Bug#358042: Makes other packages FTBFS: missing depends on GSSAPI

On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:56:23PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 16:16 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:01:22PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > Obviously, you're missing a dependency. > I have corrected -dev now. Please reschedule davfs2 f

Bug#358553: addresses.framework: hard-coded dep on old version of gnustep-base

Package: addresses.framework Version: 0.4.6-4.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package completely unusable The addresses-for-gnustep NMU left a hard-coded dependency on libgnustep-base1.10 in debian/control: Package: addresses.framework Section: libs Architecture: any Depends: libgnustep-

Bug#358310: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory

tag 358310 +patch Thanks Martin Michlmayr wrote: [...] mips-linux-gnu-g++: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [chewing.la] Error 1 The attchment is a patch from Hou ZhengPeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which solve this problem. -Andrew diff -ruNad scim-chewing-0.2.1.o

Processed: Re: Bug#358310: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 358310 +patch Bug#358310: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#358393: marked as done (powermgmt-base: Missing 'Depends' on debconf)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358393: fixed in powermgmt-base 1.24 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#358551: Acknowledgement (f-spot: crashes with exception when started)

More on this bug: if I copy /etc/mono/config to ~/.mono, then f-spot runs. According to strace, it appears to be looking for mono stuff in /usr/etc, which is an odd path to be looking for anything on a Debian system. Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Bug#358551: f-spot: crashes with exception when started

Package: f-spot Version: 0.1.8-1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable > f-spot Starting new FSpot server Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: intl in (wrapper managed-to-native) Mono.Posix.Catalog:gettext (intptr) in <0x0001a> Mono.Posix.Catalog:GetString (Syste

Processed: Re: libopenobex library transition

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 358279 important Bug#358279: FTBS: transition to new version of libopenobex Severity set to `important'. > severity 358275 important Bug#358275: FTBS: transition to new version of libopenobex Severity set to `important'. > severity 358283 imp

Bug#358543: apache: fails to install

severity 358543 important tags 358543 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 07:20:51PM -0800, Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > Package: apache > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > Upon install of apache, I get the following error message: > dpkg: error proces

Processed: Re: Bug#358543: apache: fails to install

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 358543 important Bug#358543: apache: fails to install Severity set to `important'. > tags 358543 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#358543: apache: fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > thanks Stopping proce

Bug#358550: FTBFS: error: 'struct dqblk' has no member named 'dqb_curblocks'

tensions.c:419: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has > type 'u_int64_t' > extensions.c:426: error: 'struct dqblk' has no member named 'dqb_curblocks' > extensions.c: In function 'show_message': > extensions.c:689: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' > extensions.c:697: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' > extensions.c: In function 'show_readme': > extensions.c:758: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' > extensions.c:766: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' > extensions.c: In function 'del_check': > extensions.c:1583: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' > extensions.c: In function 'path_to_device': > extensions.c:1835: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as > truth value > make[2]: *** [extensions.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/wu-ftpd-2.6.2/src' > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/wu-ftpd-2.6.2' > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 > ** > Build finished at 20060322-1639 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358536: x11-common does not install

reassign 358536 libxft-dev close 358536 2.1.8.2-4 merge 358536 358439 quit On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:56:34AM +0100, hungerburg wrote: > Package: x11-common > Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 > Severity: grave > Tags: experimental > x11-common will not install here; dpkg complains: > Unpacking replacemen

Processed: Re: Bug#358536: x11-common does not install

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 358536 libxft-dev Bug#358536: x11-common does not install Bug reassigned from package `x11-common' to `libxft-dev'. > close 358536 2.1.8.2-4 Bug#358536: x11-common does not install 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Develope

Bug#358548: FTBFS on mips: The variable | is unbound.

Package: axiom Version: 20050901-4.1 Severity: serious Hae you noticed that axiom fails to build on mips with: | The variable | is unbound. What can we do about this? > Automatic build of axiom_20050901-4.1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106 ... > 146 making /build/tbm/axiom-20050901/obj/linux/inte

Bug#358543: apache: fails to install

Package: apache Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Upon install of apache, I get the following error message: dpkg: error processing apache (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: apache E: S

Bug#358547: FTBFS: missing b-d?: Can't locate bad_module_without_name.pm

Package: libembperl-perl Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Your package fails to build in unstable. Might be a missing b-d since it seems to build in a working environment but not in a clean chroot. > Automatic build of libembperl-perl_2.0.1-1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.94 ... > #211 EmbperlObj

Bug#358540: FTBFS: cannot find -lXinerama

Package: wmaker Version: 0.92.0-5.2 Severity: serious You're missing a build-depends after the X reorganization. > Automatic build of wmaker_0.92.0-5.2 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106 ... > /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 -o > wmaker actions.o appicon.o app

Bug#358545: FTBFS: ...skipped cscursor.so for lack of libcrystalspace.a...

Package: crystalspace Version: 0.99-20060125-1 Severity: serious Your package fails to build on unstable on a number of architectures. It's not obvious to me from the build log what actually fails but it does, just see http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=crystalspace > Automatic build o

Bug#358512: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp: kernel-headers seems to contain unconfigured kernel

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include * Mau [Thu, Mar 23 2006, 01:01:22AM]: Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp Version: 2.6.16-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable probably a bug in this package - module-assistant says 'Warning, /usr/src/linux-headers-2.

Bug#351566: marked as done (warped: FTBFS: configure: error: Could not find PCCTS headers.)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:32:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#351566: fixed in warped 20051029-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#358536: x11-common does not install

Package: x11-common Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: grave Tags: experimental x11-common will not install here; dpkg complains: Unpacking replacement x11-common ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/X1

Processed: severity of 349283 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > # from discussion with maintainer > severity 349283 serious Bug#349283: tor: Tor security advisory: hidden services can be located quickly Severity set to `serious'. > End of messag

Bug#358532: installation-reports: sparc ultra 1 reboot fails

Package: installation-reports Version: etch beta2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Boot method: cd Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/sparc/jigdo-cd/debian-testing-sparc-binary-1.jigdo Date: 2006-03-22 Machine: Sun ultra 1 Processor: ultrasparc

Bug#351623: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: breaks reiserfs)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:34:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#351623: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: seems to be fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#358510: linux-image: SCSI/SATA boot problem

* Glenn English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-22 16:57]: > > A SATA drive isn't SCSI, so it shouldn't be labeled as such. If it has > to be for some reason, the real SCSI drive(s) should come first in /dev. As an aside, IDE disks will probably show up at sda at some point in the not too distant to

Processed: Re: Bug#358510: linux-image: SCSI/SATA boot problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 358510 initramfs-tools 358510 Bug#358510: linux-image: SCSI/SATA boot problem Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image' to `initramfs-tools'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#358510: linux-image: SCSI/SATA boot problem

What does the following command say: dpkg -l initramfs-tools yaird -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 358507 is minor

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > severity 358507 minor Bug#358507: saved passwords are world-readable Severity set to `minor'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: severity of 358042 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > severity 358042 serious Bug#358042: Makes other packages FTBFS: missing depends on GSSAPI Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#358512: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp: kernel-headers seems to contain unconfigured kernel

#include * Mau [Thu, Mar 23 2006, 01:01:22AM]: > Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp > Version: 2.6.16-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > probably a bug in this package - module-assistant says 'Warning, > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.16-1 seems to contain uncon

Bug#347672: evolution: Evolution 2.4.2.1 freezes on startup

Package: evolution Version: 2.4.2.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #347672 I ran into the same problem: evolution:9113): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_gc_set_foreground: assertion GDK_IS_GC (gc)' failed *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x... The first occurence of it correlated with an upgrade of gli

Bug#358507: saved passwords are world-readable

Quoting Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Il giorno gio, 23/03/2006 alle 10.18 +1100, Drew Parsons ha scritto: The permissions of this file are -rw-r--r--. This means anyone on the same machine can read your passwords, correct? In a directory not accessible by any other user? drwx--

Bug#358510: more

Ubuntu does this too... -- Glenn English [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG ID: D0D7FF20 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358507: saved passwords are world-readable

Il giorno gio, 23/03/2006 alle 10.18 +1100, Drew Parsons ha scritto: > Package: evolution > Version: 2.4.2.1-1 > Severity: critical > > evolution offers you the option of saving passwords to mail servers so you > don't have to type them in each time. They get saved to > ~/.gnome2_private/Evolutio

Bug#358512: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp: kernel-headers seems to contain unconfigured kernel

Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp Version: 2.6.16-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable probably a bug in this package - module-assistant says 'Warning, /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.16-1 seems to contain unconfigured kernel source!' Thanks - Mau -- System Information: De

Bug#358510: linux-image: SCSI/SATA boot problem

Package: linux-image Version: 2.6.?? i386 and amd64 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have 2 systems with SCSI system disks and SATA misc disks (P4 and AMD64). At install, I put / on the SCSI and the grub MBR on (hd0) (set to the SCSI in the BIOS). The installer wrote /b

Bug#358507: saved passwords are world-readable

Package: evolution Version: 2.4.2.1-1 Severity: critical evolution offers you the option of saving passwords to mail servers so you don't have to type them in each time. They get saved to ~/.gnome2_private/Evolution. The permissions of this file are -rw-r--r--. This means anyone on the same mach

Bug#358411: marked as done (libdata-visitor-perl: FTBFS: Failed 5/5 test scripts)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:02:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358411: fixed in libdata-visitor-perl 0.02-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#356807: marked as done (nessus-core - FTBFS: undefined reference to `stream_pending')

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:19:00 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356807: fixed in nessus-core 2.2.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#347672: freeze caused by specific email

I've only experienced this same freeze just today. I've got evolution 2.4.2.1-1, so it's been running fine for two months now since January. The lockup now occurs, I think I can identify a specific email that came in today which triggered it. The message is on an IMAP server so the message above a

Bug#320541: uudeview and CAN-2004-2265

clone 320541 -1 -2 reassign -1 dnprogs reassign -2 goldedplus thanks On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:20:50PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote: > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Matej Vela, Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:00:13 +0100: > >>Note that the following packages contain copies of uudeview: > >> > >>

Bug#262119: marked as done (kimberlite: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: parse error before string constant)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:35:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in kimberlite 1.1.0-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Processed: Re: uudeview and CAN-2004-2265

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 320541 -1 -2 Bug#320541: unsafe temp file creation (CAN-2004-2265) Bug 320541 cloned as bugs 358500-358501. > reassign -1 dnprogs Bug#358500: unsafe temp file creation (CAN-2004-2265) Bug reassigned from package `uudeview' to `dnprogs'. > reassi

Bug#340159: marked as done (linuxconf-1.26r4/diajava/XColorNames.java fails DFSG #1)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:43:46 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#335143: marked as done (removal of automake1.6)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:20:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335143: fixed in snort 2.3.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#356706: marked as done (snort: please update build-dependencies for libmysqlclient)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:20:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356706: fixed in snort 2.3.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#284865: marked as done (kimberlite: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'loglevel' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:35:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in kimberlite 1.1.0-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Processed: Re: Bug#337790: One possible solution ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 337790 libnjb Bug#337790: libnjb-hotplug doesnt take into account the new udev system without hotplug Warning: Unknown package 'libnjb-hotplug' Bug reassigned from package `libnjb-hotplug' to `libnjb'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please c

Bug#280247: marked as done (kimberlite: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-3.4): Please use '#include ' instead of 'extern int errno;')

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:35:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in kimberlite 1.1.0-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Processed: fixed, but looking for a better solution; decrease severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package neon Ignoring bugs not assigned to: neon > severity 358042 important Bug#358042: Makes other packages FTBFS: missing depends on GSSAPI Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#320541: uudeview and CAN-2004-2265

Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matej Vela, Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:00:13 +0100: >>Note that the following packages contain copies of uudeview: >> >> dnprogs: mail/uulib/uulib.c (0.5.13) >> goldedplus: build/goldlib/uulib/uulib.c (0.5.15) >> libconvert-uulib-perl: uulib/uulib.c (0.5.20)

Bug#241959: marked as done (kimberlite_1.1.0-3.2(unstable): FTBFS: swig errors)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:35:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in kimberlite 1.1.0-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#201226: marked as done (kimberlite: FTBFS: Missing files)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:28:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in kimberlite 1.1.0-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#358462: marked as done (FTBFS: can't parse dependency)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:18:48 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358462: fixed in malaga 6.13-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#358321: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-dep on cdbs)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:20:31 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358321: fixed in ttf-freefont 20060126b-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#358304: marked as done (FTBFS on mips/mipsel: needs -lpthreads)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:17:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358304: fixed in avahi 0.6.9-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#358402: pyroman: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

retitle 358402 missing build-dep on python. thanks Pyroman doesn't build native modules, so the correct dependency is python, not python-dev. Thanks anyway, I'll add that the next upload. best regards, Erich Schubert -- erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C(o_

Bug#356624: marked as done (libnasl: FTBFS on ia64)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:17:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356624: fixed in libnasl 2.2.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#210496: marked as done (kimberlite_1.1.0-3.1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared object)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:32:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in kimberlite 1.1.0-3.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#358493: FTBFS: testsuite failures.

Package: tagcoll Version: 1.6.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source tagcoll fails to build on Alpha, IA64 and Sparc. E.g. alpha: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/tagcoll-1.6.1/tests' [...] tagcoll_mmapindex: . tagcoll_opset: ./bin/sh: line 4: 8481 Aborted

Processed: Re: Bug#357509: free(): invalid pointer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 358468 grave Bug#358468: evolution: glibc detected double free or corruption (out) Severity set to `grave'. > merge 358468 358071 Bug#358071: SIGABRT error after glib update Bug#358468: evolution: glibc detected double free or corruption (out)

Bug#358462: FTBFS: can't parse dependency

* Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-22 13:58]: > > dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency libmalaga1-dev > > libmalaga2-dev > > dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occoured while parsing Conflicts > > Wow, I wonder why it always built fine before. Perhaps the tools used > to b

Bug#358489: VPL almost useless

Package: quanta Version: 4:3.5.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The attachment is quanta_test.html that I have used to verify some fatal behaviours of the VPL facility of Quanta 3.5.1, here described in some numbered examples. All are fully reproducible. I use Debian

Bug#358462: FTBFS: can't parse dependency

Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: malaga > Version: 6.13-5 > Severity: serious > > Your package fails to build: > > dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency libmalaga1-dev libmalaga2-dev > dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occoured while parsing Conflicts Wow, I wonder w

Bug#324188: Errrr

To me this looks more like an alsa bug than a swh-plugins bug. The plugins (at least in .4.14-1) appear to operate as expected in other host apps (specifically I tested dyson compressor with the same arguments as in the bug report in Audacity, and recieved an output that was not distorted in a way

Bug#337790: One possible solution ...

I recently installed Ubuntu Dapper and found that gnomad2 would not work for me due to the problem described in this bug. Here is my new script version which works for both the hotplug system and udev, I think. Changes: 1) permissions for root:audio should be 0660, not 0666. 2) if DEVICE is not se

Bug#358477: rpmstrap.1 is non-free

package: rpmstrap version: 0.5.2-1 severity: serious The manpage for rpmstrap was written by the maintainer of the package. At the end, it says it can be freely redistributed. However, this says nothing about modification. Please fix the wording, or remove the manpage, and remove the existing s

Processed: kompare: Kompare cannot parse diff output

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 358415 important Bug#358415: kompare: Kompare cannot parse diff output Severity set to `important'. > tags 358415 unreproducible Bug#358415: kompare: Kompare cannot parse diff output There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > stop S

Bug#358415: kompare: Kompare cannot parse diff output

severity 358415 important tags 358415 unreproducible stop Hello, I can't reproduce the problem. Kompare works fine here. Can anyone else test this and report? Thanks, Christopher Martin Ferenczi Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kompare displays "Could not parse diff output" error dialog and

Bug#358473: FTBFS: -MGStreamer segfaults on mips

Package: libgstreamer-perl Version: 0.04-1 Severity: serious (sid)158:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/src/libgstreamer-perl-0.04] /usr/bin/perl -MGStreamer -I blib/lib -I blib/arch zsh: segmentation fault /usr/bin/perl -MGStreamer -I blib/lib -I blib/arch Compiling with GCC 4.0/4.1, -O0/-O2 doesn't make a

Bug#326714: acknowledged by developer (Removed)

Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #326714: kbear crashes at every file transfer, > which was filed against the kbear package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explan

Bug#326714: Removed

François Valenduc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > It's true that gftp-gtk is also a good replacement but I think > kftpgrabber is better in a KDE/Qt environment. > What do you think of my proposal ? Sure. It seems Fathi BOUDRA already intends to package it for Debian; see

Processed: sendmail: cert TA06-081A

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Package: sendmail Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > Version: 8.13.4-3 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > Followup-For: Bug #358440 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 358440 security Bug#3584

Bug#358440: sendmail: cert TA06-081A

Package: sendmail Version: 8.13.4-3 Followup-For: Bug #358440 tags 358440 security thanks Cert also lists this bug: http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA06-081A.html -- Package-specific info: Ouput of /usr/share/bug/sendmail/script: ls -alR /etc/mail: /etc/mail: total 251 -rw-r--r--1 r

Processed: closing 358270

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > close 358270 1.4-1 Bug#358270: FTBFS: error: expected identifier or '(' before ']' token 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in

Processed: tagging 233275

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > tags 233275 patch Bug#233275: gpsim-led: Loading libgpsim_led.so.0 causes segmentation fault There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#358462: FTBFS: can't parse dependency

Package: malaga Version: 6.13-5 Severity: serious Your package fails to build: dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency libmalaga1-dev libmalaga2-dev dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occoured while parsing Conflicts > Automatic build of malaga_6.13-5 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106 ... > ra

Bug#358458: FTBFS: internal redland sources not found

Package: redland-bindings Version: 1.0.2.1-3 Severity: serious Your package doesn't build on unstable: > Automatic build of redland-bindings_1.0.2.1-3 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106 ... > checking ECMA CLI implementations to use... > checking Java JDK includes... > checking for redland-config..

Processed: severity of 358439 is grave, merging 358331 358439

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > severity 358439 grave Bug#358439: x11-common should replace: libxft-dev Severity set to `grave'. > merge 358331 358439 Bug#358331: x11-common: uninstalable - trying to overwrite /usr

Bug#353133: libshell-posix-select-perl: FTBFS: test failures

Hi The reason why the tests fail are following differences between the reference files and the output files (cdumps). It are all whitespace, print and warning changes... --- Ref_Data/eslect.cdump_ref 2003-05-12 02:51:55.0 +0200 +++ eslect.cdump2006-03-22 20:50:18.0 +0100

Processed: reassign 358370 to libxft-dev, closing 358370, merging 358331 358370

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > reassign 358370 libxft-dev Bug#358370: x11-common: Error while upgrading to version 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 Bug reassigned from package `x11-common' to `libxft-dev'. > close 358370 2.1.8.2-4

Processed: severity of 358423 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > # not RC > severity 358423 important Bug#358423: synfig: libsynfig0 depends on lower-priority package (libdv-bin) Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: reassign 358439 to libxft-dev, closing 358439, merging 358331 358439

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > reassign 358439 libxft-dev Bug#358439: x11-common should replace: libxft-dev Bug reassigned from package `x11-common' to `libxft-dev'. > close 358439 2.1.8.2-4 Bug#358439: x11-common

Bug#358403: Info received (was Bug#358403: testresources: FTBFS: SyntaxError: invalid syntax)

On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 04:40:08AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > Meh, > I've just noticed its a FTBFS. I'll check the source deps as soon as I > get a chance. > But the symptoms are those of a python2.3 build happening. Presumably, one of the scripts is using /usr/bin/python as the interpreter

Bug#357439: amaya bug

Do you by any chance have the nonfree flash plugin installed, and did you recently dist-upgrade a boatload of xorg packages ? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358440: sendmail: race, exec arbitrary, fixed 8.13.6

Package: sendmail Version: 8.13.4-3 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole Please see the following advisories/reports: http://www.auscert.org.au/6148 http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/alerts/id/216 http://www.sendmail.org/8.13.6.html Cheers, Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Bug#358441: tetex-doc: still contains files that are also in tetex-doc-nonfree

Package: tetex-doc Version: 3.0-15 Severity: serious No idea why this happens, and I need to leave now - that's just a reminder that i don't forget tomorrow Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Bug#358324: rapid svn bug

Please send the output of: dpkg -l 'libsvncpp*' Thanks Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358439: x11-common should replace: libxft-dev

Package: x11-common Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: serious Preparing to replace x11-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (using .../x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement x11-common ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb (--unpack): trying

Processed: closing 358331, merging 358331 358308

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > close 358331 2.1.8.2-4 Bug#358331: x11-common: uninstalable - trying to overwrite /usr/include/X11 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked

Processed: Re: gstreamer0.10-tools: gst-launch-0.10 doesn't play sound

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 358002 gstreamer0.10-alsa Bug#358002: gstreamer0.10-tools: gst-launch-0.10 doesn't play sound Bug reassigned from package `gstreamer0.10-tools' to `gstreamer0.10-alsa'. > severity 358002 important Bug#358002: gstreamer0.10-tools: gst-launch-0.

Bug#358002: gstreamer0.10-tools: gst-launch-0.10 doesn't play sound

reassign 358002 gstreamer0.10-alsa severity 358002 important thanks > Package: gstreamer0.10-tools > Version: 0.10.4-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > when using "gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=file:///home/path/file.mp3" > I get the following output : > Setting p

Bug#352210: marked as done (websvn: Temporary files not compliant to FSH)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:47:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352210: fixed in websvn 1.61-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#358403: testresources: FTBFS: SyntaxError: invalid syntax

Hello, On 06-Mar-23 03:47, Robert Collins wrote: > Hi, this means you are trying to use the package with python 2.3 which > is not supported. I just used 'apt-get build-dep testresources' and 'dpkg-buildpackage' in a clean unstable chroot. It should be possible to build the package that way. Re

Bug#356703: marked as done (pennmush: please update build-depends for newer libmysqlclient)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356703: fixed in pennmush 1.8.0p11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#354196: marked as done (mailfilter: FTBFS: no rule to make y.tab.o)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354196: fixed in mailfilter 0.6.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#358321: FTBFS: missing build-dep on cdbs

bts tags 358321 pending thanks Quoting Adam Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: ttf-freefont > Version: 20060126b-2 > Severity: serious > > Since the switch to using cdbs for this package, it no longer > builds from source, since you *cough* forgot the build-dep. Hmmm, /me beats self with a c

Bug#358429: libxine1: new symbols introduced in 1.1.1 without shlibs bump

Package: libxine1 Version: 1.1.1-1 Severity: serious Hello, libxine1 1.1.1-1 introduces new symbols wrt 1.0.1-1.6, but its shlibs file still specifies (>= 1.0.1). Please fix. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer

Bug#351623: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: seems to be fixed

Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7 Version: 2.6.15-8 Followup-For: Bug #351623 Hello all, I've got no reiserfs problems with version 2.6.15-8. From the changelog, it looks like this is the relevant patch: * Add stable Release 2.6.15.5: - reiserfs: disable automatic enabling of reiserfs inode

Bug#355827: sshfs: does not work

Miklos Szeredi wrote... > > > strace -s1024 -f -o sshfs.log sshfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: dir/ > > > > and search the mount system call in sshfs.log. Do you find something like > > > > mount("[EMAIL PROTECTED]:", "dir/", "fuse", MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV,0x804d058) = > > -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) > >

  1   2   >