Bug#345604: [Fontinst] License of the fontinst documentation

Frank Küster wrote: But there's also files in the talks subdirectory for which no source is currently available. Do you know about the license situation for them, or should I try to contact Ulrik or Taco? And, for that matter, I guess roadmap.eps has been created with MetaPost - do you happen

Processed: Damn me. Let's close the right bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 354217 Bug#354217: DEVPTS_FS not present at linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to marlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > reopen 344217 Bug#344217:

Bug#354323: openoffice.org: [oowriter] Freezes when trying to export *.rtf as XHTML

Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: serious The Writer completely freezes and the program must be separately killed from terminal when it is exporting an *.rtf document in XHTML format. The *.rtf (written in Windows Word) document that was used it at http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp

Processed: tagging 336437

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > tags 336437 pending Bug#336437: libxine1: use of internal libmad makes other apps crash in amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here

Bug#280370: marked as done (a2ps using lp broken)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267527: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#267527: marked as done (a2ps option "-P" does not work )

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267527: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#340044: marked as done (a2ps: source file tests/tstfiles/Converter.java fails DFSG #1)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340044: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#266112: marked as done (ggz-gnome-client: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'ggz_table_left')

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:23:05 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ggz-gnome-client: #266112 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#299665: marked as done (boson-data: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Can't find X libraries. Please check your installation and add the correct paths!)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:22:05 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line boson-data: #299665 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#294452: marked as done (hptalx: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:27:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line hptalx: #294452 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#287846: marked as done (oftc-hybrid: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'yy_aconf' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:24:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line oftc-hybrid: #287846 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#345100: Not fixed in 1.1.1-1

Just wanted to not that libxine version 1.1.1 does not fix this bug. pornview still segfaults somewhere in libxine.so. pornview spawns 8 additional threads, each of them doing different tasks in xine like loading alsa module, loading config and so on. I suspect there is a race condition somewhere

Processed: retitle 345100 to libxine1 makes pornview segfault on startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > retitle 345100 libxine1 makes pornview segfault on startup Bug#345100: segfaults on startup Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#300885: marked as done (cursel: FTBFS: cursel Build-Depends on objc-poc which has been removed from the archive)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:40:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line cursel: #300885 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#304180: marked as done (aspectj-anttasks: FTBFS: package org.aspectj.tools.ajdoc does not exist)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:42:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line aspectj-anttasks: #304180 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#326862: marked as done (ggz-docs: FTBFS: cannot stat `./ggz-game-development-guide_toc.html': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:41:08 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ggz-docs: #326862 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#326940: marked as done (redboot: FTBFS (i386): cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-finit-priority")

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:43:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line redboot: #326940 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#350480: marked as done (xvnc4viewer: FTBFS on amd64)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#350405: marked as done (FTBFS: cast from 'void*' to 'CARD32' loses precision)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#352520: marked as done (vnc4 - FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `/build/buildd/vnc4-4.1.1+X4.3.0/debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/vnc.so': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#353563: marked as done (Do not build on alpha)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353563: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#353711: marked as done (FTBFS on amd64: needs -fPIC)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353711: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#353577: marked as done (Do not build on ia64)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353577: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#327068: marked as done (saxon-catalog: FTBFS: The import "com/icl/saxon/aelfred/SAXDriver" is not valid, since it does not name a type in a package.)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:39:15 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line saxon-catalog: #327068 done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

Package: preseed Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file...even for not preseeded installs. I found this while running a standard install with the sid_d-i netinst of 20060224. -- System Information: Debian Release: tes

Bug#331649: nice: libant1.6-java to ant transition

Salut Arnaud, Sorry to bother you again, but it's been a very long time. Should I look for another sponsor? Daniel Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Yes, busy, your mail is in red in my inbox ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#347376: bricolage: dont run with standard instalation

Hi, bricolage does run just fine for me in default configuration, I cannot reproduce this bug. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To U

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 347376 +moreinfo +unreproducable Unknown tag/s: +unreproducable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimen

Processed: this is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 354342 serious Bug#354342: FTBFS: can't find res_mkquery Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file... > even for not preseeded installs. >From which location does it try to fetch a preseed file? (file: ? http: ?) GSt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#354351: fail to install

Package: texinfo Version: 4.8-5 Severity: grave When installing it, it fails like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get -f install S'està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet S'està construint l'arbre de dependències... Fet 0 actualitzats, 0 nous a instal·lar, 0 a eliminar i 356 no actualitzats.

Bug#354353: php-net-checkip: FTBFS: no available versions of package php-pear can satisfy version requirements

Package: php-net-checkip Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'php-net-checkip' on unstable, I get the following error: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Build-Depends-Indep dependency for php-net-checkip cannot be satisfied because no available vers

Bug#354240: This really is a symlink problem

John, Am Freitag, den 24.02.2006, 11:14 -0600 schrieb John Goerzen: > merge 354240 354132 > thanks > > I had this symlink: > > /var/lib/asterisk -> /asterisk/lib > > It turns out that one of the asterisk maintainer scripts must be blowing > away that symlink and then creating a directory at /va

Bug#354351: fail to install

On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: > Package: texinfo > Version: 4.8-5 > Severity: grave > > kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value' Please tell me the output of which kpsewhich and kpsewhich --version I tested kpsewhich -var-value TEXMFSYSVAR on curre

Processed: reassign 351495 to festival

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > reassign 351495 festival Bug#351495: The package is unusable without the patch #335845 Bug reassigned from package `festlex-ifd' to `festival'. > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: severity of 354323 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 354323 important Bug#354323: openoffice.org: [oowriter] Freezes when trying to export *.rtf as XHTML Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#354356: python-htmltmpl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

Package: python-htmltmpl Version: 1.22-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'python-htmltmpl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: cd . && python setup.py build --build-base="./build" /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 Please a

Bug#354358: libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used)

Package: libswt-gtk-3.1-java Version: 3.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Azureus hasn't been working on AMD64 Debian out of the box ever, I think. This seems to be why. >From a Sun Hotspot 1.5.0_05 error log after a sigsegv when starting Azureus: Stack: [0x7f96

Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion

tags 354206 + unreproducible moreinfo severity 354206 important thanks Hello On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:43:50AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Package: steghide > Version: 0.5.1-7 > Severity: serious I can not reproduce this problem (on latest etch). For what architecture do you build it and wi

Processed: Re: Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 354206 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > severity 354206 important Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion Severity set to `important'.

Bug#354361: cdbs: FTBFS: FAIL: hdparm.sh

Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.34 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'cdbs' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: PASS: recursive.sh PASS: udeb-1.sh FAIL: hdparm.sh PASS: distutils-1.sh make[5]: Entering directory `/cdbs-0.4.34/test' make[5]: Nothing to be done for `tarballs'. make[5

Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file... > > even for not preseeded installs. > > >From which location does it try to fetch a preseed file? (file: ? http: ?

Bug#348706: Possible patch

I am preparing an upload with your patches. If 9.3 is ready like you intended to, please send it over. -- .''`. I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think : :' : I have ended up where I needed to be -- Douglas Adams `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux `

Bug#354204: loop-aes-source: FTBFS: Cannot find debian/patches

tags 354204 + confirmed pending thanks On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Package: loop-aes-source > Version: 3.1c-2 > Severity: serious > > From my pbuilder build log: > > ... > dh_installdocs > dh_install > cp: cannot stat `./debian/patches': No such file or dir

Processed: Re: Bug#354204: loop-aes-source: FTBFS: Cannot find debian/patches

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 354204 + confirmed pending Bug#354204: loop-aes-source: FTBFS: Cannot find debian/patches There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Bug#354370: matplotlib: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `/matplotlib-0.86.2/debian/python-matplotlib-data/usr/share/matplotlib/mpl-data/Vera*.ttf': No such file or directory

Package: matplotlib Version: 0.86.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'matplotlib' in a clean unstable chroot, I get the following error: copying lib/matplotlib/backends/Matplotlib.nib/classes.nib -> /matplotlib-0.86.2/debian/python-matplotlib-data/usr/share/lib/python2.3/site-pack

Bug#354371: lastfmsubmitd: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

Package: lastfmsubmitd Version: 0.22-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'lastfmsubmitd' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_testroot # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. python setup.py clean --all make: python: Command not found make: *** [c

Bug#354371: marked as done (lastfmsubmitd: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:17:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354371: fixed in lastfmsubmitd 0.22-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#354358: marked as forwarded (libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used))

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:08:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #354358, regarding libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used) to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) "Billy Biggs" <[EMA

Bug#354379: wesnoth: Wesnoth crash Xorg

Package: wesnoth Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software When starting wesnoth, the display becomes all black and the monitor display a label "No signal". I cannot do anything but kill the Xserver (Ctrl+Alt+Backspace). I managed to run wesnoth from a console (

Bug#323815: bzflag: This bug still present in both testing and unstable.

Package: bzflag Version: 2.0.4.20051017-0.1 Followup-For: Bug #323815 reopen 323815 thanks This bug was marked fixed and closed four months ago; but the version which fixes the bug is not in unstable and never made it to testing. The versions in both testing and unstable remain unusuable; this b

Bug#354358: libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used)

tag 354358 +confirmed severity 354358 serious retitle 322897 azureus: unusable on AMD64 retitle 331723 azureus: unusable on AMD64 block 322897 on 354358 thanks On 2/25/06, Lauri Alanko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: libswt-gtk-3.1-java > Version: 3.1-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: ren

Bug#354075: util-linux-patch breaks nfs-user-server (fwd)

More info. Maybe the dump can be sent directly to the list (or CC'd). -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:39:17 -0500 From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The difference between the two is that in case (1) (the "good" case) we're calling pmap_getmaps() in orde

Bug#354379: wesnoth: Wesnoth crash Xorg

On Saturday, 25 February 2006 20:27, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > Package: wesnoth > Version: 1.1.1-3 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > When starting wesnoth, the display becomes all black and the monitor > display a label "No signal". I cannot do anything but kill the

Bug#338006: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#338006: Postfix problem still there

On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote: > Hello Kurt, > > will/could the changes in 0.9.8a-7 have any effect on the postfix issues > I'm experiencing? Is it worth a try? A new postfix version has been uploaded to unstable, which has as changelog entry: * New upstream, fixes

Bug#353010: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-es: two problems

Hi, After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English, even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove or reinstall the package with no success. Best regards, Manolo Díaz --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: pts 0 #~ LC_ALL=C aptitude reinstall mozilla-thunderb

Bug#354351: kpathsea version

Hello, I have the same problem kpathsea from tetex-bin version 2.0.2-31: kpathsea version 3.4.5 Copyright (C) 1997 - 2002 K. Berry & O. Weber. It worked after I upgraded tetex-bin to 3.0-14: kpathsea version 3.5.4 Copyright (C) 1997 - 2004 K. Berry & O. Weber. I think you should add a dependenc

Bug#354361: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#354361: cdbs: FTBFS: FAIL: hdparm.sh

Andreas Jochens wrote: > When building 'cdbs' on amd64/unstable, > I get the following error: > > PASS: recursive.sh > PASS: udeb-1.sh > FAIL: hdparm.sh Yes, I had already made the same detection. It will be fixed in the next upload as soon as the current one goes through to testing. -- To UN

Bug#353010: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-es: two problems

Hi, After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English, even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove or reinstall the package with no success. Best regards, Manolo Díaz --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: pts 0 #~ LC_ALL=C aptitude reinstall mozilla-thunderb

Processed: severity of 354379 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > severity 354379 normal Bug#354379: wesnoth: Wesnoth crash Xorg Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debia

Bug#352849: forwarding and downgrading bug

forwarded 352849 http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 severity 352849 normal thanks After some more investigation, it is clear that this bug is only in tiff2pdf and not in the actual tiff library. (Other programs that use libtiff can handle this image fine, including tiff2ps an

Bug#353315: Patch

tag 353315 patch thanks The attached patch implements Daniel's suggestion. I verified that it fixed the build. -- Matt diff -ru upsd-2.6-orig/Makefile upsd-2.6/Makefile --- upsd-2.6-orig/Makefile 2006-02-24 20:38:56.0 -0800 +++ upsd-2.6/Makefile 2006-02-24 20:39:34.0 -080

Processed: forwarding and downgrading bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 352849 http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 Bug#352849: libtiff-tools: tiff2pdf segfaults Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097. > severity 352849 normal

Processed: Patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 353315 patch Bug#353315: upsd: FTBFS with new make There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databas

Bug#354351: fail to install

Norbert Preining wrote: > On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: > >>Package: texinfo >>Version: 4.8-5 >>Severity: grave >> >>kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value' > > > Please tell me the output of > which kpsewhich /usr/bin/kpsewhich > and > kpsewhich --version [

Bug#354389: Checkinstall segfaults with latest Sid update

Package: checkinstall Version: 1.5.3-3 Severity: grave When attempting to execute "checkinstall" scripts after updating Sid today, I get segfaults during package creation. Checkinstall was working prior to upgrading system packages. --SNIP-- checkinstall 1.5.3, Copyright 2001 Felipe Eduardo Sa

Bug#347095: Patch

tag 347095 patch tag 349443 patch thanks The attached patch fixes both of these bugs. To fix bug 347095, it removes the build-dependency on xlibs-dev. To fix bug 349443, it removes the X11 subdirectory. -- Matt diff -ru pixmap-2.6pl4-orig/debian/control pixmap-2.6pl4/debian/control --- pixmap-

Bug#353010: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-es: two problems

On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 08:53:41PM +0100, Manolo Díaz wrote: > Hi, > > After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English, > even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove > or reinstall the package with no success. Yes, the prerm script is not correct,

Processed: Patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 347095 patch Bug#347095: pixmap: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > tag 349443 patch Bug#349443: FTBFS: overrides internal X11 headers There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping p

Processed: Re: Bug#323815: bzflag: This bug still present in both testing and unstable.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 323815 Bug#323815: bzflag: shoots trough other players Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Bug#323815: bzflag: This bug still present in both testing and unstable.

reopen 323815 thanks On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:22:01PM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote: > This bug was marked fixed and closed four months ago; but the version > which fixes the bug is not in unstable and never made it to testing. The version which was listed as fixing the bug is indeed present in t

Bug#352103: marked as done (portreserve: init script does not work)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352103: fixed in portreserve 0.0.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#354200: marked as done (e2undel: FTBFS with current make)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354200: fixed in e2undel 0.8-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#354356: marked as done (python-htmltmpl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354356: fixed in python-htmltmpl 1.22-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#323815: bzflag: This bug still present in both testing and unstable.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:57:36 -0800 Steve Langasek wrote: > > The version which was listed as fixing the bug is indeed present in > testing and unstable (rather, a later version is present). Whoops. For some dumb reason I took 2.0.4.20051017-0.1 as an earlier version than 2.0.4.20051017 because o

Bug#354401: Error "chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group" when setting up tex-common

Package: tex-common Version: 0.18 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When setting up tex-common: Setting up tex-common (0.18) ... Adjusting permissions of TeX font cache... chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group dpkg: error processing tex-common (--configure): subprocess post-

Processed: tagging 248654, tagging 260173, tagging 307813, tagging 314341, tagging 340299, tagging 340866 ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 > tags 248654 + pending Bug#248654: should use the new debhelper 4.2 udeb support There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 260173 + pending Bug#260173: cdbs: Run dh_installmi

Bug#354351: fail to install

Dear Miguel! On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: > >>kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value' > > /usr/bin/kpsewhich > > > and > > kpsewhich --version > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/media/loop0$ kpsewhich --version > kpathsea version 3.4.5 Uuups, where did you got this from? Do y

Processed: severity of 354342 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > # as I said, FTBFS are only RC if there is a previous package version in the > Debian archive > severity 354342 important Bug#354342: FTBFS: can't find res_mkquery Severity set to

Bug#345604: [Fontinst] License of the fontinst documentation

Taco Hoekwater wrote: Frank Küster wrote: But there's also files in the talks subdirectory for which no source is currently available. Do you know about the license situation for them, or should I try to contact Ulrik or Taco? And, for that matter, I guess roadmap.eps has been created with M

Bug#354401: Error "chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group" when setting up tex-common

Hi Vincent! On Son, 26 Feb 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Adjusting permissions of TeX font cache... chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid > group > tex-common/groupname: UNKNOWN This is strange, how did the UNKNOWN came into the tex-common/groupname? Did you enter it? The default for groupname is us

Bug#354401: Error "chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group" when setting up tex-common

On 2006-02-26 01:42:04 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: > This is strange, how did the UNKNOWN came into the tex-common/groupname? I really don't know. It was previously 82 (in my config.dat backup from 2006-02-22 01:07:52), and now UNKNOWN. In the past, /etc/group contained: users:x:82: (I had t

Processed: Adding tags: confirmed, patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 354145 + confirmed patch Bug#354145: mindi: Cdrom not detected after cdrom boot There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#354145: mindi: Cdrom not detected after cdrom boot

Salut Yann, Thanks a lot for reporting this issue and for mentioning the workaround you found! I can confirm the problem and it's all my fault: When I made the change in 1.06-2 to get DMA to work on VIA chipsets, I relied on the ide-generic module to get loaded later, which is wrong as the CD can

Bug#328557: marked as done (twiki: TWiki Remote Command Execution Vulnerability)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:33:04 +1100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line twiki: TWiki Remote Command Execution Vulnerability has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#354389: checkinstall segfaults

Updating checkinstall to version 1.6.0 fixes the segfaults with the latest Sid sources. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#354414: www.debian.org: Invalid URL in jigdo files used to download Debian Stable DVD ISO

Package: www.debian.org Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I've downloaded jigdo and template files from http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/jigdo-dvd/ After jigdo-lite (installed from the jigdo-file package) started to download files, I got error messages for e

Bug#354145: Bug#268308: dvd+rw-tools: growisofs prejudiced against sudo

Hi Daniel, I just stumbled across this bug whilst looking into an issue with the mondo package that I maintain and writing DVDs under sudo which does not work because of the situation described in this bug. I believe that rather than applying a patch as suggested by LaMont, all that would be requ

Bug#264972: marked as done (wv: Security problem with wv)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:10:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#319673: Intent to NMU aspell-fo

Hi Peter, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has kindly agreed to sponsor an NMU of aspell-fo based on my patch (included above). Please let us know if there any reason why it should not be done, otherwise it is going to be uploaded next weekend (March 4-5). Best regards, Jurij Smak