Bug#370176: marked as done (netgen: FTBFS: cannot find -lXi)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#370176: fixed in netgen 4.4-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#372171: w3m: Searching on the page causes segfault

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 372171 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#372171: w3m: Searching on the page causes segfault There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#370746: marked as done (libgmp-ocaml: uninstallable, depends on unavailable ocaml-nox-3.09.1)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:52:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch

Frans Pop wrote: Shouldn't silo just depend on "current gcc" instead of on an explicit version no that the need to depend on 2.95 is gone? It's not necessary, but I thought it's not a bad idea to leave it like this. At least it improves the chances that there will be no surprises next time t

Bug#372240: idle-python2.3: unsatisfiable dependency on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3)

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:01:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:57:57PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > idle-python2.3 depends on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3), which is impossible > > to satisfy because the latest nonvirtual version of python2.3-tk was > > 2.3.5-9.1 and dpkg

Bug#372244: somehow the message vanished

Somehow the main text of my bug report got dropped. No clue how that happened. Anyway, here's the gist: Attempting to install python-serial fails with the following error, making the package impossible to use: Errors were encountered while processing: python-serial E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpk

Bug#372244: python-serial: cannot install ("loop over non-sequence")

Package: python-serial Version: 2.2-2 Severity: grave Attempting to install python-serial fails with the following error, making the package impossible to use: Errors were encountered while processing: python-serial E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to ins

Processed: reopening 369735, closing 369735

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 369735 Bug#369735: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding Bug reopened, originator not changed. > close 369735 4.1.11a-4sarge4 Bug#369735: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/

Bug#372240: idle-python2.3: unsatisfiable dependency on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3)

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:57:57PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > idle-python2.3 depends on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3), which is impossible > to satisfy because the latest nonvirtual version of python2.3-tk was > 2.3.5-9.1 and dpkg does not (yet?) support versioned dependencies on > virtual packages.

Processed: severity of 368705 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > # bogus justification, package installs fine > severity 368705 normal Bug#368705: libswt3.1-gtk-java and mozilla-browser Bug#361696: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Coarse dependencies Severity s

Bug#372240: idle-python2.3: unsatisfiable dependency on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3)

Aaron M. Ucko writes: > Package: idle-python2.3 > Version: 2.3.5-10 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > idle-python2.3 depends on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3), which is impossible > to satisfy because the latest nonvirtual version of python2.3-tk was > 2.3.5-9.1 and dpkg doe

Bug#372240: idle-python2.3: unsatisfiable dependency on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3)

Package: idle-python2.3 Version: 2.3.5-10 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable idle-python2.3 depends on python2.3-tk (>= 2.4.3), which is impossible to satisfy because the latest nonvirtual version of python2.3-tk was 2.3.5-9.1 and dpkg does not (yet?) support versioned depende

Bug#372075: mystery of dh_installdirs

Hi all, I got an FTBFS bug yesterday; On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:13:53 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: lynx-cur > Version: 2.8.6dev18-1 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: ... > > install -m 755 debian/lynx > > /build/buildd/lynx-cur-2.8.6dev18/

Bug#363173: libzipios++-dev: Shouldn't ship it's own config.h

Hi, > Well, yes, but do we actually know of any such packages in the archive? I > don't deny that there's a problem, but that it makes the package unusable? It > seems a bit over-the-top. Given the following output: apt-cache rdepends libzipios++0c2a libzipios++0c2a Reverse Depends: libzipios++-

Processed: Re: Bug#368705: libswt3.1-gtk-java and mozilla-browser

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 368705 critical Bug#368705: libswt3.1-gtk-java and mozilla-browser Bug#361696: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Coarse dependencies Severity set to `critical' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debia

Bug#368857: Question about linux-wlan-ng-firmware in main

tag 368857 patch thanks * Enrico Tassi [Sun, 28 May 2006 13:44:57 +0200]: Hello Enrico (and Victor), > Could you please examine this bts entry and give me suggestions. > Please CC me, since I'm not subscribed. So there was a 20-message long thread in -mentors, but you were dropped from CC when

Bug#339749: maildrop REMOVED from testing

severity 339749 important thanks On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:21:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Bug #339749: maildrop: kills processes it shouldn't > > > Perhaps a misfeature, but not a release-critical bug (this affects only > > certain children which are fairly broken anyway). > > A

Bug#370007: marked as done (libcamomile-ocaml-dev: binNMU-unsafe dependency on libcamomile-ocaml-data (= ${Source-Version}))

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:02:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#370007: fixed in camomile 0.6.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: Re: Bug#339749: maildrop REMOVED from testing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339749 important Bug#339749: maildrop: kills processes it shouldn't Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Processed: Re: Question about linux-wlan-ng-firmware in main

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 368857 patch Bug#368857: linux-wlan-ng-firmware: Should be in contrib There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#363173: libzipios++-dev: Shouldn't ship it's own config.h

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:55:10AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > You can't reliably use zipios to build software with it that uses > autoconf. > It may even break software on other archs by overriding the configure > script. Well, yes, but do we actually know of any such packages in the archive?

Processed: Re: Bug#339749: maildrop REMOVED from testing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339749 grave Bug#339749: maildrop: kills processes it shouldn't Severity set to `grave' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gsfonts-x11 0.19.0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 362911 + fixed Bug#362911: gsfonts-x11: Fonts not installed properly Tags were: patch Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Processed: NMU diff for gsfonts-x11 0.19.0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 362911 + patch Bug#362911: gsfonts-x11: Fonts not installed properly There were no tags set. Bug#366948: xfig can't find fonts Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#357608: marked as done (gnome-media: Upgrade fails due to incorrect dependencies)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#357608: fixed in gnome-media 2.14.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#368832: marked as done (gnome-media-common: fails to install)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368832: fixed in gnome-media 2.14.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#368833: marked as done (libgnome-media0: Fails to install)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368833: fixed in gnome-media 2.14.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: Fixed in NMU of apt 0.6.44.1-0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 366931 + fixed Bug#366931: Unable to parse empty packages/sources files There were no tags set. Bug#367086: apt: apt-get source fails on empty *_Sources files Bug#370160: treats empty packages/sources files as errors Tags added: fixed > tag 367086

Bug#362911: NMU diff for gsfonts-x11 0.19.0.1

tag 362911 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my gsfonts-x11 0.19.0.1 NMU. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Amon Tobin - Wi

Bug#360421: marked as done (couple of file conflicts)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360421: fixed in gnome-media 2.14.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#372227: marked as done (amarok-gstreamer uninstallable on sid)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Jun 2006 15:33:55 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372227: amarok-gstreamer uninstallable on sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#363173: libzipios++-dev: Shouldn't ship it's own config.h

Hi, > > Zipios shouldn't ship it's own "zipios-config.h" config file. > > Am I the only one who thinks this severity is inflated? important, yes, but > grave? You can't reliably use zipios to build software with it that uses autoconf. It may even break software on other archs by overriding the co

Processed: Re: maildrop REMOVED from testing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339749 important Bug#339749: maildrop: kills processes it shouldn't Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#370808: Samhain: Version 2.2.0 does not build in AMD64

tags 370808 upstream help thanks Hi Samhain support! This is (again) the Debian maintainer of Samhain speaking. I wanted to notify you of a bug recently submitted to the Debian Bug Tracking System: #370808 [1] it seems that the latest version of samhain cannot be built in amd64: http://buildd.deb

Processed: Re: Bug#371878: gnunet: Failed to open `/usr/share/GNUnet//wizard.glade'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Severity 371878 important Bug#371878: gnunet: Failed to open `/usr/share/GNUnet//wizard.glade' Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Processed: ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 314847 maildrop -d $USER defers, "Unable to create a dot-lock." Bug#314847: maildrop does not deliver because of dotlock problem Changed Bug title. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Processed: Samhain: Version 2.2.0 does not build in AMD64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 370808 upstream help Bug#370808: samhain_2.2.0-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (amd64): ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, help > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#339749: maildrop REMOVED from testing

severity 339749 important thanks On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:08:22PM -0600, Debian testing watch wrote: > FYI: The status of the maildrop source package > in Debian's testing distribution has changed. > > Previous version: 1.5.3-2 > Current version: (not in testing) > Hint:

Bug#369877: kaffe FTBFS on ia64

ploaded in gcj-4.1 Version 4.1.1-1. > > > > > Which this fix is available on ia64 kaffe should build fine. > > > > > > > > This does not seem to be the case, however, see: > > > > > > > > <http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kaffe

Bug#369741: marked as done (Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:47:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#369735: marked as done (Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:47:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#369754: marked as done (Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:47:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#369372: marked as done (gnome-power-manager: dbus service file created in wrong location)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#369372: fixed in gnome-power-manager 2.14.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#372227: amarok-gstreamer uninstallable on sid

Package: amarok-gstreamer Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable amarok-gstreamer is uninstallable on sid for i386 According to the Debian site package search the only newer version of this package is for arch kfreebsd Here is the dpkg output: The following packages have unmet

Bug#369877: kaffe FTBFS on ia64

ild fine. > > > > > > This does not seem to be the case, however, see: > > > > > > <http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kaffe&ver=2%3A1.1.7-2&arch=ia64&stamp=1149744354&file=log&as=raw> > > > Automatic build of kaffe_2:1.1.

Bug#369877: kaffe FTBFS on ia64

ldd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kaffe&ver=2%3A1.1.7-2&arch=ia64&stamp=1149744354&file=log&as=raw> > > Automatic build of kaffe_2:1.1.7-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 > > Build started at 20060608-0620 > > > > Setting up gcj-4.1-base (4.1.1-2) ...

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gambit 0.2006.01.20-1.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 369708 + fixed Bug#369708: FTBFS with GCC 4.1: assigns NULL to iterator There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 370743 + fixed Bug#370743: FTBFS with GCC 4.1: extra qualification 'gbtNfgHs::' There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > qui

Bug#372106: gngeogui: uninstallable in sid since gngeo was removed

Le Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:40:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] : > Hello Julien, Hi Bill, > gngeogui depends on gngeo which was recently removed form unstable. This > make gngeogui uninstallable on unstable. Yeah, I made a bugreport against ftp.debian.org to remove gngeogui. See bug #372202 Thanks

Processed: Fixed in NMU of avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 372193 + fixed Bug#372193: avifile: FTBFS with g++4.1: extra qualification There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#368991: Processed: Re: Bug#368991: banshee: crash when click play

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:24:16AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote: > Normally this is not problematic, since gcc aligns the stack > boundary to 16 bytes by default. However this doesn't seem to hold > for mono/banshee, or if one manually changes that alignment. This makes sense. Thanks for figu

Processed: tagging 372106

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 372106 + pending Bug#372106: gngeogui: uninstallable in sid since gngeo was removed There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Processed: Fixed in NMU of php4-sqlite 1.0.2-9.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 341045 + fixed Bug#341045: php4-sqlite: Missing/bad dependency to apache There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: tagging 350754

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 350754 + help Bug#350754: mailutils-imap4d: Risk of mailbox corruption by imap4d due to lack of multiple access locking? There were no tags set. Tags added: help > End of messa

Bug#372200: libgnomesu0 uninstallable.

Package: libgnomesu0 Version: 0.9.5-2+b1 Severity: grave Hi, It seems there was a binNMU for libgnomesu on amd64 and s390 to rebuild against libtasn1-3. But now it's uninstallable because it has a arch all package with a strict versioned dependency on. Could you please do a sourceful upload to

Bug#372193: NMU diff

I uploaded the following nmu: diff -urN avifile-0.7.44.20051021~/debian/changelog avifile-0.7.44.20051021/debian/changelog --- avifile-0.7.44.20051021~/debian/changelog 2006-06-03 19:17:44.0 + +++ avifile-0.7.44.20051021/debian/changelog2006-06-08 19:55:27.0 + @@ -

Bug#370743: NMU diff

I've uploaded the following NMU: diff -u gambit-0.2006.01.20/debian/changelog gambit-0.2006.01.20/debian/changelog --- gambit-0.2006.01.20/debian/changelog +++ gambit-0.2006.01.20/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gambit (0.2006.01.20-1.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU as part of the GCC 4.1

Bug#300146: guile-1.6: FTBFS (gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type

found 300146 1.6.7-1 thanks Just marking this as found in version 1.6.7-1, since it wasn't marked as found in any version, and it's still the version currently in testing. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: guile-1.6: FTBFS (gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 300146 1.6.7-1 Bug#300146: guile-1.6: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type Bug marked as found in version 1.6.7-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#354436: Bug#367095: libxine1: Please use the Debian ffmpeg version

Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 19:28 +0200, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:48:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > This is a wishlist bug, but please consider it as important. There is a > > Debian package of ffmpeg, with shared versions of the library. Please > > build libxi

Bug#363173: libzipios++-dev: Shouldn't ship it's own config.h

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:49:02AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > Package: libzipios++-dev > Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07-3.3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Zipios shouldn't ship it's own "zipios-config.h" config file. Am I the only one who thinks this severity

Bug#362516: tightvncserver dependency issue

Hi On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:49:50PM +0200, Valerio Santinelli wrote: > It looks like in the current version included in the testing / unstable > repository is again dependant on the obsolete xserver-common package. Can > you plese check this out? No it is depending on x11-common OR xserver-comm

Processed: Re: Bug#370701: vncserver: Xvnc (started from inetd for XCMP support) fails after recent dist-upgrade

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 370701 important Bug#370701: vncserver: Xvnc (started from inetd for XCMP support) fails after recent dist-upgrade Severity set to `important' from `grave' > merge 365594 370701 Bug#365594: Xvnc have wrong default font paths. Bug#370701: vncs

Bug#372196: installation-reports: Installing debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso (Etch) dies at "Installing Base System" step

Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to install Debian AMD64 testing (Etch) using the official netinst iso, the installation process always dies at the "Installing Base System" step saying: Failed getting Release file file:///cdro

Bug#370701: vncserver: Xvnc (started from inetd for XCMP support) fails after recent dist-upgrade

severity 370701 important merge 365594 370701 thanks Hi This is a known problem, and the default font paths will be changed. It is not a grave bug though. Regards, // Ola On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 03:19:53PM +0200, Tim Van Holder wrote: > Package: vncserver > Version: 3.3.7-12 > Severity: grave

Bug#372185: marked as done (rhythmbox: uninstallable in sid)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:08:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372185: rhythmbox: uninstallable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#372193: avifile: FTBFS with g++4.1: extra qualification

Package: avifile Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-2 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of avifile_1:0.7.44.20051021-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46 > Build started at 2006060

Processed: reassign 353066 to ntp-server, severity of 353066 is grave, merging 353066 302127

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > reassign 353066 ntp-server Bug#353066: ntp-simple: cannot create "ntp" group on install Bug reassigned from package `ntp-simple' to `ntp-server'. > severity 353066 grave Bug#353066:

Processed: reassign 348744 to ntp-server, merging 348744 302127

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > reassign 348744 ntp-server Bug#348744: ntp-simple: sudo apt-get install fails need to be root Bug reassigned from package `ntp-simple' to `ntp-server'. > merge 348744 302127 Bug#3021

Bug#372185: rhythmbox: uninstallable in sid

Package: rhythmbox Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable The following packages have unmet dependencies: rhythmbox: Depends: libsexy1 (>= 0.1.6) but it is not installable Depends: libtotem-plparser0 but it is not installable -- System Information: Deb

Bug#367935: checkinstall's temporary script is deleted by installwatch and installation therefore fails

The bug has occurred again. I built Qt 4 (downloaded from KDE's SVN qt-copy), and then tried to install it with this command: checkinstall --pkgname=qt4x make install_qmake install_mkspecs sub-src-install_subtargets sub-tools-install_subtargets install_htmldocs It's a pretty big package to inst

Bug#372179: apr-util: FTBFS: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/include/apr-1.0': No such file or directory

Package: apr-util Version: 1.2.7-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of apr-util_1.2.7-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46 > Build started at 2006060

Bug#372178: syntax error in prerm script

Package: dietlibc-dev Version: 0.29-12 Severity: serious Removing dietlibc-dev ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/dietlibc-dev.prerm: line 6: syntax error: unexpected end of file dpkg: error processing dietlibc-dev (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Bug#371086: marked as done (pioneers-server-console: -v option doesn't work)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:32:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#371086: fixed in pioneers 0.9.64-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: tags 368060 - patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # reassigned to a different package, patch no longer applicable > tags 368060 - patch Bug#368060: wxPython missing Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Processed: back

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 357481 1.11.4.dfsg-1 Bug#357481: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification Bug marked as found in version 1.11.4.dfsg-1. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Processed: severity of 372082 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > severity 372082 important Bug#372082: xfwm4: many (most?) keybindings broken Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: severity of 372126 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > severity 372126 important Bug#372126: bind9: Memory explosion or race condition on delete of 20'000 records. Severity set to `important' from `critical' > End of message, stopping p

Bug#372171: SOLVED (kind of) -- move ~/.w3m out of the way

I have no idea why, but moving my ~/.w3m directory out of the way and restarting w3m has solved the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#372172: CVE-2006-2230: Denial of service in xine-ui

Package: xine-ui Version: 0.99.3-1.3 Severity: grave Tags: security patch sid etch Several format string vulnerabilities have been discovered in xine-ui, the user interface of the xine video player, which may cause a denial of service. This bug report refers to DSA 1093. Regards, Joey

Bug#372171: w3m: Searching on the page causes segfault

Package: w3m Version: 0.5.1-4 Severity: grave Searching on any page with either "/" or "C-s" causes a segfault after entering the string to search for and hitting RET. I can't pinpoint exactly when, but I've been using w3m on this unstable system for years, and this has only started happening in

Bug#369265: fai-nfsroot: fai install dies with "nfs: RPC call returned error 101"

Hi, On 6/8/06, Thomas Pöhnitzsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] well the name of the bug actually describes exactly the problem I had. I never said that building the nfsroot failed, as it did not for me. Agreed, this is, as you say, what users look for. No discussion necessary. I didn't want

Bug#372168: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification

Package: kchmviewer Version: 2.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch > Automatic build of kchmviewer_2.5-1 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by > sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > if powerpc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/usr/share/qt3/include > -I/usr/include/kde -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REEN

Processed: back

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 357481 lprof_1.11.4.dfsg-1 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity 357481 serious Bug#357481: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification Severity set to `serious' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#369828: tagging 369608

Hi Ryan, On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:07:20AM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 369608 unreproducible It would be iterresting to know how you tried to reproduce the bug. Perhaps architecture plays a role too? I got quite a lot bug

Processed: Fixed in NMU of holotz-castle 1.3.8-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 357897 + fixed Bug#357897: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break... Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#369265: fai-nfsroot: fai install dies with "nfs: RPC call returned error 101"

Hi, On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote: > BTW: I don't understand the name of this bug. Why is a bug which > creates problems in nfsroot building filed with the topic that fai > gives an error at install time: "nfs: RPC call returned error 101" well the name of the bu

Bug#372082: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372082: xfwm4: many (most?) keybindings broken

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:53:42AM -0600, Bert Riding wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:44:31 +0100 > Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What happens if you run xfce-settings-show and look at the window > > manager key settings? Can you tell us what's there and try choosing > > the default

Processed: Foo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 356311 libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1 Bug#356311: dosbox: Shifted symbols broken Bug reassigned from package `dosbox' to `libsdl1.2'. > close 356311 1.2.10-1 Bug#356311: dosbox: Shifted symbols broken 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/D

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

On 2006-06-08T08:47:41, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >There may be files in there which aren't owned by our package though, or > >modified. > Huh? > > I just meant make individual symlinks for a individual binaries. NOT a > symlink for the entire directory. Ahhh. Ok. I thought y

Bug#372082: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372082: xfwm4: many (most?) keybindings broken

On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:44:31 +0100 Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tags 372082 +unreproducible moreinfo > thanks > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:35:40AM -0600, Bert wrote: > > Ctl+Alt+arrow_keys doesn't cycle through workspaces > > KP_Del (not Alt_Del) deletes workspace > > KP_Ins (not a

Bug#372082: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372082: xfwm4: many (most?) keybindings broken

On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:44:31 +0100 Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tags 372082 +unreproducible moreinfo > thanks > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:35:40AM -0600, Bert wrote: > > Ctl+Alt+arrow_keys doesn't cycle through workspaces > > KP_Del (not Alt_Del) deletes workspace > > KP_Ins (not a

Bug#369877: kaffe FTBFS on ia64

oes not seem to be the case, however, see: <http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kaffe&ver=2%3A1.1.7-2&arch=ia64&stamp=1149744354&file=log&as=raw> Automatic build of kaffe_2:1.1.7-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060608-0620 Setting up gcj-4.

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

On 2006-06-08T07:15:01, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really > >>>needs those files there. > >>Could we symlink 'em somewhere? > >Yes, I think that is a good solution (short of rearanging the > >resource paths completely). I

Bug#318795: libaio: empty shlibs file

Is there any progress on this bug? I was about to file another one: Package: libaio Version: 0.3.104-1 Severity: serious Justification: 8.6: Thus, when a package is built which contains any shared libraries, it must provide a `shlibs' file for other packages to use ... -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0

Bug#372142: fuse-utils: postrm removes device

Package: fuse-utils Version: 2.5.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: policy 10.6 Packages must not remove any device files in the `postrm' or any other script. This is left to the system administrator. fuse-utils.postrm: cd /dev; ./MAKEDEV -d fuse Which does: makedev fuse

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

On 2006-06-08T08:21:38, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Please fix it everywhere, if you don't mind. > >> > >>Thanks Horms!! > >Of course, special attention needs to be paid to upgrading to (and > >possibly, back off from) a version with that change. > > I'm pretty sure that RPM

Bug#372082: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#372082: xfwm4: many (most?) keybindings broken

tags 372082 +unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:35:40AM -0600, Bert wrote: > Ctl+Alt+arrow_keys doesn't cycle through workspaces > KP_Del (not Alt_Del) deletes workspace > KP_Ins (not alt_Ins) adds workspace > (and so on) > and to me, the most serious breakage is from > Tab

Bug#369877: kaffe FTBFS on ia64

gt; > Automatic build of kaffe_2:1.1.7-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 > Build started at 20060608-0620 > > Setting up gcj-4.1-base (4.1.1-2) ... > > However kaffe do not build-depends on gcj-4.1, so how the fixed gcj-4.1 > should affect kaffe build ? kaffe Build-Depends on

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2006-06-08T08:21:38, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please fix it everywhere, if you don't mind. Thanks Horms!! Of course, special attention needs to be paid to upgrading to (and possibly, back off from) a version with that change. I'm pretty s

Bug#369815: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: Bug#369815: ships binary in /etc

Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2006-06-08T07:15:01, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really needs those files there. Could we symlink 'em somewhere? Yes, I think that is a good solution (short of rearanging the resource paths com

  1   2   >