Bug#400066: marked as done (lcdproc_0.5.1-2(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: impossible constraint in asm)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#400066: fixed in lcdproc 0.5.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#393725: marked as done (Destar is unable to restart op-panel daemon)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 06:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393725: fixed in destar 0.2.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#398380: marked as done (op-panel: postinst fails: adduser: The group `asterisk' does not exist.)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 06:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#398380: fixed in op-panel 0.26.dfsg-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: your mail

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 393725 destar Bug#393725: Destar is unable to restart op-panel daemon Bug reassigned from package `op-panel' to `destar'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Bug#379628: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Bug#379628: CALL FOR HELP: Vista beta compatibility testing

2006-12-08 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Ok, I've now also successfully tested this with win2000 in addition to Vista in response to Frans' concern. Szaka, I would assume that your patch should work for XP and 2003 as well. Do you agree? What about NT4? (VOLUME_MOUNTED_ON_NT4 appears to be some sort of compatibility flag?) Cheers, An

Bug#402259: To add

2006-12-08 Thread David Broome
This package still works with the testing version, but the package itself resides in unstable so it would seem that the package would support that distrubution. Also, deleting the pre-removal script was easier than downgrading. I don't know why I didn't try that sooner. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Processed (with 1 errors): merge

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 402194 serious Bug#402194: libocc-x11: FTBFS: cp: missing destination file operand after `oo2crc.tmp' Severity set to `serious' from `important' > merge 402194 394638 Bug#394638: uninstallable, /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig: No such file or director

Bug#402260: gossip: Quits with symbol lookup error when I receive a message

2006-12-08 Thread Sam Morris
Package: gossip,libnotify1 Version: gossip/0.19-2,libnotify1/0.4.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: dependencies not tight enough (rendering package unusable) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When I receive a message, Gossip quits. The following is printed to the console: gossip:

Bug#402259: sysv-rc-bootsplash: fails to install or remove

2006-12-08 Thread David Broome
Package: sysv-rc-bootsplash Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I try to install I get this error Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package sysv-rc-bootsplash. (Reading database ... 109388 files and directories currently installed

Bug#402213: marked as done (neon26: FTBFS on 64-bit platforms: libneon26.pc patch rejected)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 02:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#402213: fixed in neon26 0.26.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#402241: spamassassin needs more than 512MB to process innocent 2.5MB email

2006-12-08 Thread Duncan Findlay
It's generally a bad idea (i.e. not supported) to stick messages larger than 250k through spamassassin. The spamc client refuses to check messages larger than this size, and the example procmailrc in /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/examples/procmailrc.example mentions this. The only reason I haven't c

Bug#401920: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: doesn't start, crash instead

2006-12-08 Thread Ricardo Mones
tags 401920 unreproducible moreinfo severity 401920 important thanks On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:39:28 + Fabien COUTANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2 > Version: 2.6.0-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > From an xterm: > $ cd # go to home d

Processed: Re: Bug#401920: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: doesn't start, crash instead

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 401920 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#401920: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: doesn't start, crash instead There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > severity 401920 important Bug#401920: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: doesn't start, crash instead Sev

Bug#402241: spamassassin needs more than 512MB to process innocent 2.5MB email

2006-12-08 Thread Santiago Vila
For the record: A very similar problem is reported in the spamassassin bug tracking system: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3296 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#402245: Package fails with ghc6 6.6

2006-12-08 Thread Bryan Donlan
Package: libghc6-plugins-dev Version: 0.9.10-3.4 Severity: grave The test program (based on the example in the hs-plugins docs) at http://etc.uguu.us/hsplugins-test.tbz2 works with: ii ghc6 6.4.1-2 ii libghc6-plugins-dev 0.9.10-1 ii libghc6-src-exts-de

Processed: severity of 402100 is serious

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > severity 402100 serious Bug#402100: enigma: 1.00 beta should not enter etch Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: Re: Bug#375988: procmail: Segmentation fault

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 375988 serious Bug#375988: procmail: Segmentation fault Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > clone 375988 -1 Bug#375988: procmail: Segmentation fault Bug 375988 cloned as bug 402241. > tags 375988 help Bug#375988: procmail: Segmentation

Bug#401045: marked as done (Subject: PHP5 5.2.0 has a class DateTime, as does phpgroupware 0.9.16)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:02:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401045: fixed in phpgroupware 0.9.16.011-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 213260 pending Bug#213260: pine-tracker: Please use debconf for announcing new versions There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 292528 pending Bug#292528: pine: postinstall asks q

Processed: "only" important

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 400121 important Bug#400121: CVE-2006-6015: Buffer overflow in konqueror Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#400121: "only" important

2006-12-08 Thread Andreas Barth
severity 400121 important thanks Hi, though this is a security bug, it is not bad enough to warrant RC-grade: 23:52 < jmm> aba: non-issue 23:53 < jmm> aba: browser-crashes w/o potential for code injection don't need to be RC Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSC

Bug#402220: portmap: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2006-12-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: portmap Version: 5-23 Severity: serious Hi, When upgradeing portmap, I get the following error: Setting up portmap (5-23) ... dpkg: error processing portmap (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: portmap

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-08 Thread Mohammed Sameer
owner 400923 ! thanks > setting the HOME environmental variable a Oops. Meant DISPLAY -- GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group Member. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read h

Processed: Re: Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 400923 ! Bug#400923: gdm: $DISPLAY variable not set Owner recorded as Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#401045: NMU uploaded

2006-12-08 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, I uploaded an NMU of your package. Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for etch. Please find the used diff below. Cheers, Andi diff -ur ../phpgroupware-0.9.16.011~/debian/changelog ../phpgroupware-0.9.16.011/debian/changelog --- ../phpgroupware-0.9.16.

Bug#401895: marked as done (gnupg2: [CVE-2006-6235] remotely controllable function pointer)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401913: fixed in gnupg2 2.0.0-5.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#401913: marked as done (CVE-2006-6235: arbitrary indirect call in GnuPG)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401913: fixed in gnupg2 2.0.0-5.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#398466: marked as done (hostapd 0.5.5-3 serious regression with madwifi)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#398466: fixed in hostapd 1:0.5.5-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#400923: (no subject)

2006-12-08 Thread Mohammed Sameer
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:07:29AM -0500, Jeff Beaird wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > >The point is that, according to the bug submitter, programs being run > >*under* multi-gnome-terminal don't have $DISPLAY set in their environment. > > > >It may indeed still not be an m-g-t bug, but at least

Bug#401913: NMU uploaded

2006-12-08 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, I uploaded an NMU of your package. Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for etch. Please find the used diff below. Cheers, Andi diff -Nur ../gnupg2-2.0.0~~/debian/changelog ../gnupg2-2.0.0/debian/changelog --- ../gnupg2-2.0.0~~/debian/changelog 2006-12-

Processed: forcibly merging 401273 397497 402093

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > forcemerge 401273 397497 402093 Bug#401273: mldonkey-server: error on post-install on upgrade Bug#397497: debian/utils/mldonkey_users is incompatible with multiuser-style users.ini B

Bug#398466: NMU Ready

2006-12-08 Thread Matt Brown
The fix described in the third post is incorrect. The backported patches applied in -3 have already reordered this part of the code so that it works correctly with madwifi. Unfortunately that backport missed the final component of the fix, which was to all the hostapd_flush_old_stations call to fa

Bug#402094: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.8: Intel drivers (net/e100.c, net/e1000/e1000_main.c))

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 23:10:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This is not a vulnerability has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#402213: neon26: FTBFS on 64-bit platforms: libneon26.pc patch rejected

2006-12-08 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: neon26 Version: 0.26.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Your latest neon26 upload, while otherwise laudable, breaks on 64-bit platforms because the library-renaming patch does not (fully) apply; see, for instance, http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=neon2

Bug#393062: FTBFS: i-csstli.adb:55:01: (style) multiple blank lines

2006-12-08 Thread Alex de Oliveira Silva
Even though this a simple fix, I provide anyhow a patch for it. (the patch is attached to this email) But now I see this errors. gcc-4.1 -c -gnatfno -O3 -gnatg -g -I- -gnatA -gnatpg /home/enerv/debian/libadabindx-0.7.2/build/i-csstli.adb i-csstli.adb:52:04: warning: "Elmt_Size" is not modified

Bug#401920: more info ?

2006-12-08 Thread Colin Leroy
Hi, Are you configuring an IMAP server? if so, which version of libetpan do you have installed? Thanks, -- Colin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 401843 is important

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > severity 401843 important Bug#401843: /usr/bin/gpg-agent: gpg-agent sometimes get stuck and stops working Severity set to `important' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processi

Bug#401845: marked as done (Tries to use gconf but you don't need have gconf2 installed)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401845: fixed in gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#399214: marked as done (solfege: Fails to upgrade (3.0.6-1 -> 3.6.3-1); cannot remove it as well)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:47:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#399214: fixed in solfege 3.6.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#398205: closed by Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: alexandria: Pulling information from internet sources does not work at all)

2006-12-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
found 398205 0.6.1-1 thanks On 2006-11-13 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-11-13 Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > From: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Version: 0.6.1-1 > [...] > > > I assume the alexandria 0.6.1-

Bug#402200: mysql-server-5.0 upgrade restart mysql even if it wasn't running and reinstall rc.d scripts

2006-12-08 Thread Georges Da Costa
Package: mysql-server-5.0 Version: 5.0.30-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.3.2 After upgrading mysql-server-5.0 the mysql server is running even if it was not before the upgrade. See bug #316321 and #397446 for a patch used to correct the same problem with apache. This is dangerous as

Processed: Re: Bug#398205 closed by Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: alexandria: Pulling information from internet sources does not work at all)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 398205 0.6.1-1 Bug#398205: alexandria: Pulling information from internet sources does not work at all Bug marked as found in version 0.6.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#402191: hercules cannot work with 2.6.18 host kernel, except as root

2006-12-08 Thread Andreas Barth
Package: hercules Version: 3.03.1-1 Severity: grave Hi, hercules tries to setup tun device by itself. However, since 2.6.18, this change has happend in the kernel: [NET]: Require CAP_NET_ADMIN to create tuntap devices. Date: Thu Jun 22 16:07:52 2006 -0700 The "usual" way to deal with

Bug#401398: marked as done (neon26: please put two alternative packages in the shlibs files)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401961: fixed in neon26 0.26.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#401388: marked as done (libneon26-gnutls should not conflict with libneon26)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401961: fixed in neon26 0.26.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#401263: apt-get busted -- again!

2006-12-08 Thread Goedson Teixeira Paixao
I've sent a patch earlier to this bug log that fixed a crash on APT, for me. And, judging by the stack trace you sent, it seems to be the same one affecting me. Try the apt-segfault.diff attached to this message. You may need to apply apt-ftbfs.diff also, if you're not able to compile from the orig

Bug#401961: marked as done (conflicts with libneon26, making most neon-using packages uninstallable)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401961: fixed in neon26 0.26.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#401721: iceape: doesn't start. segfaults.

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 401721 iceape-browser Bug#401721: iceape: doesn't start. segfaults. Bug reassigned from package `iceape' to `iceape-browser'. > severity 401721 grave Bug#401721: iceape: doesn't start. segfaults. Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > block

Processed:

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 402151 important Bug#402151: MailScanner 4.51.5-1.1 corrupt exim 4.63 spool files Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#402179: tar: FTBFS: race condition in test-suite

2006-12-08 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: tar Version: 1.16-2 Severity: serious Hello Bdale, tar test-suite tests/append02.at has a race condition which cause the test to fail sometimes, and thus the package to FTBFS. echo Creating archive.1 tar cf archive.1 file1 file2 >>>here echo Creating archive.2 tar cfT archive.2

Bug#401556: marked as done (DVD Burn Fails with strange behavior)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:32:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401556: DVD Burn Fails with strange behavior has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Processed: Re: Bug#402175: powersaved: Wrong (constant) battery info when AC is unplugged

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 402175 normal Bug#402175: powersaved: Wrong (constant) battery info when AC is unplugged Severity set to `normal' from `critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Processed: reassign 400783 to linux-2.6, forcibly merging 389803 400783

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > reassign 400783 linux-2.6 Bug#400783: Dom0 crashes with xen-linux-system-2.6.17-2-xen-686=2.6.17-9 Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.17-2-xen-686' to `linux-2.6'. > forcem

Bug#402175: powersaved: Wrong (constant) battery info when AC is unplugged

2006-12-08 Thread Michael Biebl
severity 402175 normal thanks Felix Homann wrote: > Package: powersaved > Version: 0.14.0-6 > Severity: critical > Justification: causes serious data loss > > > On my laptop, when the AC adaptor is unplugged 'powersave -B' reports a > constant battery state (75% charged, 180 minutes left) no ma

Bug#397571: Bug#397676: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#397676: Bug#397571: debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly

2006-12-08 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > debiandoc2latex -s sed_script > > as it can be used with debiandoc2latex{dvi,ps,pdf} I added it to CVS. We need to test it and debug it. But why we need it. since if it is debiandoc2latex, t

Bug#402175: powersaved: Wrong (constant) battery info when AC is unplugged

2006-12-08 Thread Felix Homann
Package: powersaved Version: 0.14.0-6 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss On my laptop, when the AC adaptor is unplugged 'powersave -B' reports a constant battery state (75% charged, 180 minutes left) no matter what the state according to 'acpi -V' is, it doesn't change a

Processed: Re: FTBFS: Unable to find gcc-3.3

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 323742 + patch Bug#323742: FTBFS: Unable to find gcc-3.3 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#323742: FTBFS: Unable to find gcc-3.3

2006-12-08 Thread Alex de Oliveira Silva
Tags 323742 + patch thanks Even though this a simple fix, I provide anyhow a patch for it. (the patch is attached to this email) --- ndiswrapper-modules-i386.orig/debian/control2006-12-08 14:03:36.0 -0300 +++ ndiswrapper-modules-i386-1.1/debian/control 2006-12-08 14:03:10.000

Bug#397676: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#397676: Bug#397571: debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly

2006-12-08 Thread 韓達耐
Hi Frank! From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended > ii texlive-base 2005.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Essential programs and > files > ii texlive-base-bin 2005.dfsg.2-5 TeX Live: Essential binaries > ii t

Bug#402152: marked as done (xmedcon - FTBFS: checking if NIFTI package is complete... no)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
-nifti-prefix. > *** > make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 > ****** > Build finished at 20061208-1149 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: xmedcon Source-Version: 0.9.9.3-

Processed: Re: scim-bridge: installation fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/tamil-gtk2im.postinst: line 7: update-gtk-immodules: command not found

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 398376 + patch Bug#398376: scim-bridge: installation fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/tamil-gtk2im.postinst: line 7: update-gtk-immodules: command not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#398376: scim-bridge: installation fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/tamil-gtk2im.postinst: line 7: update-gtk-immodules: command not found

2006-12-08 Thread Alex de Oliveira Silva
Sorry! The correct patch is this. --- scim-bridge-0.2.4.orig/debian/control 2006-12-08 13:47:37.0 -0300 +++ scim-bridge-0.2.4/debian/control2006-12-08 13:46:33.0 -0300 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Package: scim-bridge Architecture: any -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends},

Bug#398376: scim-bridge: installation fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/tamil-gtk2im.postinst: line 7: update-gtk-immodules: command not found

2006-12-08 Thread Alex de Oliveira Silva
Tags 398376 + patch thanks Even though this a simple fix, I provide anyhow a patch for it. (the patch is attached to this email) --- scim-bridge-0.2.4.orig/debian/control 2006-12-08 13:47:37.0 -0300 +++ scim-bridge-0.2.4/debian/control2006-12-08 13:46:33.0 -0300 @@ -8,

Bug#400894: FTBFS: tries to write in $HOME

2006-12-08 Thread Lex Spoon
The problem is related to bug 397045. The package depends on "ant" and on "gcj" in order to try and get a setup for compiling Java code using ant. I am not sure what the dependencies should be changed to. I will leave it alone for now, in the hopes that the ant and/or gcj maintainers make this c

Bug#397571: marked as done (debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#397571: fixed in debian-reference 1.09-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#397571: Bug#397676: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#397676: Bug#397571: debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly

2006-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:18:07AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote: >> From: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/TeX/reference.zh-tw.tex (in Big5) >> >> Oops, I forgot to run "bin/fixlatex" on it. debiandoc2latex d

Bug#397571: Bug#397676: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#397676: Bug#397571: debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly

2006-12-08 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:18:07AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote: > From: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/TeX/reference.zh-tw.tex (in Big5) > > Oops, I forgot to run "bin/fixlatex" on it. debiandoc2latex doesn't > provide an "s" function like the othe

Bug#383158: marked as done (sbaz: FTBFS: Build-Depends dependency for sbaz cannot be satisfied because the package scala-dev cannot be found)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:16:36 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line sbaz: FTBFS: Build-Depends dependency for sbaz cannot be+satisfied because the package scala-dev cannot be found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#401498: guile-1.8 doesn't work on ia64; likely lilypond regression

2006-12-08 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
The latest version of guile, guile-1.8, does not work on ia64. See #401400 for more information. Because lilypond depends on guile, this causes a problem for further support for lilypond on ia64 in Debian. The latest version of lilypond, 2.8, does not build against guile-1.6.8, and thus requires

Bug#402152: xmedcon - FTBFS: checking if NIFTI package is complete... no

2006-12-08 Thread Roland Marcus Rutschmann
Hi, On Friday 08 December 2006 15:27, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: xmedcon > Version: 0.9.9.3-2 > Severity: serious this is so embarrassing. When I built V-1 I reckecked everything and then uploaded the wrong build package (missing libnifti). When I found out I wanted to upgrade fast before

Bug#392935: marked as done (unable to find a javac compiler)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:18:01 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line unable to find a javac compiler has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#402152: xmedcon - FTBFS: checking if NIFTI package is complete... no

2006-12-08 Thread Bastian Blank
* [configure-stamp] Error 1 > ** > Build finished at 20061208-1149 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#397571: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#397676: Bug#397571: debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly

2006-12-08 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:20:11AM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote: > From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote: > > >> I'm confident that this bug (#397571) is solved after new > > >> deb

Bug#402151: MailScanner 4.51.5-1.1 corrupt exim 4.63 spool files

2006-12-08 Thread Stephane Leclerc
Package: mailscanner Version: 4.51.5-1.1 Severity: serious Hi! If we use $acl_m variable in the Exim configuration, the output spool file is corrupted by mailscanner. Reading the "52.1 Format of the -H file" section of Exim doc, it seems that "-aclm" is not at the right place. It should be befor

Bug#402149: gnash: icon missing/does not start any flash

2006-12-08 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Subject: gnash: icon missing/does not start any flash Package: gnash Version: 0.7.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I get this kind of error when I try to open any flash file. I have tried with flash files from the firefox cache, same result. [EMAIL PROTECTED] /

Bug#402148: doesn't contain source

2006-12-08 Thread Andreas Barth
Package: latex-xft-fonts Version: 0.1-5 Severity: serious Hi, the package claims in its copyright file: These fonts were converted from the LaTeX .pfb forms, and are under the respective licenses of the sources. In this case, it would be good if it would be created from the .pfb-forms "on

Processed: adjusting severity, flightgear package should not enter Etch like this, various bug handling

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the flightgear package is unusable on my machine, maintainer didn't answer, > # somebody should at least confirm or infirm the bug > # breaks unrelated software > severity 372070 grave Bug#372070: flightgear: Flightgear does not start (huge HDD activi

Bug#397571: Bug#397676: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#397676: Bug#397571: debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly

2006-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ii texlive-base-bin 2005.dfsg.2-5 TeX Live: Essential binaries > ii texlive-pdfetex 2005.dfsg.2-5 TeX Live: pdfTeX > [12 > ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [max level recursion of virtual fonts=10]. > >\endgroup

Processed: tagging 402111

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > tags 402111 + upstream fixed-upstream confirmed Bug#402111: new upstream version available Tags were: patch security Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream, confirmed > End of message,

Bug#402111: new upstream version available

2006-12-08 Thread Alex de Oliveira Silva
tags 402111 + patch thanks Only for documentation http://madwifi.org/changeset/1842 (the patch is attached to this email) --- madwifi-0.9.2+r1809.20061115.orig/net80211/ieee80211_wireless.c 2006-12-08 08:29:46.0 -0300 +++ madwifi-0.9.2+r1809.20061115/net80211/ieee80211_wireless.c 2

Processed: (no subject)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 401996 serious Bug#401996: init script fails to stop smstools under some conditions Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Processed: new upstream version available

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 402111 + patch Bug#402111: new upstream version available Tags were: security Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Bug#397676: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#397676: Bug#397571: debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly

2006-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Hi Danai, hi Jens, Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can build it well in my etch system but pbuilder still has issues with > zh-tw: > debiandoc2latexpdf: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly > debiandoc2latexpdf: rerun with the -v option to found out why > debiando

Bug#397571: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#397676: Bug#397571: debian-reference: FTBFS: ERROR: reference.zh-tw.pdf could not be generated properly

2006-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/TeX/reference.zh-tw.tex (in Big5) > > Oops, I forgot to run "bin/fixlatex" on it. debiandoc2latex doesn't > provide an "s" function like the other debiandoc2* comma

Bug#402063: vulnerable to overflow in PS handling (CVE-2006-5864)

2006-12-08 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006, Kees Cook wrote: > > I saw that you updated 0.4 and 0.6, but not 0.1; perhaps you do not > > ship evince 0.1 anymore, but if you do, do you know whether is it > > affected? > The earliest supported evince in Ubuntu is 0.4. As far as I can tell, > if ps/ps.c exists in the

Processed: tagging 401236

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > tags 401236 help Bug#401236: varmon segfaults on alpha There were no tags set. Tags added: help > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: bug 402063 is forwarded to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383485

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > forwarded 402063 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383485 Bug#402063: vulnerable to overflow in PS handling (CVE-2006-5864) Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Processed: pending

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 398169 + pending Bug#398169: lighttpd: invoke-rc.d fails on "force-reload" There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 380080 + pending Bug#380080: lighttpd: logrotate stops servers, and sometimes it does not starts again Tags were: patch

Bug#253356: marked as done (drgeo: depends on experimental libgcc)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:15:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Also fixed in this version (fix v-t) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#254230: marked as done (package built with libgcc1 installed from experimental)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:15:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Also fixed in this version (fix v-t) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#401348: marked as done (sasl2-bin: saslauthd will not start after fresh install)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401348: fixed in cyrus-sasl2 2.1.22.dfsg1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#402111: marked as done (new upstream version available)

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:00:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#402111: new upstream version available has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#402111: new upstream version available

2006-12-08 Thread Uwe Kleine-Koenig
Package: madwifi-source Version: 1:0.9.2+r1809.20061115-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Hello, the new version fixes CVE-2006-6332. Please see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.madwifi.user/11906 for details. Best regards Uwe -- Uwe Kleine-Koenig http://www.google.com/search?q

Bug#400214: octave2.1-forge: include top-level dir /octave2.1-forge/

2006-12-08 Thread Thomas Weber
Am Montag, den 27.11.2006, 18:15 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > We will upload a package of either octplot or semidef-oct which triggers > > the bug, so there's something to point to. > > > These packages have the advantage of > > - no reported bugs and an up-to-date version in testing and >

Processed: closing 340079

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > # version tracking is more precise > close 340079 6b-11 Bug#340079: insecure tempfiles 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in

Bug#402103: sasl2-bin: Can anyone explain why did bug number 398534 got closed??

2006-12-08 Thread Fabian Fagerholm
severity 402103 important tags 402103 + moreinfo thanks On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 23:52 -0500, andrew wrote: > I seem to miss the solution. It's December 7, i get a sasl2-bin update a > postfix update and the mailserver is done. First i get: [...] > To resolve the problem I had to revert back to 2.1.1

Processed: Re: Bug#402103: sasl2-bin: Can anyone explain why did bug number 398534 got closed??

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 402103 important Bug#402103: sasl2-bin: Can anyone explain why did bug number 398534 got closed?? Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tags 402103 + moreinfo Bug#402103: sasl2-bin: Can anyone explain why did bug number 398534 got clos

Processed: Re: Bug#401999: mdadm fails to upgrade in testing. Can't start service.

2006-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 401999 splashy Bug#401999: mdadm fails to upgrade in testing. Can't start service. Bug reassigned from package `mdadm' to `splashy'. > retitle 401999 references undefined variable $RUNLEVEL in lsb-base-logging.sh Bug#401999: mdadm fails to upg

Bug#401999: mdadm fails to upgrade in testing. Can't start service.

2006-12-08 Thread martin f krafft
reassign 401999 splashy retitle 401999 references undefined variable $RUNLEVEL in lsb-base-logging.sh thanks also sprach Raúl Sánchez Siles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.12.07.1548 +0400]: > I also attach the file /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh which belongs to package > splashy version 0.2.2 Thanks for th