Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376884: fixed in kdebluetooth 0.99+1.0beta1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376975: fixed in kdebluetooth 0.99+1.0beta1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376884: fixed in kdebluetooth 0.99+1.0beta1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376429: fixed in xbuffy 3.3.bl.3.dfsg-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376975: fixed in kdebluetooth 0.99+1.0beta1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376900: fixed in libopenobex 1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please see Don's reply. It contains all useful information. Even though
> you behave like a Kindergarte would be the right place for you, I'm not
> doing total mouthfeeding for you now.
As you continue to send irrelevent rants, you are obviously not
able
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376900: fixed in libopenobex 1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Also, as usual, you are ignoring the vital fact that the
> > > combination of CDDL and GPL is something between legally dubious
> > > and illegal. Of course, yo
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 11:19]:
> As you are unable to prove your claims by quoting related parts of written
> down rules, you are obviously not trustworthy.
Please see Don's reply. It contains all useful information. Even though
you behave like a Kindergarte would be the rig
severity 377295 normal
thanks
Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 02:32:04PM -1000, Ryo Furue wrote:
bash# dpkg-reconfigure exim
db_upgrade: /var/spool/exim/db/retry.lockfile: unrecognized file type
db_upgrade: DB->upgrade: /var/spool/exim/db/retry.lockfile: Invalid argument
ba
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 377295 normal
Bug#377295: exim: db_upgrade error during configuration
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 02:32:04PM -1000, Ryo Furue wrote:
>
> bash# dpkg-reconfigure exim
> db_upgrade: /var/spool/exim/db/retry.lockfile: unrecognized file type
> db_upgrade: DB->upgrade: /var/spool/exim/db/retry.lockfile: Invalid argument
> bash#
>
> I marked this bug as "grave" but I
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060707 17:50]:
> > You seem not to understand how a constitution works
> >
> > If you do not follow written rules, you end up in arbitraryness.
>
> Actually, I'm a debian officer while you are not. It seems that
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060707 17:50]:
> You seem not to understand how a constitution works
>
> If you do not follow written rules, you end up in arbitraryness.
Actually, I'm a debian officer while you are not. It seems that my peer
developers actually have some trust in me th
Hi there,
This has been given a Mitre ID CVE-2006-3458.
Please mention this in changelogs.
Cheers,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
severity 377300 normal
reassign 377300 libmozjs0d
merge 377300 376374
tag 376374 pending
thanks
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:19:03PM -0400, Akira Yamanita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: libxul0d
> Version: 1.8.0.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Epiphany an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 377300 normal
Bug#377300: libxul0d: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d: undefined
symbol: JS_SetGCParameter
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> reassign 377300 libmozjs0d
Bug#377300: libxul0d: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxul.
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
