Processed: Re: libnss-mdns should recommend zeroconf

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 353311 Bug#353311: mrename: FTBFS: can't parse dependency Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks, Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#353311: libnss-mdns should recommend zeroconf

reopen 353311 thanks, On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:23:44PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > Actually libnss-mdns has to recommend zeroconf. > > How else do you expect the entire zeroconf stack to work when two > machines only has a cable between them? > > The zeroconf stack is supposed to work without

Bug#351532: marked as done (freeloader fails to fire up from terminal)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 23:17:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#351532: fixed in freeloader 0.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#354798: tomboy: Tomboy won't start

this is fixed with the new dbus (0.61-3) from today. f-spot was also infected. greetings, fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#355090: FTBFS: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision

Package: amaya Version: 9.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hi, amaya 9.4-1 FTBFS on 64 bit archs because of the following problem: [...] x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -O2 -Wall -x c++ -D__cplusplus -D_UNIX -D_GL -D_WX -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I../../amaya/xpm -I../../thotlib

Bug#355083: avahi-daemon: links against non-existent library

Package: avahi-daemon Version: 0.6.8-1 Severity: serious When starting avahi-daemon, I get this error: Starting Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD Daemon: avahi-daemon/usr/sbin/avahi-daemon: error while loading shared libraries: libavahi-core.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory /usr/sb

Bug#355076: FTBFS: build-dependency on wenglish cannot be fulfiled

Package: gpw Version: 0.0.19940601-8 Severity: serious You have a build-dependency on a package that no longer exists: > Automatic build of gpw_0.0.19940601-8 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.75 ... > Building dependency tree... > E: Package wenglish has no installation candidate > Package wenglish is

Bug#355075: FTBFS: line 7: syntax error near unexpected token `}'

Package: cpipe Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: serious Your packages doesn't build in unstable. This may be related to recent changes in make but I haven't looked at it in detail. > Automatic build of cpipe_3.0.0-2 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.75 ... > /usr/bin/make > make[1]: Entering directory `/buil

Processed: Re: rain: FTBFS (ppc64): config.guess and config.sub are too old

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 299315 normal Bug#299315: rain: FTBFS (ppc64): config.guess and config.sub are too old Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#299315: rain: FTBFS (ppc64): config.guess and config.sub are too old

severity 299315 normal thanks * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-02 23:41]: > Right, I get the same problems on MIPS running a 64-bit kernel. Since > MIPS is a supported architecture, this bug is RC. Sorry, I was wrong about that. Shouldn't stop you from fixing this bug though. 0

Bug#353814: marked as done (kdelibs-bin: meinproc is relicensing my code)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:17:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353814: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#355067: libgnome2-canvas-perl: Package needs to be recompiled against latest libgnomecanvas

Package: libgnome2-canvas-perl Version: 1.002-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The libgnome2-canvas-perl package in Debian unstable was apparently built against version 2.10.0 of libgnomecanvas2, but that library has since been upgraded to 2.12.0. There is a minor API ch

Processed: Bug#299315: rain: FTBFS (ppc64): config.guess and config.sub are too old

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 299315 serious Bug#299315: rain: FTBFS (ppc64): config.guess and config.sub are too old Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#190413: marked as done ("Security patch is fundamentally broken")

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:05:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop

Greetings, The new upgrade procedure fails on alpha, regardless of the kernel workaround, there's still a udev - initramfs-tools dependency loop which interrupts the udev postinst, and the failures cascade from there: # touch /etc/udev/kernel-upgrade # dselect Reading package lists... Done Buildi

Bug#353277: Please reject to rule on the ndiswrapper question

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:43:45PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 01 Mar 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > Of course, I can be convinced that the constitution does give the ctte that > power, but so far, I am not. Otherwise, why didn't we pose to the ctte a > request for how the

Bug#355047: marked as done (install: segmentation faultsts)

Your message dated Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:52:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355047: install: segmentation faultsts has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#354969: marked as done (Does not depend on libpantomime1)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:17:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354969: fixed in pantomime 1.1.2.dfsg-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#355049: python2.3-poker-network: hangs in "Preconfiguring packages ..."

Package: python2.3-poker-network Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable a clean "apt-get install poker-network" will proceed to download everything and then hang in "preconfiguring packages ...". I haven't yet determined the cause, but I can't get past that step. -- System Info

Bug#355047: install: segmentation faultsts

Package: install Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) cannot update with apt-get libc6 ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#344420: marked as done (mailutils: movemail loses mail if destination disk is full)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:46:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344420: fixed in mailutils 1:0.6.93-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#354771: marked as done (avahi-daemon: missing dependency on libavahi-core3)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:43:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354771: fixed in avahi 0.6.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#343777: marked as done (Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:46:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343777: fixed in mailutils 1:0.6.93-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#355045: xqf: Fails to run - segmentation fault

Package: xqf Version: 1.0.4-directhex3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** I've been trying to write a patch for XQF to fix an unrelated problem. However, it seems it's not my dodgy C programming causing segfaults - I find mysel

Bug#354943: marked as done (FTBFS: please remove Makefile)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:47:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354943: fixed in jpilot 0.99.8-0.99.9-pre-20060225-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#340119: marked as done (Fails to upgrade)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:47:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340119: fixed in coreutils 5.94-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#339136: marked as done (stat --format behavior change with default newline)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:47:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339136: fixed in coreutils 5.94-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#355006: svn-buildpackage: Files marked with (?) should not cause fatal error

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:22:02PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > I'm wondering if there is reasoning why this is the other way round? > In compilers, the rope is tightened with options like -Wall for more > restrictive checks. Because it optimizes for the common case? But I think having compilers n

Bug#355006: svn-buildpackage: Files marked with (?) should not cause fatal error

| | --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii | Content-Disposition: inline | Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable | | On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:04PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: | > Package: svn-buildpackage | > Version: 0.6.14 | > Severity: serious | | > Given situ

Bug#345161: locales not installable

Bastian Venthur escribió: > Hi ff-locale-maintainers, > > would it help to involve more DDs in co-maintaining this package? > Firefox is an important package and I guess for many non-techies an > uninstallable locale renders firefox useless. > > I suggest to ask for help e.g. on d-devel. This way

Bug#355006: marked as done (svn-buildpackage: Files marked with (?) should not cause fatal error)

Your message dated Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:46:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355006: svn-buildpackage: Files marked with (?) should not cause fatal error has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: Re: Bug#354969: Does not depend on libpantomime1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package libpantomime1-dev Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libpantomime1-dev > tags 354969 +pending Bug#354969: Does not depend on libpantomime1 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Bug#354969: Does not depend on libpantomime1

package libpantomime1-dev tags 354969 +pending thanks On 2006-03-02 05:45:27 -0700 Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: libpantomime1-dev does not depend on libpantomime1. Thanks. I had about three bugs in my dependencies. And if I hadn't made 1 out of 2 of them, it may have actually work

Bug#353277: Please reject to rule on the ndiswrapper question

On Wed, 01 Mar 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:03:56AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Otherwise, the ctte could overrule just about everything in Debian. Were > > they not bound by the SC themselves, they could overrule even the SC itself > > by determining

Processed: retitle 353932 to machine compromised with awstats.pl?configdir

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > retitle 353932 machine compromised with awstats.pl?configdir Bug#353932: machine compromised with awstats.pl?configdir (should have been Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping

Processed: tagging 353932

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 353932 - patch Bug#353932: machine compromised with awstats.pl?configdir (should have been Tags were: patch security Tags removed: patch > End of message, stopping processing he

Processed: Re: Bug#354973: gnucash: crash at startup: ERROR: no code for module (g-wrap gw startup)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 354973 serious Bug#354973: gnucash: crash at startup: ERROR: no code for module (g-wrap gw startup) Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#354973: gnucash: crash at startup: ERROR: no code for module (g-wrap gw startup)

severity 354973 serious thanks Remi Vanicat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: gnucash > Version: 1.9.1-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: experimental > Justification: renders package unusable > > When trying to run a localy build experimental gnucash, it failed at > startup with the error: > Sub

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ude 0.2.9b-2.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 350384 + fixed Bug#350384: ude: broken dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 350385 + fixed Bug#350385: uwm: broken dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 352396 + fixed Bug#352396: uwm: Uninstallable d

Processed: Fixed in NMU of tochnog 20010124-2.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 337460 + fixed Bug#337460: tochnog: FTBFS: undefined reference to 'MAIN__' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Bug#337460: Patch for NMU of tochnog

Hi Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D diff -u tochnog-20010124/debian/

Bug#355006: svn-buildpackage: Files marked with (?) should not cause fatal error

Package: svn-buildpackage Version: 0.6.14 Severity: serious Given situation: # svn-buildpackage ... dh_clean make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/net/deb/debian/bbweather/bbweather' E: Resolve them manually before continueing E: found unresolved issues: ?

Bug#354971: (no subject)

Bug reported in Boson bugtracker : http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121810 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#353932: can't reproduce exploit

My attempts to reproduce this exploit have failed. Anyone else? Charles -- 6 million housewives Can't be wrong Who keep Their husbands Right along in Burma-Shave http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1955/million_housewives signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#354971: (no subject)

The bug already reported in Ubuntu bug tracker with a trace. https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/boson-base/+bug/28713 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Processed: severity of 354971 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 354971 grave Bug#354971: boson-base: 0.11-1 crash on AMD64 Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#354444: tetex-base: Again md5sum not known.

Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roland Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Package: tetex-base >> Version: 2.0.2c-9 >> Severity: grave >> Justification: renders package unusable >> >> >> I get this error when upgrading to tetex-base 3.0-14: >> >> /etc/texmf/map/dvips/context/original-

Bug#354987: expect-tcl8.3: FTBFS: can't parse dependency

Package: expect-tcl8.3 Version: 5.43.0-3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... dh_gencontrol -a dh_gencontrol: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated. dpkg-gencontrol: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) ... [more harmless LOGNAME

Processed: Downgrading KWeather bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 348459 important Bug#348459: can not select any station - unknown station? Severity set to `important'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#348459: Downgrading KWeather bug

severity 348459 important stop Since there are workarounds and only a subset of users seem stopped, I'm downgrading to important. Christopher Martin pgp8gwIMZwFt5.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: Block 350435 by 354969

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 350435 by 354969 Bug#350435: FTBFS due to unmet build-dep on libgnustep-gui0.9-dev Was blocked by: 351408 Blocking bugs added: 354969 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Processed: severity of 354971 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 354971 important Bug#354971: boson-base: 0.11-1 crash on AMD64 Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#350435: Block 350435 by 354969

block 350435 by 354969 thanks Bug 354969 prevents lusernet.app from building, and thus prevents 350435 from being fixed. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#350890: Some remarks

Hello, I had a similar problem with krusader 1.60.0-3.1, eg. 1.60.0-3+b1 worked fine, and 1.60.0-3.1 crashed on my home directory (I even made a testcase for it). Krusader 1.70.0 solved my problem, so maybe it's really fixed. However, I've lost my backtrace, so I can't be sure. Maybe the situati

Bug#354973: gnucash: crash at startup: ERROR: no code for module (g-wrap gw startup)

Package: gnucash Version: 1.9.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable When trying to run a localy build experimental gnucash, it failed at startup with the error: Subject: gnucash: crash at startup: ERROR: no code for module (g-wrap gw startup) -- System I

Bug#354971: boson-base: 0.11-1 crash on AMD64

Package: boson-base Version: 0.11-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Boson 0.11-1 doesn't work on AMD64. It crashs with this message : boson: [bool SpeciesTheme::loadTheme(const QString&, const QColor&)] theme path: /usr/share/apps/boson/themes/species/human/ KCrash: Appl

Bug#353844: gnomemeeting: package does not install on etch, neither does it build

Hi Vincent, Am Dienstag, den 28.02.2006, 19:04 +0100 schrieb Vincent Danjean: >Hi, > > You wrote: > > The NEW queue is visible at: > > > > Can you provide an URL where we can install this package > 'by hand' ? The NEW queue does not seem to be av

Bug#354969: Does not depend on libpantomime1

Package: libpantomime1-dev Version: 1.1.2.dfsg-4 Severity: serious libpantomime1-dev does not depend on libpantomime1. This is serious because it causes lusernet.app to fail to build since it can't find -lPantomime. > Linking app LuserNET ... > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lPantomime > collect2: l

Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop

I implemented in udev 0.085-1 a first attempt to solve this problem. It's totally untested and I will not able to test it myself soon, so reports are appreciated. The upgrade procedure should be something like: # switch sources.list to testing apt-get update touch /etc/udev/kernel-upgrade apt-ge

Bug#354967: wmspaceweather - FTBFS: Build-depends against xlibs-dev

Package: wmspaceweather Version: 1.04-16 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Package xlibs-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another so

Bug#354654: general: fat32 gets corrupted

Hello, Since I have the need to continue to work with my machine1, I finally did an apt-get dist-upgrade for machine1, and installed debian kernel 2.6.15-1-686. I erased fat32 partition and replaced it by a ext2 and give access to it from windows using fs-driver. I will see if problems are stil

Bug#354677: marked as done (uruk: FTBFS: [zoem] error around input line <13> in <./include.zmm>)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Mar 2006 02:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354677: fixed in uruk 20051129-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#354945: bashisms in the maintainer scripts

Package: postfix-policyd Version: 1.70-2 Severity: serious Statements like [ "$1" == "configure" ] are invalid and should be replaced with [ "$1" = "configure" ]. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#354943: FTBFS: please remove Makefile

Package: jpilot Version: 0.99.8-0.99.9-pre-20060225-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source Hello, jpilot 0.99.8-0.99.9-pre-20060225-2 doesn't compile on many arches. The problems is that it's missing the .deps directory. Example: Makefile:551: .deps/address.Po: N

Bug#354916: python2.3-sqlobject not installable in unstable (missing formencode)

Il giorno gio, 02/03/2006 alle 01.59 +0100, Emanuele Aina ha scritto: > Package: python-sqlobject > Version: 0.7.0-1 > Severity: grave > > python2.3-sqlobject in unstable is not installable due to the requirement > of python2.3-formencode, which is not in unstable. Ciao Emanuele, I'm sorry but