Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 382385 + patch
Bug#382385: mozilla_2:1.7.13-0.3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 381816 sid
Bug#381816: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on ghc6 (< 6.4.1-999)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 03:40:26 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug has already been fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 381817 sid
Bug#381817: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on ghc (< 6.4.2)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Hi Sam,
Should this bug really be considered "grave"? Is there a valid reason why
the exec'ed scripts should be printing to stderr, or could this be equally
considered a bug in those scripts?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
Package: qof
Severity: serious
Version: 0.7.0-1
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=qof%26ver=0.7.0-1%26arch=sparc%26stamp=1155137227%26file=log
[...]
Executed 344 tests. There were 6 failures.
FAIL: test-book-merge
[...]
Executed 1908 tests. There were 99 failures.
FAIL: test-date
[...]
=
Looking at these messages and a quick google revealed this email
suggesting that -rdynamic was needed.
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/glade-users/2005-October/002750.html
So I added a LDFLAGS declaration to debian/rules as attached and it
works for me.
--- silky-0.5.2/debian/rules2004-0
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:27:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pympd crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Package: bittorrent
Version: 3.4.2-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Googleing it makes it look like it might be a python 2.3 vs 2.4 problem,
but the default python version has been 2.4 for a while now, so...
Exception in thread Thread-2:
Traceback (most recent call last):
Do not ignore me bplease,
bI found your email somewhere aand now decided to write you.
I am coming to your pblace in few weeks and thought we
can meet each other. Let me know if you do nobt mind.
I am a nicae pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
T
Hi,
I was looking at this bug, and I have found that there are two
problems that trigger this bug: gdLargeFont and gdGiantFont seem to
have been swapped, and gdSmallFont has changed sightly and the sample
png doesn't reflect this.
I'll keep digging on this...
--
Martín Ferrari
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:20 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The thing is that there are many ways that a user might have set their
> passdb backend which happened to work, but which were never correct
> according to the documented syntax. I'm pretty sure that "backend1,
> backend2" was not the doc
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:17:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381378: fixed in freeciv 2.0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-96
Severity: serious
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>crontab -l
You (joey) are not allowed to use this program (crontab)
See crontab(1) for more information
This is not a cron.allow ot cron.deny issue:
stat64("/var/spool/cron", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
chd
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:17:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383052: fixed in python-libgmail 0.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335274 + fixed
Bug#335274: matanza: completely broken packaging
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 340496 + fixed
Bug#340496: matanza: wrong format on man page
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295644 grave
Bug#295644: gdeskcal does not check dates of repeat events for errors
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Hello Peter,
If I did everything right, the binNMU should be in incoming.
It's a true binNMU, no source changes except for the debian/changelog.
I didn't close the bug yet, I don't know if that should be done with the
binNMU or not. After all the bug would resurface again when the buildds
build the
digging through upstream's source, i think this is a good starting
point:
http://pike.ida.liu.se/development/cvs/pike.xml?between=2006-05-23&and=2006-05-25
i'll be looking more at this over the weekend, since marek is
out and requested some help. there are some changelog entries
later on talking
reassign 383727 mdadm
close 383727
thanks
On Aug 19, Laurent CARON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had to remove the symlink z60_mdadm.rules -> ../mdadm.rules to get
> system boot again.
As you could easily have verified:
- the file is provided by the mdadm package
- there are at least three bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383727 mdadm
Bug#383727: Latest udev makes system unbootable because /dev/mdXX are not
created
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `mdadm'.
> close 383727
Bug#383727: Latest udev makes system unbootable because /dev/mdXX are not
created
'c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I can confirm that, as maks said, the fixed packages from
mentors.debian.net indeed fixes this bug.
I took the sources from mentors, built it localy, installed the
generated packages and went back to using the nuke call in
/usr/share/initra
OK,
I am preparing a new package revision that produces debug
symbols. Since I have no amd64 box at hand, would you volunteer to
respin this package on your machine in order to get a readable
backtrace (Of course, I would provide instructions)?
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383709 serious
Bug#383709: libaudio-file-perl: Missing dependency package libaudio-flac-perl
which has been removed recently
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 383555 udev 0.097 broken by klibc-utils nuke <= 1.4.19-1
Bug#383555: udev 0.097 broken by klibc-utils <= 1.4.19-1
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Package: udev
Version: 0.097-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I had to remove the symlink z60_mdadm.rules -> ../mdadm.rules to get
system boot again.
Since i have /boot on md0 (raid1) / on md1 (raid5) /boot would not
mount.
Removing the symlink makes the devices to
found 383314 6:6.0.6.2-2.6
thanks
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:20:01PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:51:15PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > http://www.overflow.pl/adv/imsgiheap.txt reported a buffer overfl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 383314 6:6.0.6.2-2.6
Bug#383314: libmagick9: Buffer overflow in SGI parser [CVE-2006-4144]
Bug marked as found in version 6:6.0.6.2-2.6.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 12:55:20AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> A fixed initramfs-tools package is being uploaded, affected users should
> upgrade it.
Why initramfs-tools?
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/udev is in the udev package.
--
CJ van den Berg
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Steve
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 06:14:37PM +0900, Michael Neuffer wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Am Freitag, 18. August 2006 10:38 schrieb Michael Neuffer:
passdb backend = tdbsam,
>
>>> This is your problem. There is no passdb backend named "tdbsam,". Yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 383555 udev 0.097 broken by klibc-utils <= 1.4.19-1
Bug#383555: udev 0.097 broken by initramfs-tools <= 0.74
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
The problem lies in the addition of several lines in
apt/apt-pkg/tagfile.cc that were added for the mmappable package file
case, but in the fix for #376777, were not put inside proper
ifstatements for the non-mmap case, and are actually broken in that
case (corruption every 64kB of package file).
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 12:36:57AM +0200, CJ van den Berg wrote:
> It sure would help if I attached it wouldn't it. :)
>
> ...
thanks to pinpoint that,
a fixed klibc-utils nuke is already uploaded to mentors
-> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/klibc/
and should reach incoming the nex
retitle 383555 udev 0.097 broken by initramfs-tools <= 0.74
thanks
On Aug 19, CJ van den Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've found the solution. See the attached diff.
>
> After replacing "nuke" with "rm -rf" (as it was in the last udev version I
> believe) and running "update-initramfs -u" e
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378654: fixed in busybox 1:1.1.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
found 382617 2.2.3-1
thanks
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:45:02AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Hi,
First of all, my buildd tried to build the latest version and failed
with the same error.
> Umm.. I've noticed that you are building in a Xen kernel, is
> '-fstack-protector' supported
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383710: fixed in busybox 1:1.1.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # missing manpages are not RC
> severity 383713 important
Bug#383713: gcc-4.1: Manpages are missing
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 382617 2.2.3-1
Bug#382617: samhain: FTBFS: multiple undefined references
Bug marked as found in version 2.2.3-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
It sure would help if I attached it wouldn't it. :)
...
--
CJ van den Berg
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/udev.borked 2006-08-19
00:16:32.0 +0200
+++ /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/udev 2006-08-19
0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 383555 udev 0.097 broken by initramfs-tools <= 0.74
Bug#383555: udev broken for initrd kernels
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 383403
Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 242866 linux-2.6
Bug#242866: drivers containing firmware blobs
Bug#243022: ymfpci_image.h: Sourceless microcode
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-11
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.1
After upgrading to latest version of gcc-4.1 the manpages have disappeared from
the package - g++ has the same bug.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, '
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:32:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383500: xmldiff: fails to install due to Python transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: synfig
Version: 0.61.05-7
Severity: serious
The synfig package build-depends on g++-4.0, which is no longer available on
hppa because of ABI changes on that architecture.
Resolving this means either 375080 must be addressed, or the hppa binaries
for synfig must be removed.
--
Steve Lan
I've found the solution. See the attached diff.
After replacing "nuke" with "rm -rf" (as it was in the last udev version I
believe) and running "update-initramfs -u" everything is back to normal.
It seems that /dev/.udev/queue/ doesn't even exist here and nuke fails with
an error code 1 which cau
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 06:14:37PM +0900, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 18. August 2006 10:38 schrieb Michael Neuffer:
> >>passdb backend = tdbsam,
> > This is your problem. There is no passdb backend named "tdbsam,". You
> > want "tdbsam". Do you have an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 377109 - moreinfo
Bug#377109: RM: cdrtools -- RoM: non-free, license problems
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:25:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383701: Mice don't work anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi,
just wanted to confirm the bug is still there. My symptoms are similar. I
can see all accented chars nicely in OOo 2.0.3 or when exported/printed
to PDF. However, as soon as I print into a PS (or to the printer) the
accents are lost (german Umlaut here).
The strange thing is that it is dep
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Attempting to build busybox on sarge yields the following during build:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/busybox-1.1.3/debian/build/build-udeb'
cp debian/build/build-udeb/docs/BusyBox.1
debian/build/build-udeb/docs/busybox.1
touch debian/stamps/b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # dn, fix iit
> reassign 373899 cupsys
Bug#373899: cupsys: USB backend cannot access /dev/usb/lp0
Bug reassigned from package `cupsys' to `cupsys'.
> found 373899 1.2.1-2
Bu
tags 377109 - moreinfo
thanks
On 10750 March 1977, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> There many reverse dependencies still, and there is no replacement at
> the moment nor dummy upgrade packages for users of tools like 'mkisofs'.
> Removing now would break too many things.
Thats why i still wait.
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:03:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383590: fixed in perforate 1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 354203 -1
Bug#354203: RM: kernel-source-2.2.25 -- RoM; obsolete
Bug 354203 cloned as bug 383706.
> severity -1 normal
Bug#383706: RM: kernel-source-2.2.25 -- RoM; obsolete
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383688 mdadm
Bug#383688: udev: /dev/md? missing
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `mdadm'.
> forcemerge 382263 383688
Bug#382263: missing dev nodes when RAID brought up before init
Bug#383688: udev: /dev/md? missing
Bug#382450: Root on (lv
reassign 383688 mdadm
forcemerge 382263 383688
thanks
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.18.2132 +0100]:
> Is this a mdadm bug?
Yes. Temporary workaround:
rm /etc/udev/rules.d/z60-mdadm.rules
I will get to fixing this on Sunday.
--
martin; (greetings from the
Package: udev
Version: 0.097-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
first, I'm not sure the bug comes from this package, because I updated
both libhal1 and udev at the same time.
When I rebooted (very few time later), Xorg complained with this : """
(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice
Thanks for the report,
I've notified upstream, although it might be fixed in the CVS version. I'll
try to upload a new version based on the CVS as soon as I can.
Miry
__
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y móv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 383487 apt
Bug#383487: parsing packages files: Reads from pipe results in corrupt data
Bug reassigned from package `python-apt' to `apt'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
reassign 383487 apt
thanks
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:00:53PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> This does not exclude the possibility that the problem is in libapt.
> Looking at the differences in tagfile.cc in apt, there are
> buffering/mmap changes made to the reading code, which is IMHO hig
On Friday 18 August 2006 20:17, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 18, David Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > device nodes for kernel autoconfigured raid arrays are not created.
>
> They are on my system, and I can't see why they should not.
>
> Is this a regresssion? Are you using an initramfs?
De
Package: udev
Version: 0.097-1
Followup-For: Bug #383555
Same here, udev failed to load drivers, for example the PS/2 mouse, the
network or the sound drivers. They all don't work right.
worked fine yesterday, with the previous udev version.
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/ud
On Aug 18, David Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this a regresssion? Are you using an initramfs?
> Definately not using initramfs what do you mean by regression?
Did this work with a precedent version of udev?
Anyway, this is probably a bug in mdadm. Check that you are using the
latest r
On Friday 18 August 2006 20:56, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 18, David Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is this a regresssion? Are you using an initramfs?
> >
> > Definately not using initramfs what do you mean by regression?
>
> Did this work with a precedent version of udev?
> Anyway, thi
package yaird
severity 382788 wishlist
tags 382788 confirmed
thanks
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:03:22 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:31:48PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > How do any of the above make this bug release-critical?
> >
> > No need to waste time writi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 373899 1.2.1-3
Bug#373899: cupsys: USB backend cannot access /dev/usb/lp0
Bug marked as not found in version 1.2.1-3.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
On Aug 18, David Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> device nodes for kernel autoconfigured raid arrays are not created.
They are on my system, and I can't see why they should not.
Is this a regresssion? Are you using an initramfs?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package yaird
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: yaird
> severity 382788 wishlist
Bug#382788: yaird does not uses the kernel command like to find out the root
partition
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> tags 382788 confirmed
Bug#382788: yaird d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 377791 wishlist
Bug#377791: FTBFS: need versioned dependency on libsysfs (undefined references
in sarge version)
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
>
End of message,
retitle 374996 kills all your processes (including browser) on open a web page
with flash
severity 374996 critical
# Justification: may cause data loss
thanks
This is really horrid. I think I'll refrain from running gnash at all without
disabling (commenting out, at least) this part of the code
Hi,
It seems gcc bug #381710 got fixed, so it should now probably build
without the patch.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 374996 kills all your processes (including browser) on open a web
> page with flash
Bug#374996: mozilla-plugin-gnash: Firefox crashes on open a web page with flash
Changed Bug title.
> severity 374996 critical
Bug#374996: kills all your proces
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 381380 - moreinfo
Bug#381380: hal-device-manager fails to run
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
Tags removed: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Package: udev
Version: 0.097-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
device nodes for kernel autoconfigured raid arrays are not created.
This causes my LVM volume group to not be found and thus all my
filesystems (such as /usr /var /home) are nto availible.
I believe this bug w
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:43:31PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 01:27 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:48:38AM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > > Package: python-numeric-tutorial
> > > > Ver
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:06:55PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are you (or anyone else) looking into this bug? The version in
> > testing FTBFS on all archs, and the version in unstable FTBFS on
> > mips*, so we don't seem to have a releasable emacs
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370424: fixed in libggz 0.0.13-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 377791 -fixed
Bug#377791: FTBFS: need versioned dependency on libsysfs (undefined references
in sarge version)
Tags were: fixed
Tags removed: fixed
> found 377791 1.02.00-8
Bug#377791: FTBFS: need versioned dependency on libsysfs (undefined refer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 381665 + moreinfo
Bug#381665: pympd crash
Tags were: etch
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 376771 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32
Bug#376771: RM: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-* -- RoM
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32'.
> clone
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 05:52:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 18 August 2006 16:08, maximilian attems wrote:
> > rationale:
> > 2.2 is not supported since long (dead upstream)
> > d-i removed the last vestiges of it's usage past beta 3
> This is NOT correct as I have said several times be
Package: udev
Version: 0.097-1
Followup-For: Bug #383555
Same bug here (please note that the kernel version below is wrong, since the
latest sid kernel won't boot correctly anymore).
I guess tomorrow many users will be pretty frightened to see their box not
booting correctly anymore ;)
Cheers
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:47:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287812: fixed in nqc 2.5.r3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:47:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383381: fixed in gforge-plugin-scmsvn 4.5.14-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Hello!
Jeffrey's advise didn't work for me.
Debian unstable, upgraded at 17 p.m. GMT+4 (unfortunately I can't
write full bug report, but I suppose my environment is the same with
other poor people upgraded today.
--
/aim [ http://aim.pp.ru/ ]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Package: udev
Version: 0.097-1
Followup-For: Bug #383555
Same bug here. Same error messages at boot time, udev not mounting its
tmpfs in /dev, leading to a lot of problems such as alsa not working,
ipw2200 not being able to load its firmware, etc.
Downgrading to 0.093-1, running update-initramfs
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:10:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380706: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
retitle 376771 RM: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-* -- RoM
thanks
in accordance with the d-i team any 2.4 kernel-image package
can be removed from unstable for all archs except
i386 and m68k (both legacy archs :-P)
this includes the following list of kernel-images:
Package kernel-image-2.4.27-2-s390
Packa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 383314 + patch
Bug#383314: libmagick9: Buffer overflow in SGI parser [CVE-2006-4144]
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 377950 380442
Bug#377950: unrecognized: ' httpd_accel_with_proxy on'
Bug#380442: squid: HTTP acceleration is broken
Forcibly Merged 377950 380442.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
tag 383314 + patch
thanks
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:20:01PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:51:15PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > http://www.overflow.pl/adv/imsgiheap.txt reported a buffer overflow in
> > the SGI parser (demo exploit linked in the report).
> >
> > This h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 376771 RM: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-* -- RoM
Bug#376771: RM: kernel-image-2.4-sparc32 -- RoM; obsolete
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Hello,
> CVE-2006-2885: "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in
> CVE-2006-2886: "view.php in KnowledgeTree Open Source 3.0.3 and earlier
Let's remove knowledgetree from testing:
* Has two security issues;
* Has an open request for adoption since a couple of months but no takers
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:51:11PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>reassign 377109 ftp.debian.org
>retitle 377109 RM: cdrtools -- RoM: non-free, license problems
>thanks
>
>Hi guys,
>
>ok well, as JS stays with an interpretation of CDDL and GPL that the
>whole world does not follow (all wrong, of cour
I'm running XFS as my root-fs. If that matters.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:17:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377331: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
I can confirm this bug really exists on standard initrd kernels. I have
this same problem on two different laptops. I run the standard Debian
kernels (which are initrd kernels.)
I have found the following:
1)
if xdm/gdm etc doesn't start... you can go to a root session and:
/etc/init.d/udev
Hi,
I had the same problem (on ibook powerpc).
I have tested gnash cvs. It doesn't crash firefox and woks.
Best regards,
Bin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 18 August 2006 16:08, maximilian attems wrote:
> rationale:
> 2.2 is not supported since long (dead upstream)
> d-i removed the last vestiges of it's usage past beta 3
This is NOT correct as I have said several times before!
m68k Beta3 still uses 2.2. 2.2 kernel source can only be remov
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
