Package: z88dk
Version: 1.6.ds1-3
Severity: serious
The latest version of this package incorrectly identifies s390 as a 64-bit
architecture:
[...]
rm -f debian/build-stamp debian/build-arch-stamp debian/build-indep-stamp
case "$DEB_BUILD_ARCH" in
s390|alpha|amd64|ia64|ppc64)
echo "64bi
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jan 2007 07:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404049: fixed in openmotif 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jan 2007 07:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404049: fixed in openmotif 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Dec 31, 2006, at 12:37 PM, b9 wrote:
I've created a quick hack fix for the Wiggly Gnome Bug. This is not a
good fix as it doesn't address *why* the problem occurred or prevent
it from occurring again. However, it's good enough for me to get work
done on my G3 iMac, and I figured you might fi
Your message dated Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405136: fixed in perl4caml 0.9.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Which version of totem-mozilla was installed at the time this upgrade
was attempted? Was /usr/lib/firefox a directory or a symbolic link?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular. - Adlai Stevenson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 02:15 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Debian bug #404733 shows a case where installation of a package fails
> because it contains a symbolic link with the same path as a directory
> included in an installed package. I think this is the expected
> behaviour. However, installati
You wrote:
> I installed a new version of this package from unstable on a testing
> box, and got no problems on its way.
The problem was reported as appearing during an attempt to upgrade to
version 2.0.0.1+dfsg-1, so it cannot be very well fixed by this version!
However, I'm beginning to suspect
Package: splashy
Severity: serious
While removing/purging splashy, dpkg complains that it can't remove
/lib/splashy because it still contains files, which are:
pluto:~# ll /lib/splashy
total 12
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 690 Jan 2 03:15 0-progress
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 887 Jan 2 03:15 2-progress
-
On 12/31/06, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Zack> 2) Run the crashing command under valgrind - valgrind does support PPC
Zack> now, I believe - and get us a backtrace from that.
==6046== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==6046== Copyright (C) 2002-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Sew
This seems to be fixed "upstream", along with other issues regarding ieee1394
on linux 2.6.19, according to [0]:
-
kernel 2.6.19 release notes
From: Stefan Richter:
Date: 2006-12-03 3:00 am
eth1394: memory alignment problem fixed
ieee1394: recursive locking fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 401536 3.0.23d-3
Bug#401536: Uninstallable because of dependency on nonexistent libgnutls11
Bug marked as found in version 3.0.23d-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Package: dfsbuild
Version: 0.99.2
Followup-For: Bug #404563
Hi,
the attached patch scans both /usr/lib/grub and /lib/grub for the grub
bootloader files.
This resolves the copy-grubfile bug for me.
regards,
Lars
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
> tags 391143 + pending
Bug#391143: dpkg: Fake bug to collect last dpkg translation updates before
On 01/01/07, Alex Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please report any tests to this bug report.
I have tested this patch and the package builds and installs and
purges correctly with the patch applied... further more the daemon is
not started by default.
This is the extent of my testing, someon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 397074 388037
Bug#397074: stun setup fails with "No primary IP given. Exiting."
Bug#388037: Separate client binary or add START_DAEMON option to
/etc/default/stun
Forcibly Merged 388037 397074.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 397074 + patch
Bug#397074: stun setup fails with "No primary IP given. Exiting."
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
forcemerge 397074 388037
thanks
Attached is a patch to stop the start of stund by default and add a
START_DEMON option to /etc/default/stun
The patch applies to the debian source and is untested.
Please report any tests to this bug report.
Regards
Alex Owen
diff -uNr stun-0.96.dfsg.old/debian/i
Package: dfsbuild
Version: 0.99.2
Followup-For: Bug #404555
Hi,
the attached patch uses the file "Release" first and (if it fails) falls
back to "_dists_._Release". It works for me.
I hope, this fix is appropriate.
regards,
Lars
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
Package: yelp
Version: 2.16.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While building gnome-terminal from source in a pbuilder chroot i get this error:
checking for X... no
configure: error: X development libraries not found
make: *** [config.status]
reassign 405186 libxml-sax-perl
tags 405186 -sid
found 405186 0.14-0.1
thanks
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:14:37PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 04:16:22PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > > /usr/bin/perl -I../perl ../perl/db2x_texixml
> > > --utf8trans-program=../utf8trans
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 405186 libxml-sax-perl
Bug#405186: docbook2x: FTBFS: reference to nonexistent nodes
Bug reassigned from package `docbook2x' to `libxml-sax-perl'.
> tags 405186 -sid
Bug#405186: docbook2x: FTBFS: reference to nonexistent nodes
Tags were: sid
Ta
tags 405186 sid
thanks
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 04:16:22PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > /usr/bin/perl -I../perl ../perl/db2x_texixml
> > --utf8trans-program=../utf8trans/utf8trans
> > --utf8trans-map=../charmaps/texi.charmap docbook2X.txml
> > /usr/bin/iconv: illegal input sequence at position
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 405186 sid
Bug#405186: docbook2x: FTBFS: reference to nonexistent nodes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 405193 etch-ignore
Bug#405193: zblast-x11: files in /usr/X11R6/include/X1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 405192 etch-ignore
Bug#405192: mova: files in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 405206 experimental
Bug#405206: FTBFS - gnome-terminal needs build-dep on gnome-doc-utils
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:56:13PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 01 January 2007 14:02, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> > > How about uploading the fix as well to unstable?
> > As far as I can tell, Frans wanted to upload this fix first to
> > experimental, give it a wider testing, and th
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 2.16.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While building gnome-terminal from source in a pbuilder chroot i get this error:
checking for GDU_MODULE_VERSION_CHECK... configure: error: Package requirements
(gnome-
Your message dated Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:32:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384838: fixed in libgd2 2.0.33-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Op 01-01-2007 om 13:12 schreef Frans Pop:
> severity 403346 serious
second!
> Another example: http://bugs.debian.org/405169
> and I have no idea how many other reports we've not seen on the list...
Initial _long_ report seen on the list
402956
403778
403904
all got a follow-up that don't nee
At Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:40:43 -0800,
David Schleef wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:51:03AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > However, if I remove libgstlibvisual.so, I get the following while
> > launching the first command with LANG=C:
>
> Ok, that is approximately what I expected, although I'm
Your message dated Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:36:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libapache-mod-ssl: restart leaves
/var/cache/apache/__db.ssl_cache.db there
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Hi,
Even with udev installed, the directory used by kqemu-modules does not
exist:
ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/udev.d/099_kqemu.rules': No such file or
directory
udev is up-to-date (0.103-1).
I think the link is meant to go to /etc/udev/rules.d/
Moreover, the postinst script detects if
Package: mova
Version: 4.0-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 11.8.7
mova installs the following files into /usr/X11R6/include/X11:
usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps/mova_32x22.xpm
usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps/mova_32x32.xpm
This is prohibited by the Debian policy, section 11.8.7:
"The i
Package: zblast-x11
Version: 1.3-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 11.8.7
zblast-x11 installs the following file into /usr/X11R6/include/X11:
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps/xzb.xpm
This is prohibited by the Debian policy, section 11.8.7:
"The installation of files into subdirectories
Package: docbook2x
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of docbook2x_0.8.3-1 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
> Build started at 2007010
On Monday 01 January 2007 14:02, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> > How about uploading the fix as well to unstable?
>
> Hello, Andi.
>
> As far as I can tell, Frans wanted to upload this fix first to
> experimental, give it a wider testing, and then put it into unstable.
> So I am reall
Package: kqemu-source
Version: 1.3.0~pre9-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Attempted to install the latest and greatest kqemu using m-a. This failed
trying to write to a /etc/udev.d subdirectory. I am not using udev so obviously
do not have this.
There is no dependency on
El domingo, 31 de diciembre de 2006 11:09, Andreas Barth escribió:
> * David Martínez Moreno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061221 10:17]:
> > Changes:
> > linux-ntfs (1.13.1-5) experimental; urgency=high
> > .
> >* Patched ntfsprogs/ntfsresize.c in order to fix grave resizing
> > problem of Vista part
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403346 serious
Bug#403346: installation-report: Creates mails that are way too big and never
make the list
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Your message dated Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323743: fixed in nautilus-python 0.4.3-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304370: fixed in nautilus-python 0.4.3-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
43 matches
Mail list logo
