pryzby wrote: I can run `memprof -- xterm` and the xterm does load. However I can't profile or do a leak check on it; it gives errors like: ** (memprof:23125): WARNING **: Can't open /proc/23132/mem I don't get that, I just can't get any kind of result except for xterm being slow.

Processed: pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 291939 pending Bug#291939: [ARCH] Add support for Architecture aliases/wildcards Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tag 347744 pending Bug#347744: dpkg - FTBFS: undefined reference to `sepol_genbools' Tags were: patch Bug#348659: ftbfs: undefin

Bug#349295: memprof bug

Justin Pryzby wrote: Hey Jason, Can you confirm the ability to run "xterm" under memprof? I agree that memprof seems to be totally busted, but it seems to at least be capable of spawning an xterm, if nothing else. I just want to check and see if we are seeing the thing. Another bug was submit

Bug#349295: memprof bug

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:45:51PM -0500, Jason Dorje Short wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > >Hey Jason, > > > >Can you confirm the ability to run "xterm" under memprof? I agree > >that memprof seems to be totally busted, but it seems to at least be > >capable of spawning an xterm, if nothing else.

Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app

Does memprof work with xterm? It is the only program I have tried so far that actually ran.. On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:06:08AM +0100, Emilian Nowak wrote: > On 2006-01-22 (sunday), at Justin Pryzby write: > So there is nothing interesting here besides main function has argc=97, but I > started

Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app

On 2006-01-22 (Sun), at 22:50:14 Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Oki - I will try rebuilding it and some debugging. > Ok, need any help? I made another few attempts to track this thing Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread -1224050112 (LWP 30277)] 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall

Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app

On 2006-01-22 (sunday), at Justin Pryzby write: > > Oki - I will try rebuilding it and some debugging. > Ok, need any help? Hmm... How should I debug that. I stareded this non-stripped memproof then I selected some program for memproofing. Before executing it I made gdb --pid=`pidof memproof` then

Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app

On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 04:41:14AM +0100, Emilian Nowak wrote: > On 2006-01-22 (sunday), at 22:18:00 Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > It appears that our memprof package has major issues. Could you try > > compiling it locally with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip, and running it > > under valgrind (oh the ir

Bug#349435: marked as done (lua5.1 - FTBFS: cannot stat `/build/buildd/lua5.1-5.0.99/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lua.1': No such file or directory)

5.1-5.0.99/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lua.1': No such > file or directory > make: *** [common-post-build-arch] Error 1 > ** > Build finished at 20060122-1748 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian ---

Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app

On 2006-01-22 (sunday), at 22:18:00 Justin Pryzby wrote: > It appears that our memprof package has major issues. Could you try > compiling it locally with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip, and running it > under valgrind (oh the irony!) to try to get a backtrace of the > problem at an early stage? I co

Processed: Re: Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 349295 serious Bug#349295: memprof doesn't do anything? Severity set to `serious'. > severity 349453 serious Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#349453: memprof hangs just after executing profiled app

severity 349295 serious severity 349453 serious thanks On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 03:12:49AM +0100, Emil Nowak wrote: > Package: memprof > Version: 0.5.1-12 > Severity: important > > Everey time I try to run some application using memprof it hangs displaying > ths error on console: > > *** glibc de

Bug#324025: aqsis: Steve's right, never mind that patch

Package: aqsis Followup-For: Bug #324025 In retrospect, I must agree with Steve's analysis of the patch I submitted for this bug; please disregard it, as it was entirely too hasty and won't actually work right. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstabl

Bug#104394: what your employer doesnt want you to know

How have you been,, You have been selected to generate 1.5 - 3.5k daily! Phone me at my line below. Let me help you generate payments! Regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1*800*352*3288 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of lightlab 0.3-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 347012 + fixed Bug#347012: lightlab: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libggiwmh 0.1.0-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 347142 + fixed Bug#347142: libggiwmh: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ucbmpeg-play 2.3p-13.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 346929 + fixed Bug#346929: ucbmpeg-play: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Processed: Re: diff for 1.0.1-2.1 NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 346953 + fixed Bug#346953: wmmemmon: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#349447: apt-proxy: Does not work with twisted 2.1.

Package: apt-proxy Version: 1.9.32 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, I just upgraded to the latest version of twisted in unstable (2.1.0-2), which seems to be incompatible with apt-proxy. At first, there is a dependency problem, as apt-proxy should depend on python-twis

Processed: Re: /usr/sbin/localepurge: line 158: 2688K: value too great for base (error token is "2688K")

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 348681 + moreinfo Bug#348681: /usr/sbin/localepurge: line 158: 2688K: value too great for base (error token is "2688K") There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Processed: Add patch tag

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 335145 + patch Bug#335145: removal of automake1.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databas

Bug#348681: /usr/sbin/localepurge: line 158: 2688K: value too great for base (error token is "2688K")

tags 348681 + moreinfo thanks Christoph Berg wrote (18 Jan 2006 13:04:11 +0100) : > [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED] sudo localepurge > /usr/sbin/localepurge: line 158: 2688K: value too great for base (error token > is "2688K") For my first BSP, I'm having had a look to the code, and it seems that one of t

Bug#343521: zaptel module compilation

I had the exact same problem last week, with linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686. This seems to be a bug in various linux-headers versions. As I see, this bug is related to: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333842 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=330081 Also, I fixed this

Bug#349443: FTBFS: overrides internal X11 headers

Package: pixmap Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS pixmap FTBFS: make[1]: Entering directory `/build/build/pixmap-2.6pl4' gcc -m32 -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -I.. -I/usr/X11R6/include/X11 -I/usr/include/ -I/usr/X11R6/include-Dlinux -D__i386__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L

Bug#349442: dpkg: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed (abort).

Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get the following error: ay:/home/lefevre# dpkg --configure -a dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed. Aborted (core dumped) As a consequence, I can no longer upgra

Processed: Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#349405: Hardware problem?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 349405 Bug#349405: alsa-base: No Sound with Intel 82801DB/DBL/DBM AC'97 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Carlos Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping proc

Processed: Tag #346933 as fixed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 346933 + fixed Bug#346933: openmotif: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#349405: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#349405: Hardware problem?

close 349405 thanks On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 the mental interface of Carlos Moffat told: > Hi, > > Since my original report, I tried a LiveCD and couldn't get any sound > either. But I tried the headphone jack, and I got sound, so I got the > strong suspicion that whatever the hardware switch for t

Bug#349405: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#349405: Hardware problem?

close 349405 thanks On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 the mental interface of Carlos Moffat told: > Hi, > > Since my original report, I tried a LiveCD and couldn't get any sound > either. But I tried the headphone jack, and I got sound, so I got the > strong suspicion that whatever the hardware switch for t

Bug#349439: pente - FTBFS: error: syntax error before 'Pixmap'

Package: pente Version: 2.2.5-5 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of pente_2.2.5-5 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] > cd wmslib/src/abut; gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer > -I/build/buildd/pente-2.2.5/wmslib/src > -I/build/buildd/pent

Processed: Fixed in NMU of fbdesk 1.1.5-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 300451 + fixed Bug#300451: fbdesk: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid use of undefined type 'struct ResourceManager' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 341507 + fixed Bug#341507: fbdesk must depend on libxft There were no tags set. Tags added: f

Processed: Re: libooc-x11-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 347159 Bug#347159: libooc-x11-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug reopened, originator not changed. > close 347159 20020123-2.1 Bug#347159: libooc-x11-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev 'close' is deprecated; see h

Processed: Fixed in NMU of jack-tools 0.0.2-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 346697 + fixed Bug#346697: jack-tools: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#347159: libooc-x11-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev

reopen 347159 close 347159 20020123-2.1 tags 347139 -fixed close 347139 20020123-2.1 thanks It is inappropriate to use "-done" without a Version: header for any bug closed by an upload, *particularly* one closed in NMU. The proper procedure is to tag bugs closed in NMU as "fixed", or to close the

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ticker.app 0.5.0-5.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 347064 + fixed Bug#347064: ticker.app: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gtktrain 0.9b-9.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 346846 + fixed Bug#346846: gtktrain: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnuserv 3.12.7-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 346753 + fixed Bug#346753: gnuserv: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#338006: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#338006: Postfix problem still there

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:20:10PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote: > > I tried it after Yari wrote again (I attached his mail at the bottom of > this mail). And it works. I also do not think it is the best solution but I > think it is a workaround until the bug in OpenSSL is fixed. The default cipher

Bug#349435: lua5.1 - FTBFS: cannot stat `/build/buildd/lua5.1-5.0.99/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lua.1': No such file or directory

* [common-post-build-arch] Error 1 > ** > Build finished at 20060122-1748 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#349434: twclock - FTBFS: cannot create regular file `/build/buildd/twclock-2.5/debian/twclock/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults': No such file or directory

Package: twclock Version: 2.5-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of twclock_2.5-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] > echo Installing Twclock in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults > Installing Twclock in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults

Processed: Blocking bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 347156 by 346709 Bug#347156: itk3.0-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 346709 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Processed: Blocking bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 347154 by 346695 Bug#347154: ivtools-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 346695 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Processed: A couple of patches.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 340289 +patch Bug#340289: amaya: missing build-dependency on libfreetype6-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > tags 346632 +patch Bug#346632: amaya: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch >

Bug#346655: Need help with erlang?

Hi there! I was about to NMU because of: #346655. I have also seen other FTBFS bugs you had, and you are active, so I wonder, is there anything we can do to help you? Thanks! -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux

Bug#346632: A couple of patches.

tags 340289 +patch tags 346632 +patch thanks Hi again. The pango problem is actually a wxWidgets bug with GTK+ 2.8. Please find attached a patch fixing it, stolen from CVS (and the wxwidgets2.6 package). Also attached a patch replacing the xlibs-dev Build-Depends by libxt-dev and libxxf86vm-dev,

Bug#340150: New upstream version 1.1+ fixes this bug.

Tags: pending Tags: fixed-upstream thanks New upstream version 1.1+ fixes this bug. New .deb is under way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: diff for 5.2.2-6.2 NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 346934 + fixed Bug#346934: pgplot5: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Processed: Fixed in NMU of spim 7.1-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 326097 + fixed Bug#326097: spim: FTBFS: static declaration of 'exception_file_name' follows non-static declaration Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 346936 + fixed Bug#346936: spim: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no ta

Processed: Fixed in NMU of motv 3.94-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 297183 + fixed Bug#297183: motv: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'snapbase' follows non-static declaration Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 300290 + fixed Bug#300290: motv: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete elem

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gle 3.1.0-5.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 346668 + fixed Bug#346668: gle: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#346668: Patch for NMU of gle

This one time, at band camp, Luk Claes wrote: >Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if >you think that the attached patch won't work. Looks great, thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#345604: contains non-free documentation

On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 18:08 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote: > And here some documents with (possibly) problematic license: pdftex-a.pdf GFDL, >= v1.2, no Invariant Sections, Front- or Back-Cover Texts fontinstallationguide.pdf GFDL, >= v1.2, no Invariant Sections, Front- or Back-Cover Texts Source c

Bug#349426: skim: FTBFS due to missing binary-arch target in debian/rules

Package: skim Version: 1.4.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS, policy 4.8 Tags: patch Due to missing binary-arch target in debian/rules, skim 1.4.3-1 fails to build from source on all buildds. Attached is the patch we used in Ubuntu to temporarily fix this problem. Note that this patch on

Bug#348632: marked as done ("Wrong Password!" given, but password is Correct!)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:47:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348632: fixed in gringotts 1.2.8+1.2.9pre1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#349405: Hardware problem?

Hi, Since my original report, I tried a LiveCD and couldn't get any sound either. But I tried the headphone jack, and I got sound, so I got the strong suspicion that whatever the hardware switch for the headphones/speakers what stuck. I put the headphones in again, wiggled it some, and got sound b

Processed: tagging 347036

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 347036 - fixed Bug#347036: pente: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Processed: Re: Xdialog: syntax error leads to infinite memory allocation loop

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342815 patch Bug#342815: Xdialog: syntax error leads to infinite memory allocation loop There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#346668: Patch for NMU of gle

Hi Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D diff -u gle-3.1.0/debian/changel

Bug#342815: Xdialog: syntax error leads to infinite memory allocation loop

tags 342815 patch thanks The result of the ridiculous memory use is not a loop but a recursion, which causes the stack to grow. This generally results in a SIGSEGV as there is no other way to report stack exhaustion to the program. If the label for a row is empty, the row is unselectable. If th

Bug#347760: marked as done (libaudio-cd-perl: not installable in sid because of libcdaudio)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:17:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347760: fixed in audio-cd 0.05-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#347748: marked as done (audio-cd - FTBFS: Not available build dependency)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:17:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347748: fixed in audio-cd 0.05-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#346777: marked as done (xblast: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:19:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346777: fixed in xblast 1:2.6.1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#346148: marked as done (checkroot.sh: does not properly handle fsck exit states)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:19:01 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342160: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#344089: marked as done (initscripts postinst calls mountvirtfs unconditionally)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:19:01 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344089: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#342160: marked as done (initscripts: checkroot.sh ignores fsck result)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:19:01 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342160: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#341075: marked as done (Keep 2.86.ds1-6 out of testing)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:19:01 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341075: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ogre 1.0.6-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 343239 + fixed Bug#343239: ftbfs [sparc] dh_compress: Can't cd to debian/libogre5-dbg: No such file or directory Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 346919 + fixed Bug#346919: ogre: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags

Processed: Fixed in NMU of beep-media-player 0.9.7.1+cvs20050803-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 258218 + fixed Bug#258218: Missing include files There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 327649 + fixed Bug#327649: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 347152 + fixed Bug#347152: beep-media-player-dev: uninstalla

Processed: Re: xpm2wico: SIGSEGV on amd64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 312120 patch Bug#312120: xpm2wico: SIGSEGV on amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs datab

Bug#312120: xpm2wico: SIGSEGV on amd64

tags 312120 patch thanks This is also reproducible on IA64, and probably any 64-bit system other than the Alpha and 64-bit MIPS that it specifically tests for. Here's a patch that appears to make it generally 64-bit clean which I have tested on IA64: diff -urN xpm2wico-0.2.4.3/src/readicon.c xpm

Bug#346644: Intend to NMU bzflag

tags 347986 patch pending tags 346644 patch pending thanks I have given this package some love. My patch is attached. I fix several important issues: bzflag (2.0.4.20051017-0.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Remove Build-Dependency on xlibs-dev (Closes: #346644). * Remov

Bug#347159: marked as done (libooc-x11-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:18:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#349002: Recent kernel bugs CAN-2005-2709, CAN-2004-1057, CAN-2005-2973...

Christian Hammers wrote: > There were some kernel security announcements on bugtrag the last couple > of days. As those CAN Ids do not show up on the cross reference > or the nonvuln list, I wonder if Debian is affected and when fixed packages > can be expected. See http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kern

Bug#348306: marked as done (/etc/knowledgetree/environment.php (which contains passwords) world-readable)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348306: fixed in knowledgetree 2.0.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#346862: marked as done (gkrelldnet: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:17:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346862: fixed in gkrelldnet 0.14.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#347089: marked as done (snake4: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:17:22 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347089: fixed in snake4 1.0.12-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#346804: marked as done (xclip: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:47:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346804: fixed in xclip 0.08-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 317082 patch Bug#317082: libc6-s390x: missing depends on lib64gcc1 Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: patch > tags 317082 - moreinfo Bug#317082: libc6-s390x: missing depends on lib64gcc1 Tags were: patch moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > thanks Stop

Bug#338006: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#338006: Postfix problem still there

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:23:13PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote: > Hello! > > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > > openssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: > > Was this meant for me? Otherwise sorry for spamming around... ;-) > > I u

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

tags 317082 patch tags 317082 - moreinfo thanks On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:47:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:14:35AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > 1) use "dpkg --search" but only with the library name from objdump, not > >with the full path. > >Questio

Bug#346741: Patch for NMU of gkrellm-leds

Hi Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D diff -u gkrellm-leds-0.8.0/debia

Bug#349381: FTBFS: '__open' aliased to undefined symbol 'open'

Package: audiooss Severity: serious Version: 1.0.0-2 Hi When I try to build the package when solving #346676 (removing the xlibs-dev build dependency) it fails with the following error: gcc -m32 -c -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -I/usr/X11R6/include -Dlinux -D__i386__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=19930

Processed: Intend to NMU bzflag

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 347986 patch pending Bug#347986: bzflag: native package should not be? There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending > tags 346644 patch pending Bug#346644: bzflag: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: patch,

Processed: Re: pente: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 347036 2.2.5-5 Bug#347036: pente: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug marked as found in version 2.2.5-5. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#347036: pente: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

found 347036 2.2.5-5 thanks Hi, pente is now failing to build with the following error: checking for X... no [...] cd wmslib/src/abut; gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -I/build/buildd/pente-2.2.5/wm slib/src -I/build/buildd/pente-2.2.5/obj-x86_64-Linux -g -Wall -O2 -c abut.c In file included from /bu

Processed: Intend to NMU beep-media-player-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 347152 patch pending Bug#347152: beep-media-player-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Bug#285180: beep-media-player-dev: should not depend xlibs-dev Tags added: patch, pending > thanks Stopping processing here

Bug#338006: Postfix problem still there

Hello! > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > openssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: Was this meant for me? Otherwise sorry for spamming around... ;-) I upgraded to openssl 0.9.8a-6 but the Postfix errors stayed. I also got a mail f

Bug#349405: alsa-base: No Sound with Intel 82801DB/DBL/DBM AC'97

Subject: alsa-base: No Sound with Intel 82801DB/DBL/DBM AC'97 Package: alsa-base Version: 1.0.10-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi, I've lost all sound in my system, despite having all the proper snd_ modules loaded: ls

Processed: Fixed in NMU of wayv 0.3-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 346922 + fixed Bug#346922: wayv: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Processed: Re: Intend to NMU ivtools

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 346695 -pending Bug#346695: ivtools: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Tags were: pending patch Tags removed: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Processed: Intend to NMU ivtools

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 346695 patch pending Bug#346695: ivtools: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#348977: libapache-mod-witch: post-removal fails with sed reference failure

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Steve, > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-20 12:39]: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:18:08AM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > Package: libapache-mod-witch Version: 0.0.4-2 Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > I wan

Bug#347423: #347423: evince: renders ECMA-6 PDF as featureless black pages

I tried building poppler with --disable-cairo-output, which fixes the pdf display bug. See Bug #349371 Ingo -- /* Why waste time? -- asuffield */ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#346970: marked as done (xlog: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:02:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346970: fixed in xlog 1.3.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

  1   2   >