Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 384364 = pending
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
Tags were: help moreinfo
Tags set to:
> Good point...retitling. (The explanation is simply that Peter used an
> ACPI system)
I think quite a lot of systems are ACPI these days.
> I'll paste the error while I'm at it:
> ##
> # ACPI system but acpid not running.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Hi Martin,
> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
> transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified.
I can r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 342545 patch
Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
On Don, 24 Aug 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Please consider the attached changes for an updated package. I attach a
> diff between the current 3.13-6 and 3.13-6.2.
What I forgot. Ready prepared packages are available at
deb http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ check/
deb-src http:
On Thu, August 24, 2006 9:12, Steve Langasek said:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
>> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
>> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
>> transition, the severit
Package: bakery2.4
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'bakery2.4' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
# build reference documentation
/usr/bin/make -C docs/reference
make[1]: Entering directory `/bakery2.4-2.4.0/docs/reference'
doxygen Doxyfile
make[
tags 342545 patch
thanks
Right, here's an off-the-cuff patch, which gets me past the point of the
SIGBUS on paer.
The same bug exists in the handling of Inf and NaN, but I didn't bother
patching for those since those constants should always be defined on Debian
systems and the related code paths
On Thu, August 24, 2006 9:23, Julien Danjou said:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
>> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
>> transition
Package: gmailfs
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'gmailfs' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dh_installdirs
install -m755 gmailfs.py
/gmailfs-0.7.2/debian/gmailfs/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages
install -m755 mount.gmailfs /gmailfs-0.7.2/debian
Package: jadetex
Version: 3.13-6
Followup-For: Bug #384334
Dear Ohura-san!
Frank already posted the absolutly minimal changes which would help
fixing the updates problems with tetex/texlive.
Furthermore, I have prepared a package including several changes, here
is the changelog entry with additi
Package: vnc4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef
-fno-merge-constants -I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support -I.
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/include
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
> transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified.
Your package *fail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # upstream says this just papers over the real issue (nsis needs proper
> porting)
> tags 383336 - patch
Bug#383336: nsis: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'char*' to 'DWORD' loses precisio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 384364 moreinfo
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
There were no tags set.
Tags added: mor
On Thu, August 24, 2006 4:13, Steve Langasek said:
> severity 384364 serious
> quit
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:27:38AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> On Wed, August 23, 2006 22:01, Julien Danjou said:
>> > Package: planner
>> > Version: 0.14-9
>> > Severity: serious
>
>> > Hello,
>
>> > T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 384364 help
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: help
>
End
Right, so I noticed paer has been re-opened post-compromise, so I had a look
at this:
Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 19108)]
0x40cb2150 in negNan () at tools/qlocale.cpp:131
131 *((const double *) le_neg_nan_bytes));
(gdb) bt
#0 0x40cb21
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 383823 +patch
Bug#383823: gimp-gap crashes when duplicating images
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
tags 383823 +patch
thanks
This seems to be fixed in version 2.2.1 upstream. I've attached a patch
that patches the affected file up to the version in 2.2.1. It works for
me.
Thanks,
John Wright
=== added file 'debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff'
--- debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 384168 does not install on ACPI systems without acpid
Bug#384168: does not install without acpid
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
retitle 384168 does not install on ACPI systems without acpid
thanks
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:47:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst
script needs to be fixed so that the package installation
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> That would be wonderful if you, or another hppa porter, could track down
> where the bug lies. libgcc2 is almost certainly the wrong package, since
> nothing should be *using* libgcc2 in a fresh build of qt-x11-free; it may be
> a b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Still, rejecting on TO address is tricky, mailing list mail is usually not
> addressed to me.
Unfortunately, you haven't shown your configuration file yet.
I suspect you're using a wildcarded multidrop configuration.
- --
Matt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384364 serious
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
reassign 342545 qt-x11-free
thanks
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:52:48AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:39:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The qt-x11-free package builds fine with a standard Debian setup.
> > Building with prctl --unaligned=signal makes the "bug" repro
tags 384112 +patch
thanks
I have attached a patch that updates freeloader to the new Python
policy, which ought to fix this bug.
Thanks,
John Wright
=== added file 'debian/pycompat'
--- debian/pycompat 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +
+++ debian/pycompat 2006-08-24 00:16:43 +
@@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 342545 qt-x11-free
Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails
Bug reassigned from package `libgcc2' to `qt-x11-free'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384112 +patch
Bug#384112: freeloader: Will not install. Depends on python < 2.4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:47:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> >If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst
> >script needs to be fixed so that the package installation does not fail if
> >acpid is not installed. That is the issue that needs to be addressed.
>
Hi.
Could you provide a full gdb backtrace?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 373541 serious
Bug#373541: Python policy transition
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> merge 373541 384290
Bug#373541: Python policy transition
Bug#384290: python-
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out o
If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst script
needs to be fixed so that the package installation does not fail if acpid is
not installed. That is the issue that needs to be addressed.
It *is not* required...just look at the error message or the init script
severity 384394 important
tags 384394 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:56:58PM -0400, morph wrote:
> Any app that depends on libgnome-2 (e.g. evince) fails on start-up with
> the following error: evince: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0: undefined symbol:
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384394 important
Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 384394 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup
The
Hi Geoff,
I'm sure Steve's explaination of how debian packages are built is not
clear to you.
This is not a bug. It may happen (and in fact it happens almost every
time due to me being in the CET timezone and uploading packages in
the evening while dinstall is run) that architecture indepe
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365196: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 384394 libgnome2-0
Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup
Warning: Unknown package 'libgnome2'
Bug reassigned from package `libgnome2' to `libgnome2-0'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:17:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384242: fixed in evolution-exchange 2.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Matthias Andree wrote:
(demoting to serious, tagging upstream, retitling)
Additional info:
fetchmail 6.3.4 and older do NOT log out of the upstream server after
SIGPIPE (I don't know the rationale behind this - it's not in the
comments), which prevents the deletions from happening properly.
Ret
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 384364 minor
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
severity 384364 minor
thanks
On Wed, August 23, 2006 22:01, Julien Danjou said:
> Package: planner
> Version: 0.14-9
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Sorry, it has built just fine on all architectures so far. Additionally,
the log you provide
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363375: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
I have just built and tested the package using the latest upstream
release (8.28.8). This seems to fix a substantial number of outstanding
bugs for fglrx-driver. It also adds support for Xorg 7.1.
Flavio, if you need a head start for the upgrade to 8.28.8, I have put
my package up at http://zwets
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Whoever takes care of forking cdrtools, please remember to fork from
a version prior to the license "clarifications" by Joerg Schilling, as
well as prior to the CDDL switch.
See this debian-legal subthread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00357.html
And, please, try and clarify wh
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:59:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:26:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcj-4.0 removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On (23/08/06 14:31), Steve Langasek wrote:
> reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org
> severity 384324 important
> retitle 384324 please lower the override priority for libtasn1-3-bin and
> libtasn1-2-bin
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:07:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > I'm not sure it should
reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org
severity 384324 important
retitle 384324 please lower the override priority for libtasn1-3-bin and
libtasn1-2-bin
thanks
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:07:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (23/08/06 18:58), Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:05:49PM
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:13:14PM -0500, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-20 09:10]:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> I'll take a look at kazehakase to see if it's the same bug.
> >
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
This patch fixes the bug 383555, the problem is on:
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/udev
This script moves the /dev directory inside the initramfs to the
real location in the new root.
Currently it fails in the line "nuke /dev/.udev/queue/", because this
directory does not exist.
Package: libgnome2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Any app that depends on libgnome-2 (e.g. evince) fails on start-up with
the following error: evince: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0: undefined symbol:
bonobo_activation_get_goption_group
System Informat
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384241: fixed in evolution-jescs 2.6.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
In fact, there was an upgrade of xserver-xorg-core from version 1:1.0.2-9
to 1:1.1.1-3 without any upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-ati.
I got the same problem with fglrx and fbdev.
The bug seems to be related to sloppy version dependencies between the two
packages. This morning upgrade should not h
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:33:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384312: fixed in xawtv 3.95-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:39:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > With the attached patch 'xawtv' can be compiled on powerpc.
> > Regards
> > Andreas Jochens
> >
> > diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c ./console/fbtools.c
> > --- ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c20
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:37:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI
version number mismatch - xserver fails to start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:08:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Evolution] Bug#384242: evolution-exchange: FTBFS: missing
build-dep on 'libedata-book-1.2'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: centericq
Version: 4.21.0-12
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of centericq_4.21.0-12 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 383184 + fixed
Bug#383184: evolution-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libecal1.2-dev,
libebook1.2-dev'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org
Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package
Bug reassigned from package `libtasn1-3-bin' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 384324 important
Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts a
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Like Eric, when upgrading experimental, trouble appear fixed for me.
--
God is dead.' -Nietzsche|'Nietzsche is dead.' -God
88' _`88'_ `8 | Pascal LACROIX
http://kikoucalou.chez-alice.fr
La vie est pleine d'une infinité d'absurdités, qui, impudemme
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Stefano -
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > The name "Open Publication License" is right, the URL was wrong.
>
> Could you please correct the URL then? I guess the following is the
> correct one:
>
> http://opencontent.org/openpub/
I have changed it. The
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:33:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382905: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
This problem was discussed upstream, here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341942
And was fixed with this clean and simple patch to configure.in:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=65572
The patch submitted by James is ok, but adds a lot of noise, because it
adds many other thi
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:01:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:38:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
It happened to me too, installing 1:6.6.1-0 from experimental seems to
have fixed it. IIRC an xorg-server upload that was targetted at
experimental was accidentally uploaded into unstable recently.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 384168 serious
Bug#384168: does not install without acpid
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:15:58 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Intent to NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
It looks like on July 14th you said it was going to be fixed, but I just
has this problem again today. I back ported Version: 2.5.9-10sarge2
to get squid up and running temporarily.
--
Geoff Cummins
IT Administrator
Sno Falls Credit Union
http://www.snofalls.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (425) 888
Same for me,
This occured also today after upgrade
(EE) module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1)
(EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module requirement mismatch, 0)
B.Rgds
Pascal LACROIX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
23/08/2006
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: trac
Version: 0.9.6-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I get a lots of "no module named cache" exceptions on my tracs (when
browsing online svn ie).
Symlinking trac module to site-packages make trac working again :
ln
Hello, apparently things have gone better. I am not sure that this is
because of the install mentioned in an earlier message.
I have another computer with Debian/Testing installed and tried the
install/configuration of ekiga and notice that on that computer the
configuration of the ALSA sound syst
* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-20 09:10]:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I'll take a look at kazehakase to see if it's the same bug.
>
> M, sadly, i can't even reproduce the bug. Is the password manager
> enabled by default
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 384316 important
Bug#384316: Segmentation fault in smbd
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
> severity 383592 important
Bug#383592: samba processes crash due to incorr
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 02:28:42PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: xawtv
Version: 3.95-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'xawtv' on powerpc/unstable,
I get the following error:
[snip]
With the attached patch 'xawtv' can be compiled on powerpc.
R
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:10:50AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:34:47AM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Mike, can you take a look?
Package: planner
Version: 0.14-9
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of planner_0.14-9 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006082
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384289: fixed in tcp-wrappers 7.6.dbs-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: nautilus-python
Version: 0.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of nautilus-python_0.3.0-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006082
I've just released Eterm 0.9.4 which resolves this issue. I don't
know why ljlane didn't respond or pass this along to me, but it's
resolved now.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.e
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This seems to of occurred for the first time sometime today, but as the
xserver is starting up it is saying that the ATI driver is reporting the
ABI version as version 0 and it is expecting
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
