Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:08:24 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#385239: fixed in rssreader.app 0.6.2.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 390733 libxml2
Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault scrollkeeper-update -q)
Bug reassigned from package `synaptic' to `libxml2'.
found 390733 2.6.26.dfsg-3
Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Cupsys 1.2.4-1 has an unversioned depends on libdbus-1-3, while 1.2.4-2 depends
on libdbus-1-2 = 0.62. This is a
serious regression, given that libdbus-1-2 has been removed from the archive.
The latest
Boson-base package is remplaced by the boson package.
I think i need to ask ftp master to remove this package.
Regards,
Gonéri
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:08:24 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352392: fixed in rssreader.app 0.6.2.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 07:44:49 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close the bug as well.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 390733 libxml2
found 390733 2.6.26.dfsg-3
thanks
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:31:07PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Package: synaptic
Version: 0.57.11
Severity: serious
# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up synaptic (0.57.11) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/synaptic.postinst: line 6: 4289
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:27:38 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#390800: cupsys depends on libdbus-1-2,
which is no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 375215
Bug#375215: libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:27:17 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Never mind, corrected upload done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
found 390773 0.10.5-4
close 390773 0.10.5-5
stop
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
Version: 0.10.5-5
Severity: serious
After upgrading this system from unstable circa 6-9 months ago,
quodlibet failed as described in #390309.
Are you 100% sure you tried with 0.10.5-5? I
thanks
Subject: libnss-ldap: This bugs come back
Followup-For: Bug #375215
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2
After an upgrade to 251-5.2, during the boot sequence i have an
increasing timeout during udev initialization (16, 32, 64 seconds).
Downgrading to udev 251-5.1 solve the problem.
Package: gdm
Version: 2.14.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #390607
The reason why I have submitted bug for GDM is that other WM start
session OK (i.e. wdm)
I can also start session with startx without problem.
Best regards
Andrei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 390773 0.10.5-4
Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict
Bug marked as found in version 0.10.5-4.
close 390773 0.10.5-5
Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict
'close' is deprecated; see
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 387709 + unreproducible
Bug#387709: fails to start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Another problem with smart-notifier is that it calls dh_python but
lacks a pycompat file, so the new dh_python will do old-style stuff
with it, including adding a postinst call to compileall.py.
that's RC then. and a packaging problem, not our
tags 390654 + unreproducible
thanks
strange. works for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 387709 + unreproducible
thank you
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:37:49PM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
The xfonts-* installed/non-installed in my system:
Miguel, other people have more or less the same fonts installed and
can't reproduce. Can you strace or gdb it and see if you find
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:25:56 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390772: xserver-xorg-core: Server fails to start after
upgrade to 1.1.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 390654 + unreproducible
Bug#390654: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing argument?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 390693 4.1.1ds1-12
Bug#390693: gcc-4.1 fails to build the glibc on ia64
Bug marked as found in version 4.1.1ds1-12.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:02:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#389962: fixed in noffle 1.2.0~rc1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
[root mad] cd /etc/apache2/mods-available ; svn info | grep URL
URL :
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-apache/trunk/apache2/config-dir/mods-available
says it all. I happen to version my
Package: apache2-mpm-prefork
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
sorry for the french locale, but I guess all is pretty clear enough.
* Stopping apache 2.0 web server...
grep: /etc/apache2/conf.d/[^.#]*: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type
[ ok ]
Package: apache2.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
it seems that there is a problem to stop apache2 that makes the upgrade fail.
* Stopping apache 2.0 web server...
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390419: fixed in libbonoboui 2.14.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: kaffeine
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since the last apt-get update upgrade kaffeine refuses to start completely,
it exits immediately without any output (no text on console, X screen ...).
This is the output when I want to start kaffeine
severity 390817 important
force-merge 390817 390785
thanks
Pierre Habouzit skrev:
says it all. I happen to version my /etc/ files under svn, hence the
loss that incured because it messed up with the .svn dirs in a bad way.
Please look at already-filed bugs before filing new bugs.
- tfheen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 390817 important
Bug#390817: apache2.2-common: /etc/apache2/*-available/ have .svn dirs inside
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
force-merge 390817 390785
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
thanks
Stopping processing
Package: apache2-common
Version: 2.0.55-4.2
Severity: serious
it should have been made an empty package, without maintainer scripts,
so that it could be purged, as it's superseeded with apache2.2-common.
[madcoder mad] LC_ALL=C sudo dpkg --purge apache2-common
(Reading database ... 142646
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:24:27 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390431: freemind: locks up when starting new map
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:17:29 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390521: fixed in isomd5sum 11.1.0.95-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 390562 firefox
Bug#390562: firefox: CPU eating while waiting for passwd
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org' to `firefox'.
severity 390562 normal
Bug#390562: firefox: CPU eating while waiting for passwd
Severity set to `normal' from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
close 390812
Bug#390812: apache2.2: does not upgrades
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Warning: Unknown package 'apache2.2'
Bug closed, send any
Package: dirmngr
Version: 0.9.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: unavailable dependency
Hello,
dirmngr depends on libpth2 but this package was removed from sid.
The name is now libpth20.
A rebuild or a binNMU should fix this problem.
thx.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: gnupg-agent
Version: 1.9.20-2
Severity: serious
Justification: unavailable deps
Hello,
gnupg-agent depends on libpth2 but this got removed from sid.
The name is now libpth20.
A binNMU should fix this problem (thats why I cc: to vorlon because
he closes these bugs.;))
-- System
Tilman Schr� wrote:
Package: kaffeine
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since the last apt-get update upgrade kaffeine refuses to start completely,
it exits immediately without any output (no text on console, X screen ...).
This is the output
Stefano Melchior [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: aspell-it
Version: 0.60.20060723-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is the message:
Error: The file /usr/lib/aspell/it.rws is not in the proper format.
Wrong endian order.
Dear all,
well I own a PPC
Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:11:50 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Vulnerable code not present
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:35:13AM +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
Subject: libnss-ldap: This bugs come back
Followup-For: Bug #375215
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2
After an upgrade to 251-5.2, during the boot sequence i have an
increasing timeout during udev initialization (16, 32,
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:02:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390726: fixed in firehol 1.231-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
#
tags 289339 pending
Bug#289339: ITP: einstein -- puzzle game inspired by Albert Einstein's puzzle
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 293009 pending
Bug#293009: ITP: cunit -- Unit
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.54.dfsg.1-1
Severity: grave
After an update from 8.50-1.1 ps2pdf segfaults with a ps file generated
by dvi2ps.
| Starting program: /usr/bin/gs -dSAFER -dCompatibilityLevel=1.2 -q -dNOPAUSE
-dBATCH -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=pdf/user.pdf.new -dSAFER
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 390789 grave
Bug#390789: apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1 postinst error
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
merge 390789 390786
Bug#390786: apache2.2-common: cannot touch /var/log/apache2/error.log
Bug#390789: apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1 postinst
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390136: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390106: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390133: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 390855 openoffice.org
Bug#390855: openoffice.org-calc: segfault when creating/manipulating charts
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-calc' to `openoffice.org'.
severity 390855 grave
Bug#390855: openoffice.org-calc: segfault when
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 390762 grave
Bug#390762: openoffice.org is crashing on startup
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
reaasign 390762 openoffice.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
close 390762 2.0.4~rc3-1
Bug#390762: openoffice.org is
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:06:01 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390128: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 307575 grave
Bug#307575: cross-site scripting attack via redirect parameter (CAN-2005-1308)
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi.
I don't see any reason why this is a serious bug, neither a bug at all,
apart from preventing Tomcat entering etch.
Like other libraries, it is the local administrator's responsibility to
set the CLASSPATH accordingly or, in Tomcat's case, use the common and
shared directories, as you already
Thanks for dealing with the bug so fast!
The source package appear to contain the same file:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39.orig.tar.gz
e2fsprogs-1.39/doc/draft-leach-uuids-guids-01.txt
Steve Langasek suggested on debian-legal that asking for permission
from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 390329 + moreinfo + unreproducible
Unknown tag/s: +.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental
Package: apache2-common
Version: 2.0.55-4.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hey ho,
Removing apache2-common ...
Stopping apache 2.0 web server...apache2:
Syntax error on line 116 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf:
Syntax error on line 1 of
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:02:32PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Thanks for dealing with the bug so fast!
The source package appear to contain the same file:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39.orig.tar.gz
e2fsprogs-1.39/doc/draft-leach-uuids-guids-01.txt
Ola Lundqvist:
Roland and Per: Please try this new version that is uploaded to
debian today.
It works now, in version 1.2.9-20. Thanks!
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Jaako,
thanks for taking time to investigate this bug.
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 08:20:10PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
Somehow I suspect that trac needs versioned dep to python-subversion...
Can you reproduce this with python-subversion 1.4.0 ?
(provides python2.4-subversion ...)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
severity 388457 minor
thanks
Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
Hi.
I don't see any reason why this is a serious bug, neither a bug at all,
apart from preventing Tomcat entering etch.
Like other libraries, it is the local administrator's responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 388457 minor
Bug#388457: tomcat5 don't find the ejc.jar
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
severity 385486 normal
thanks
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:25:47PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
severity 385486 serious
thanks
The severity justification for this bug is innappropriate. However, the
severity looks correct considering that, unless someone knows
differently, removing the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 385486 normal
Bug#385486: RM: mcvs [ia64 mipsel s390 sparc] -- RoM; FTBFS
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:02:32PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Thanks for dealing with the bug so fast!
The source package appear to contain the same file:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39.orig.tar.gz
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 389681 Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable
or method `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Reports undefined variable and fails
Changed Bug title.
close 389681 0.0.55
Bug#389681: Retrieving
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 389681
Bug#389681: Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or
method `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to
Package: electricsheep
Version: 2.6.8-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Running electricsheep from command line gets the following
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~] electricsheep
X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
Major opcode of failed request:
Works fine for me on a laptop, have you tried putting the return clause *before* ldap ? If so please close the bug... I'd like to see it in etch! :)# /etc/nsswitch.conf## Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch functionality.
# If you have the `glibc-doc' and `info' packages installed,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 386831 - experimental
Bug#386831: User tomcat5 problem after removing tomcat5 but keeping tomcat5.5
Tags were: help experimental
Tags removed: experimental
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
