Package: mesa-common-dev
Version: 6.4.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The apt-get dist-upgrade failed on my system. I have tried doing an apt-get -f
install to fix the problem and also
tried removing the conflicting package to no avail. I hope the following
informa
forwarded 381394 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Quoting Brandon Peirce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >The fix from http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198920
> >seems
> >to have completely broken the -g option of useradd. (src/usradd.c $Id:
> >1.100)
>
> The indent
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 381394 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#381394: postgresql-common fails to install at useradd command
Bug#381399: Subject: postgresql: postgresql can't be installed
Bug#381404: proftpd: fails to install (useradd bug?)
Bug#381408: useradd's -g option does
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:04:48 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386978: libsnmp-multi-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
on 'libsnmp-perl'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:02:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388155: fixed in cyrus21-imapd 2.1.18-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Bill Allombert wrote:
> Yes, I know, this is why I wrote exactly what command I was using.
> I ddes not occur if you omit a single package.
This is very strange and I doubt it has anything to do with mit-scheme.
If you look at the maintainer scripts, you'll see that the code to
manipulate the em
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 385796 important
Bug#385796: kopete: forgets contact properties after session ends
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:36:34PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
>>> If you aren't aware of any free sample bank, this doesn't mean they
>>> don't exist...
>> This is not the way it works.
> IMHO it is the way it works.
I'm sorry, but it's not. Debian policy, section 2.2.1:
[...] the packa
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:57:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388142: libgalago1: uninstallable, needs rebuilt against
libdbus-1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 09:51:35PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:23:18AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > If you aren't aware of any free sample bank, this doesn't mean they
> > don't exist...
>
> This is not the way it works.
IMHO it is the way it works.
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:04:35 +1000 (EST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnustep-dl2: 386221 386225 293025 360547
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:04:35 +1000 (EST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnustep-dl2: 386221 386225 293025 360547
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: ripit
Version: 3.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation
hi,
there's a policy violation on your package.
according to debian policy section 2.2.1:
"must not require a package outside of main for compilation or execution
(thus, the package must not declare a "Depends", "
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388126 minor
Bug#388126: libstartup-notification0: still depends on xlibs
Severity set to `minor' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Subject: ia32-libs: ldconfig files installed in wrong directory?
Package: ia32-libs
Version: 1.15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The ldconfig configuration files are installed in /lib/ldconfig.
Shouldn't they be installed in
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:02:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387731: fixed in ggz-kde-client 0.0.13-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Hi!
Please see /usr/share/doc/bluez-utils/README.Debian, it is documented
there how register-passkeys and add-passkeys are supposed to work.
> debian:/etc/bluetooth# cat /usr/share/doc/bluez-utils/README.Debian.gz
> |grep passkeys
> debian:/etc/bluetooth#
>
> (yes, nothing)
At least here I ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 388155 + pending
Bug#388155: cyrus21-common: purging the package fails (require debconf)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Il giorno lun, 18/09/2006 alle 22.06 +0200, Fathi Boudra ha scritto:
> Package: libgalago1
> Version: 0.3.3-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> hi,
>
> libgalago1 is uninstallable again, and the package is outdated:
> upstream -> version 0.5.1 (May 21, 2006)
> debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 385800 + fixed
Bug#385800: libassa: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from
'ASSA::EventHandler*' to 'int' loses precision
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:17:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375664: fixed in libcontextual-return-perl 0.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
As explained by upstream, this appears to be a bug in libcairo or another
library.
Either way, it is not a pan bug (as can be seen from the stacktrace, now that I
am actually looking at it).
Please reassign or close this bug.
--
Søren O.
"Oh, bother" said the Borg, "we've assimilated Pooh".
Package: tex-common
Version: 0.28
Severity: serious
Hello Debian TeX maintainers,
There is an error when attempting to purge the package:
Removing tex-common ...
Purging configuration files for tex-common ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tex-common.postrm: line 36: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule:
No
> Hi,
>
> here is the problem:
>
> Setting up maxdb-webtools (7.5.00.34-4) ...
> Starting MaxDB web server: start-stop-daemon: error while loading shared
> libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
> invoke-rc.d: initscript maxdb-webtools, action "start"
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:17:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387195: fixed in console-data 2:1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: cyrus21-common
Version: 2.1.18-3
Severity: serious
Hello Henrique,
There is an error when attempting to purge the package:
Removing cyrus21-common ...
Purging configuration files for cyrus21-common ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/cyrus21-common.postrm: line 12:
/usr/share/debconf/confmodu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package vim vim-common vim-doc vim-full vim-gnome vim-gtk vim-gui-common
> vim-lesstif vim-perl vim-python vim-ruby vim-runtime vim-tcl vim-tiny
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: vim-gn
Package: libopentoken3.0b
Version: 3.0b-4
Severity: serious
Hello Ludovic,
Upgrading from Sarge fails due to a file conflict:
/usr/lib/libopentoken.so.3.0b used to belong in libopentoken3.
Selecting previously deselected package libopentoken3.0b.
Unpacking libopentoken3.0b (from .../libope
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:37:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Notice how it continued to strip setgid from the file "maildrop",
> > > whose name is supposed to match "maildrop$".
> > >
> > > How is this supposed to work, again?
>
> -X excludes any file containing a substring, as documented on
Package: firefox-sage
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been found in sage:
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Sage 1.3.6
allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via
JavaScript in a content:encoded eleme
Hi Jason
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 18:26, Jason Thomas wrote:
> option C, we create a way to extract the version information from every
> grub file. So that the grub shell can check that its version matches
> the stage files and if not generate an ERROR message.
I tryied to understand how to
Package: libgalago1
Version: 0.3.3-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hi,
libgalago1 is uninstallable again, and the package is outdated:
upstream -> version 0.5.1 (May 21, 2006)
debian -> version 0.3.3 (August 27, 2005)
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
This is still broken (at least the debian testing package, 3.1-3.1) I
will try to give as much details as i can:
> Please see /usr/share/doc/bluez-utils/README.Debian, it is documented there
> how
> register-passkeys and add-passkeys are supposed to work.
debian:/etc/bluetooth# cat /usr/share/d
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:23:26AM -0400, Chris Hanson wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: mit-scheme
> > Version: 7.7.90+20060414-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hello Chris,
> >
> > when upgrading from sarge to etch in some circumstances, the following
> > problem occur:
>
> > This is
Package: findimagedupes
Version: 0.1.3-7
Severity: grave
findimagedupes will execute code stored in the names of the files.
This allows arbitrary code to be executed as the user by anyone who
can add files to a directory findimagedupes is run on; hence this is a
security hole and is grave.
An ex
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Thierry,
I'm interested in sponsoring your package gstm 1.2-3. I will review
your package and contact you via e-mail. (I'm still in the NM queue,
but my AM requests me to prepare a sponsored package as part of my NM
procedure.)
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
De
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:03:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388096: libpng3: FTBFS due to awk script syntax error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Clint Adams writes:
> Package: osgcal
> Version: 0.1.41-1
> Severity: serious
>
> osgcal fails to build on sparc because of a bus error in Xvfb.
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=osgcal&arch=sparc&ver=0.1.41-1&stamp=1156511554&file=log
>
Thanks for reporting the problem. We
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388126 grave
Bug#388126: libstartup-notification0: still depends on xlibs
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 238245 -1
Bug#238245: Open Publication License is not DFSG Free
Bug 238245 cloned as bug 388141.
> retitle -1 www.debian.org copyright statements are false & website is illegal
> to publish until all contributors are contacted for relicensing
Bu
Package: freej
Version: 0.8.1-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
freej can't be used at least with ImageLayer objects created
from a .js file.
The examples available from the upstream website, in particular
pan.js with its picture 1steps063.jpg doesn't work at all.
Tal
* maximilian attems wrote:
> > It didn't fix the problem.
>
> one first shot would be to lower CONFIG_NR_CPUS in config.alpha-smp
Tried that already.
> or otherwise one could use a similar hack than the one proposed here:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115507250028744&w=2
Didn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 388116 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356600
Bug#388116: pan: crashes at startup when launched remotely
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356600.
> thanks
Stopping proces
I would like to say that Joerg Schilling's public statement controls.
Legally, I have no idea. (If his public statement was very clear, then his
public statement would definitely control. Given his mishmash of different
public statements, though)
Frankly, this may call for consulting a la
reassign 388125 xvfb
found 388125 2:1.0.2-10
kthxbye
There is probably an unaligned access in one Xalloc() in Xvfb.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388125 xvfb
Bug#388125: osgcal FTBFS (sparc): bus error in xvfb
Bug reassigned from package `osgcal' to `xvfb'.
> found 388125 2:1.0.2-10
Bug#388125: osgcal FTBFS (sparc): bus error in xvfb
Bug marked as found in version 2:1.0.2-10.
> kthxbye
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:38:16PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334697
> > This bugreport sounds like a joke, really.
> > If the goal isn't to 'not release apt-listbugs with etch',
> > this is going to be bad.
> How imp
Package: osgcal
Version: 0.1.41-1
Severity: serious
osgcal fails to build on sparc because of a bus error in Xvfb.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=osgcal&arch=sparc&ver=0.1.41-1&stamp=1156511554&file=log
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Package: findimagedupes
Version: 0.1.3-7
Severity: grave
findimagedupes will execute code stored in the names of the files.
This allows arbitrary code to be executed as the user by anyone who
can add files to a directory findimagedupes is run on; hence this is a
security hole and is grave.
An ex
Package: tikiwiki
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A security issue has been found in tikiwiki:
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in tiki-g-admin_processes.php
in Tikiwiki 1.9.4 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL
commands via the (1) pid and (2) w
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:19:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388070: GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi!
Contacted on IRC, Ian Lynagh told me that he will try soon to bootstrap
GHC again on Alpha.
His analysis of the current FTBFS is actually a bug in the previous
Alpha version of the compiler showing up while trying the new one.
Regards,
--
Jérémy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378496: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.28.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:47:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366564: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.28.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: pan
Version: 0.112-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
When I start pan I get a brief view of the main window which
disappears quickly due to a segfault. I'm running pan via ssh -X from
a powerpc machine and an i386 X server. pan works fine directly from
the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # Fixed by a package in the archive...
> tags 386081 - pending
Bug#386081: gnomeicu: Links against obsolete libtasn1-2 package
Tags were: fixed pending
Tags removed: pending
>
End of
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:47:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355485: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.28.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383974: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.28.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:41:32PM -0400, José Parrella wrote:
> Indeed. I do not mean to steal their work (and actually the Developer's
I didn't mean stealing too, I meant more like fiddling into their plans.
Like, if they are working on it currently and you NMU something
inbetween, this would pr
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:02:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386251: fixed in xcdroast 0.98+0alpha15-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: maxdb-webtools
Version: 7.5.00.34-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
Setting up maxdb-webtools (7.5.00.34-4) ...
Starting MaxDB web server: start-stop-daemon: error while loading shared
libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object fil
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe escribió:
> Well, I would like to try it, but since I've changed my VGA-card
> recently, I hit #375689 and thus went over to a fully self-managed
> xorg.conf.
It's ok. That's actually why I'm not testing this myself.
> Hm, I think (or better I strongly hope :)) the xorg-ma
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334697
>
> This bugreport sounds like a joke, really.
> If the goal isn't to 'not release apt-listbugs with etch',
> this is going to be bad.
How important is apt-listbugs for users of stable? I don't think stable
would have
Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Notice how it continued to strip setgid from the file "maildrop",
> > whose name is supposed to match "maildrop$".
> >
> > How is this supposed to work, again?
-X excludes any file containing a substring, as documented on the man
page.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Descri
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:30:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kamera has empty list of "Supported cameras"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: lfm
Version: 0.91.2-1
Severity: grave
Attached is a patch that updates lfm to current python policy.
Actually attached this time around.
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
diff -Naur lfm-0.91.2/debian/changelog lfm-0.91.2-1.1/debian/changelog
--- lfm-0.91.2/debian/changelog 20
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:32:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388071: binaries are not executable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:00:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388088: Fix wrong symbolic link at
/etc/init.d/sl-modem-daemon
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Just my 0.02¢
I think this packages (as it is now) is not suitable for debian anyway
and should be removed or re-done with the data of the debian archive
(instead of the data of the ubuntu archive).
The same utility that is used to extract icons/desktop files in ubuntu
could be used for the debia
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:18:45AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> >The postrm cannot rely on debconf being installed when the package
> >is purged.
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Something seems to be broken. libslp1 depends on debconf. Why can't it
> rely on debconf being installed when the package is pur
Package: libpng3
Version: 1.2.8rel-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
This is a dupe of #329812 for the oldlibs libpng3 package.
Note that you don't actually have to have mawk around: the following one-liner
change to scripts/makefile.elf suffices to make
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:25:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line NMU is OK
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 05:54:43PM -0400, José Parrella wrote:
> Please try this patch. I'm not a bash (nor debconf!) guru but I think
> that it address your concerns regarding the non-interactivity for the
> mouse device setting. Please let me know if the patch works for you.
Well, I would l
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:17:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387980: fixed in egroupware 1.2-104.dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I have reviewed Arjan's patch, and it is correct, thus, I intend to upload
> it as an NMU to fix the bug and allow the package to build correctly.
Thanks for your work.
- --
Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
Formateur Cellule P
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:00:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384357: Intent to NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:53:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: Unable to include GWorkspace/GWProtocol.h
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Il giorno lun, 18/09/2006 alle 15.07 +0200, Bastian Blank ha scritto:
> Package: zope-common
> Version: 0.5.24
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> dzhandle make-instance creates files with owner zope which is executed
> as root by the init script. This gives this user the same rights as
> root.
Hi all!
. Original Message ...
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:11:55 +0200 "Michael Meskes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>During our bug-squashing-party we decided that it would be a good idea
>to make jadetex become RC bug free in etch and upload the NMU that
>Norbert prepared. However, to make sure
Package: sl-modem-daemon
Version: 2.9.9d+e-pre2-6
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
The init script creates a wrong symbolic link:
ln -s ttySL0 /dev/modem
It's wrong because should be use absolute path on ln:
ln -s /dev/ttySL0 /dev/modem
I attached the patch f
Package: kdesdk
Version: 4:3.5.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
when trying to build 'kdesdk' in a clean unstable chroot,
I get the following error:
Building dependency tree...
E: Build-Depends dependency for kdesdk cannot be satisfied because no available
versions of package libsvn0-dev can satis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388070 gij-4.1 4.1.1-13
Bug#388070: GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat
Bug reassigned from package `gcj-4.1' to `gij-4.1'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 387500 + fixed
Bug#387500: Debian installer fails to install GRUB
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: fixed
> tag 387729 + fixed
Bug#387729: Only wrapper for grub-install is available, not the real
grub-install
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
St
[Roman Zippel]
> I looked at the failing self tests. The first one is a bug in the
> created wrapper. The basic problem is that in
> svn_delta.c:_wrap_svn_txdelta_apply_wrapper() the value of temp3 is
> not modified by svn_txdelta_apply_wrapper(), so the return is
> basically random.
Thanks for t
reassign 385004 openssl,apache-ssl
* Philip Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060918 14:57]:
> it seemed to be the apache.pem key cert. Not the config files.
Hm, that is a bit bad with sharing. But then, it sounds like it is a bug
in the ssl-part. I reassigned the bug as well to openssl.
Cheers,
Andi
Package: dokuwiki
Version: 0.0.20060309-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
upstream's 20060309_d_ release fixes four security issues, one of
them, http://bugs.splitbrain.org/index.php?do=details&id=906, allowing
attackers to place any code on the server where t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 316321
Bug#316321: apache2-common: 'reload' init target should not restart server
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Hi,
FYI: The complete source package of the NMU I have prepared is also
available from my personal repository [1] and can be easily retrieved by
doing:
dget
http://moonshine.dnsalias.org/debian/unstable/gnome-pilot_2.0.14-0.1_i386.changes
Greetings Arjan Oosting
[1] http://moonshine.dnsalias.
Package: zope-common
Version: 0.5.24
Severity: grave
Tags: security
dzhandle make-instance creates files with owner zope which is executed
as root by the init script. This gives this user the same rights as
root.
Bastian
--
Vulcans worship peace above all.
-- McCoy, "Return to T
reopen 316321
thanks
sorry, i disagree. "reload" should not start a service that is not
running. i suppose current policy is a little ambiguous on the issue,
but i brought it up on devel some time before raising the severity and
the general consensus was in agreement with me. i also supplied a p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388070 gcj-4.1 4.1.1-13
Bug#388070: GC Warning: Couldn't read /proc/stat
Bug reassigned from package `ecj-bootstrap' to `gcj-4.1'.
> tags 388070 - ftbfs
Unknown tag/s: ftbfs.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato w
reassign 388070 gcj-4.1 4.1.1-13
tags 388070 - ftbfs
thanks
This is actually an upstream bug in gcj-4.1, so I'm reassigning this
one. As for the "invalid free()" crash, here's a backtrace:
#0 0x2ba99dbf707b in *__GI_raise () from /usr/lib/debug/libc.so.6
#1 0x2ba99dbf884e in *__GI_abor
Package: ecj-bootstrap
Version: 3.2-3
Tags: ftbfs
Severity: serious
ecj-bootstrap won't build when /proc is not mounted. Also note the
invalid free() call which was reported by glibc.
find build/bin -name '*.java' -exec rm -f {} \;
find build/bin -name '*.html' -exec rm -f {} \;
mkdir -p build/b
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:01:04AM +0100, peterthevicar wrote:
> kamera requires the package libgphoto2-2-dev to populate its list of
> supported cameras in the add camera dialog. Without that package you
> are presented with an empty list so cannot set up your camera. digikam
> depends on libgph
Package: libgcj7-dbg
Version: 4.1.1-13
Severity: serious
None of the binaries below /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin is executable:
-rw-r--r-- root/root 8421 2006-09-08 16:03:23
./usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/gij-4.1
-rw-r--r-- root/root 71536 2006-09-08 16:03:23
./usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/gcj-dbtool-4.1
-r
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:24:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 2.0.55-4.2?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Hi,
* Philip Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060830 10:43]:
> I have more info. I did a stack trace with apache-ssl.dbg built from
> source, and it was crashing in libssl.
>
> But this didn't help.
>
> What *did* help was totally purging the apache-ssl package, deleting the
> /etc/apache-ssl direct
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 05:35:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388069: libfreetype6-dev: missing subdirectory in headers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:54:10AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> I have prepared a new diff.gz for the new upstream version of
> gnome-pilot. It fixes the FTBFS bug, and 9 other bugs. As I am no DD yet
> I can not do the actual NMU so some else has to do the actual upload.
I've sponsored this NMU
it seemed to be the apache.pem key cert. Not the config files.
Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
* Philip Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060830 10:43]:
I have more info. I did a stack trace with apache-ssl.dbg built from
source, and it was crashing in libssl.
But this didn't help.
What *did* help was
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
