Bug#389010: Additional information

Just resent my mail since the I sent it to "389010-submitter" by mistake and thus it did not reach the maintainers. (I had better read the BTS-instructions carefully *before* sending the information for the first time; sorry for that.) regards, Vivenzio > I also had this problem and solved it by

Bug#398797: gradm: fails to install

Quoting Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > BTW, given the contents of this debconf message, is it better to remove the > > package anyway...? > Ouch, I should have noted all debconf translators that this package is > _deprecated_

Bug#399010: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#399010: runtime error: file file:///usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/xhtml/profile-chunk-code.xsl line 253 element apply-templates

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:45:18AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:04:31PM -0500, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Package: xsltproc > > Version: 1.1.18-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > I can no longer build the gimp-help package with xsltproc

Bug#399010: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#399010: runtime error: file file:///usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/xhtml/profile-chunk-code.xsl line 253 element apply-templates

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:04:31PM -0500, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: xsltproc > Version: 1.1.18-1 > Severity: serious > > I can no longer build the gimp-help package with xsltproc 1.1.18-1. It > worked fine with 1.1.17. It fails at this: > > -- Building HTML for cs > cd ./ht

Bug#399009: marked as done (kcontrol: Does not show any configuration options)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:37:43 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line kcontrol: Does not show any configuration options has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#399010: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#399010: runtime error: file file:///usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/xhtml/profile-chunk-code.xsl line 253 element apply-templates

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:04:31PM -0500, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: xsltproc > Version: 1.1.18-1 > Severity: serious > > I can no longer build the gimp-help package with xsltproc 1.1.18-1. It > worked fine with 1.1.17. It fails at this: > > -- Building HTML for cs > cd ./ht

Bug#399016: kaddressbook: Data loss, involving strange file duplication and locking problems

Package: kaddressbook Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have noticed this behavior for some time, since back in KDE 3.4.x at least, but this is the last straw, so I'm filing a bug. A week or so ago I entered a few new contacts into my KDE

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#398962: i82365 driver behaves very badly in vmware

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 398962 390809 391962 Bug#398962: i82365 driver behaves very badly in vmware Bug#390809: Error message from pcmcia (i82365) Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged: Bug 390809 is not in the same package as 398962 > reas

Bug#399010: runtime error: file file:///usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/xhtml/profile-chunk-code.xsl line 253 element apply-templates

Package: xsltproc Version: 1.1.18-1 Severity: serious I can no longer build the gimp-help package with xsltproc 1.1.18-1. It worked fine with 1.1.17. It fails at this: -- Building HTML for cs cd ./html/cs && \ /usr/bin/xsltproc --nonet --xinclude \ --stringparam l10n.gentex

Bug#399009: kcontrol: Does not show any configuration options

Package: kcontrol Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable kcontrol, when launched, does not present any configuration options -- the entire left pane is blank. On launch, it gives the following error message into the terminal: kcontrol: WARNING: No K me

Processed: reopening 318123, tagging 318123, merging 318123 399003

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22 > # bug was incorrectly marked as "fixed", got closed in the BTS pass > reopen 318123 Bug#318123: [CVE-2006-0061] xlockmore: xlock segfaults with libpam-opensc, returns to user session

Bug#392964: marked as done (ptex-bin: purging the package fails (mktexlsr unavailable))

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:32:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392964: fixed in ptex-bin 3.1.10~beta3+0.04b-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#398781: marked as done (ptex-bin: postrm fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ptex-bin.postrm: line 43: update-texmf: command not found)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:32:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392964: fixed in ptex-bin 3.1.10~beta3+0.04b-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#398782: marked as done (jbibtex-bin: postrm purge fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/jbibtex-bin.postrm: line 24: update-texmf: command not found)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:32:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392964: fixed in ptex-bin 3.1.10~beta3+0.04b-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: Re: ptex-bin: postrm fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ptex-bin.postrm: line 43: update-texmf: command not found

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 398781 patch Bug#398781: ptex-bin: postrm fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ptex-bin.postrm: line 43: update-texmf: command not found There were no tags set. Bug#392964: ptex-bin: purging the package fails (mktexlsr unavailable) Bug#398782: jbibtex-bin: p

Bug#398781: ptex-bin: postrm fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ptex-bin.postrm: line 43: update-texmf: command not found

tags 398781 patch thanks Hi Masayuki, As promised, here is the patch for the 0-day NMU which I've prepared for ptex-bin. The NMU will be uploaded shortly. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and

Bug#399003: xlock accepts empty password if opie is in the pam auth stack

Package: xlockmore Version: 5.22-1.1 Severity: grave | krb:/etc/pam.d# grep -v '^#' common-auth | authsufficient pam_opie.so | authrequiredpam_unix.so Now when I run xlock, it will accept just any password. Sometimes I even see the opie challenge just before xlock is gone.

Processed: forcibly merging 398368 398996

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22 > forcemerge 398368 398996 Bug#398368: mimedefang: installation fails: chown: `defang:smmsp': invalid group Bug#398996: mimedefang: postinst failure: tries chown to inexistant group smm

Bug#397469: #397469 was a bug in python-adns

Hi Yavor, On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Yavor Doganov wrote: > It seems that this was a bug in python-adns, since today 1.1.0-2 entered > testing and straw behaves as expected (without your patch). I'm so > sorry that I didn't test it with python-adns from unstable. python-adns 1.1.0-2 doesn't fix the p

Bug#397828: marked as done (efp: no game in the package)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:47:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#397828: fixed in efp 1.4-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: efp: diff for NMU version 1.4-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 397828 + patch Bug#397828: efp: no game in the package Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#397859: marked as done (elinks: Can't build twice in same source tree - insufficient cleanup)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:32:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#397859: fixed in elinks 0.11.1-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#397828: efp: diff for NMU version 1.4-1.1

tags 397828 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my efp 1.4-1.1 NMU. diff -Nru /tmp/yZM03XRMOb/efp-1.4/debian/changelog /tmp/Xmqu9ova6d/efp-1.4/debian/changelog --- /tmp/yZM03XRMOb/efp-1.4/debian/changelog2006-11-17 02:31:55.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/Xmqu9ova6d/efp-1.4/debian/changelo

Processed: elinks: diff for NMU version 0.11.1-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 397859 + patch Bug#397859: elinks: Can't build twice in same source tree - insufficient cleanup Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#397859: elinks: diff for NMU version 0.11.1-1.1

tags 397859 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my elinks 0.11.1-1.1 NMU. diff -Nru /tmp/l8xl4IWYPU/elinks-0.11.1/debian/changelog /tmp/5M6mniFYRl/elinks-0.11.1/debian/changelog --- /tmp/l8xl4IWYPU/elinks-0.11.1/debian/changelog 2006-11-17 02:26:06.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/5M6mniFY

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:21:39AM +0100, Frederic Schutz wrote: > Here is where I am with this bug. > postinst calls /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/restart.sh, which itself > calls /etc/init.d/apache2 restart. > If the restart fails with exit value != 0, the execution of the scripts > stops, thus m

Bug#396704: marked as done (nut-usb: newhidups (2.0.4-2.1) does not find UPS device)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:47:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#396704: fixed in nut 2.0.4-2.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 396704 + patch Bug#396704: nut-usb: newhidups (2.0.4-2.1) does not find UPS device Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Processed: Re: Bug#398922: advi: Installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 398922 important Bug#398922: advi: Installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

Here is where I am with this bug. postinst calls /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/restart.sh, which itself calls /etc/init.d/apache2 restart. If the restart fails with exit value != 0, the execution of the scripts stops, thus making postinst fail. If I replace /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/restart.sh b

Bug#398996: mimedefang: postinst failure: tries chown to inexistant group smmsp

Package: mimedefang Version: 2.57-1 Severity: serious Justification: renders package uninstallable As the subject says: postinst tries to chown /var/spool/MIMEDefang to defang:smmsp, but the smmsp group doesn't exist. This is probably a result of not depending on sendmail anymore. -- System Infor

Bug#398922: advi: Installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib

severity 398922 important thanks On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 04:39:48PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > According to the Debian Policy as well as the etch release policy (5 c > in the latter document), packages are RC if they do not follow the FHS. > advi installs architecture-independent TeX input file

Bug#396704: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.3

tags 396704 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my nut 2.0.4-2.3 NMU. diff -Nru /tmp/UcyTWRkxv3/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog /tmp/8ucH3sh4Yv/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog --- /tmp/UcyTWRkxv3/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog 2006-11-17 01:28:46.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/8ucH3sh4Yv/nut-2.0.4/debian/

Bug#398997: Please provide a s390 binary package

Package: vnstat Version: 1.4-4 Severity: serious The source package vnstat is arch-any and it builds fine on s390. Therefore, I see no reason for not providing a s390 binary package. This is a RC bug, because it downgrades the quality of the release for this package. The post [1] asks the porters

Processed: forcibly merging 398584 398987

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22 > forcemerge 398584 398987 Bug#398584: php5-imap needs to be recompiled against PHP 5.2.0 Bug#398987: Impossible to install php5-imap Bug#398800: php5-imap: Impossible to install the pa

Bug#396704: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.2

2006/11/17, Arnaud Quette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ... > Would it be enough to drop the '| hotplug' from the dependencies? I don't > think anyone's really using hotplug today in etch, I'm surprised to see that > it's still in the archive at all. ok, in this case, the nmu would suit me fine. I fo

Bug#398209: marked as done (hyperestraier: FTBFS: upstream build rules look in $(HOME) for includes)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:42:34 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line hyperestraier: FTBFS: upstream build rules look in $(HOME) for includes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#396704: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.2

2006/11/17, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:59:45PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: > it's not sufficient (otherwise I would have quickly done it ;-) since > it only addresses udev enabled systems so post 2.6.3 kernels iirc. > for previous release, hotplug rules are sti

Bug#398987: Impossible to install php5-imap

Package: php5-imap Version: 5.1.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable at install time, I have the following message : colibri:~# apt-get install php5-imap Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that

Bug#396704: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.2

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:59:45PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: > it's not sufficient (otherwise I would have quickly done it ;-) since > it only addresses udev enabled systems so post 2.6.3 kernels iirc. > for previous release, hotplug rules are still needed. So there should > be some test done ate

Bug#398797: gradm: fails to install

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > BTW, given the contents of this debconf message, is it better to remove the > package anyway...? Ouch, I should have noted all debconf translators that this package is _deprecated_ and it does not worth translating it. Well, they seen it a

Bug#398799: marked as done (modprobe -q dm-crypt breaks initscripts)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:17:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#398799: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#398401: marked as done (freeswan: unpack fails: trying to overwrite `/etc/init.d/ipsec', which is also in package openswan)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:32:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#398401: fixed in freeswan 2.04-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#396528: marked as done (hunspell: FTBFS on arm: 3 tests failed)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:32:50 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#396528: fixed in hunspell 1.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#398830: marked as done (xfonts-x3270-misc: postrm purge fails: mkfontdir: command not found)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:32:53 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#398830: fixed in ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#398880: marked as done (exim4_4.63.20061115-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dep)

din by sbuild/sparc 79 | Build started at 20061116-0733 | ** | Checking available source versions... | Fetching source files... | Reading Package Lists... | Building Dependency Tree... | Need to get 2036kB of source archives.

Bug#394954: marked as done (xfonts-x3270-misc: postrm script assumes mkfontdir(1) is installed)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:32:53 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#398830: fixed in ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#394954: marked as done (xfonts-x3270-misc: postrm script assumes mkfontdir(1) is installed)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:32:53 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#394954: fixed in ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#398772: marked as done (bcfg2: postrm fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/bcfg2.postrm: line 25: syntax error near unexpected token `do')

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:32:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#398772: fixed in bcfg2 0.8.6.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#398830: marked as done (xfonts-x3270-misc: postrm purge fails: mkfontdir: command not found)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:32:53 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#394954: fixed in ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#397830: xsabre: It does _not_ work on powerpc

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:18:47PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Well, it sure sounds like an endianness problem to me. Looks like I was right. src/txtrmap.C, line 218: fread(&map_w,sizeof(map_w),1,f); fread(&map_h,sizeof(map_h),1,f); fread(&n,sizeof(n),1,f); Fixing this specific ca

Processed: Re: Bug#398880: exim4_4.63.20061115-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dep

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags #398880 confirmed pending Bug#398880: exim4_4.63.20061115-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dep There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#398797: gradm: fails to install

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 06:23:40PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > An exit code of 30 happens if the message isn't displayed to the user. > > Since the input happens at critical priority in debconf, the obvious > > explanation would have been that you were using the non-interactive > > frontend

Bug#397830: xsabre: It does _not_ work on powerpc

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 10:54:03PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I confirm I can reproduce this bug on powerpc. I'll be happy to help > debugging it. Well, it sure sounds like an endianness problem to me. For starters, try running it in gdb and print the backtrace? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: h

Bug#390968: marked as done (gnutls12: not to be released)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:21:41 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#398880: exim4_4.63.20061115-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dep

tags #398880 confirmed pending thanks On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:33:02AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > your package failed to build from source, probably because of a > missing build-dep on libsqlite3-dev. *waah* Fixed in svn. Greetings Marc --

Bug#397830: xsabre: It does _not_ work on powerpc

"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/11/2006): > The original submitter was using powerpc; you are using i386. That's > quite probably related... Hi, I confirm I can reproduce this bug on powerpc. I'll be happy to help debugging it. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois PS: I'm now on-list.

Bug#365234: marked as done (libtasn1-2: Please patch to fix CVE-2006-0645 security issue)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:22:23 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#306822: marked as done (nvu_0.99+1.0pre-1(mipsel/unstable): uses old version of mozilla)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:22:57 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#352182: marked as done (Crash in the ASN.1 DER decoder)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:22:23 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#396704: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.2

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:59:45PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: > [quickly passing by, since I just had my 2nd baby this morning ;-) ... ] Congratulations :-) > it's not sufficient (otherwise I would have quickly done it ;-) since > it only addresses udev enabled systems so post 2.6.3 kernels iirc

Bug#323741: muse-el: FTBFS: emacs not found

tags 323741 + moreinfo unreproducible tags 323741 - patch thanks On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 01:17:57PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: >> Setting up emacs21 (21.4a+1-1) ... >> [...] >> Done >> [...] >> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/muse-el-3.02.8/examples' >> EMACS=emacs SITEFLAG=--no-site-f

Bug#397830: xsabre: It works here

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:38:05PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote: > I can't reproduce this here. sabresdl works fine in 8, 16 and 24 bit, so > I guess this shouldn't be grave. The original submitter was using powerpc; you are using i386. That's quite probably related... /* Steinar */ -- Homepage:

Processed: Re: muse-el: FTBFS: emacs not found

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 323741 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#323741: FTBFS: Cannot find emacs Tags were: patch Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > tags 323741 - patch Bug#323741: FTBFS: Cannot find emacs Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo patch Tags removed: patch >

Bug#396704: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.2

[quickly passing by, since I just had my 2nd baby this morning ;-) ... ] 2006/11/16, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: tags 396704 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my nut 2.0.4-2.2 NMU. it's not sufficient (otherwise I would have quickly done it ;-) since it only addresses

Processed: tagging 396528

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25 > tags 396528 + patch Bug#396528: hunspell: FTBFS on arm: 3 tests failed There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: Re: Bug#398944: Empty Global Modules Index

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 398944 normal Bug#398944: Empty Global Modules Index Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Processed: found 397659 in 2.2.33-5, closing 397659

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25 > found 397659 2.2.33-5 Bug#397659: jspwiki: FTBFS: source code not available Bug marked as found in version 2.2.33-5. > close 397659 2.2.33.ds1-1 Bug#397659: jspwiki: FTBFS: source co

Bug#398944: Empty Global Modules Index

severity 398944 normal thanks Matt Kern writes: > Subject: Empty Global Modules Index > Package: python2.3-doc > Version: 2.3.5-11.1 > Severity: grave > > The Global Modules Index on the above package is empty. Quickly > downloading a couple of pristine debs from ftp.debian.org and unpacking > t

Processed: Package is currently useless

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package em8300 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: em8300 > severity 342377 grave Bug#342377: Fails to build with 2.6.14 Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trackin

Processed: trivial patch to fix 398369 by adding dependency on defoma.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 398369 + patch Bug#398369: xfonts-baekmuk: installation fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/xfonts-baekmuk.postinst: line 11: /usr/bin/defoma-font: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#398369: trivial patch to fix 398369 by adding dependency on defoma.

tags 398369 + patch thanks Adding a dependency on defoma fixes this problem. Patch attached. -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson diff -ur xfonts-baekmuk-2.2/debian/control xfonts-baekmuk-2.2.fixed/debian/control --- xfonts-baekmuk-2.2/debian/control 2006-11-16 18:53:27.0 +0100 +++ xfonts-

Bug#398824: remstats: postrm purge fails: /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/apache-uninclude_all.sh: No such file or directory

> Pre-Depends are not guaranteed to be installed at purge time, only essential > packages are. This cleanup needs to either happen in the postrm remove > target instead of in the purge target, or it needs to be done conditionally > on purge, depending on the nature of the clean-up. I think I'll

Bug#398797: gradm: fails to install

> No, it exits because db_input is supposed to *display* it to the user as > necessary, and the return value informs the caller whether this is actually > done -- in the general case you get a 30 return /after/ it's been shown to > the user, since the first time it's called is normally when it does

Bug#398922: Bug#398920: advi: Documentation not available

Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Frank Küster wrote: >>> After installing advi, no documenation is available. The reason is that >>> the manual.pdf is hidden in the advi-examples package. The easiest fix >>> is probably to rename advi-exampl

Bug#398824: remstats: postrm purge fails: /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/apache-uninclude_all.sh: No such file or directory

> Pre-Depends are not guaranteed to be installed at purge time, only essential > packages are. This cleanup needs to either happen in the postrm remove > target instead of in the purge target, or it needs to be done conditionally > on purge, depending on the nature of the clean-up. Then moving t

Bug#398797: gradm: fails to install

> An exit code of 30 happens if the message isn't displayed to the user. > Since the input happens at critical priority in debconf, the obvious > explanation would have been that you were using the non-interactive > frontend. The config script is buggy anyway, since the question will only > be dis

Bug#398695: FTBFS: latex errors

Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is a patch that would fixe the three bugs that receive this > report. Sorry, there was an error in the patch. I hate dpatch, or it hates me. Here's the correct version, Regards, Frank diff -Nur advi-1.6.0.old/debian/advi-doc.examples advi-1

Bug#398245: postfix - FTBFS: error: 'xsasl_getconfpath' undeclared here (not in a function)

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 19:53 +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > I'm attaching a new version of 10tls.dpatch where this change is made. Sorry, the file I attached was a temporary one that I used for testing. Please don't use it. Here's the correct version. -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1

Bug#398245: postfix - FTBFS: error: 'xsasl_getconfpath' undeclared here (not in a function)

Package: postfix Version: 2.3.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #398245 On some platforms, SASL_VERSION_* is apparently not defined when the preprocessors is processing src/xsasl/xsasl_cyrus_common.h. At least that's the only explanation I can think of. So including sasl.h in that file should fix this. I'm a

Processed: postfix - FTBFS: error: 'xsasl_getconfpath' undeclared here (not in a function)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 398245 + patch Bug#398245: postfix - FTBFS: error: 'xsasl_getconfpath' undeclared here (not in a function) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trackin

Bug#394418: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

On 11/16/06 Stephen Gran wrote: > > > Contact Vince Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for access to arm machines for > > > build tests. I have told him to expect an email from you. > > > > He has a netwinder that he's granting access to? A shell account on a > > machine where the build failure doesn't

Bug#397759: fails to configure: mv: cannot stat `/etc/chrony/chrony.keys.1.21-2': No such file or directory

> Any progress on this? Yes. I have fix for this and another more serious bug. I just need to find time to get the package built and tested. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Bug#398944: Empty Global Modules Index

Subject: Empty Global Modules Index Package: python2.3-doc Version: 2.3.5-11.1 Severity: grave The Global Modules Index on the above package is empty. Quickly downloading a couple of pristine debs from ftp.debian.org and unpacking them shows the problem: $ ls -l /tmp/docs/python2.3-doc_2.3.5-*/

Processed: Re: FTBFS: latex errors

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 398695 patch Bug#398695: FTBFS: latex errors There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > tags 398922 patch Bug#398922: advi: Installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > tags 398920 patch Bug#398920: adv

Processed: patch to fix postrm failure in xfonts-x3270-misc.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 394954 + patch Bug#394954: xfonts-x3270-misc: postrm script assumes mkfontdir(1) is installed There were no tags set. Bug#398830: xfonts-x3270-misc: postrm purge fails: mkfontdir: command not found Tags added: patch > tags 398830 + patch Bug#39883

Bug#398370: wrong version number in patch.

Oops... Wrong version number in patch! Should have been "0.0.1-3.1" instead of "0.0.1-4". -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390615: marked as done (aspell-it: Wrong endianess in it.pws)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:47:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390615: fixed in aspell-it 0.60.20060723ds1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#394954: patch to fix postrm failure in xfonts-x3270-misc.

tags 394954 + patch tags 398830 + patch thanks Attached patch should fix postrm issues in xfonts-x3270-misc. See debian/changelog part of the patch for description of changes. Patch attached. -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson diff -ur ibm-3270-3.3.4p6.orig/debian/changelog ibm-3270-3.3.4p6/debian

Bug#398922: FTBFS: latex errors

tags 398695 patch tags 398922 patch tags 398920 patch thanks Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This bug is very strange: It's easily reproducible with pbuilder, even > if I log into the chroot and build manually with dpkg-buildpackage. > However, if I call the Makefile targets manually, t

Processed: merge postrm failure bugs.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 398830 394954 Bug#398830: xfonts-x3270-misc: postrm purge fails: mkfontdir: command not found Bug#394954: xfonts-x3270-misc: postrm script assumes mkfontdir(1) is installed Forcibly Merged 394954 398830. > thanks Stopping processing here. P

Bug#397412: wmaker: Wmaker crash on creating desktop

On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 10:35:02AM +0500, jamhed wrote: > It doesnt crash :) Aieee :-) OK, here's a version of wmaker built with -g -O2 (the other one was built with -g -O0 -DDEBUG). Is it capable of giving a proper backtrace? http://people.debian.org/~sesse/wmaker_0.92.0-6.1~debug2_i386.deb

Bug#393711: libnss-mdns: /etc/nsswitch.conf configuration is broken

Hi, This is a followup for Debian bug . On Tue, Oct 17, 2006, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Sure, the line upstream recommends has also one disadvantage, which is > that it is inherently incompatible with unicast DNS domains called > .local. But that's the wa

Bug#398370: patch to transition xfonts-knickers away from /usr/X11R6.

tags 398370 + patch tags 395796 + patch tags 362388 + patch thanks I've updated the xfont-knickers package to hopefully current standards. See top of patch (debian/changelog) for full change descriptions. Patch attached. -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson diff -ur xfonts-knickers-0.0.1.orig/debian/

Bug#396704: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.2

tags 396704 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my nut 2.0.4-2.2 NMU. diff -Nru /tmp/LRfH3vNJyo/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog /tmp/xC08KP7paL/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog --- /tmp/LRfH3vNJyo/nut-2.0.4/debian/changelog 2006-11-16 15:46:23.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/xC08KP7paL/nut-2.0.4/debian/

Processed: nut: diff for NMU version 2.0.4-2.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 396704 + patch Bug#396704: nut-usb: newhidups (2.0.4-2.1) does not find UPS device There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#398936: libapache2-mod-ifier: The module breaks POST processing

Package: libapache2-mod-ifier Version: 0.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This module, when installed and enabled, breaks all processing of POST requests. It should be removed from Etch until it can be updated to work correctly. -- System Information: Debian Rel

Processed: patch to transition xfonts-knickers away from /usr/X11R6.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 398370 + patch Bug#398370: xfonts-knickers: installation fails: /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontdir: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > tags 395796 + patch Bug#395796: xfonts-knickers: missing build target in debian/rules

Bug#397759: fails to configure: mv: cannot stat `/etc/chrony/chrony.keys.1.21-2': No such file or directory

On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:11:05PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > I will add your patch as it makes the script more robust. I won't be able > to get to it until this weekend. Any progress on this? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Processed: Re: Bug#398923: ttf-opensymbol: postinst fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # I'd consider it grave, as it was once for fontconfig but now is > important > severity 398923 important Bug#398923: ttf-opensymbol: postinst fails Severity set to `important' from `grave' > reassign 398923 fontconfig Bug#398923: ttf-opensymbol:

  1   2   >