Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 367024 wishlist
Bug#367024: Licences conflict: Ruby under pure GPL with OpenSSL Licence
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 22:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354498: fixed in tulip 2.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> The binary package libopenssl-ruby1.8 (pure GPL) depends on libssl0.9.7
> (OpenSSL Licence). Those 2 licences conflict due to a clause in
> OpenSSL Licence which has to be added to the GPL.
Ruby is distributed with dual-license which is "Ruby's License" or
Shame on me.
Doing a df, I saw that the /var/ partition was totally full. After
apt-get autoclean and reboot everything works. It looks like the upgrade
some days took the last bits of that partition ;( Now I also know, why
there were shown always the same available upgrades the last two days by
a
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:56:51AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This bug moved to Etch.
manpages-dev still needs to add a Conflicts: glibc-doc (<< 2.3.6-8)
You mean "Replaces".
Yes, sorry. I didn't know before you made me investigate this that a
Replace
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 22:07:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367647: Seems to be due to cdbs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: mesa-utils
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Looking at the actual files, they are mostly
Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Brian Paul All Rights Reserved.
(Some have fewer years; that's the union of the years.)
One of these (opencloseopen.c) is additionally
* (C) Copyright IBM Cor
Package: xorg-server
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Do a search for "/FreeB". The source package contains a bunch of code under
this
license, but the license is not in the debian/copyright file. (Indeed, it's not
even in the package -- the license header points to a URL, and you ha
Package: mesa
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The copyright file mentions that certain parts of the package are under the
"FreeB" license. Checking, indeed certain files are.
It does not mention that one file is under the "GLX Public License".
Neither license is in the copyright fil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 211765 -1
Bug#211765: xfree86: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software
License B is not DFSG-free
Bug 211765 cloned as bug 368564.
> reassign -1 xorg-server
Bug#368564: xfree86: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Soft
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 211765 -1 -2
Bug#211765: xfree86: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software
License B is not DFSG-free
Bug 211765 cloned as bugs 368559-368560.
> reassign -1 x11-proto-gl
Bug#368559: xfree86: material under GLX Public License and S
Package: x11proto-gl-dev
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The copyright file contains a copy of the license notices from the top of the
header files. So far so good. HOWEVER, those notices do not contain the actual
licenses. They merely refer to them by reference:
http://oss.sgi.com
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 18:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367228: fixed in srm-reader 0.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: kooka
Version: 4:3.5.2-1+b2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***line
The application crash right at the invocation:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kooka
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x0cb22654 ***
KCrash: Applicat
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 17:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367194: fixed in aboot-installer 0.0.21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi Lars,
Thanks for taking care of my poor little package... I'm sure you
understand why I haven't looked at it much lately :-( Anyway, it seems
the patch you NMUed created some problems - As I'm still stuck with
Debconf for a bit, and then have to catch up with at least one month
of job I put awa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 368540 0.092-1
Bug#368540: udev: breaks booting with an initramfs image on Thinkpad T43 that
needs special scsi/sata modules
Bug marked as found in version 0.092-1.
> notfound 368540 0.091-2
Bug#368540: udev: breaks booting with an initramfs ima
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 01:50:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368321: python-wxglade: wxglade fails to start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Hello Wolf,
/usr/lib/wx/python/wx2.6.pth is a file provided by the package
python-wxgtk2.6, and /usr/lib/wx/python/wx2.4.pth is provided
by python-wxgtk2.4
So defining alternatives for wx.pth is a job for python-wxgtk2.*
As they was no bug related to this issue with these packages, I think that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 367986 moreinfo
Bug#367986: sylpheed-gtk1: ..moving mail between folders within Sg1-1.0.6,
crashes X.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368477 normal
Bug#368477: gcc-4.0 should depend on libc6-dev
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 360992 serious
Bug#360992: exmap: FTBFS (ppc64): syntax error before numeric constant
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
The problem is in libgbf-1-0 package from gnome-build source package
Looking at gnome-build sources it seems that libgbf-am.so and
libgbf-mkfile.so should be somewhere but they arent.
So gbf_backend_get_backends () returns NULL because no backend is found
and anjuta cant load the project :(
I yo
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Paul Menzel wrote:
> So as I see it, killing just hpssd and starting it manually lets
> hp-toolbox start. Then there is also something written in hpssd.port
> and .pid. (1)
>
> Killing hpssd and hpiod and starting both fails.
Hmm, add a "sleep 1" in the /etc/init.d/hplip scri
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This actually effects all the linux-header files for 2.6.17 except the
base one linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package firefox
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 367983 368432
Bug#367983: gnuserv built without Unix Domain sockets, Internet Domain sockets
or System V IPC
Bug#368432: gnuserv: gnuserv fails on start
Merged 367983 368432.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
merge 367983 368432
stop
Hi Manoj,
I think the bug has already been reported as #367983 and fixed in a NMU
yesterday (version 3.12.7-2.2).
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C9
Package: udev
Version: 0.091-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When I tried to upgrade to udev 0.092-1, my system would no longer boot.
My initramfs was regenerated with the same configuration and kernel that
I have been using successfully for some time. On boot, the ke
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368009 minor
Bug#368009: apt-src: Apt-src install fails
Severity set to `minor' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 14:04:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364216: fixed in poker-network 1.0.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Monday 22 May 2006 19:18 skrev Bastian Venthur:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Because of the lack of "touch patch-stamp", or anything else that creates
> > patch-stamp, in the patch-stamp target, patch-stamp, configure-stamp, and
> > build-stamp are redone when debian/rules binary is called. That mi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 368531 moreinfo
Bug#368531: RuntimeError: (111, 'Connection refused')
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
severity 368009 minor
thanks
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:33:55PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > They should be "downloaded from the mirrors", though in this case the files
> > of those names correspond to sources.list lines of
> > deb file:///opt/ deb-repo/
> > and
> >
tags 368531 moreinfo
stop
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:27:45PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> The kernel is a binary obtained from Xen.
Could you please try with a Debian kernel image or with our patch
released on http://alioth.debian.org/project/showfiles.php?group_id=30894 ?
Cheers,
--
Ju
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350748 + fixed
Bug#350748: Please drop debian/control fiddling
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Package: xen-utils-3.0
Version: 3.0.2+hg9656-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When xend starts:
[2006-05-22 22:07:18 xend] INFO (SrvDaemon:278) Xend Daemon started
[2006-05-22 22:07:18 xend] INFO (SrvDaemon:282) Xend changeset: Thu Apr 27
09:58 :50 2006 +0100
x27;
> make: *** [install] Error 1
> ******
> Build finished at 20060522-1421
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 368477 normal
thanks
It is not definitely grave,
gcc can generate kernels, without libc6-dev,
so it is usable.
IMHO, this bug should be simply closed.
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libroxen-imho
Version: 0.99-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper, pike7.4-dev | pike7.6-dev | pike7, po-debconf
it failed on ALL architectures because pike7.4
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 20:48:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Void
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 11:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368013: fixed in busybox 1:1.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 11:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367714: fixed in busybox 1:1.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 365698 +experimental
Bug#365698: pan_0.95-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing b-d on dpatch
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Tags added: experimental
> tags 365889 +experimental
Bug#365889: pan_0.95-3(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: make clean fails
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 08:58:52AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> On Sunday, 2006-05-21 at 01:23:35 -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:56:51AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > This bug moved to Etch.
> > > manpages-dev still needs to add a Conflicts: glibc-doc (<< 2.3.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 358460 + fixed
Bug#358460: exmap: FTBFS (amd64): /usr/bin/ld: sharedarray.o: relocation
R_X86_64_32S against `writeme' can not be used when making a shared object;
recompile with -fPIC
Tags were: patch
Bug#358466: FTBFS (alpha): shared lib without
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # duplicate report, severity 368435 serious
> reassign 368435 tasksel-data
Bug#368435: tasksel: fails to upgrade with aptitude dist-upgrade
Bug reassigned from package `tasksel' to `
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # hardware-specific, not a regression
> severity 368490 important
Bug#368490: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: ohci1394 module panics and/or halts kernel
Severity set to `important' from `c
On May 22, "Francisco Javier F. Serrador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is tha output:
I did not ask for the output, I asked if you can understand the origin
of that error message.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
close 368487
merge 368487 368408
quit
Somehow I missed 368408.
Sorry for the duplicated report.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings, another pick of ours for the week. Be sure to add this to your
radars, keep an eye out for it on Monday preferably. You don't miss out on
this opportunity that you could profit greatly.
Vemics Inc is the company name, it's trading under the symbol VMCI on
Pinksheets. VMCI is trading a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 368487
Bug#368487: tasksel-data: overwrite files from tasksel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> merge 368487 368408
Bug#36840
El lun, 22-05-2006 a las 18:41 +0200, Marco d'Itri escribió:
This is the output I obtained:
Cannot lock /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules!
Cannot lock /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules!
> On May 22, "Francisco Javier F. Serrador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > During confi
Forget last message. I ran it without being root
This is tha output:
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
# program, probably run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules
file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.
# PCI de
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.45
Severity: serious
Dear Debian Install System team,
Upgrading taskel from sarge to sid fails with the error:
Selecting previously deselected package tasksel-data.
Unpacking tasksel-data (from .../tasksel-data_2.45_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> have a look at the
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=gnome-schedule
>
> buildogs, version 1.0.0-1.1
Setting up courier-authlib (0.58-1.0) ...
Setting up courier-authlib-userdb (0.58-1.0) ...
Setting up courier-authdaemon (0.58-1.0) ...
Start
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-12
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
machine: Toshiba tecra A4
AFAIK all tecras A4 and all satellite m40 models have the same hardware/bios
configuration, so this bug affect them all.
If the module ohci1394 is loaded while
On May 22, "Francisco Javier F. Serrador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During configuration phase, several lines like this appear:
> sh: -c: line 0: `th1s/.*[[:space:],]NAME="(eth0)"[[:space:]]*(,.*|\|)$/1/p'
> sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `,.*'
Can you try to debug this?
De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362666 important
Bug#362666: libmms0 has hidden dependency on glib
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tag 362666 + pending confirmed upstream
Bug#362666: libmms0 has hidden dependency on glib
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pendi
severity 362666 important
tag 362666 + pending confirmed upstream
stop
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> libmms doesn't seem to depend on anything in particular:
> $ ldd /usr/lib/libmms.so.0.0.0
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x2ae123713000)
> /lib6
severity 362657 normal
tags 362657 + moreinfo
stop
Hi,
I'm trying to respond to bugs you filed against libmms individually,
here I'm only responding to concerns you expressed in #362657.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> The public headers for libmms in libmms-dev inclu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362657 normal
Bug#362657: libmms-dev: needless dependency on glib.h
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tags 362657 + moreinfo
Bug#362657: libmms-dev: needless dependency on glib.h
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Sto
Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gcc-4.0 should depend, not recommend libc6-dev, otherwise it can not
find crt1.o and can not generate binaries.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (200, 'testing')
Architecture: i
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 08:58:52AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> On Sunday, 2006-05-21 at 01:23:35 -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:56:51AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > This bug moved to Etch.
> > > manpages-dev still needs to add a Conflicts: glibc-doc (<< 2.3.6
Package: crystalcursors
Version: 1.1.1-6
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Because of the lack of "touch patch-stamp", or anything else that creates
patch-stamp, in the patch-stamp target, patch-stamp, configure-stamp, and
build-stamp are redone when debian/rules binary is called. That might not be
s
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Matt Kraai wrote:
Subject: Bug#366832: Patch
[...]
Many thanks -- I'll apply that as soon as I bring my unstable machine back
up-to-date.
Cheers,
Phil.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 350748 serious
Bug#350748: Please drop debian/control fiddling
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 368436 normal
Bug#368436: linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686: Package is missing fundamental files
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here
On Sun, 21 May 2006 19:34:16 -0700, Steve wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:32:14AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 May 2006 17:55:12 -0700, Steve wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:40:09PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen
Bastian Blank wrote:
severity 368436 normal
thanks
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:29:49AM +0200, Clement Hermann (nodens) wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686
Version: 2.6.16-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Pardon, the package works.
Only if you can build an i
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 05:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367975: fixed in gtksourceview 1.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package gtksourceview libgtksourceview1.0-0 libgtksourceview-common
> libgtksourceview-dev libgtksourceview-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libgtksourceview-dev libgtksourceview-c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368429 serious
Bug#368429: Error processing manpages-dev when upgrading
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> merge 368429 365547 368155 368160 368281
Bug#365547: manpages-dev uninstallable because of conflicting file
sem_destroy.3.gz
severity 368436 normal
thanks
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:29:49AM +0200, Clement Hermann (nodens) wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686
> Version: 2.6.16-12
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Pardon, the package works.
> I'm glad there is work in progress to inte
reopen 363059
thanks
I think you made a mistake somehow. In debian/rules you (still) delete the
usr/share/icons/default directory soon after dh_installdirs create it:
# Don't overwrite system's default xcursor
rm -r $(CURDIR)/debian/crystalcursors/$(ICONDIR)/default
I think you
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Paul Menzel wrote:
> hpssd was still running. After killing it, /etc/init.d/hplip start
> worked.
Ok.
> [ERROR]: Unable to connect to HPLIP I/O. Check and make sure HPLIP is
> running.
> [ERROR]: Unable to create client object.
Please send me the output of (run as root):
Package: udev
Version: 0.092-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During configuration phase, several lines like this appear:
sh: -c: line 0: `th1s/.*[[:space:],]NAME="(eth0)"[[:space:]]*(,.*|\|)$/1/p'
sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `,.*'
Then:
Populatin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 363059
Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create
alternatives.
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:29:49AM +0200, Clement Hermann (nodens) wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686
Version: 2.6.16-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
severity seems exagerated,
as packages are work under progress.
xen is far from st
Hello,
have a look at the
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=gnome-schedule
buildogs, version 1.0.0-1.1
virtually all architectures failed because courier-authdaemon failed to install
and
remove correctly.
The package was obviously not installed in the buildd chroots.
I had to man
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 345371 3.0.1-2
Bug#345371: FTBFS: missing build-depends
Bug marked as found in version 3.0.1-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
|--==> Sebastian Bremicker writes:
SB> Hi!
>>As seen below, the package description refers to a userland package that
does
>>not exist, hence making this code essentially useless. The repository
>>mentioned as a workaround in previous bug reports is no longer active. This
>>package n
Hi,
I intent to NMU exmap soon to solve the RC bugs. Please tell me if you
don't want me to do so.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:29:49AM +0200, Clement Hermann (nodens) wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686
> Version: 2.6.16-12
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
severity seems exagerated,
as packages are work under progress.
xen is far from stable itself ;)
> --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 368358 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#368358: courier-authdaemon - fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> tags 368360 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#368360: courier-authdaemon - fails to remove
There were no
tags 368358 + moreinfo unreproducible
tags 368360 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: courier-authdaemon
> Version: 0.58-1.0
> Severity: grave
>
> | Setting up courier-authdaemon (0.58-1.0) ...
> | Starting Courier authentication services:
> /var/run/courier/authdaem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> package shishi
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: shishi
> tags 366526 pending
Bug#366526: [mostly-dummy-RC] Don't migrate; changes planned
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
On 5/21/06, Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new level caching system causes xmoto to break for the second time
> its run.
Hmm, initially I had the problem with i386 on linux too (it worked
fine on Windows), but finally got it to work on both Windows and linu
i386.
If it's relate
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686
Version: 2.6.16-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm glad there is work in progress to integrate xen in the Debian kernels.
However, the current -xen kernels are mostly unusable :
Package: gnuserv
Version: 3.12.7-2.1
Severity: grave
Hi,
gnuserv has started failing with:
__> gnuserv
Sorry, the Emacs server is only supported on systems that have
Unix Domain sockets, Internet Domain sockets or System V IPC
Sounds like a compilation error of some sort. D
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:23:22PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
>> Steve Langasek wrote:
[snipped]
>
>>> Right now, this doesn't really look to me like an apt-src bug.
>
>> I really can't tell. I'm not well-versed in the internal working of the
>> apt-* stuff. Are the _opt_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367704 + pending
Bug#367704: Initial install fails
Tags were: fixed-upstream confirmed
Tags added: pending
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Quoting Richard Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm drowning in spam here, any more ideas on what I can check? I've tried
> purging the sa-exim and spam assassin packages and reinstalling, didn't
> help. Logs still show SA appears to be working fine, but sa-exim is still
> saying there was an unk
Your message dated Sun, 21 May 2006 23:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327950: fixed in qglviewer 1.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sunday, 2006-05-21 at 01:23:35 -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 02:56:51AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > This bug moved to Etch.
> > manpages-dev still needs to add a Conflicts: glibc-doc (<< 2.3.6-8)
> You mean "Replaces".
It's not a complete replacement. Consider t
95 matches
Mail list logo
