Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution

tags 365533 patch thanks On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:56:33AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Thanks for the report. While I think that people who are admin can > already do a lot of damage and should hence be considered trusted, > executing php code is a step further in permissions and thus this ca

Bug#367060: marked as done (gnucash_1.9.5-3(experimental/mips/signy): FTBFS: "./config.status: No such file or directory")

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 23:17:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367060: fixed in gnucash 1.9.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: severity of 362911 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > severity 362911 serious Bug#362911: gsfonts-x11: Fonts not installed properly Severity set to `serious' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#366275: closed by David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#366275: fixed in xbase-clients 1:7.0.1-2)

This message is being sent to you automatically in response to an email that you sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Most likely, you tried to reply to an email that has been sent through this service. If you did not send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, please ignore this message. The Paranoia Remailer

Bug#366275: marked as done (xbase-clients: Missing build dependency)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 21:47:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366275: fixed in xbase-clients 1:7.0.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: Re: Bug#367227: xdm does not start after last upgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 367197 grave Bug#367197: xdm does not start after last upgrade Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > severity 367227 grave Bug#367227: xdm does not start after last upgrade Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > severity 365383 grave Bug#3

Bug#367326: nvidia-kernel-source: Fails to load when running under Xen

Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.8756-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The module can't be loaded when built under linux 2.6.16-1-xen-k7, because there is an undefined symbol xen_tlb_flush. I installed the module through module-assistant, with kernel 2.6.16-1-xen

Processed: Fixed in NMU of fruit 2.1.0.1dfsg-0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 350033 + fixed Bug#350033: binary in orig.tar.gz Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#350677: marked as done (apr-util_1.2.2-3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib)

Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 13:25:36 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing this bug. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Processed: tagging 338286

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 338286 - pending Bug#338286: lirc-modules-source does not build Tags were: pending Tags removed: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#367325: expect-dev: No libexpect shared library

Package: expect-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The expect-dev package does not ship with the libexpect shared library, which makes the package unusable: $ ls -l /usr/lib/libexpect* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 14 22:10 /usr/lib/libexpect.so -> libexpect5.43.so -

Bug#336752: moderation of bug reports #350847 and #353458

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > IMHO all packages using this address as the maintainer address should > get an RC bug because the maintainer contact is not reachable. The > list should at least accept mails from the BTS without complaining > bug reporters about l

Bug#362885: marked as done (x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 21:06:50 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#354075: Does not mount with NFS user server

* LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Apr 28 12:31 -0500]: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:33:26PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > I just did an upgrade on my laptop running Sid and found that I could > > no longer mount a remote NFS share on my desktop. The NFS server is > > running Sid as well w

Bug#362533: marked as done ("AttributeError: 'PySwigObject' object has no attribute 'max_streams'")

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 17:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362533: fixed in gr-usrp 0.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#350088: [Fwd: Re: Bug#356347: [Fwd: please try libmhash2 0.9.6-2]]

Using libmhash2 0.9.6-1, with gringotts I got a segfault and equivalent backtrace as Uwe Steinmann and Simon McVittie. Upgrading to libmhash2 0.9.6-2 fixed it for me, so I believe the bug has been squished. Thanks a lot! Wolfgang - Forwarded message from Wolfgang Faber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#367316: nvidia-glx: Does not accelerate

Package: nvidia-glx Version: 1.0.8756-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The driver doesn't work. glxgears -printfps gives ~10fps, and quake2 gives a constant 5 fps at all times... # glxinfo | grep direct gives: direct rendering: Yes # glxinfo | grep vendor gives: server

Bug#356347: [Fwd: please try libmhash2 0.9.6-2]

Dear all, On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:13:33PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > I just uploaded libmhash2 0.9.6-2 to unstable. Please try this as I > think it will fix these bugs. (I'm pretty sure they are both the same > bug.) upgrading to libmhash2 0.9.6-2 fixed the problems for me on powerpc

Bug#362918: Trivial patch

Simon Huggins writes: > I've built the packages this way and it works fine for me to run > apt-proxy with it on amd64. > > I'd like to NMU with this if you don't have time to fix it but I want to > check with you first. please go ahead and consider making this change in the other twisted-* packag

Bug#364516: marked as done (LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is broken)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 16:17:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364516: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.38+1.39-WIP-2006.04.09-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts

Steve, I forgot to copy this to Roland and bugs. Bruce On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:19:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 07:03:24PM +1200, Bruce MacDonald wrote: > > The font paths in xorg.conf are: > > > $ grep FontPath /etc/X11/xorg.conf > > FontPath"/usr/

Bug#361913: linphone: patch for "passwords stored world-readable"

Package: linphone Version: 1.3.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #361913 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Linphone also stores passwords in ~/.linphonerc. That file may have been created group- or world-accessible because it was created with fopen(), which uses the user's umask. See coreapi/lp

Processed: tex-common 0.22 also install font cache dirs which are not world writable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package tex-common Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tex-common > found 354113 0.22 Bug#354113: jadetex: FTBFS: mktexdir failed Bug marked as found in version 0.22. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#344730: marked as done (cduce: FTBFS: build-depends on old version of ocaml)

Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 00:31:01 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 344370 fixed by cduce 0.4.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#366169: marked as done (gst-plugins-ugly0.10_0.10.3-1(unstable/arm/cats): FTBFS unsatisfiable build-depends)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:47:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366169: fixed in gst-plugins0.8 0.8.12-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#354113: tex-common 0.22 also install font cache dirs which are not world writable

package tex-common found 354113 0.22 thanks Hi maintainers, i got a report that the documentation of a package I maintain contains whit pages. I have build the package in a freshly created sid pbuilder tree and get the following in my build.log: ... TEXINPUTS=".:$TEXINPUTS" \ dvips -o dr

Bug#356769: ndiswrapper-utils: Fails to detect manufaturer names in inf-file rendering unusable

Hi, Can you please try this out w/ 1.15-1 or 1.16-1 and tell me if it still fails? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366935: marked as done (torcs - FTBFS: configure: error: Can't find libm.)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:05:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366935: fixed in torcs 1.2.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#338532: marked as done (sfs: FTBFS: compile error in rpctypes.h: declaration of 'set' must be available)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:03:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338532: fixed in sfs 1:0.8-0+pre20060514.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#362804: marked as done (torcs: Pacakge not installable (missing libopenal0 package))

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:05:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362804: fixed in torcs 1.2.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#360193: marked as done (torcs - FTBFS: error: AL/alut.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:05:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360193: fixed in torcs 1.2.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#364801: marked as done (sourcenav: Installs manpages under wrong dir)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:04:02 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364801: fixed in sourcenav 5.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366828: marked as done (postgresql-7.4: FTBFS: Link error)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:17:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366828: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.12-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#352376: marked as done (ndiswrapper-utils: Uninstallable because of unmet dep on ndiswrapper-modules-1.8)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 17:28:48 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ndiswrapper-utils: Uninstallable because of unmet dep on ndiswrapper-modules-1.8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#367221: marked as done (quodlibet: fails to find module pygst)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 16:17:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367221: quodlibet: fails to find module pygst has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#367177: marked as done (FTBFS: debian/rules:28: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory)

x27;. Stop. | ** | Build finished at 20060514-0225 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- ,''`. : :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/

Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty

reopen 362885 thanks BTW, I'm reopening this bug: Making a symlink is bogus since dpkg removes it when one removes a package that contains files in /usr/X11R6/bin. Otherwise, x11-common should make sure that the symlink remains (if possible). -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web:

Processed: Re: version in testing FTBFS with current kernel in testing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 359159 + etch Bug#359159: version in testing FTBFS with current kernel in testing There were no tags set. Tags added: etch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#367278: obexftp_0.19-3(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on amd64: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol'

Package: obexftp Version: 0.19-3 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > /usr/bin/ld: > /build/buildd/obexftp-0.19/swig/perl/../../obexftp/.libs/libobexftp.a(client.o): > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used whe

Bug#347663: marked as done (sfs-common: failure to remove, trying to deregister inexistent document)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:03:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347663: fixed in sfs 1:0.8-0+pre20060514.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty

Any news about this bug? As the current error doesn't solve any problem, why not let /usr/X11R6/bin there until a better solution (if any) is found? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work

Bug#367212: marked as done (FTBFS: missing dependency on bzip2)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:02:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367212: fixed in aegis 4.22-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 362885 Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#364582: marked as done (spca5xx-modules-i386: Recommend on non-Debian package)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:05:02 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364582: fixed in spca5xx 20060501-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 363030 Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386 Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs datab

Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386

reopen 363030 thanks Hi Junichi, maybe this is of interest of you. Feel free to close it if you don't think it's worth working on this issue. Thanks. bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 363030 to pbuilder

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > reassign 363030 pbuilder Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386 Bug reassigned from package `aegis' to `pbuilder'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#367231: marked as done (emacs21 fails to install/upgrade on sid after dist-upgrade)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 13:29:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367231: emacs21 fails to install/upgrade on sid after dist-upgrade has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#365102: synfigstudio: 365102: please provide a backtrace

Fabian Fagerholm wrote: Anthony, any chance you could try the following things: * Could you compile the attached file (g++ -g -o test test.cpp) and run it under gdb? If it crashes in the same way, we have a smaller test case to work with. The program does not crash.

Bug#366870: raggle: crash at startup

hi José On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 12:45:59PM -0700, José H. Espinosa wrote: > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jhe/deb/ncurses-ruby-1.0' > gcc -fPIC -g -O2 -g -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I/usr/ > local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I. -DHAVE_UNISTD_H -DHAVE_NCURSES_H - now that taking

Bug#367221: quodlibet: fails to find module pygst

Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 15:46 +0200, Sebastien Barthelemy wrote: >> Package: quodlibet >> Version: 0.18-3 >> Severity: grave >> Justification: renders package unusable >> >> The package, installed with aptitude on a etch system, fails to start with >> t

Bug#367070: bacula-director-pgsql - postinst called with unknown argument `upgrade'

severity 367070 minor thanks On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:32:55PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: bacula-director-pgsql > Version: 1.38.9-3 > Severity: grave > | Preparing to replace bacula-director-pgsql 1.36.3-2 (using > .../bacula-director-pgsql_1.38.9-3_amd64.deb) ... > | postinst calle

Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts

On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 07:03:24PM +1200, Bruce MacDonald wrote: > The font paths in xorg.conf are: > $ grep FontPath /etc/X11/xorg.conf > FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc" > FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic" > FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/X11/1

Processed: Re: Bug#367070: bacula-director-pgsql - postinst called with unknown argument `upgrade'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 367070 minor Bug#367070: bacula-director-pgsql - postinst called with unknown argument `upgrade' Bug#367066: bacula-director-pgsql: postinst called with unknown argument `upgrade' Bug#367069: bacula-director-pgsql - fails to upgrade Severity

Processed: Trivial patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 362918 serious Bug#362918: twisted-runner: Build depends on itself. Severity set to `serious' from `important' > # This is RC I'm afraid given it has incorrect build-deps and therefore > # won't build on amd64 but it's trivial so... > tags 362

Processed: Not RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 350224 important Bug#350224: kaffeine/xine engine freezes on rewinding Severity set to `important' from `serious' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Bug#367177: FTBFS: debian/rules:28: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory

Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Your package fails to build from source, you switched from dpatch to > quilt for patch management but debian/rules still tries to include > the dpatch top-level Makefile and dpatch is no longer in > Build-Depends: Oops, and thanks. I'll have a new u

Bug#364801: sourcenav: Installs manpages under wrong dir

tags 364801 +patch thanks Please find attached patch to fix this issue. Kindly regards, Erik -- www.ErikSchanze.de * Bitte keine HTML-E-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Limit: 100 kB * - Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 28. Oktober 2006*

Processed: sourcenav: Installs manpages under wrong dir

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 364801 +patch Bug#364801: sourcenav: Installs manpages under wrong dir There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#284770: Bug #284770: dbmail: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You tagged this bug "fixed-upstream pending" six week ago. > Did you hit problems with uploading the new packages ? You could say that. My sponsor flagged down the packages I had prepared. > We really need this bug to be fixed soon. dbmail-2.2 is imminent. And the pa

Bug#365845: marked as done (FTBFS: requires automake-1.7)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 10:02:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365845: fixed in mtr 0.71-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#367221: quodlibet: fails to find module pygst

On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 15:46 +0200, Sebastien Barthelemy wrote: > Package: quodlibet > Version: 0.18-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > The package, installed with aptitude on a etch system, fails to start with > the following message : > > $ quodlibet > Traceback

Bug#365845: FTBFS: requires automake-1.7

On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:23:44PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:59:14PM +0200, Roberto Pariset wrote: > > mtr_0.71-1 FTBFS with error: > > [...] > > Which make it quite clear it needs automake-1.7. Please add it as a > > dependency. > > Methinks this FTBFS occurs due to

Processed: tagging 365816, tagging 364937, tagging 366965

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 365816 pending Bug#365816: vlc has circular Depends on vlc-plugin-alsa and wxvlc There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 364937 pending Bug#364937: vlc: Reenable the

Bug#367181: marked as done (FTBFS: I have no package to build)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 09:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367181: fixed in allegro4 2:4.0.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#356347: [Fwd: please try libmhash2 0.9.6-2]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am forwarding this message to you as the bug submitter of #356347 so you can also test the patch. Kind regards, Bastian - Original-Nachricht Betreff: please try libmhash2 0.9.6-2 Datum: Sun, 14 May 2006 01:23:52 -0400 Von:

Bug#367231: emacs21 fails to install/upgrade on sid after dist-upgrade

Package: emacs21 Version: 21.4a-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable emacs21 could not be installed on sid as you can see from apt-get and apt-cache output that is clearer then any long explanation I can write down. #apt-get install emacs21 Reading package lists... Done Buil

Bug#366588: pending

tags 366588 +pending found 366588 3.7.2-3sarge1 notfound 366588 3.8.2-1 notfound 366588 3.8.2-2 thanks I have sent a patch to the security team for the sarge version. If they agree, presumably a new version will be upload soon and a woody version will also be prepared. Here is the patch. It is

Bug#367081: sa-exim: not working with latest spamassassin package

I sent this once already and it never made it onto the bug tracker, so trying again. Which means SA-Exim did work, but SpamAssassin itself failed for some reason. It would be great if you can search through your logs and see if you can find out why SpamAssassin isn't working. From syslog:

Processed: scite: 355404: still happens :(

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 355404 Bug#355404: scite: segfaults when showing menus/windows/popups 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > found 355404 1.68-

Bug#355404: scite: 355404: still happens :(

reopen 355404 found 355404 1.68-1 thanks I've started to notice that this bug is still present, perhaps a pango or X update caused it. I get crashes trying to open the file menu and the same crash I described before with the Find dialog. Also, should scintilla be split out into a library package

Bug#367221: quodlibet: fails to find module pygst

Package: quodlibet Version: 0.18-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package, installed with aptitude on a etch system, fails to start with the following message : $ quodlibet Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/quodlibet", line 310, in ? import py

Bug#367228: FTBFS: missing build-depends on debhelper

Package: srm-reader Version: 0.09 Severity: serious > Automatic build of srm-reader_0.09 on juist by sbuild/alpha 0.44 ... > dpkg-source: unpacking srm-reader_0.09.tar.gz > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is srm-reader > dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.09 > dpkg-buildpackage: host archite

Processed: pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 366588 +pending Bug#366588: CVE-2006-2120: denial of service (crash) via a crafted TIFF image Tags were: security Tags added: pending > found 366588 3.7.2-3sarge1 Bug#366588: CVE-2006-2120: denial of service (crash) via a crafted TIFF image Bug ma

Bug#360713: marked as done (etc/init.d/and stop does not stop and)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 06:02:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360713: fixed in and 1.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: 365653 is grave.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 365653 grave Bug#365653: ketchup: problem with stable kernels > .9 Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Bug#284770: Bug #284770: dbmail: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:00:30PM +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > Thanks for taking an interest. Both bugs have long since been fixed in the > debian packages for dbmail I maintain at debian.nfgd.net. Since preparing the > 1.2 packages I've become heavily involved in upstream devel.

Bug#367212: FTBFS: missing dependency on bzip2

Package: aegis Version: 4.22-1 Severity: serious Hi, aegis_4.22-1 FTBFS on all archs for not getting results of (!failing) one test out of 239, because it misses bzip2, as shown below: CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \ test/02/t0225a-pmil.sh test/02/t0225a-pmil.ES test/

Bug#367049: mount breaks cfs

I have a fix for this bug. After applying the 30nfs4.dpatch, there is a function in mount/nfsmount.c called probe_port, which contains the statements: if (!port || port == p_port) { saddr->sin_port = htons(port); if (clnt_ping(saddr, prog, *p_vers, *p_prot)) goto o

Processed: reassign 366870 to ncurses-ruby

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > reassign 366870 ncurses-ruby 1.0-2 Bug#366870: raggle: crash at startup Bug reassigned from package `raggle' to `ncurses-ruby'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#366634: mindi: Filesystem to use for initrd is UNSUPPORTED

Hi Tim, Thank you for your bug report. Please send me your logs: /var/log/mondo-archive.log /var/log/mindi.log From what I can see so far, my first suspicion is that you don't use a standard Debian kernel but a self-compiled one. Is this true? If so, please read the first section of the mindi p

Bug#367046: privoxy segfaults when in multi-thread mode

On Sat, 13 May 2006, Sami J. Laine wrote: > Package: privoxy > Version: 3.0.3-2-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > I run privoxy inside an UML host for some network testing, just to > let you know, though it is normally considered as not having impact > on programs on

Bug#367208: cfs fails to mount /var/lib/cfs/.cfsfs with an NFS error

Package: cfs Version: 1.4.1-16 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable See subject. For fixing this problem, you need to add the option udp to the mount command in /var/lib/cfs/cfs_mount.sh. I send a small patch to do this. bye Gerhard -- System Information: Debian

Bug#362048: libnss_ldap library dependencies screwed on IA64

On 2006-04-12 Peter Chubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > I did apt-get upgrade yesterday, and now noone can login to the box. > The problem is: > ldd /lib/libnss_ldap.so.2 [...] > libtasn1.so.2 => not found [...] > libtasn1.so.2 is no longer present in libtasn1-2 > the current versio

Bug#366933: marked as done (libkipi - FTBFS: error: libkipi/interface.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 04:02:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366933: fixed in libkipi 0.1.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#366484: marked as done ("ircp -r" silently overwrites files)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 04:02:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366484: fixed in libopenobex 1.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#367194: FTBFS: missing build-depends on debhelper

Package: aboot-installer Version: 0.0.20 Severity: serious You're missing a build-dependency on debhelper: > Automatic build of aboot-installer_0.0.20 on juist by sbuild/alpha 0.44 ... > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is aboot-installer > dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.0.20 > dpkg-buil

Processed: Fixed Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#366933: libkipi - FTBFS: error: libkipi/interface.h: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 366933 +pending Bug#366933: libkipi - FTBFS: error: libkipi/interface.h: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: bug 367059 is forwarded to http://bugs.kde.org/127296

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > forwarded 367059 http://bugs.kde.org/127296 Bug#367059: krita: renders colors incorrectly on ppc Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugs.kde.org/127296. > End

Bug#366933: Fixed Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#366933: libkipi - FTBFS: error: libkipi/interface.h: No such file or directory

tags 366933 +pending stop I've commited a fix upstream and to alioth. Pbuilds fine. --- libkipi/libkipi/Makefile.am (revision 540612) +++ libkipi/libkipi/Makefile.am (revision 540613) @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ METASOURCES = AUTO -INCLUDES= $(LIBKIPI_CFLAGS) $(all_includes) +INCLUDES = -I.. -I$(srcdir)/..

Bug#367181: FTBFS: I have no package to build

Package: allegro4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source allegro4 fails to build on all arches, see http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=allegro4 Automatic build of allegro4_2:4.0.4-2 on garkin by sbuild/m68k 85 [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolc

Bug#365262: mozilla-firefox-locale-all: maxVersion problem

Package: mozilla-firefox-locale-all Followup-For: Bug #365262 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mozilla-firefox-locale-all maintainer, Now all of language packs are disabled because of its setting in install.rdf. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/mozilla-firefox-locale-all-1.5.0.1lang2

Bug#364264: marked as done (directvnc: FTBFS: dfb.c:33: error: syntax error before 'caps')

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 02:02:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364264: fixed in directvnc 0.7.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#367177: FTBFS: debian/rules:28: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory

Stop. | ** | Build finished at 20060514-0225 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- ,''`. : :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Bug#366870: raggle: crash at startup

hi, On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 12:45:59PM -0700, José H. Espinosa wrote: > Hi > >can you please check if /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ncurses.rb exists? > Yes it exist > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] : file /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ncurses.rb > /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ncurses.rb: ASCII English text okey, what does `/usr/bin/env rub

Bug#364264: A patch to fix this bug.

Thanks I will upload a new version now. I'll also orphan the package at the same time as I realize that I'm not a good maintainer anymore. // Ola On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 06:04:42PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > tags 364264 + patch > thanks > > I have attached a patch that fixes this bug. >

Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Sonntag, den 14. Mai 2006: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:54:04AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Sythos schrieb am Mittwoch, den 21. September 2005: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > > Package: fisg > > > > > Version: 0.

Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:54:04AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Sythos schrieb am Mittwoch, den 21. September 2005: > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Package: fisg > > > > Version: 0.3.8-2 > > > > Severity: grave > > > > Justification: renders package

Bug#351646: Bug #351646: atlas3: FTBFS: No rule to make .../3dnow/liblapack.so

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:54:16AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > --- debian/rules.b2006-03-21 05:48:25.0 + > +++ debian/rules 2006-03-21 05:49:43.0 + > @@ -677,6 +677,10 @@ > lib%.so: lib%.so.$(SO) > ln -snf $$(basename $<) $@ > > +lib%.so: lib%.so.$(V