Package: openjade
Version: 1.4devel1-16
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of openjade_1.4devel1-16 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006081
Hi,
the place to fix this is in debian/postinst and is pretty straightforward.
regards,
Holger
pgpYe1QA5nWNC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
found 383759 4.63-2
thanks
I experience the same trouble with the version from unstable. No
problem with the Sarge packages.
--
I had a very low opinion of TCL, basically because it wasn't Lisp. --RMS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 383759 4.63-2
Bug#383759: exim4-config: Fails to upgrade/install
Bug marked as found in version 4.63-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Scott,
Are you still seeing this error with useradd? Does it happen with
libnss-ldap 251-5, which is now the current version in testing/unstable?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the wor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 382607 patch
Bug#382607: CVE-2006-4041: Pike Unspecified SQL Injection Vulnerability
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> clone 382607 -1
Bug#382607: CVE-2006-4041: Pike Unspecified SQL Injection Vulnerability
Bug 382607 cloned as bug 383766.
tags 382607 patch
clone 382607 -1
reassign -1 pike7.6
found -1 7.6.24
notfound -1 7.6.87
thanks
(some bts-fu to reflect the bug exists in both versions of pike)
executive summary for security team: not escaping query strings
can possibly result in SQL injection for apps that use pike+postgresql.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 383403 - confirmed
Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware
Tags were: upstream sid d-i etch confirmed help sarge-ignore
Bug#242866: drivers
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.62-4
Severity: serious
When upgrading the exim4 packages I receive the following error:
Setting up exim4-config (4.62-4) ...
/usr/sbin/update-exim4.conf: line 434: 14851 Illegal instruction
${EXIM} -C "${UPEX4C_outputfile}.tmp" -bV >/dev/null
Invalid new configfil
the second set of changes of which i spoke do seem to be overlapping,
so i'll try merging them together and applying them both:
http://pike.ida.liu.se/development/cvs/diff.xml?module=Pike&file=7.6/src/modules/Postgres/postgres.c&from=1.40&to=1.41
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> merge 383403 242866
Bug#242866: drivers containing firmware blobs
Bug#383403: linux-2.6: includes nondistributable and non-free binary firmware
Bug#243022: ymfpci_image.h: Sourceless
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 382444 sid
Bug#382444: scim-uim: libuim1 transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 02:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383741: fixed in cron 3.0pl1-97
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 379988 sid
Bug#379988: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libyaz
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:54:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Request for binNMU for scim-uim
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:47:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382617: fixed in samhain 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 09:28:46AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Well, apparently the -3 package that you said you couldn't find was on
> > security.d.o all along, because this was *not* in the second -3 package that
> > I uploaded; but that one was rejected because it was a duplicate.
> > I've
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 11:28:03PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> The problem is more subtle, as shown by the arm build of 2.8a-2:
>java: no
> *** ERROR:configure:Can't configure Java.
> Command:
> ./autoconf/javatest --java=/usr/bin/java --jflags= --jvflags=-noverify
> --javac=/usr/bin/javac --
touch /etc/cron.deny
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure, no problem. I am flying overseas today, though -till Monday
I'll be unavailable.
L.
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
OK,
I am preparing a new package revision that produces debug
symbols. Since I have no amd64 box at hand, would you volunteer to
respin this
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:04:17PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> PS: The problem seems to be related to the most recent libc6
> update. After rebuilding and installing 23b-2
Then the problem went away because you rebuilt 23b-2; it has nothing to do
with which version of glibc you had installed.
>
I can confirm that this is not a libgd-gd2-perl problem, but a libgd2 problem.
The problem arises with a patch which changes all the font
definitions, generated by the maintainer with different fonts. THe
purpose of this patch was supposedly to change the font encoding,
which would also break thi
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 08:51:29PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:42:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > > It appears to be a correct fix for the regression that has been reported.
>
> > > > I'd rather make it re
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 08:51:29PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:42:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > It appears to be a correct fix for the regression that has been reported.
> > > I'd rather make it read:
> > > if (height <= 0 || (F
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo