Bug#297789: updated patch

2006-04-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:22:26PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: find an updated patch attached. How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch? and what specifically makes this a policy violation and/or release critical bug (thereby justifying serious, and

Bug#363154: xprint: Xprint fails to start and makes X stop

2006-04-18 Thread Laurent CARON
Drew Parsons wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 23:13 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote: Package: xprint Version: Xprint fails to start Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Xprint is broken after last sid update Hi Laurent, did you use reportbug to make this report? Normally it

Bug#297789: updated patch

2006-04-18 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:15:29AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch? I was not aware you where waiting for an updated patch since one year (or two, counting the other bug which contained code to activate rdev, too). and

Bug#356918: marked as done (libx11: FTBFS in experimental.)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:21:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libx11: FTBFS in experimental. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#297789: updated patch

2006-04-18 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 297789 important thanks On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:25:53AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:15:29AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch? I was not aware you where waiting for an updated patch

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xkb-data-legacy 1.0.1-4

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 362099 + fixed Bug#362099: xkb-data-legacy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#362099: marked as done (xkb-data-legacy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:54 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of xkb-data-legacy 1.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#297789: updated patch

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297789 important Bug#297789: util-linux: please provide rdev executable for amd64 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#362192: bus error in autogsdoc on some architectures

2006-04-18 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi, I was able to track this failure down to /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Tools/gdnc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Tools/gdnc Bus error [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ After rebuilding gnustep-base with debugging symbols, gdb produced the following stack trace: (gdb) run Starting program:

Bug#363061: Implicit granting of rights? (was: Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free)

2006-04-18 Thread Frank Küster
Hi debian-legal, Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 15:14 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: , | %%% Copyright (C) 1994 Aloysius G. Helminck. All rights reserved. | %%% Permission is granted to to customize the declarations in this | %%% file to serve the needs of

Processed: Re: Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives.

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363059 normal Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives. Severity set to `normal'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free

2006-04-18 Thread Frank Küster
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The fd files in the same directory don't have any copyright or license statement at all; don't know whether they need one. Even worse, they contain the statement: %Filename: whatever %Created by: tex fontplcm %Created using fontinst v1.335 But there's

Bug#363265: crystalcursors: Should either depend on some xorg 7 or conflict with xorg 7

2006-04-18 Thread Sune Vuorela
Package: crystalcursors Version: 1.1.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package will not work with the current xorg in testing or the xfree in sarge. It should have either a depend or a conflict. This might be a normal bug under normal circumstances, but

Processed: tagging 362099

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17 tags 362099 - fixed Bug#362099: xkb-data-legacy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: Re: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives.

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363059 grave Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives. Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives.

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363059 grave Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives. Severity set to `grave'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#356330: Fixed in NMU of libosip2 2.2.2-2.1

2006-04-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Mar 18 Avril 2006 05:43, Anand Kumria a écrit : tag 328825 - fixed tag 352251 - fixed tag 356330 - fixed thanks, I'm reverting your NMU. You made a mistake -- in debian/copyright -- since you felt your changes were urgent enough to warrant no review time, I'm reverting them straight

Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386

2006-04-18 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, Steve Langasek wrote: aegis: user root too privileged This seems to indicate that you were running the build target as root, correct? That doesn't sound release-critical to me, given that the autobuilders will never run the build target this way. There seems to be something wrong in

Bug#363128: marked as done (cps-site: postinst failure (UnboundLocalError in dzhandle))

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363128: fixed in zope-common 0.5.23 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#361749: /etc/init.d/shishid doesn't go to background

2006-04-18 Thread Simon Josefsson
Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: shishid Version: 0.0.23-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The shishid script in /etc/init.d doesn't start the daemon in the background, so the server won't be started after installation (you're forced to kill it to

Bug#361775: CVE number

2006-04-18 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! This has been assigned CVE-2006-1772. Please mention this number in the changelog when you fix this to ease tracking. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and

Bug#363274: gaim-dbg: empty package

2006-04-18 Thread OuoU
Package: gaim-dbg Severity: grave This packages does not contain any debugging symbol. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16 Locale: LANG=C,

Processed: Re: python-codespeak-lib: unsatisfiable dependency on python (= 2.4)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 345383 0.7-svn20050721-3 Bug#345383: python-codespeak-lib: unsatisfiable dependency on python (= 2.4) 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.7-svn20050721-3, send any further

Bug#363275: emelfm: x11-common 1.0.1-3 conflicts with emelfm

2006-04-18 Thread George B.
Package: emelfm Version: 0.9.2-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, The latest version of x11-common (1.0.1-3) conflicts with emelfm, for whatever reason. :-( This makes it emelfm uninstallable, from now on. HTH, George B. -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#345383: python-codespeak-lib: unsatisfiable dependency on python (= 2.4)

2006-04-18 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
close 345383 0.7-svn20050721-3 thanks On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 07:34:41PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Package: python-codespeak-lib Version: 0.7-svn20050721-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable python-codespeak-lib has a dependency on python (= 2.4); however, Debian's

Bug#363277: gnuserv: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'strerror'

2006-04-18 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: gnuserv Version: 3.12.7-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gnuserv' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: gcc -c -I. -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I -g -O2 gnuclient.c In file included from gnuclient.c:61: ./sysfile.h:395: error: conflicting types for 'strerror'

Bug#362837: fix: recompile

2006-04-18 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2006-04-16 13:39:49 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: For the record: a simple rebuild allowed my CGAL programs to work again. Yes, we had a bug report about the same problem, but not with much details. I already got rid of mpn_sub_nc in the trunk (fixing a potential bug at the same time); the

Bug#362074: Raising the severity again

2006-04-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
tags 362074 + pending thanks Awaiting for the new libxp-dev package, after recent xutils-dev fixing. So stay tuned... On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: severity 362074 serious kthxbye I'm raising the severity of this bug again; it makes xaw3d unusable

Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty

2006-04-18 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Steve Langasek [Mon, Apr 17 2006, 08:58:38PM]: On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:51:58AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Steve Langasek [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 04:58:25PM]: If you ask me, I think it's better to keep the vast majority of irritating bugs confined to

Processed: Re: Bug#362074: Raising the severity again

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 362074 + pending Bug#362074: Please install to /usr/ instead of /usr/X11R6 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#363287: mpfr: FTBFS on s390, illegal instruction in umul_ppmm

2006-04-18 Thread Laurent Fousse
Package: mpfr Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hello, MPFR no longer build from source on s390. A complete build log can be found at : http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mpfrver=2.2.0.dfsg.1-5arch=s390stamp=1145312906file=logas=raw I verified with the

Bug#363288: linm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libncurses5-dev'

2006-04-18 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: linm Version: 0.7.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'linm' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: checking ncurses.h usability... no checking ncurses.h presence... no checking for ncurses.h... no configure: error: ncurses.h not found. make: ***

Bug#363294: gnutls13 - rebuild looses dep against libtasn1

2006-04-18 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: gnutls13 Version: 1.3.5 Severity: grave A rebuild of gnutls13 looses its dependency against libtasn1 and uses a staticaly linked version instead. Bastian -- Without followers, evil cannot spread. -- Spock, And The Children Shall Lead, stardate 5029.5

Bug#363295: vnc4server: Xvnc4 can not found 'fixed' font with xorg 7.0.14

2006-04-18 Thread Carlos C Soto
Package: vnc4server Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The vnc4server can not find the fixed font, this is a result from executing: $ Xvnc4 :1 Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb' Xvnc Free Edition 4.1.1 - built Apr 17 2006 16:16:47

Bug#363296: vnc4server: missing font fixed

2006-04-18 Thread Alexander Loob
Package: vnc4server Version: 4.1.1+X4.3 Severity: grave After update to the new x.org packages, I can´t start vncserver anymore. This is the content of the logfile: Tue Apr 18 12:52:57 2006 vncext: VNC extension running! vncext: Listening for VNC connections on port 5901 vncext:

Bug#363303: pure-ftpd-mysql uninstallable due to libmysqlclient abi change

2006-04-18 Thread Christopher Schmidt
Package: pure-ftpd-mysql Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Due to mysql-client ABI changes[1], pure-ftpd-mysql is uninstallable: The following packages have unmet dependencies. pure-ftpd-mysql: Depends: libmysqlclient15 (= 5.0.15-1) but it is not installable Package

Bug#361919: marked as done (exim4: Dropping all hosts with ignore_target_hosts results in host lookup did not complete)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:30:44 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#361919: fixed in exim4 4.50-8sarge2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#363302: libx11-6: When migrating to X.Org 7, server says: _X11TransOpen: Unable to find transport for local

2006-04-18 Thread Tobias Diaz
Package: libx11-6 Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When migrating to X.Org 7 in Debian unstable, X server report this error and does not create the X-11 Socket. Xdm, kdm, gdm and startx stay frozen and only a blank screen with X cursor is showed.

Bug#362806: chiark-tcl: ftbfs [sparc] error: tcl8.3/tcl.h: No such file

2006-04-18 Thread Ian Jackson
Blars Blarson writes (Bug#362806: chiark-tcl: ftbfs [sparc] error: tcl8.3/tcl.h: No such file): Package: chiark-tcl Version: 1.0.0 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source chiark-tcl failed to build on all buildds. Appears to be missing build-dependancies. Sorry

Bug#363305: gmsh: FTBFS: build depends on xlibmesa-glu-dev

2006-04-18 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: gmsh Version: 1.64.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, gmsh build-depends on xlibmesa-glu-dev which isn't available in unstable anymore. Thanks for considering. bye, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers

Bug#363311: pyroman: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python'

2006-04-18 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: pyroman Version: 0.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'pyroman' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_installudev -ppyroman dh_install -ppyroman dh_link -ppyroman dh_python dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to

Bug#363274: marked as done (gaim-dbg: empty package)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:28:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Invalid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#353175: marked as done (proftpd-ldap segfaults in (probably) ldap module)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:02:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#353175: fixed in proftpd 1.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#363324: nvidia-graphics-modules-i386: FTBFS (unsatisfied nvidia-kernel-source) in testing

2006-04-18 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Package: nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 Version: 1.0.8178+2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source This package Build-Deps on nvidia-kernel-source, which was removed from testing. This only affects testing, but makes this package RC-buggy in all releases together with #362424

Bug#363311: marked as done (pyroman: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python')

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:02:36 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363311: fixed in pyroman 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363274: acknowledged by developer (Invalid)

2006-04-18 Thread Loic Dachary
Debian Bug Tracking System writes: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #363274: gaim-dbg: empty package, which was filed against the gaim-dbg package. My bad. No clue how I manage to have an empty gaim-dbg package. Does not matter much I guess. Sorry for

Bug#363287: marked as done (mpfr: FTBFS on s390, illegal instruction in umul_ppmm)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363287: fixed in mpfr 2.2.0.dfsg.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#363275: marked as done (emelfm: x11-common 1.0.1-3 conflicts with emelfm)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363275: fixed in emelfm 0.9.2-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#358402: marked as done (pyroman: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:02:36 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#358402: fixed in pyroman 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363325: wrong dependencies from nunit-console 2.2.7-1 to libnunit-cil 2.2.6-1

2006-04-18 Thread Marc Cromme
Package: nunit-console, nunit Version: 2.2.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/code/id/yaz/ztest$ apt-cache show nunit-console Package: nunit-console Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 116 Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#360417: bootsplash

2006-04-18 Thread Free Ekanayaka
|--== Junichi Uekawa writes: JU Hi, JU Anyway, we need to find some solution over how to package bootsplash JU package; we are in a difficult situation where there is no bootsplash JU package while there is kernel-patch-bootsplash in Debian. Hi, sorry for the long delay. I think

Bug#363325: wrong dependencies from nunit-console 2.2.7-1 to libnunit-cil 2.2.6-1

2006-04-18 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 15:19 +0200, Marc Cromme wrote: Package: nunit-console, nunit Version: 2.2.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/code/id/yaz/ztest$ apt-cache show nunit-console Package: nunit-console Priority: optional Section: devel

Bug#334156: NMU of hat

2006-04-18 Thread Arjan Oosting
Hi Ian and Isaac, I am preparing an NMU of hat (which probably will be uploaded by my AM Martin Michlmayr). It has two longstanding RC bugs which make hat unusable and FTBFS. I intend to update hat to a new upstream version 2.04 and drop the support for nhc98, which is removed from the archive,

Bug#362431: upgrade broke X server

2006-04-18 Thread Ken Foskey
I upgraded tonight and the xorg server broke. Complaining about missing bitmap and pcidata modules. As outlined I commented out the offending line: # ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib/modules gdm and X now work successfully. Problem: This particular line should have automatically been removed for me

Processed: severity of 353589 is serious

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17 severity 353589 serious Bug#353589: CVE-2005-4713 and CVE-2006-0056: remote vulnerabilities Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: Re: Bug#363252: manpages-dev: file collision with modutils

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363252 serious Bug#363252: manpages-dev: file collision with modutils Severity set to `serious'. merge 363252 360843 Bug#360843: manpages-dev tries to overwrite files from modutils (create_module.2.gz) Bug#363252: manpages-dev: file

Bug#334156: NMU of hat

2006-04-18 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi Arjan, On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: I am preparing an NMU of hat My plan has been to file a bug requesting hat's removal. If you would like to take over the package then please feel free, but an NMU would probably be a waste of effort. Thanks Ian --

Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor

2006-04-18 Thread BERTRAND Joël
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.59b Severity: grave Arch: sparc It is impossible to build a ramfs image on a HyperSPARC workstation. I have try to install etch/sparc on a SS20 that runs with four HyperSPARC processors. When it boots, system hangs when it tries to load the ramfs image.

Bug#363274: gaim-dbg: empty package

2006-04-18 Thread Ari Pollak
What? Could you provide just a little bit more information about this, like what version of gaim-dbg you're using, and what you mean by This packages does not contain any debugging symbol, since it certainly looks like it does for all the architectures I see. Loic Dachary (OuoU) wrote: Package:

Bug#346164: Reopen, reassign to clisp

2006-04-18 Thread Robin Verduijn
reopen 346164 reassign 346164 clisp stop The clisp package still tries to use gcc-3.3 for certain platforms but does not depend on that compiler for the platforms in question. Either it should just try and use the system gcc or a proper dependency on gcc-3.3 should be added. Thanks, - robin --

Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor

2006-04-18 Thread maximilian attems
severity 363344 important tags 363344 moreinfo thanks cher bertrand, On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:04:08PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote: Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.59b Severity: grave Arch: sparc hmm it may be serious, but for now i go for important. anyway you omitted lots of

Processed: Reopen, reassign to clisp

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 346164 Bug#346164: FTBFS on arm, hppa, sparc Bug reopened, originator not changed. reassign 346164 clisp Bug#346164: FTBFS on arm, hppa, sparc Bug reassigned from package `mcvs' to `clisp'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: Re: Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363344 important Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor Severity set to `important'. tags 363344 moreinfo Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping

Bug#363362: x11-common: postinst fails if /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty

2006-04-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.0.14 Severity: grave The postinst contains the following: if [ -d /usr/X11R6/bin ] [ ! -L /usr/X11R6/bin ]; then rmdir /usr/X11R6/bin || die Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty. Please remove any items still in the directory. You can move them

Bug#361270: marked as done (update-initrams doesn't call lilo, when grub is around)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:00:03 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#361270: Upgrade of initramfs-tools made kernel unbootable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#363295: vnc4server: Xvnc4 can not found 'fixed' font with xorg 7.0.14

2006-04-18 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Ok, will change the default fonts dir. Regards, // Ola On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:53:56AM -0500, Carlos C Soto wrote: Package: vnc4server Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The vnc4server can not find the fixed font, this is a result from

Bug#363362: x11-common: postinst fails if /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty

2006-04-18 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 363362 important thanks On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:30:53PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: The postinst contains the following: if [ -d /usr/X11R6/bin ] [ ! -L /usr/X11R6/bin ]; then rmdir /usr/X11R6/bin || die Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty. Please remove any

Processed: Re: Bug#363362: x11-common: postinst fails if /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363362 important Bug#363362: x11-common: postinst fails if /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#363370: xine-ui: printf missing-format-string bugs

2006-04-18 Thread Darren Salt
Package: xine-ui Version: 0.99.3-1.3 Severity: serious Posted to xine-devel by Diego Pettenó [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : Seems like there's disclosure of a vulnerability in latest released xine-ui : (0.99.4) at http://www.open-security.org/advisories/16 . The code that's : there referred to is already

Bug#334156: NMU of hat

2006-04-18 Thread Arjan Oosting
Op di, 18-04-2006 te 16:17 +0100, schreef Ian Lynagh: Hi Arjan, On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: I am preparing an NMU of hat My plan has been to file a bug requesting hat's removal. If you would like to take over the package then please feel free, but an

Bug#361910: FTBFS (alpha): Undefined system call: sigprocmask

2006-04-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Falk Hueffner wrote: klibc fails to build on alpha: [...] SYSCALL FOUND: getrlimit SYSCALL FOUND: tkill klibc/syscalls/SYSCALLS.i:187: Undefined system call: sigprocmask ld -r -o klibc/syscalls/syscalls.o ld: no input files make[4]: ***

Bug#363375: kernel-patch-openswan: Patched linux-source-2.6.16 fails to compile

2006-04-18 Thread Lupe Christoph
Package: kernel-patch-openswan Version: 1:2.4.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm sorry to report that the most recent versions of the kernel-patch-openswan and linux-source-2.6.16 don't agree: net/ipsec/ipsec_alg.c:847:2: warning: #warning Using built-in AES rather

Bug#363373: xvfb-run has disappeared

2006-04-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: xvfb Version: 1:1.0.2-5 Severity: grave xvfb doesn't contain the xvfb-run command anymore. It is going to break some packages relying on it to build correctly. The old script from the 6.9 package works correctly with the new version, so it's only a matter of including it. (Note that

Processed: setting package to util-vserver, tagging 362887, tagging 363342, tagging 363343

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16 package util-vserver Ignoring bugs not assigned to: util-vserver tags 362887 + pending Bug#362887: util-vserver - FTBFS: 1 of 18 tests failed: Segmentation fault There were no tags

Bug#344942: doxymacs: Fails to install with !! File error ((Cannot open load file url))

2006-04-18 Thread Roger Leigh
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 07:20:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: I suggest depending upon w3-el-e21 unconditionally, which would make things robust, even if it's not strictly required in all cases. xemacs21 already depends upon xemacs21-basesupport, so

Bug#362074: Raising the severity again

2006-04-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: tags 362074 + pending thanks Awaiting for the new libxp-dev package, after recent xutils-dev fixing. So stay tuned... While the new libxp-dev should be coming soon, this really looks like bug #363267, in which case

Bug#362074: Raising the severity again

2006-04-18 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:39:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: tags 362074 + pending thanks Awaiting for the new libxp-dev package, after recent xutils-dev fixing. So stay tuned... While the new libxp-dev

Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty

2006-04-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: If you move the files, dpkg may be unable to find them at package uninstallation, resulting in orphaned files on the filesystem; or there may Not 100% correct. The problem of deinstallation is covered with the symlink

Processed: Re: Bug#363373: xvfb-run has disappeared

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363373 normal Bug#363373: xvfb-run has disappeared Severity set to `normal'. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#361910: FTBFS (alpha): Undefined system call: sigprocmask

2006-04-18 Thread Falk Hueffner
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: could you try if the following patch helps? Yes, it helps. Thanks. -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: This is serious

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 340712 serious Bug#340712: firebird2-server-common: binary file security.fdb is not a config file but uses ucf! Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#362887: marked as done (util-vserver - FTBFS: 1 of 18 tests failed: Segmentation fault)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:18:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#362887: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.210-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: merging 363147 360148

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17 merge 363147 360148 Bug#360148: libxklavier10: Adding Arabic to keyboard switcher in GNOME generates an error Bug#363147: libxklavier10: Debian patch xorg_xkb_path.patch breaks

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ucd-snmp 4.2.5-5.2

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 355641 + fixed Bug#355641: no shared libraries in latest non-maintainer upload Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed tag 359204 + fixed Bug#359204: Missing snmp_api.h Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here.

Bug#362136: marked as done (ksynaptics: ftbfs on i386 sid)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:43:49 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line ksynaptics: ftbfs on i386 sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363375: Acknowledgement (kernel-patch-openswan: Patched linux-source-2.6.16 fails to compile)

2006-04-18 Thread Lupe Christoph
I just realized that the exact version of the Debian kernel-source package is missing. It is 2.6.16-7. HTH, Lupe Christoph -- | You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear | | weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest | | bidder. Makes you

Processed: severity of 360148 is grave

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17 severity 360148 grave Bug#360148: libxklavier10: Adding Arabic to keyboard switcher in GNOME generates an error Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 233767, tagging 260040, tagging 299162, tagging 244792, tagging 343772, tagging 353916

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 tags 233767 + pending Bug#233767: libapache-mod-mp3: Warning on installation There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 260040 + pending Bug#260040: libapache-mod-mp3: [NMU]

Processed: patch for two RC bugs

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 334156 patch Bug#334156: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on nhc98 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tags 310009 patch Bug#310009: hat-gch6 is uninstallable There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#355711: marked as done (vim-latexsuite: purging fails, postrm calls non-essential command)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:18:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#355711: fixed in vim-latexsuite 20060325-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#362773: marked as done (xautolock conflicts with x11-common)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:32:38 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#362773: fixed in xautolock 1:2.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: tagging 359120, tagging 260042, tagging 244791, tagging 355311

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 tags 359120 + pending Bug#359120: diff for 1.4-8.2 NMU for libapache-mod-random Tags were: patch Tags added: pending tags 260042 + pending Bug#260042: libapache-mod-random: [NMU]

Bug#352690: Patch for haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k

2006-04-18 Thread Arjan Oosting
package haskell-src-exts tags 352690 patch thanks Hi, I have prepared a patch will will make haskell-src-exts build from source again in pbuilder and (probably) on m68k and amd64 as well. Greetings Arjan diff -Naur haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/changelog

Processed: Patch for haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package haskell-src-exts Ignoring bugs not assigned to: haskell-src-exts tags 352690 patch Bug#352690: haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: severity of 361770 is normal

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 361770 normal Bug#361770: After few hours amule make Xorg use 100% CPU Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#363147: libxklavier10: Debian patch xorg_xkb_path.patch breaks libxklavier

2006-04-18 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hey Marcelo, Wow, this is pretty embarrasing. I didn't have a fully upgraded box at the time of the upload, so got 4 testers on IRC to check the package for me. They said it was ok; my half upgraded system seemed ok as well, and then I went for easter vacation until today. It's weird nobody else

Processed: Re: Bug#362074: Raising the severity again

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: block 362074 by 363267 Bug#362074: Please install to /usr/ instead of /usr/X11R6 Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 363267 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: setting package to libcommoncpp2 libcommoncpp2-1.3-2 libcommoncpp2-dev libcommoncpp2-doc ...

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.18 package libcommoncpp2 libcommoncpp2-1.3-2 libcommoncpp2-dev libcommoncpp2-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libcommoncpp2-doc libcommoncpp2-dev libcommoncpp2 libcommoncpp2-1.3-2

Processed: merge twinkle...

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 362440 important Bug#362440: libccext2-1.3.so.1: cannot open shared object file Severity set to `important'. merge 362440 362583 Bug#362440: libccext2-1.3.so.1: cannot open shared object file Bug#362583: twinkle fails to start with new

Bug#363147: marked as done (libxklavier10: Debian patch xorg_xkb_path.patch breaks libxklavier)

2006-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363147: fixed in libxklavier 2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

  1   2   >