Hi Konrad,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:59:52PM +0100, Konrad D??browski wrote:
> After trying a few different combinations, I've seen that skribe compiles
> with
> bigloo 2.7 (in testing at the moment), but not with bigloo 2.8 (including the
> official sources).
>
> Should an RC bug be filed ag
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 23:42, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It would be equally valid to say that aoetools does not support
> automounting, and therefore /usr/sbin is appropriate.
So you're saying that a person that has an aoe driven SAN should have to mount
it by doing something like:
mount /de
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:24:24 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line reached unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
severity aoetools important
thanks
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:54:20PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Subject: aoetools: policy violation: binaries in wrong location
> Package: aoetools
> Version: 10-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Tags: patch
> The aoetools binaries
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:32:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384285: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:32:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375689: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 05:54:43PM -0400, José Parrella wrote:
> tags 385078 +patch
> thank you
>
> Please try this patch. I'm not a bash (nor debconf!) guru but I think
> that it address your concerns regarding the non-interactivity for the
> mouse device setting. Please let me know if the patch
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:02:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383166: fixed in xprint 1:1.1.99.3+git20060910-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:02:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375125: fixed in xprint 1:1.1.99.3+git20060910-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:04:00AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Any news ?
Sorry, I didn't get to the box on Monday evening as I originally
planned. I'm not sure when I'll be there again, presumably sometime
next week.
Cheers,
Christian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 388336 -1 -2
Bug#388336: Uninstallable due to libgcj7 -> libgcj7-0 transition
Bug 388336 cloned as bugs 388345-388346.
> reassign -1 libgnome-java
Bug#388345: Uninstallable due to libgcj7 -> libgcj7-0 transition
Bug reassigned from package `libgc
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#264351: fixed in gpsim 0.21.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293660: fixed in gpsim 0.21.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Subject: aoetools: policy violation: binaries in wrong location
Package: aoetools
Version: 10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: patch
The aoetools binaries need to be in the /sbin directory instead of
/usr/sbin since they are used to prepare the device to mount its
vo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384782 serious
Bug#384782: v4l-conf: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/v4l-info', which is also in
package xawtv
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334155: fixed in gpsim 0.21.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244126: fixed in gpsim 0.21.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388332 normal
Bug#388332: vlc: VLC and Freebox does not work anymore
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346347: fixed in gpsim 0.21.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265766: fixed in gpsim 0.21.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: libgconf-java
Version: 2.12.3-1
Severity: grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Due to the transition of libgcj7 -> libgcj7-0, the libgconf-java is
uninstallable. Please rebuild it. Many packages had been rebuild via
binNMU, so you maybe also want to find out, why not this
On Sunday 17 September 2006 03:59, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> severity 284699 serious
> found 284699 4:3.5.4-2
> thanks
>
> From what I understood, upstream KDE completely ignores licensing
> questions regarding non-source files beyond distributability. Other
> icons from crystalsvg seem non-free,
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:47:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388147: fixed in libopentoken 3.0b-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386570 + moreinfo
Bug#386570: sounds/icons with unclear licensing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 388092
Bug#388092: kdesdk: FTBFS: Build-Depends dependency for kdesdk cannot be
satisfied because no available versions of package libsvn0-dev can satisfy
version requirements
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> stop
Stopping processing he
After trying a few different combinations, I've seen that skribe compiles with
bigloo 2.7 (in testing at the moment), but not with bigloo 2.8 (including the
official sources).
Should an RC bug be filed against the bigloo package in unstable to stop it
entering testing until skribe gets ported t
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.6-svn20060918.debian-1
Severity: grave
Tags: l10n
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello,
I just upgrade vlc and Freebox TV canal are not decode anymore with this
new versio.
I obtain this messages:
--
[0325] main decoder e
Package: phpbb2
Version: 2.0.21-1
Severity: serious
Hello Jeroen,
There is an error when attempting to purge phpbb2:
Removing phpbb2 ...
Purging configuration files for phpbb2 ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/phpbb2.postrm: line 20: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No
such file or directory
dpkg: e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386392 + fixed-upstream
Bug#386392: fails to build
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> tags 386392 + pending
Bug#386392: fails to build
Tags were: fixed-upstream patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
tags 388149 +patch
tags 388149 +pending
thanks
I've looked into the reported vulnerabilities further, and produced the
following patch. The patch does 3 things.
- Firstly it disables the "Trust un-sanitized HTML" option altogether.
- Secondly a nice side effect of the way I did first item results
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:33:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388177: fixed in msntp 1.6.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:17:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368563: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:33:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385695: fixed in ircd-hybrid 1:7.2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 388273 serious
Bug#388273: cannot remove/upgrade ggz-gtk-games
Severity set to `serious' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388149 +patch
Bug#388149: CVE-2006-4712: Cross Context Scripting vulnerability in sage
Tags were: confirmed security
Tags added: patch
> tags 388149 +pending
Bug#388149: CVE-2006-4712: Cross Context Scripting vulnerability in sage
Tags were: patch
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:34:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388227: fixed in mydms 1.4.4+1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: python-logilab-common
Version: 0.16.1-2
Severity: serious
Hello Alexandre,
There is an error when upgrading python-logilab-common from sarge to etch,
Setting up python-logilab-common (0.16.1-2) ...
pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: already exists:
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/lo
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, David Starner wrote:
It's a little late to be releasing completely rewritten versions of
programs for etch. So that solution means removing findimagedupes from
etch altogether.
If I'm not completely wrong there is no freeze for packages of
priority extra (or did I missed s
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:34:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388236: fixed in steam 2.2.18-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
reopen 388092
stop
I'm wrong. It looks like we'll have to switch over to libdb4.4-dev, and
kdepim will need a rebuild against the new libpisock9. Thanks for the
tip.
Note to self: get more sleep.
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:33, Christopher Martin wrote:
> "kdesdk: FTBFS: Build-Depends depe
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:33:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kdesdk: FTBFS: Build-Depends dependency for kdesdk cannot be
satisfied because no available versions of package libsvn0-dev can satisfy
version requirements
has caused the attached Bug report t
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-21
Followup-For: Bug #388115
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fyi, purging tetex-base and reinstalling it seemed to fix the problem.
my guess is tetex-base is behaving slightly differently and breaks with
some other non-dependency package on the syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 388300 0.097-1
Bug#388300: udev does not provide/create /dev/MAKEDEV symlink
Bug marked as found in version 0.097-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: libuptimed-dev
Version: 1:0.3.7-3
Severity: serious
Hello Daniel,
There is an error when upgrading the package from sarge to etch,
Preparing to replace libuptimed-dev 1:0.3.3-3 (using
.../libuptimed-dev_1%3a0.3.7-3_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libuptimed-dev ...
dpkg: erro
After being notificated of Bug #370540 (could fail gracefully
if /dev/MAKEDEV exists), I took a look at the udev init script. The
function for creating /dev/MAKEDEV (line 45) says:
[ ! -e /dev/MAKEDEV ] || ln -s /sbin/MAKEDEV /dev/MAKEDEV
This will quit if MAKEDEV does not exist, but not create
#370540
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
retitle 385695 FTBFS on alpha: remove unused va_list
thanks
My previous patches were nonsense. This one fixes the issue.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys & Net Admin
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 18_remove_unused_va_list.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 385695 FTBFS on alpha: remove unused va_list
Bug#385695: FTBFS on alpha: va_list is not a pointer
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 386478 Obsolete package: Etch will have only 2.6 kernels, 2.6 version
> out of date
Bug#386478: kernel-patch-2.4-bluez: Obsolete package: Etch will have only 2.6
kernels
Changed Bug title.
> severity 386478 grave
Bug#386478: Obsolete package:
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:56:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346968: NMU patch for wmmount
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: udev
Version: 0.100-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1
After upgrading to udev 0.100-1 and rebooting I noticed that the
isdnutils init script complained that /dev/MAKEDEV could not be found.
It looks like udev does not provide a MAKEDEV symlink anymore,
so /dev/MAKEDEV does no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 387798 grave
Bug#387798: libgutils1-dev: broken symlink (missing dep?)
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388282 important
Bug#388282: When trying to acces samba share from other computer PANIC appears
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On 9/19/06, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
n Mon, 18 Sep 2006, David Starner wrote:
> Package: findimagedupes
> Version: 0.1.3-7
Just to let you know the status quo: There is a completely rewritten
verison of findimagedupes in preparation which does not show the
problem (and closes th
severity 388282 important
thanks
Quoting marcel aguilella ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.23c-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When mounting share samba hangs with the following message in log.smbd
>
Hangs? Or panics?
Please also provide th
Package: atftpd
Version: 0.7.dfsg-0.2
Severity: serious
Hello Ludovic,
There is an error when attempting to purge the package:
Removing atftpd ...
Purging configuration files for atftpd ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/atftpd.postrm: line 4: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing a
Hi,
* Erik Schanze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050925 13:13]:
> Please feel free to ask for more info.
Can you try whether it works with the new version 3.95-4?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Ok, I've had a further look into things, and it appears now that the
first injection problem (when allow HTML is unchecked) is with the function:
function htmlToText(aStr) {
varformatConverter =
Components.classes["@mozilla.org/widget/htmlformatconverter;1"].createInstance(Components.inter
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387788: fixed in mit-scheme 7.7.90+20060906-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Bill Allombert wrote:
>> This is very strange and I doubt it has anything to do with mit-scheme.
>> If you look at the maintainer scripts, you'll see that the code to
>> manipulate the emacs files is boilerplate, automatically generated by
>> debhelper. The mit-scheme package doesn't do any expli
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386952: fixed in maildrop 2.0.2-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
I'm seeing the same errors on my sparc64 (log file looks the same too).
Cheers,
FJP
pgptNFeTOYX2A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: libdc1394-13
Version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: grave
On a clean chroot:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install libdc1394-13
[snip]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libdc1394-13: Depends: libraw1394-5 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
The package need to be rebuilded
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382576: fixed in docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Thank you for this hint! ;o)
prerm contains this line: ggz-config --remove
--noregistry=/usr/share/ggz/modules/ggz-txt-client
a mkdir of this directory helped to remove ggz-gtk-games
this was needed because that directory is only provided by the debian
package ggz-txt-client which is _not_ a d
Setting up a specific ALPHA macro which is passed via CPPFLAGS to the
configure script in debian/rules is not elegant, because gcc has a
built-in __alpha__ macro to take care of it. Hence, here is the new
patch which will come in the 7.2.2-2 revision.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`
I have exactly the same problems on amd64 sid:
apt-get upgrade
[code]Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ggz-gtk-games: Depends: ggz-gtk-game-data (= 0.0.13-1)
Package: f-spot
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
F-spot cannot start anymore since the last update. Trying $f-spot --debug , I
have:
=
Got a SIGSEGV while executing native code. This usually i
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388237: fixed in tikiwiki 1.9.5+dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23c-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When mounting share samba hangs with the following message in log.smbd
[2006/09/19 15:06:47, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1592)
PANIC (pid 25177): substitutions failed
[2006/09/19 15:06:47, 0] lib/util.c:log_
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388122: fixed in tikiwiki 1.9.5+dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
JackTheDipper wrote:
> I currently have ggz-gtk-games 0.0.13-1 installed and
> I'm unable to remove it (post-installation: error code 255)
> or upgrade (pre-removal: error code 255) to 0.0.13-3
>
> so my whole apt-get/dpkg-system is now broken.
If the whole apt-get dpkg system is broken because of
Package: ggz-gtk-games
Version: 0.0.13-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi ;o)
I currently have ggz-gtk-games 0.0.13-1 installed and
I'm unable to remove it (post-installation: error code 255)
or upgrade (pre-removal: error code 255) to 0.0.13-3
so my whole apt-get/d
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:31:15PM -0400, Chris Hanson wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know, this is why I wrote exactly what command I was using.
> > I ddes not occur if you omit a single package.
>
> This is very strange and I doubt it has anything to do with mit-scheme.
> If you l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 358575 2.1.5-8sarge3
Bug#358575: purge mailman deletes all ucf-managed conffiles
Bug marked as found in version 2.1.5-8sarge3.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Package: fglrx-control
Version: 8.28.8-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
fireglcontrol doesn't work it just gives "Floating point exception"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i38
I wrote, in a somewhat addled fashion,
> The ldconfig configuration files are installed in /lib/ldconfig.
> Shouldn't they be installed in /etc/ld.so.conf.d? They're not being
> picked up by ldconfig.
More correctly, ia32-libs installs links to the added directories
in /lib/ldconfig, which do no
n Mon, 18 Sep 2006, David Starner wrote:
Package: findimagedupes
Version: 0.1.3-7
Just to let you know the status quo: There is a completely rewritten
verison of findimagedupes in preparation which does not show the
problem (and closes the other open bugs). It will be released as
package quit
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:29:40PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Christian Aichinger, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 13:14:25 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Yasm is just a generic assembler that supports both nasm and gas syntax,
> > > and is almost ready for tasm.
>
> > How far are you?
>
> Syntax is almost done:
Christian Aichinger, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 14:49:32 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:29:40PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Christian Aichinger, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 13:14:25 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > Yasm is just a generic assembler that supports both nasm and gas syntax,
> > > > and is
Hi Niko >@2006.09.19_13:36:02_+0200
Thanks for the help. Can you send me your patch with the memmove()'s and
I'll have a look at it?
> Package: tinysnmp-agent
> Version: 0.8.4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This is the sam
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:12:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line /sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device "fuse"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Christian Aichinger, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 13:14:25 +0200, a écrit :
> > Yasm is just a generic assembler that supports both nasm and gas syntax,
> > and is almost ready for tasm.
>
> I see you asked on yasm-devel about that already:
> http://cvs.tortall.net/pipermail/yasm-devel/2006-May/000152.html
Package: fuse-utils
Version: 2.5.3-4.1
Severity: serious
The current fuse-utils is uninstallable (makedev 2.3.1-82, udev
0.100-1 installed):
Setting up fuse-utils (2.5.3-4.1) ...
creating fuse device node...
/sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device "fuse"
dpkg: error processing fuse-utils (--
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388228: fixed in nagios 2:1.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388229: fixed in nagios 2:1.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: tinysnmp-agent
Version: 0.8.4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is the same as #282260, but as that's already archived, I'm opening
a new bug.
The tinysnmpd daemon still doesn't start on sparc but gives a SIGBUS
instead. This is with a recompiled (with -O0, as
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:20:11PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I don't remember exactly anymore, but when I looked at it yasm
> > didn't look very promising for porting loadlin to it.
Well, I remember now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/loadlin/yasm$ yasm -p help
Available yasm parsers:
gas
This issue does not seem to affect Tikiwiki 1.9.5. I will apply some security
checks from upstream anyway and make a new release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388149 +confirmed
Bug#388149: CVE-2006-4712: Cross Context Scripting vulnerability in sage
Tags were: security
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:52:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in latest package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388234: fixed in serendipity 1.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
tags 388149 +confirmed
thanks
Hi, just a quick note to acknowledge receipt of this bug report. Will
provide fix/further updates after work today.
Alan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 388067 pending
thanks
Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please see build1.log and build2.log.
Thank you. I found the problem: The patch target deleted one of its
prerequisites, which therefore was always remade and newer than
patch-stamp. The only thing I do not understand is
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:53:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#388230: config/postrm depends on
non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388067 pending
Bug#388067: *** [stampdir/patch-stamp] Error 2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
There is another one, CVE-2006-4711:
http://mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15101
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387313: fixed in banshee 0.10.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387482: fixed in banshee 0.10.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387313: fixed in banshee 0.10.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
