I also suffered this boot problem.
Thanks to (not so well documented) feature in update-initramfs, postinst
of udev only updates the latest kernel. Thus I was able to boot with
older kernel.
The latest initramfs-tools seems to solved the issue for booting and
starting with latest udev.
If anyon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 363943 +pending
Bug#363943: tar: [L10N:DE] German PO file update + patch to tar.pot file
Tags were: pending l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 377557 +pending
Bug#377557: tar: bufferover flow in tests/genfile.c
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pend
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 382096 pending
Bug#382096: swig1.3: FTBFS: /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make: No such file or
directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping process
Hello,
Why do you consider this package unusable? I'm testing it and it seems to work
fine.
Please notice that the directory that you mention is not needed in the actual
version, and I believe it's a bug: the directory should not be in the
package.
In Debian, the python modules are now manage
Well, I forgot the attachments in the previous mail.
Here they are.
--
Love,
Marga
#include
#include
using namespace std;
int main (int argc, char *argv) {
string hi;
hi = "Hi";
return 0;
}
#include
using namespace std;
int main (int argc, char *argv) {
string hi;
hi = "Hi"
Package: nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy
Version: 1.0.7182-1
Severity: serious
Hi Donald
The x86 binary packages aren't built from the uploaded source package.
They appear to have been built from a pre-release version of the package
that was available for testing before the final version was upl
Package: nullmailer
Version: 1:1.03-2
Severity: grave
Errors were encountered while processing:
nullmailer
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install. Trying to recover:
Setting up nullmailer (1.03-2) ...
dpkg: error processing nullmailer (--configure):
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 254576 + fixed
Bug#254576: sablevm: Please use /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 382260 + fixed
Bug#382260: sablevm: FTBFS in hppa: ./src/pa/ffitarget.h: file not found
Tags were: pending
Tags added
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 382260 pending
Bug#382260: sablevm: FTBFS in hppa: ./src/pa/ffitarget.h: file not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
tags 382260 pending
thanks
I submitted this bug 10 days ago, and sablevm has been failing in hppa for
193 days now. Therefore, I'm going to upload an NMU that includes the
ffitarget.h as suggested.
While preparing the NMU, I found out that many files were not being cleaned
up and therefore ended
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 04:12 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> And I have no idea about:
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus
> kernel-patch-2.4-fasttraks150
> kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity
> kernel-patch-2.4-lowlatency
I'm the maintainer of kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity , and it should be
removed too. Will
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 06:55:26PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> retitle 376771 RM: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-* -- RoM
> thanks
>
> in accordance with the d-i team any 2.4 kernel-image package
> can be removed from unstable for all archs except
> i386 and m68k (both legacy archs :-P)
>
> this inc
Package: nvidia-glx-legacy-dev
Version: 1.0.7182-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
file /usr/include/GL/glext.h is missing in nvidia-glx-legacy-dev which
makes this package unusable since any code can't be compiled.
This file is in the nvidia archive so it is just
Hi, I've tried to reproduce this bug today with the provided gmoorc in
an up-to-date sid and couldn't do it. Gmoo started fine every time.
I even tried installing only xorg and xfonts-base (suspecting from the
fonts critical message) in a chroot and not even in that reduced
environment could I rep
Package: libnss-ldap
Followup-For: Bug #376426
This bug just got a bit more serious. On AMD64 the only libnss-ldap
package available in the archive is now 251-5
(so AMD64 users no longer have the option of downgrading to 238-1).
Meaning there is no functional binary libnss-ldap package for AMD64
Tags 382618 + patch
Thanks
This bug is obviously due to a change in , the addition
of an "s" member, which has the "value" member inside.
I'm attaching a patch that fixes this problem, by adding all the
corresponding "s." before the "value" member.
BTW, when doing a "debian/rules clean" 3 files
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 382618 + patch
Bug#382618: slat: FTBFS: error: 'perm_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Mike, can you take a look? Appears to be related with xulrunner
transition. So maybe you have an idea what the reason might be.
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `
This seems to be caused by code enclosed in #ifdef FORCE_ALIGN which,
according to configure.in is defined on ia64. Though this code doesn't
seem to be maintained. Upstream's lack of the architectures in question
maybe?
FORCE_ALIGN is also defined on alpha, arm*, hp*, mips* and sparc*. Does
the er
reassign 382153 libstdc++6-4.1-dev 4.1.1-11
thanks
I've been testing this problem in merulo.debian.org, and I was able to
reproduce it.
This bug is actually in the c++ standard library. I was able to develop a
very small test case that reproduces this bug, and also one that "fixes"
it. I'm attac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382153 libstdc++6-4.1-dev 4.1.1-11
Bug#382153: odyssey_0.4-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compiler errors
Bug reassigned from package `odyssey' to `libstdc++6-4.1-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383799 normal
Bug#383799: ImportError: No module named BitTornado
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
I rebuilt mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.22-4 with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip on a
Pentium IV and installed the unstripped libmysqlclient15off library.
The backtrace is different:
(gdb) r -C /dev/null -bV
Starting program: /usr/sbin/exim4 -C /dev/null -bV
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thre
severity 383799 normal
thanks
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Cameron Dale wrote:
> On 8/19/06, Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I just updated all my packages in unstable to the latest, and I do not
> >experience this issue.
> I also upgraded my packages in unstable to the l
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:19:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383815: gconf2-common: fails to install and purge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hello,
I have the same dependencies installed and I couldn't reproduce the reported
behaviour.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:54:42PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382491
>
> This has apparently been fixed on the latest release, which was uploaded
> a few days ago.
>
> Could you please try updating to the latest version and see if the
Hello,
I deleted all discovered udev files after purging the package, then I
installed the old one, it's working well, if I upgrade to the newest, I
still get this errormessages and nothing works with the modules.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 383799 +unreproducible
Bug#383799: ImportError: No module named BitTornado
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
You beat me to it Micah. :)
On 8/19/06, Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just updated all my packages in unstable to the latest, and I do not
experience this issue.
I also upgraded my packages in unstable to the latest, which included
installing python2.4 for the first time, and I h
Hi!
On August 11th you reported that lmms was segfaulting on you:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382491
This has apparently been fixed on the latest release, which was uploaded
a few days ago.
Could you please try updating to the latest version and see if the bug you
reported
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383747 critical
Bug#383747: Unexpected font change in libgd2, makes libgd-gd2-perl FTBFS and
changes font visual aspect
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 14:02:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373818: fixed in icecast2 2.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 22:18 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Package: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2
> Version: 2.2.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
[...]
> > /usr/bin/gcc -fPIC -DSUPPORT_C `/usr/bin/xmlrpc-c-config --cflags`
> > `/usr/bin/apr-config --cflags` -I`/usr/bin/apr-config --includedir`
> > `/usr/bin
tag 383799 +unreproducable
tag 383799 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
Package: bittornado
Version: 0.3.15-2
Severity: serious
After last python upgrade bittornado does not start.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/AO$ btdownloadcurses
AOInstall16.2.8_EP0_Live_nointro.torrent
Traceback (
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 383799 +unreproducable
Unknown tag/s: unreproducable.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-up
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 382783 + fixed
Bug#382783: yacas: None of the most basic examples work
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 14:02:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373855: fixed in icecast2 2.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
It would appear I have the same issue as the others on this list and I am
running sid. I'll try and provide all the information the others have
supplied as well as the gdb output. I'm also here for questions if it
helps resolve this bug faster.
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.44-1
Followup-For: Bug #
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 382561 patch
Bug#382561: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on bzr (<< 0.9)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Package: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386
> 0.49
> Build started at 2006
Package: gnome-osd
Version: 0.11.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
as the subject says, files are missing. when copied manually from debian
source all were ok
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: mapserver
Version: 4.8.3-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of mapserver_4.8.3-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006081
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 383815 + unreproducible
Bug#383815: gconf2-common: fails to install and purge
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 383815 + unreproducible
stop
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006, David Prévot wrote:
> gconf2-common refuses to be configure. I can't purge it any more.
> $ sudo dpkg -P gconf2-common
> (Lecture de la base de données... 130569 fichiers et répertoires déjà
> installés.)
> Suppression de gconf2
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:34:35PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I wonder if this problem relates to updates in the PostgreSQL server
> to fix quoting issues, i.e. see:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/06/msg00024.html
my *guess* is that this is the case. i'll send an email to upstr
Package: gimp-gap
Version: 2.2.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
- open the gimp
- create a new empty frame
- save it as foobar-001.xcf
- clic on Video -> Duplicate images...
- choose any number of images
- OK
=> systematic crash
$ gimp
(gimp:25117): LibGimpBase-WARNIN
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:47:57PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> The last functions in the backtrace belong to the rather new SSL code
> which has been activated in 5.0.22-4 so it is indeed be likely that the
> problem "suddenly" appears after the last update.
That's true, this is the problem.
Package: gconf2-common
Version: 2.14.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gconf2-common refuses to be configure. I can't purge it any more.
$ sudo dpkg -P gconf2-common
(Lecture de la base de données... 130569 fichiers et répertoires déjà
installés.)
Suppression de gconf2-
i had a lot of problems such as described above and i finally managed to
fix it, by installing
klibc-tools and libklibc from incoming http://incoming.debian.org.
after i installed this packages i did the following:
#update-initramfs -u
and everything was fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Trevor Caira writes:
> libshout3 and libvorbisenc2 are not installed as dependencies, but
> starting mpd without them installed fails as it links against those
> libraries.
I'm not seeing this:
$ ldd /usr/bin/mpd
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnsl.
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Holger Levsen wrote:
> the place to fix this is in debian/postinst and is pretty straightforward.
I know it is easy to fix, but there are several ways to fix it.
For example: Should perhaps /usr/local/etc be a symlink to /etc?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 383481 nvidiafb contains obfuscated source code, DFSG violation?
Bug#383481: nvidiafb is not in the preferred form of modification either
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: mpd
Version: 0.11.5-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libshout3 and libvorbisenc2 are not installed as dependencies, but
starting mpd without them installed fails as it links against those
libraries.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT p
Clint Adams wrote:
>> Alternatively, if someone can build libqof1_0.7.0-1 on hppa (and
>> possibly sparc / m68k too) and report back - maybe upload the packages
>> for that arch if QOF builds properly - I'll be very grateful.
>
> I can reproduce the failure on sparc. What additional output would
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 383746 qof: FTBFS on hppa, sparc and m68k: date test failures
Bug#383746: qof: FTBFS (sparc): test suite failures
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Neil Williams wrote:
>
> Alternatively, if someone can build libqof1_0.7.0-1 on hppa (and
> possibly sparc / m68k too) and report back - maybe upload the packages
> for that arch if QOF builds properly - I'll be very grateful.
Sorry, I meant that if the working hppa build could be uploaded and
so
> Alternatively, if someone can build libqof1_0.7.0-1 on hppa (and
> possibly sparc / m68k too) and report back - maybe upload the packages
> for that arch if QOF builds properly - I'll be very grateful.
I can reproduce the failure on sparc. What additional output would be
helpful?
--
To UNSUB
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # lusers should not play with the BTS
> close 68
Bug#68: udev doesn't load psmouse driver
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#35: udev: firewire hotplug regression
Bug closed, send any further explana
I need some help fixing this. I'm the upstream developer and
co-maintainer for libqof1 and I am in the NM process, so don't have
direct access to hppa, sparc or m68k where this problem occurs. sparc
and m68k are flagged as "not keeping up so never mind" so I haven't
looked into those two. Since the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 383746 + help
Bug#383746: qof: FTBFS (sparc): test suite failures
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 382512 + fixed
Bug#382512: view3ds: FTBFS: build-dep on removed xlibmesa-glu-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 382082 patch
Bug#382082: CVE-2006-400[56]: Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities in Bomberclone
Tags were: help security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of view3ds to fix #382512; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u view3ds-1.0.0/debian/changelog view3ds-1.0.0/debian/changelog
--- view3ds-1.0.0/debian/changelog
+++ view3ds-1.0.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+view3ds (1.0.0-9.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-ma
Package: bittornado
Version: 0.3.15-2
Severity: serious
After last python upgrade bittornado does not start.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/AO$ btdownloadcurses
AOInstall16.2.8_EP0_Live_nointro.torrent
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/btdownloadcurses", line 8, in ?
from BitTorna
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:28:06 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fidogate has been removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Hi,
I've just installed a cups server using gs-esp for printing and I also
encountered the same issue. Only some accents are printed only few
times, according to the font. I tested this using abiword, openoffice
and gedit.
Versions are:
gs-esp 8.15.2.dfsg.1-1
cupsys 1.2.2.1
Thanks
sean finney wrote:
> executive summary for security team: not escaping query strings
> can possibly result in SQL injection for apps that use pike+postgresql.
>
> i've developed a patch which cleanly applies to both the 7.2 and 7.6
> branches that exist in sarge. however, looking more closely at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295644 normal
Bug#295644: gdeskcal does not check dates of repeat events for errors
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> done
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Le vendredi 18 août 2006 à 18:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380271 important
Bug#380271: SECURITY: Merge table are unaffected from later right revokations.
[WONTFIX]
Bug#382415: CVE-2006-4031: mysql security policy violation throue MERGE tables
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> stop
Stopping
Hi
The last functions in the backtrace belong to the rather new SSL code
which has been activated in 5.0.22-4 so it is indeed be likely that the
problem "suddenly" appears after the last update.
(quick fix: manually install 5.0.22-3 again, it might still be in
/var/cache/apt/archives)
I checked
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:17:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321833: fixed in bayonne 1.2.16-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
here we go:
1. add the lines of my unstable archive to your sources.list:
deb http://people.debian.org/~asac/unstable ./
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~asac/unstable ./
1a. apt-get update (aptitude update)
2. get sources:
apt-get source thunderbird
3. install build essentials:
apt
Hi,
as we had the idea that this is due to a missing CMOV Support in the Cyrix
CPU I did some tests on my Via Samuel II which is missing this support too.
Unfortunatly I was not able to reproduce the bug. But I have to say that
libmysql could have a fallback to MMX functions (which this cpu supp
Package: checkstyle
Version: 4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks DFSG #2
I just noticed that checkstyle_4.1.orig.tar.gz includes
checkstyle-src-4.1/lib/emma.jar
which according to
unzip -l checkstyle-src-4.1/lib/emma.jar
includes e.g.
com/vladium/emma/instr/InstrProcessorST.class
b
As I explained in my mail below, I have my doubt whether just a warning
is an adequate resolution to this bug. I haven't entirely made up my
mind though, because well, there is a warning and users sort of choose
for themselves, but still, currently I tend to think it's not a good
idea to allow *thi
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:46:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Hi!
First of all, I'd like to apologise for my harsh words. I spent the last
days nearly only on Debian issues including a lot of security and buildd
work and yesterday had just decided to not wait for your answer to a mail
from nearly one month ago and go ahead with the upload.
Steve Langasek w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 68
Bug#68: udev doesn't load psmouse driver
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug#35: udev: firewire hotplug regression
Bug reopened, originator not ch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package php4
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: php4
> tags 382261 +pending
Bug#382261: php5: CVE-2006-4020: arbitrary code execution in php
Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream security
Tags added: pending
> tags 382259 +pending
Bug#382259: PHP 4.4.3 and 4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign #383759 exim4-daemon-heavy
Bug#383759: exim4-config: Fails to upgrade/install
Bug reassigned from package `exim4-config' to `exim4-daemon-heavy'.
> retitle #383759 exim4-daemon-heavy: "illegal instruction" when executing on
> 100 MHz Cyrix CP
386 0.49
> > Build started at 20060819-1338
> > **
> ...
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/openjade-1.4devel1'
> > touch install-stamp
> > cmp -s COPYING /usr/share/co
reassign #383759 exim4-daemon-heavy
retitle #383759 exim4-daemon-heavy: "illegal instruction" when executing on 100
MHz Cyrix CPU
thanks
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:32:54PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:20:36PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > That confirms my suspicon. Are
severity 295644 normal
done
Le vendredi 18 août 2006 à 18:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > severity 295644 grave
> Bug#295644: gdeskcal does not check dates of repeat events for errors
> Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
> >
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:19:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383388: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:28:44PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:58:32PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Illegal Instruction? That sounds like a compiler issue with your exim
> > binary.
> >
> > Can you please try this:
> >
> > # /usr/sbin/exim4 -C /dev/null -bV
> Illegal
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:20:36PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> That confirms my suspicon. Are you using exim4-daemon-heavy or
> exim4-daemon-light?
I am using exim4-daemon-heavy.
> What's the md5sum of your /usr/sbin/exim4 binary
6a002941afe0b8a5a05bbd95d56be0e0 /usr/sbin/exim4
> and what does
For the record, I saw this "bug" because /dev/null was broken on my
system.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:28:44PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:58:32PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Illegal Instruction? That sounds like a compiler issue with your exim
> > binary.
> >
> > Can you please try this:
> >
> > # /usr/sbin/exim4 -C /dev/null -bV
> Illegal
Package: slang-slirp
Version: 1.9.0-1-1
Severity: serious
slang-slirp doesn't build on amd64, probably because you're not
building PIC code (see policy for more information on this requirement).
| Testing examples/vec ...
| /usr/bin/ld: fvec.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `a local symbol'
| c
* Stefan Huebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-19 14:24:22 +0200]:
> Sorry, the complete mail should have said, that...
>
> "after upgrading from quodlibet 0.21.1-1 I experienced the same
> problem. After some research though, I was able to fix the issue by
> upgrading python-gst0.10 from 0.10.2-.
Package: slang-slirp
Version: 1.9.0-1-1
Severity: serious
slang-slirp fails to build on ia64 and alpha with:
Testing examples/vec ...
/bin/sh: line 1: 31862 Segmentation fault ../../safe_slsh ../../slsh -n
./test.sl >test.out 2>&1
make[4]: *** [test.out] Error 139
http://buildd.debian.org/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 383344 thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
Bug#383344: thunderbird: crashes on startup
Changed Bug title.
> tags 383344 + help
Bug#383344: thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
Tags added: help
> than
severity 383636 normal
tags 383636 + moreinfo
On Friday 18 August 2006 13:27 pm, Magnus Ekdahl wrote:
> Package: ddd
> Version: 1:3.3.11-1
> Severity: serious
>
> DDD requires xterm for diplaying stdout from the program debugged.
It doesn't require it on my system -- by default, it just shows std
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383636 normal
Bug#383636: Missing dependency xterm
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tags 383636 + moreinfo
Bug#383636: Missing dependency xterm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> On Friday 18 August 2006 13:27 pm, Magnus
retitle 383344 thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
tags 383344 + help
thanks
Can anyone with amd64 platform confirm this? I would like to see at
least one other voice to justify this package with security fixes to
not enter testing.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:58:32PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Illegal Instruction? That sounds like a compiler issue with your exim
> binary.
>
> Can you please try this:
>
> # /usr/sbin/exim4 -C /dev/null -bV
Illegal instruction
This is the whole output (exim4-daemon-heavy 4.62-4).
--
Best re
Sorry, the complete mail should have said, that...
"after upgrading from quodlibet 0.21.1-1 I experienced the same problem. After
some research though, I was able to fix the issue by upgrading python-gst0.10
from 0.10.2-.. to 0.10.4-4."
don't know, why reportbugs dumped that part of the mail. H
Wouldn't it be usefull to forcing that version of python-gst0.10?
Thanks,
Stefan
Subject: quodlibet: problem with pygst still persists here
Followup-For: Bug #367221
Package: quodlibet
Version: 0.22-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 12:27:25PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> When upgrading the exim4 packages I receive the following error:
> Setting up exim4-config (4.62-4) ...
> /usr/sbin/update-exim4.conf: line 434: 14851 Illegal instruction
> ${EXIM} -C "${UPEX4C_outputfile}.tmp" -bV >/dev/null
> Invali
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
