Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:24:51 +0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #358410: debian/control misclassifies erlang-{mode,src} as
architecture any, not all
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:24:51 +0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #358410: debian/control misclassifies erlang-{mode,src} as
architecture any, not all
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
clone 366948 -1
reassign -1 xfonts-utils 1:1.0.0-4
retitle -1 update-scale-fonts: fails on empty dirs
tags -1 = patch
thanks
Hi Dato,
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:29:42PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> - gsfonts-x11 (both 0.19 and 0.19.0.1) effectively leaves behind in
> /usr/lib/X11/fonts/Ty
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package gnucash
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnucash
> retitle 370500 gnucash: QIF import causes data loss
Bug#370500: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 04:41:31PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > This package may get removed right now then. It dosen't build now and
> > will never build (IIUC) so...
>
> In that case, you might want to file a bug against the ftp.debian.org
> pseudopackage and req
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372646: fixed in zelig 2.6-2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 04:41:31PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> This package may get removed right now then. It dosen't build now and
> will never build (IIUC) so...
In that case, you might want to file a bug against the ftp.debian.org
pseudopackage and request its removal.
/* Steinar */
--
Hom
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:02:59 +0200
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:29:49PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > this was addressed upstream and will be resolved with the next update of
> > the Phobos release which might happen with Ekiga 2.0.2. If at that time
> >
severity 367326 important
thanks
While compatibility with xen would be nice, this isn't release-critical and
shouldn't prevent the inclusion of these nvidia packages in etch.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:34:02PM +0200, Stephan Weller wrote:
> Ever since I updated gnome to 2.14, the xpenguins-applet crashes the
> gnome panel when used. When killing the X server and logging in again,
> the panel is afterwards not usable and can be recovered only by killing
> the xpenguins-a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 356169 + fixed
Bug#356169: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 02:30:12PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> But then I get the following, which I'm not sure is a bug in wxwidgets-2.6 or
> your package (I thought I had a patches wxwidgets installed so either it needs
> more patching or your package needs another fix):
>
> [...]
>
> Config
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 02:06:20AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Mohammed Sameer [Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:56:29 +0300]:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Package: libzipios++-dev
> > Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07-3.3
> > Followup-For: Bug #363173
>
> > We can't simply remove the file because if we do, enigma will F
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367326 important
Bug#367326: nvidia-kernel-source: Fails to load when running under Xen
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 363173 + fixed
Bug#363173: libzipios++-dev: Shouldn't ship it's own config.h
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
reassign 370655 plplot
merge 372644 370655
thanks
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-10 23:02]:
> Package: plplot
> Version: 5.6.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Your package currently can't be build because it has conflicting
> build dependencies.
>
> You build depend on both gcj and libgcj6
* Gwenael Pellen [Sat, 03 Jun 2006 21:39:31 +0200]:
Hi,
> Package: lilo
> Version: 1:22.6.1-7+b1
> Severity: normal
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
> Setting up lilo (22.6.1-7+b1) ...
> cp: too many input files
> dpkg: error processing lilo (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 370655 plplot
Bug#370655: libplplot9: FTBFS due to wrong java build-dependencies
Bug reassigned from package `libplplot9' to `plplot'.
> merge 372644 370655
Bug#370655: libplplot9: FTBFS due to wrong java build-dependencies
Bug#372644: plplot:
reassign 370655 plplot
merge 372644 370655
thanks
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-10 23:02]:
> Package: plplot
> Version: 5.6.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Your package currently can't be build because it has conflicting
> build dependencies.
>
> You build depend on both gcj and libgcj6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 370138 + fixed
Bug#370138: libprinterconf: FTBFS: Cannot find /usr/lib/libglib2.0.la
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:57:26AM +0300, alex bodnaru wrote:
Dear Alex,
> this is a change in required parameters that left me with no networking
> in uml.
> i'm using uml with eth0=daemon option. if no uml_switch control file is
> specified, linux has previously (probably) searched it as config
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329409: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329409: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316883: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342455: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342455: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329409: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342455: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342455: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341901: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all, I got an FTBFS bug yesterday;
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:13:53 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
>
>> Package: lynx-cur
>> Version: 2.8.6dev18-1
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>>
> ...
>
>>> install -m 75
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329409: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: ivtools
Version: 1.1.3-5.2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of ivtools_1.1.3-5.2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46
> Build started at 2006061
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341901: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341901: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341901: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316883: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316883: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Both of the recent security bugs have now been fixed in
dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-4 which will be uploaded (by a sponsor) soon. In
the meantime, the packages are available at
http://users.tkk.fi/~mpolla/debian/
cheers,
-Matti
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316883: fixed in devmapper 2:1.02.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 04:47:24PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I've just made a QA upload of xcircuit, which works for me on x86. Can you
> please test it in powerpc and let me know if this problem still exists?
Unfortunately, I no longer own any powerpc machines, so I'd be unable to
test this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 356540 + fixed
Bug#356540: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 370178 + fixed
Bug#370178: gle: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:19:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298152: fixed in checkinstall 1.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: openc++
Version: 2.8-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hi!
The debian/copyright file states, in part:
| Any
| distribution of this software or derivative works must comply with all
| applicable United States export control laws.
This clause does not comply with the DFSG.
Package: zelig
Version: 2.6-2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of zelig_2.6-2-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0)
> Build-Depends-Indep: r-bas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 359804 + fixed
Bug#359804: tix: libTix8.4.so.1 lacks SONAME
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 338844 + fixed
Bug#338844: rat: unsuitable encoding in control file
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 370233 + fixed
Bug#370233: rat - FTBFS: Build dependecy against removed package xlibs
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 365230 wishlist
Bug#365230: mcvs - FTBFS: There is no package with name "FFI"
Bug#230947: There is no package with name "FFI" for hppa
Bug#270876: clisp: FFI not available on
Package: plplot
Version: 5.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package currently can't be build because it has conflicting
build dependencies.
You build depend on both gcj and libgcj6-dev, which can't be
installed at the same time now, since gcj moved to gcj 4.1.
You should probably either change
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 356169 1:0.12.4-4.2
Bug#356169: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
Bug marked as found in version 1:0.12.4-4.2.
> tags 356169 - fixed
Bug#356169: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: dereferencing type-punned p
tory
> `/build/buildd/pdp-0.12.4/build-tree/pdp-0.12.4/opengl'
> make[1]: *** [pdp_all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/pdp-0.12.4/build-tree/pdp-0.12.4'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
> ***
Package: cupsys
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Richte cupsys ein (1.2.1-2) ...
Starting Common Unix Printing System: cupsd/usr/sbin/cupsd: symbol lookup
error: /usr/sbin/cupsd: undefined symbol: cupsFileWrite
invoke-rc.d: initscript cupsys, action "start" failed.
dpkg: F
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:04:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libroken16-kerberos4kth: Please link to libdb4.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 370234 - moreinfo
Bug#370234: libapache2-mod-python - FTBFS: applying patch 01_configure.diff to
./ ... failed.
Tags were: pending moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
>
End of mess
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:04:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libroken16-kerberos4kth: Please link to libdb4.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:04:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libroken16-kerberos4kth: Please link to libdb4.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:12:40PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I extracted the attached patch here; I've never used Tomcat, so I can't say
> if it's sufficient or not. Testing would be appreciated.
...and we attach the patch.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
---
tomcat5
Hi Johan,
I see the exact same problem that Alexander noticed, and for me it
actually appeared just _after_ the upgrade to XOrg 7 ! My version is:
ii xorg 7.0.20 X.Org X Window System
According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xorg.html, xorg 7 actually
migrated to testing/e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> forwarded 354698
> http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=artifact&group_id=93438&words=1499971
Bug#354698: crashes during startup due to theming errors
Noted your statement t
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:37:26PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
>> Several solutions have been designed by Pierre Habouzit, but I cannot
>> even think about applying them. Like adding:
>>
>> #undef readdir
>> #include
>>
>> Before:
>> DynamicQueryFactory::CDynamicQueryFactory(string inDirectory
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 370234 pending
Bug#370234: libapache2-mod-python - FTBFS: applying patch 01_configure.diff to
./ ... failed.
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:35:59PM -0400, Frederic Briere wrote:
> [I'm setting this to severity: critical because it has the potential to
> bring the kernel to a grinding halt.]
Well, but it can only be done by root, and only be enabling monitor
mode for some longer time. It seems to be one of th
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369702: fixed in sdcv 0.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:30:13PM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
>
> * Laurent Fousse [2006-06-10]:
> > Hello,
> >
> > * Julien Danjou [Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:00:45PM +0200]:
> > > Here it is:
> > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-xen i386 (i686)
> > > Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.6-15
> > > li
Hi,
Hope I am not writing to wrong address. I am nice, pretty looking
girl. I am planning on visiting youra town this month. Can
we meet each other in person? Message me bback at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 365518 + patch
Bug#365518: libccscript3_1.0.8-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: cannot convert
'SQLINTEGER*' to 'SQLLEN*' for argument '2' to 'SQLRETURN SQLRowCount(void*,
SQLLEN*)
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:43:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: Build failure of doc-debian-ko on i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
2006 m. birželis 9 d., penktadienis 20:57, jūs rašėte:
> Btw, a new version of ksynaptics has been available for quite some time
> now.
A new version of libsynaptics (0.14.5a) was released today. It is supposed to
support the new xorg synaptics driver. So all you need to do is to package
libsynap
tags 365518 + patch
thanks
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:34:16PM +0200, thomas wrote:
Sorry, wrong To:
Regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Version: 1.0.12-1
Using gtkhtml, liferea still segfaults intermittently.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 365518 + patch
thanks
Hi,
attached is the NMU patch fixing the FTBFS. It was checked against
amd64 and powerpc.
Regards,
Thomas
diff -u libccscript3-1.0.9/debian/changelog libccscript3-1.0.9/debian/changelog
--- libccscript3-1.0.9/debian/changelog
+++ libccscript3-1.0.9/debian/changelog
@@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 340177 + fixed
Bug#340177: CVE-2004-2541: Buffer overflows in parsing file names from #include
statements
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my cscope 15.5+cvs20050816-1.1 NMU.
(Actually it's just the patch already attached to this bug + a changelog
entry.)
Cheers,
Julien
diff -u cscope-15.5+cvs20050816/debian/changelog
cscope-15.5+cvs20050816/debian/changelog
--- cscope-15.5+cvs20050816/debian/changelog
* Laurent Fousse [2006-06-10]:
> Hello,
>
> * Julien Danjou [Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:00:45PM +0200]:
> > Here it is:
> > Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-xen i386 (i686)
> > Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.6-15
> > linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2.1 gcc-4.1_4.1.1-2 g++-4.1_4.1.1-2
> > binutils_2.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 365518 + fixed
Bug#365518: libccscript3_1.0.8-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: cannot convert
'SQLINTEGER*' to 'SQLLEN*' for argument '2' to 'SQLRETURN SQLRowCount(void*,
SQLLEN*)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 357849 + fixed
Bug#357849: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: misc errors
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366927: fixed in webcalendar 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360690: fixed in webcalendar 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 370085 + fixed
Bug#370085: angband_1:3.0.6-2 (unstable/i386): FTBFS: build-dep on obsolete
libxaw8-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368414: fixed in ejabberd 1.1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag #364262 + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Hello,
Could you upload a fixed version ?
I'll NMU the package later today if you can't.
Regards,
--
Zorglub
Clément Stenac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 369518 + fixed
Bug#369518: baobab: runs gtk-update-icon-cache and bugs other gnome apps
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 372200 patch
Bug#372200: libgnomesu0 uninstallable.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks buddy!
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 296332 + fixed
Bug#296332: stratagus: just segfaults on amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:22:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-doc-ja: Very out of date documents with misleading
information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:24:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-doc-ko: Very out of date documents with misleading
information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
tags 372200 patch
thanks buddy!
Hi,
Attached is the a fix for rendering libgnomesu0 binNMU safe.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
// I'm no superman.
diff -u libgnomesu-0.9.5/debian/control libgno
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 367645 - unreproducible
Bug#367645: regexxer: Segmentation Fault on amd64
Tags were: confirmed unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 367645 - moreinfo
Bug#367645: regexxer: Segmentation Fault on amd64
Tags were: confirmed moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
ok, looks like bison-2.3 breaks gpc. investigating ...
> Package: gcc-4.1
> Version: 4.1.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> It seems that currently gcc-4.1 is uncompilable:
>
> gnatgcc -g -DENABLE_CHECKING -DENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING -DIN_GCC -W
> -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes
Hello,
* Julien Danjou [Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:00:45PM +0200]:
> Here it is:
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-xen i386 (i686)
> Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.6-15
> linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2.1 gcc-4.1_4.1.1-2 g++-4.1_4.1.1-2
> binutils_2.16.1cvs20060413-1 libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.1-2
> l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 318719 + fixed
Bug#318719: tecnoballz: Segfaults on startup on 64-bit machines
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 370831 + fixed
Bug#370831: tecnoballz-data: generated in binary-arch
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
St
Julien Danjou wrote:
> Uploaded. At your service.
Thanks ;)
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 367645 confirmed
Bug#367645: regexxer: Segmentation Fault on amd64
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367872: fixed in lush 1.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Hello,
The simplest fix is to simply drop the debian/libjudydebian1.shlibs
package and to let dh_makeshlibs do its work
--
Zorglub
Clément Stenac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 367645 regexxer: Segmentation Fault on amd64
Bug#367645: regexxer: Segmentation Fault
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 372115 pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Bug#372115: Last security update of postgresql-contrib breaks database
replication with DBMirror.pl
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tag 372115 upstream
Bug#372115: Last
tags 370223 +unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
I installed the woody versi0on in a UML, and updgraded to the
latest version, and the apex scores file was untouched. This is
commensurate with the code; the packages do not contain the high
scores file, so it is not overridden on upgrades, and no
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
