Processed: tagging 384364

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 384364 = pending Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting Tags were: help moreinfo Tags set to:

Bug#384168: does not install without acpid

2006-08-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
> Good point...retitling. (The explanation is simply that Peter used an > ACPI system) I think quite a lot of systems are ACPI these days. > I'll paste the error while I'm at it: > ## > # ACPI system but acpid not running.

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

2006-08-23 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: Hi Martin, > The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so > unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the > transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified. I can r

Processed: Re: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342545 patch Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#384334: jadetex: Suggested changes, NMU prepared

2006-08-23 Thread Norbert Preining
On Don, 24 Aug 2006, Norbert Preining wrote: > Please consider the attached changes for an updated package. I attach a > diff between the current 3.13-6 and 3.13-6.2. What I forgot. Ready prepared packages are available at deb http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ check/ deb-src http:

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

2006-08-23 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Thu, August 24, 2006 9:12, Steve Langasek said: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so >> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the >> transition, the severit

Bug#384421: bakery2.4: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'doxygen'

2006-08-23 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: bakery2.4 Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'bakery2.4' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: # build reference documentation /usr/bin/make -C docs/reference make[1]: Entering directory `/bakery2.4-2.4.0/docs/reference' doxygen Doxyfile make[

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 342545 patch thanks Right, here's an off-the-cuff patch, which gets me past the point of the SIGBUS on paer. The same bug exists in the handling of Inf and NaN, but I didn't bother patching for those since those constants should always be defined on Debian systems and the related code paths

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

2006-08-23 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Thu, August 24, 2006 9:23, Julien Danjou said: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > Hi Martin, > >> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so >> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the >> transition

Bug#384420: gmailfs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'docbook-to-man'

2006-08-23 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: gmailfs Version: 0.7.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gmailfs' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_installdirs install -m755 gmailfs.py /gmailfs-0.7.2/debian/gmailfs/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages install -m755 mount.gmailfs /gmailfs-0.7.2/debian

Bug#384334: jadetex: Suggested changes, NMU prepared

2006-08-23 Thread Norbert Preining
Package: jadetex Version: 3.13-6 Followup-For: Bug #384334 Dear Ohura-san! Frank already posted the absolutly minimal changes which would help fixing the updates problems with tetex/texlive. Furthermore, I have prepared a package including several changes, here is the changelog entry with additi

Bug#384418: Same problem, new file, FTBFS!

2006-08-23 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Package: vnc4 Severity: serious Tags: patch gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef -fno-merge-constants -I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common -I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support -I. -I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/include

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so > unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the > transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified. Your package *fail

Processed: tagging 383336

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > # upstream says this just papers over the real issue (nsis needs proper > porting) > tags 383336 - patch Bug#383336: nsis: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'char*' to 'DWORD' loses precisio

Processed: tagging 384364

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 384364 moreinfo Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting There were no tags set. Tags added: mor

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

2006-08-23 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Thu, August 24, 2006 4:13, Steve Langasek said: > severity 384364 serious > quit > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:27:38AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> On Wed, August 23, 2006 22:01, Julien Danjou said: >> > Package: planner >> > Version: 0.14-9 >> > Severity: serious > >> > Hello, > >> > T

Processed: tagging 384364

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 384364 help Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: help > End

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
Right, so I noticed paer has been re-opened post-compromise, so I had a look at this: Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 19108)] 0x40cb2150 in negNan () at tools/qlocale.cpp:131 131 *((const double *) le_neg_nan_bytes)); (gdb) bt #0 0x40cb21

Processed: Proposed patch

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 383823 +patch Bug#383823: gimp-gap crashes when duplicating images There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#383823: Proposed patch

2006-08-23 Thread John Wright
tags 383823 +patch thanks This seems to be fixed in version 2.2.1 upstream. I've attached a patch that patches the affected file up to the version in 2.2.1. It works for me. Thanks, John Wright === added file 'debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff' --- debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff

Processed: Retitle

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 384168 does not install on ACPI systems without acpid Bug#384168: does not install without acpid Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#384168: does not install without acpid

2006-08-23 Thread Filipus Klutiero
retitle 384168 does not install on ACPI systems without acpid thanks Steve Langasek a écrit : On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:47:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst script needs to be fixed so that the package installation

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS

2006-08-23 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > That would be wonderful if you, or another hppa porter, could track down > where the bug lies. libgcc2 is almost certainly the wrong package, since > nothing should be *using* libgcc2 in a fresh build of qt-x11-free; it may be > a b

Bug#383870: fetchmail: Fetchmail duplicates my SPAM every 10 minutes - ARGH!

2006-08-23 Thread Matthias Andree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Helge Hafting wrote: > Still, rejecting on TO address is tricky, mailing list mail is usually not > addressed to me. Unfortunately, you haven't shown your configuration file yet. I suspect you're using a wildcarded multidrop configuration. - -- Matt

Processed: Re: Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 384364 serious Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting Severity set to `serious' from `minor' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 342545 qt-x11-free thanks On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:52:48AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:39:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The qt-x11-free package builds fine with a standard Debian setup. > > Building with prctl --unaligned=signal makes the "bug" repro

Bug#384112: Proposed patch

2006-08-23 Thread John Wright
tags 384112 +patch thanks I have attached a patch that updates freeloader to the new Python policy, which ought to fix this bug. Thanks, John Wright === added file 'debian/pycompat' --- debian/pycompat 1970-01-01 00:00:00 + +++ debian/pycompat 2006-08-24 00:16:43 + @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@

Processed: Re: Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 342545 qt-x11-free Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails Bug reassigned from package `libgcc2' to `qt-x11-free'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Processed: Proposed patch

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 384112 +patch Bug#384112: freeloader: Will not install. Depends on python < 2.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#384168: does not install without acpid

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:47:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > >If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst > >script needs to be fixed so that the package installation does not fail if > >acpid is not installed. That is the issue that needs to be addressed. >

Bug#382491: segfaults on startup

2006-08-23 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Hi. Could you provide a full gdb backtrace? Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 373541 is serious, merging 373541 384290

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 373541 serious Bug#373541: Python policy transition Severity set to `serious' from `important' > merge 373541 384290 Bug#373541: Python policy transition Bug#384290: python-

Bug#384290: python-gtk-1.2: depends on python < 2.4

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > or been moved out o

Bug#384168: does not install without acpid

2006-08-23 Thread Filipus Klutiero
If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst script needs to be fixed so that the package installation does not fail if acpid is not installed. That is the issue that needs to be addressed. It *is not* required...just look at the error message or the init script

Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 384394 important tags 384394 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:56:58PM -0400, morph wrote: > Any app that depends on libgnome-2 (e.g. evince) fails on start-up with > the following error: evince: symbol lookup error: > /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0: undefined symbol: >

Processed: Re: Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 384394 important Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup Severity set to `important' from `grave' > tags 384394 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup The

Bug#378291: has this been fixed?

2006-08-23 Thread Luigi Gangitano
Hi Geoff, I'm sure Steve's explaination of how debian packages are built is not clear to you. This is not a bug. It may happen (and in fact it happens almost every time due to me being in the CET timezone and uploading packages in the evening while dinstall is run) that architecture indepe

Bug#365196: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:32:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365196: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: Re: Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 384394 libgnome2-0 Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup Warning: Unknown package 'libgnome2' Bug reassigned from package `libgnome2' to `libgnome2-0'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#384242: marked as done (evolution-exchange: FTBFS: missing build-dep on 'libedata-book-1.2')

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:17:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384242: fixed in evolution-exchange 2.6.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#383870: fetchmail: Fetchmail duplicates my SPAM every 10 minutes - ARGH!

2006-08-23 Thread Helge Hafting
Matthias Andree wrote: (demoting to serious, tagging upstream, retitling) Additional info: fetchmail 6.3.4 and older do NOT log out of the upstream server after SIGPIPE (I don't know the rationale behind this - it's not in the comments), which prevents the deletions from happening properly. Ret

Processed: severity of 384364 is minor

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 384364 minor Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting Severity set to `minor' from `serious'

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

2006-08-23 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
severity 384364 minor thanks On Wed, August 23, 2006 22:01, Julien Danjou said: > Package: planner > Version: 0.14-9 > Severity: serious > > Hello, > > There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Sorry, it has built just fine on all architectures so far. Additionally, the log you provide

Bug#363375: marked as done (kernel-patch-openswan: Patched linux-source-2.6.16 fails to compile)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:32:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363375: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#355485: Info: bug probably fixed in latest upstream release

2006-08-23 Thread Marco van Zwetselaar
I have just built and tested the package using the latest upstream release (8.28.8). This seems to fix a substantial number of outstanding bugs for fglrx-driver. It also adds support for Xorg 7.1. Flavio, if you need a head start for the upgrade to 8.28.8, I have put my package up at http://zwets

Bug#382481: marked as done (44bsd-rdist: insecure temporary file)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#377109: If you fork, please solve *both* issues

2006-08-23 Thread Francesco Poli
Whoever takes care of forking cdrtools, please remember to fork from a version prior to the license "clarifications" by Joerg Schilling, as well as prior to the CDDL switch. See this debian-legal subthread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00357.html And, please, try and clarify wh

Bug#376428: marked as done (Uninstallable due to dep on linux-image-2.6.16-1-*)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#352800: marked as done (coda-client: Missing Build Dependancy)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:59:52 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#381405: marked as done (gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:26:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcj-4.0 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#361664: marked as done (python-parted_0.11.2(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on amd64)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#377262: marked as done (FTBFS with libparted1.7-dev)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#374209: marked as done (python-parted: FTBFS: build-dep on non-existent libparted1.6-dev)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#226317: marked as done (gch: Uses wrong toplevel directory)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package

2006-08-23 Thread James Westby
On (23/08/06 14:31), Steve Langasek wrote: > reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org > severity 384324 important > retitle 384324 please lower the override priority for libtasn1-3-bin and > libtasn1-2-bin > thanks > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:07:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > > I'm not sure it should

Bug#384324: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org severity 384324 important retitle 384324 please lower the override priority for libtasn1-3-bin and libtasn1-2-bin thanks On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:07:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > On (23/08/06 18:58), Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:05:49PM

Bug#335967: marked as done (BBPFS (experimental): mips-tools doesn't include binary)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#380466: #380466 - kazehakase: quits when going to any HTTP AUTH page

2006-08-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:13:14PM -0500, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-20 09:10]: > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> I'll take a look at kazehakase to see if it's the same bug. > >

Bug#205752: marked as done (python-parted: must be updated for python2.3)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#383555: [Patch] Don't fail on moving udev from initramfs to real root.

2006-08-23 Thread Daniel Serpell
This patch fixes the bug 383555, the problem is on: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/udev This script moves the /dev directory inside the initramfs to the real location in the new root. Currently it fails in the line "nuke /dev/.udev/queue/", because this directory does not exist.

Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup

2006-08-23 Thread morph
Package: libgnome2 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Any app that depends on libgnome-2 (e.g. evince) fails on start-up with the following error: evince: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0: undefined symbol: bonobo_activation_get_goption_group System Informat

Bug#384241: marked as done (evolution-jescs: FTBFS: missing build-dep on 'libedata-cal-1.2')

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:32:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384241: fixed in evolution-jescs 2.6.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#351692: marked as done (mips-tools doesn't build on powerpc and hppa)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#384361: Possible bug origin

2006-08-23 Thread Marc . Pantel
In fact, there was an upgrade of xserver-xorg-core from version 1:1.0.2-9 to 1:1.1.1-3 without any upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-ati. I got the same problem with fglrx and fbdev. The bug seems to be related to sloppy version dependencies between the two packages. This morning upgrade should not h

Bug#384312: marked as done (xawtv: FTBFS (powerpc/ppc64): 'PAGE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function))

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:33:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384312: fixed in xawtv 3.95-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#285090: marked as done (amap: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#384312: xawtv: FTBFS (powerpc/ppc64): 'PAGE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)

2006-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:39:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > With the attached patch 'xawtv' can be compiled on powerpc. > > Regards > > Andreas Jochens > > > > diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c ./console/fbtools.c > > --- ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c20

Bug#378728: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gnat (< 3.16))

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#384361: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:37:15 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#384242: marked as done (evolution-exchange: FTBFS: missing build-dep on 'libedata-book-1.2')

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:08:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Evolution] Bug#384242: evolution-exchange: FTBFS: missing build-dep on 'libedata-book-1.2' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#284081: marked as done (New parted api, and possibility for parted 1.6.x (x>12) in debian/sarge ...)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#384292: marked as done (centericq: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL@: command not found)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
acking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: centericq Version: 4.21.0-12 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of centericq_4.21.0-12 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 2

Processed: Fixed in NMU of evolution-sharp 0.11.1-1.1

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 383184 + fixed Bug#383184: evolution-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libecal1.2-dev, libebook1.2-dev' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#370634: marked as done (gch: FTBFS: transition to GNAT 4.1 (waiting for asis))

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Processed: Re: Bug#384324: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package Bug reassigned from package `libtasn1-3-bin' to `ftp.debian.org'. > severity 384324 important Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts a

Bug#215638: marked as done (python-parted: debian/copyright lacks pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start

2006-08-23 Thread Pascal LACROIX
Like Eric, when upgrading experimental, trouble appear fixed for me. -- God is dead.' -Nietzsche|'Nietzsche is dead.' -God 88' _`88'_ `8 | Pascal LACROIX http://kikoucalou.chez-alice.fr La vie est pleine d'une infinité d'absurdités, qui, impudemme

Bug#383047: marked as done (amap: Package uninstallable: www.thc.org)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#384019: manual-copyright clarification

2006-08-23 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Stefano - > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > The name "Open Publication License" is right, the URL was wrong. > > Could you please correct the URL then? I guess the following is the > correct one: > > http://opencontent.org/openpub/ I have changed it. The

Bug#382905: marked as done (vnc4 do not build on sparc)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:33:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382905: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#373334: marked as done (Python policy transition)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#382958: Upstream URL

2006-08-23 Thread Margarita Manterola
This problem was discussed upstream, here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341942 And was fixed with this clean and simple patch to configure.in: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=65572 The patch submitted by James is ok, but adds a lot of noise, because it adds many other thi

Bug#346313: marked as done (amap license is not free)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:01:33 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#264276: marked as done (kernel-patch-nfs-swap: no copyright file)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:38:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start

2006-08-23 Thread Eric Wong
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati > Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1 It happened to me too, installing 1:6.6.1-0 from experimental seems to have fixed it. IIRC an xorg-server upload that was targetted at experimental was accidentally uploaded into unstable recently.

Processed: severity of 384168 is serious

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 384168 serious Bug#384168: does not install without acpid Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Bug#383184: marked as done (evolution-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libecal1.2-dev, libebook1.2-dev')

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:15:58 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Intent to NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#378291: has this been fixed?

2006-08-23 Thread Geoff
It looks like on July 14th you said it was going to be fixed, but I just has this problem again today. I back ported Version: 2.5.9-10sarge2 to get squid up and running temporarily. -- Geoff Cummins IT Administrator Sno Falls Credit Union http://www.snofalls.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (425) 888

Bug#384361:

2006-08-23 Thread Elisabeth LACROIX
Same for me, This occured also today after upgrade (EE) module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1) (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module requirement mismatch, 0) B.Rgds Pascal LACROIX [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23/08/2006 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#384381: trac: Python-support is buggy

2006-08-23 Thread Le_Vert
Package: trac Version: 0.9.6-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I get a lots of "no module named cache" exceptions on my tracs (when browsing online svn ie). Symlinking trac module to site-packages make trac working again : ln

Bug#384051: follow-up, news

2006-08-23 Thread Filippo Rusconi
Hello, apparently things have gone better. I am not sure that this is because of the install mentioned in an earlier message. I have another computer with Debian/Testing installed and tried the install/configuration of ekiga and notice that on that computer the configuration of the ALSA sound syst

Bug#380466: #380466 - kazehakase: quits when going to any HTTP AUTH page

2006-08-23 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-20 09:10]: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> I'll take a look at kazehakase to see if it's the same bug. > > M, sadly, i can't even reproduce the bug. Is the password manager > enabled by default

Processed: severity of 384316 is important, severity of 383592 is important, merging 384316 383592

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 384316 important Bug#384316: Segmentation fault in smbd Severity set to `important' from `normal' > severity 383592 important Bug#383592: samba processes crash due to incorr

Bug#384312: xawtv: FTBFS (powerpc/ppc64): 'PAGE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)

2006-08-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Aurelien Jarno a écrit : On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 02:28:42PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: xawtv Version: 3.95-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'xawtv' on powerpc/unstable, I get the following error: [snip] With the attached patch 'xawtv' can be compiled on powerpc. R

Bug#380466: #380466 - kazehakase: quits when going to any HTTP AUTH page

2006-08-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:10:50AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:34:47AM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Mike, can you take a look?

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

2006-08-23 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: planner Version: 0.14-9 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of planner_0.14-9 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 2006082

Bug#384289: marked as done (libwrap0: access control become void)

2006-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384289: fixed in tcp-wrappers 7.6.dbs-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#384363: nautilus-python: FTBFS: change build-dep to libnautilus-extension-dev

2006-08-23 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: nautilus-python Version: 0.3.0-3 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of nautilus-python_0.3.0-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 > Build started at 2006082

Bug#359707: License

2006-08-23 Thread Michael Jennings
I've just released Eterm 0.9.4 which resolves this issue. I don't know why ljlane didn't respond or pass this along to me, but it's resolved now. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.e

Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start

2006-08-23 Thread Alan Chandler
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This seems to of occurred for the first time sometime today, but as the xserver is starting up it is saying that the ATI driver is reporting the ABI version as version 0 and it is expecting

  1   2   >