package monotone
severity 404616 important
tag 404616 unreproducible
thanks
On 12/26/06, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: monotone
Version: 0.31-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have tried three completely different working directories with
similar result
Your message dated Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:43:24 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404633: copyright file missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:22:45AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:52:06PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> >
> > > backports are risky, again as you see for the net-r8169-1.patch,
> > > that is a "localized" driver enhancement with big slow down consequences
> > > #40052
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:52:06PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> > backports are risky, again as you see for the net-r8169-1.patch,
> > that is a "localized" driver enhancement with big slow down consequences
> > #400524 and #403782. yes upstream has a fix for that and it should
> > land soon, b
I am seeing this problem on my NSLU2. I have cron-apt configured to run
daily, and everyday I wake up to the segfault email by the cron job :(.
removing /var/cache/apt/*.bin allows me to have one pleasant encounter
with apt, not more. So, currently I added 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin' to
my daily
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:09:02PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> So far I have not tried building the kernel with this patches, but I think
> this is
> a reasonable way to resolve the problem, as the resulting cumulative patch
> (attached)
> is only 19K.
Sorry, I made this patch reversed by mist
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 03:40:58AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > I have reviewed the information available on the thermal problems with
> > HP laptops, and it appears that there is a fairly conservative set of
> > patches which takes care of the problems (thanks to Bas for pointing
> > mo
package: vlc
version: 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1
severity: serious
Hi,
the binary package lacks a copyright file, this violates policy severerly,
thus serious.
regards,
Holger
pgppBgPRykHB7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
package: perl
version: 5.8.8-7
severity: serious
Hi,
the binary package lacks a copyright file, this violates policy severerly,
thus serious.
regards,
Holger
pgp2z4guZR24R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 06:09:02PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 03:07:55AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> >
> > Hi *,
> >
> > this is indeed a severe issue which requires all our attention and care
> > to solve or circumvent in order for nobodies boxes to get any harm,
Package: libtiff-tools
Version: 3.8.2-6
Severity: serious
copyright file is not shipped along, which violates the policy.
Might be some cdbs flaw which led to such package?
> dpkg -L libtiff-tools | grep doc
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools
> ls -l /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/
total
Hi!
As Ana said, the package does not crash when libhamlib-dev is present.
This seems to happen because it tries to access the .la and .a files.
However, as far as I could see, it does not do it directly, this is done
through the "rig_init" function that is part of the libhamlib library. So,
m
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 03:07:55AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> Hi *,
>
> this is indeed a severe issue which requires all our attention and care
> to solve or circumvent in order for nobodies boxes to get any harm, you
> know how expensive these laptops are.
>
> I basically see 3 solutio
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 02:49:55AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Looks like the error is from a SIZE failing (which triggers a LIST trying to
> figure it out that way instead, which also fails, which gives the error
> message). Could you please also send your apt-proxy-v2.conf, and a new log
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:51:45PM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
>> Could you attach your /var/log/apt-proxy.log please?
> Here it is!
Looks like the error is from a SIZE failing (which triggers a LIST trying to
figure it out that way instead, which also fails, which gives the error
message).
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 11:43:05AM +0100, Beat Binotto wrote:
> This error happens on all our machines. php an ssl are enabled as modules.
> (see below). It happens on 6 different amd64 machines all with kernel 2.6.
> It also happens on 3 different i386 machines with kernel 2.6.
Out of curiosity,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >
> > The first message at http://bugs.debian.org/394392 contains some
> > information about it, but I'm sure Jeff Licquia (CCed) can provide
> > more information if necessary.
>
> I've given that a quick lo
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:56:33 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed by upload of gromacs 3.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Clint Adams, le Tue 26 Dec 2006 19:26:48 -0500, a écrit :
> > > > charset_default=utf-8
> > > > unicode=yes
> > >
> > > Isn't unicode=yes already the default?
> >
> > Nope, iso-8859-1 is (see configure.ac). But it could be by applying the
> > attached patch (yes, I had to fix the configure.a
> > > charset_default=utf-8
> > > unicode=yes
> >
> > Isn't unicode=yes already the default?
>
> Nope, iso-8859-1 is (see configure.ac). But it could be by applying the
> attached patch (yes, I had to fix the configure.ac script).
>
> But actually, text tools should rather use the current l
Clint Adams, le Sun 24 Dec 2006 09:23:44 -0500, a écrit :
> > Having lines
> > charset_default=utf-8
> > unicode=yes
>
> Isn't unicode=yes already the default?
Nope, iso-8859-1 is (see configure.ac). But it could be by applying the
attached patch (yes, I had to fix the configure.ac script).
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404585 minor
Bug#404585: Gnucash fails to write config file under .gnucash/books/
Severity set to `minor' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Your message dated Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403879: fixed in gromacs 3.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root># atari-fdisk -r /dev/sdb
>
> Unable to open /dev/sdb
So for some reason atari-fdisk doesn't find /dev/sdb. This actually has
nothing to do with kernel support for atari partition, but with your sdb
device.
Do you have a sdb entry in /dev/ ?
could you run
# str
Package: iceweasel
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
# apt-get upgrade
[...]
Preparing to replace mozilla-firefox 2.0+dfsg-1 (using
.../mozilla-firefox_2.0.0.1+dfsg-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement mozilla-firefox ...
Preparing to replace iceweasel 2.0+dfsg-1 (using
..
Package: monotone
Version: 0.31-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have tried three completely different working directories with
similar results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tree/junk$ mtn status
mtn: fatal signal: Segmentation fault
this is almost certainly a bug in monotone.
p
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404591: fixed in openser 1.1.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 11:26:52 -0700
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly do you do that provokes the bug? How do you know it fails
> to write the config file? What happens after the error message is
> printed? Why does failure to write this config file render the package
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 09:36:29PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:14:06PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > I can reproduce this bug in etch, but not in sid. Therefore it looks like
> > a problem in one of the dependencies.
> >
> >
> [...]
> > I tried downgrading l
tags 403380 + pending
stop
As Nicholas already tagged 403379 as pending, I tag the other, too,
so that it is correctly displayed on the RC-bug list.
403379 and 403380 are identical, they should be merged anyway if you
don't object.
bye,
-christian-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello
This issue has already been reported as #404049 against libmotif-dev.
As that package is not in testing and non-free anyway changes should
be made there, I'd guess.
IMHO this one here should be merged with 404049 and thus no longer be
assigned to lesstif-doc as it's confusing if people talk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 403380 + pending
Bug#403380: forutil: file conflict with gromacs /usr/bin/ffscan
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 403699 -etch
Bug#403699: ktrack: Crashes on startup
Tags were: etch
Tags removed: etch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
tags 403699 -etch
thanks
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:14:06PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I can reproduce this bug in etch, but not in sid. Therefore it looks like
> a problem in one of the dependencies.
>
>
[...]
> I tried downgrading libacl1, libattr1 and libfontconfig1 in sid to the
> v
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 09:05:22PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Files in /var/run/ should be removed by /etc/init.d/bootclean called by
> /etc/rcS.d/S36mountall-bootclean.sh and
> /etc/rcS.d/S46mountnfs-bootclean.sh
>
> I guess you have a _strange_ configuration if /var/run/ is not cleaned
> a
Le 26.12.2006, à 16:10:25, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit:
> Actually, I think I know what is happening. Sometimes my machine does not
> properly wake from resume, so I have to hard-reboot it; that leaves the pid
> and pub files. Similarly, any other unclean shutdown will probably do the
> same.
Fil
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Fourat Zouari wrote:
Ok, so you're still seenig the same start-stop-daemon error :(
what is the output of:
$ls -l `which start-stop-daemon`
here, I see
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18504 Oct 13 06:41 /sbin/start-stop-daemon
dev:~# which start-stop-daemon
/usr/local/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 404447 linux-2.6
Bug#404447: nfs-kernel-server: Transferred files get corrupted
Bug reassigned from package `nfs-kernel-server' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
reassign 404447 linux-2.6
thanks
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 03:32:37PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> This error message is coming from the kernel NFS code
> (linux-2.6-2.6.18/fs/nfs/*)
> Anibal, I suppose you should reassign this to linux-2.6.
Doing so -- the nfs-kernel-server package is for t
> Except it's a new upstream, did you make a lot of changes to the
> 'debian section' of the package?
Yes, because I didn't initially target etch. Some changes were necessary
because of the new version, some were just convenient.
> Ask Release Manager to get the new connector for Etch.
Ok. If t
severity 404538 normal
thanks
joeyh: binNMU support isn't RC, broken binNMU packages that get
uploaded to the archive are. :)
at least as the general rule
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 12/26/06, Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Fourat Zouari wrote:
>> > Package: sendmail-bin
>> > Version: 8.13.8-3
>> > Severity: critical
>>
>> > Justification: breaks unrelated software
>>
>> Eh? and how did it manage to break unrelated software ?!?!
>
> I m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404538 normal
Bug#404538: not binNMU safe, etc
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 404104 -security
Bug#404104: unnecessary depends on ca-certificates
Tags were: security
Tags removed: security
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Package: gaim-otr
Version: 3.0.0+cvs20060530-3
Followup-For: Bug #404590
Ok, I installed gaim-dbg... here is a better backtrace.
#0 0xb77f412e in g_hash_table_lookup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#1 0xb78e87cf in gaim_conversation_get_data (conv=0x868baa8,
key=0xb6700495 "otr-menu") at
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 17:27 +0100, Robert Schueler wrote:
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 2.0.2-2.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Gnucash fails to write the config file under .gnucash/books/ which store data
> about configured reports and windows-size.
> Following
Hi folks,
please find the next version of haltest.c attached, which serves as a
demonstration on how to spin down the drive.
The idea is as follows:
1. Open the drive
2. Check if drive is active (see hdparm -C /dev/hdc)
3. If the drive is active requeuery the drive state, until it gets
not_activ
Package: openser
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
OpenPKG fixed a buffer overflow in openser:
http://www.openpkg.com/security/advisories/OpenPKG-SA-2006.042.html
Patch attached, please upload.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
AP
I do. Although occasionally I don't. So, most of the time I do get I/O
error.
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Ahmad,
When this happens to you, do you also always get an "Input/output
error"?
- NSLU2 kernel:
2.6.18-3-ixp4xx
- /etc/exports options on NSLU2:
(rw,sync)
- mount | grep nfs (after removing irrelevant entries) on x86:
nfsd on /proc/fs/nfsd type nfsd (rw)
rpc_pipefs on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw)
: on type nfs
(rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,
Ahmad,
When this happens to you, do you also always get an "Input/output
error"?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-k7
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge6
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
The system has built in an Adaptec 2400A RAID controller with two 80 GB
disks attached which are configured as RAID 1. The controller is handled
by the dpt_i2o module.
In this conf
Package: gaim-otr
Version: 3.0.0+cvs20060530-3
Severity: grave
If you have a buddy with multiple accounts (using Gaim's grouping
feature), gaim give you a "Send To" menu in the conversation window. If
you change which account it is being sent to, a second OTR button
immediately appears. If you the
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Fourat Zouari wrote:
> Package: sendmail-bin
> Version: 8.13.8-3
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
Eh? and how did it manage to break unrelated software ?!?!
I meant to say that other unrelated software breaks like subversion, trac,
hylaf
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-26 17:31]:
> I just transfered a 161 MB file from my x86 to my slag via nfs and it
> worked fine. I think I'll need some more information from you:
Okay, I just tried a bigger file and I can see this too:
29724:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /mnt/tbm] cp /medi
* Ahmad Khayyat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-24 18:54]:
> When I transfer files from an x86 machine to the arm nfs server,
> files arrive corrupted (md5sum mismatch) and dmesg/syslog shows:
>
> kernel: nfsd: non-standard errno: -14
I just transfered a 161 MB file from my x86 to my slag via nfs an
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061226 08:08]:
> * Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061225 06:51]:
> > The package fails to build on ia64 according to the build log[1].
> > The missing file is in libasound2-dev so maybe a new build-dependency
> > will fix it.
>
> Actually, I doubt the c
Package: gnucash
Version: 2.0.2-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Gnucash fails to write the config file under .gnucash/books/ which store data
about configured reports and windows-size.
Following error-message appear in the terminal:
(gnucash:3171): GLib-CRITICAL *
* Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061225 06:51]:
> The package fails to build on ia64 according to the build log[1].
> The missing file is in libasound2-dev so maybe a new build-dependency
> will fix it.
Actually, I doubt the culprit is this package, but some other package -
but yes, adding
On 12/26/06, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The new version of the MySQL connector, which is about to be uploaded, will
probably not make it to etch (since the upstream version changed). If the
release managers do not make an exception, then I would rather let the
package be dropped fro
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 03:55:32PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> ...or that it dies across suspend/resume, without rm-ing the pid file.
> That would be a bug in pcscd. I do not use suspend/resume myself. I
> would be interested in more inverstigations if you can.
Actually, I think I know what
Sorry, I did not received your answer. That is not the first time I lose
a mail from the BTS and it is problematic.
Le 21.12.2006, à 22:25:01, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:12:29PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > It looks like pcscd does not want to die.
>
> ...or
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 06:54:36PM -0500, Ahmad Khayyat wrote:
> Subject: nfs-kernel-server: Transferred files get corrupted
> Package: nfs-kernel-server
> Version: 1:1.0.10-4
> Severity: important
>
> When I transfer files from an x86 machine to the arm nfs server,
> files arrive corrupted (md5su
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-26 13:12]:
> > Could you point us to a description (or testcase) showing how the
> > 2.6.18 kernel's msync() is not LSB 3.1 compliant? Fixing that might
> > well be a better direction for Debian to go with a
diff -u pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/changelog pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/changelog
--- pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/changelog
+++ pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+pcsc-lite (1.3.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix issues with looping init script. (Closes: #392357
tags 392357 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my pcsc-lite 1.3.2-3.1 NMU.
diff -u pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/pcscd.init pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/pcscd.init
--- pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/pcscd.init
+++ pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/pcscd.init
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
DESC="PCSC Lite resource manager"
PIDFI
On 12/25/06, Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Fourat Zouari wrote:
> Package: sendmail-bin
> Version: 8.13.8-3
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
Eh? and how did it manage to break unrelated software ?!?!
I meant to say that ot
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:17:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392357: fixed in pcsc-lite 1.3.2-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
* Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-26 13:12]:
> Could you point us to a description (or testcase) showing how the
> 2.6.18 kernel's msync() is not LSB 3.1 compliant? Fixing that might
> well be a better direction for Debian to go with a 2.6.18 kernel,
> than applying an ever-increasing nu
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> We in Debian have applied your "mm: msync() cleanup" patch (plus the
> other mm changes needed for this one) to our 2.6.18 kernel because
> it's needed for LSB 3.1 compliance. Given that apparently no fix for
> the induced filesystem corruption is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 392357 + patch
Bug#392357: fails to stop; postinst goes into infinite loop
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 392357 + patch
Bug#392357: fails to stop; postinst goes into infinite loop
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
tags 392357 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my pcsc-lite 1.3.2-3.1 NMU.
diff -u pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/pcscd.init pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/pcscd.init
--- pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/pcscd.init
+++ pcsc-lite-1.3.2/debian/pcscd.init
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
DESC="PCSC Lite resource manager"
PIDFI
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:07:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in slang-slirp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> found 400283 0.2-1.1
Bug#400283: gst.PluginNotFoundError: audiopanorama when adding instruments
Bug marked as found in version 0.2-1.1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400283 grave
Bug#400283: gst.PluginNotFoundError: audiopanorama when adding instruments
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Hi Hugh and Peter,
We in Debian have applied your "mm: msync() cleanup" patch (plus the
other mm changes needed for this one) to our 2.6.18 kernel because
it's needed for LSB 3.1 compliance. Given that apparently no fix for
the induced filesystem corruption is coming forth and we're trying to
get
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-24 14:30]:
> For my part, I've never heard of slang-slirp before, and it seems obvious to
> me from the naming prefix that the slirp package does have prior claim to
> the name. I think this just needs to be resolved by slang-slirp changing
> its bina
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> As you haven't uploaded the package, we're now left with the situation that
> there's an RC bug in the BTS that nobody but you actually knows what is
> about, and thus it's a bit hard to get it fixed :-)
i asked for permission on -release, however, they didn't like th
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:19:54PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hrm, just found out that at least dmenu suffers from the same utf
> breackage as dwm before 2.1-2 does (maybe some others too, needs
> checking too). dmenu needs also a ~10 line fix. Will prepare package on
> thursday, no time before
* Daniel Kobras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061224 07:11]:
> The file conflict of aub.1 with the aub package clearly is an error on
> the webmagick side. It had already been reported as #76981 and was
> subsequently fixed six year ago. Not sure what made it reappear. Anyway,
> trivial patch attached. I ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 403699 + etch
Bug#403699: ktrack: Crashes on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Package: dfsbuild
Version: 0.99.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the version of grub that ships with etch puts its files in /usr/lib/grub
instead of /lib/grub, which breaks dfsbuild.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'tes
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 11:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403874: fixed in ghextris 0.9.0-1.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 403997 + etch-ignore
Bug#403997: file conflict with clearsilver-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 11:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403996: fixed in clearsilver 0.10.3-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur ../clearsilver-0.10.3~/debian/changelog
../clearsilver-0.10.3/debian/changelog
--- ../clearsilver-0.10.3~/debian/cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317258 critical
Bug#317258: Megaraid driver lost PCI ID mapping for NetRAID 1M & 2M
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur ../ghextris-0.9.0~/debian/changelog ../ghextris-0.9.0/debian/changelog
--- ../ghextris-0.9.0~/debian/changelog 2006-1
* Daniel Kobras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061224 07:42]:
> The attached diff should help resolve the file conflict with webmagick,
> and fixes a few errors that lintian barfs about along the way. Please
> apply, or drop me a note if you want me to upload the changes as an NMU.
yes, please do so.
Chee
The new version of the MySQL connector, which is about to be uploaded, will
probably not make it to etch (since the upstream version changed). If the
release managers do not make an exception, then I would rather let the
package be dropped from etch altogether, which is why I have raised the
se
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404537: fixed in php-sqlite3 0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
found 400340 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1
thanks
Hi!
I looked at the latest package, and it still contains one of the files
in the original report, but in a different location:
icedove-1.5/archives/thunderbird-1.5.0.9-source-dfsg1.tar.bz2:mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/docs/draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-05.
Package: dfsbuild
Version: 0.99.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
cdebootstrap saves the Release file as _dists_.Release, which causes
dfsbuild to break. Changing Release to _dists_.Release in
Actions/Mirror.hs appears to resolve the problem.
Would it make sense to use ano
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 400340 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1
Bug#400340: Contains non-free files.
Bug marked as found in version 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 404486 important
Bug#404486: Subject: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: strange problems with filesystem
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping proce
Hi
Oh, I didn't know that. When I was installing Debian quite some time ago I
needed that package. I'll try and see today whether it works without.
Thanks for pointing this out. Maybe you could add something a remark to the
package description?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404537 serious
Bug#404537: php4-sqlite3 depends on the phpapi version from php5
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:32:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400339: fixed in iceweasel 2.0.0.1+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:32:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399670: fixed in iceweasel 2.0.0.1+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
