Hi,
Thanks for the report.
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, andrea wrote:
the segfault occurs when load acm
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-amd64
Locale:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 413174 important
Bug#413174: SEGFAULT when running acm
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412899: fixed in dropbear 0.49-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
severity 409703 important
retitle 409703 SQL-ledger unsafe for use with untrusted users or public
installations
tags 409703 + wontfix
thanks
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
I've done that but I closed the bug, so that its progression in etch can be
properly tracked. We ought to
Hi Jamie,
Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 17.02 -0500, Jamie ffolliott ha scritto:
[...]
The issue that forces manual editing is that: the package wants to maintain
the libpam-ldap.conf, and will not allow me to specify a uri setting to
speak to the ldap server via ldaps://. There are almost
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 410995 pending
Bug#410995: new upstream version 5.2.1 available
Tags were: upstream security fixed-upstream
Bug#410561: php5: multiple security issues fixed in php 5.2.1
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 411787 redhat-cluster-modules-2.6.18-4-686
Bug#411787: redhat-cluster-modules-2.6.18-3-686: GFS Oops on mount at
do_add_mount
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to
`redhat-cluster-modules-2.6.18-4-686'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Package: libblkid1
Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.6
libblkid1 in sid exports 3 symbols which aren't in the sarge version,
yet its shlibs don't reflect that.
The new symbols are blkid_dev_set_search, blkid_dev_has_tag,
blkid_probe_all_new. See
at 20070303-1223
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why depend on anything to do with inetd when it's only ever needed on
upgrades from very old versions? The stable version is 1.9.29, so there
is no need to support upgrades from pre-1.9.
I propose to remove this part of the upgrade logic altogether:
diff -ur
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
see debian/rules.unpack in the gcc-4.1 source for a list, plus the
INSTALL directory needs to be removed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:31:04PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:34:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: encfs
Version: 1.2.5-1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Encfs stopped working after I upgraded my system today. The
Hi,
I assume this bug was also fixed in 0.11.1-1? Could you please mark it
as such, since it now says it's still affecting unstable.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:54:57AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
Package: jokosher
Version: 0.2-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
With the unstable version of jokosher and (experimental) gstreamer,
adding an instrument (audio file) results in:
[...]
Even if the Debian package was unaffected (the changelog is dated more
than a week ago), it is still worthwhile to upgrade to 2.1.2 to fix this
vulnerability:
http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3879
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Ben Hutchings, 3.03.2007 14:24 |=-
Why depend on anything to do with inetd when it's only ever needed on
upgrades from very old versions? The stable version is 1.9.29, so there
is no need to support upgrades from pre-1.9.
I propose to
I am aware of this problem. I am away for the weekend and I can only
see myself getting new packages in by (late) Sunday.
Unless one of my sponsors have some time for this?
Best wishes,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: kernel-patch-speakup
Version: 20040506-120040506-1
Severity: serious
Justification: renders package unusable
kernel-patch-speakup and its source package speakup-cvs are very old and
need to be redone with 2.6 kernels.
Please remove it from the archive and Etch.
The other
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.1.0-13
Severity: serious
Today I upgraded x11-common from -12 to -13 on my etch system. It
displayed a debconf note incorrect nice value (btw. the wording is poor,
there's no indication we're dealing with x11-common). I pressed next
and expected some new dialog
Your message dated Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412068: fixed in zaptel 1:1.2.15~dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#413141: fixed in zaptel 1:1.2.15~dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412068: fixed in zaptel 1:1.2.15~dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#413141: fixed in zaptel 1:1.2.15~dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: xfe
Version: 0.88-3.1
Severity: serious
Hello Jose,
There is an error when attempting to purge xfe:
Removing xfe ...
Purging configuration files for xfe ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/xfe.postrm: line 24: ucf: command not found
dpkg: error processing xfe (--purge):
subprocess
-Original Message-
From: Giuseppe Sacco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 4:58 AM
To: Jamie ffolliott
Cc: Steve Langasek; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#407746: libpam-ldap upgrade breaks pam_ldap.conf
and can't login
Hi Jamie,
Il giorno lun,
Package: kdesktop
Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Step to reporduce :
* K-Menu Lock session
* (session is locked)
* Move mouse or press button to request session unlocking
* Enter password / press enter
Actual result :
* Message : Unable to
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debconf (developer): -- INPUT low x11-common/xwrapper/allowed_users
debconf (developer): -- 30 question skipped
debconf (developer): -- GO
Use of uninitialized value in join or string at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/DbDriver/Stack.pm line 104, GEN1 line 4.
Hi Sebastian,
in the meantime I tried something different... I renamed ~/.gnupg,
started seahorse and thus created a new keyring by importing my
previously exported pgp key. The seahorse-agent no longer crashes !
It seems that I had a somehow corrupt keyring. I still have it, so if
you are
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 408944 grave
Bug#408944: matplotlib: Missing Tk dependency
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
tag 408944 fixed-in-experimental
Bug#408944: matplotlib: Missing Tk dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
Package: wordpress
Severity: serious
On behalf of the Security Team I'm requesting the removal of Wordpress
from Etch. There's a steady flow of security issues being found in
Wordpress and we don't believe it's sanely maintainable over the
course of 30-36 months. (Etch life-time)
As an example,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 413260 important
Bug#413260: I should kill kdesktop_lock to unlock session
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 413249 important
Bug#413249: x11-common: config script hangs or fails
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
tags 413249 unreproducible
Bug#413249: x11-common: config
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 408944 serious
Bug#408944: matplotlib: Missing Tk dependency
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 413174 grave
Bug#413174: SEGFAULT when running acm
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:38:01AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:53:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm now next to the machine and after some cable fiddling, it seems
that despite the warning, basic functionality
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 271099 kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
Bug#271099: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686: Scheduling while atomic during rmmod
aic7xxx
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686' to
Alex Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If people test the patch and repost sucsess or failure here that may
help a decision for including the patch or not!
Just like for Brien, the patch seems to work for me (not extensively
tested yet, but...) on an up-to-date Etch system with
Package: gnomemeeting
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
While fixed for Ekiga, GnomeMeeting is still affected by unauthenticated,
remote format string flaws. I'm attaching the patch I used for stable,
but the proper fix is probably to remove gnomemeeting from Etch:
On 3/3/07, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wordpress
Severity: serious
On behalf of the Security Team I'm requesting the removal of Wordpress
from Etch. There's a steady flow of security issues being found in
Wordpress and we don't believe it's sanely maintainable over the
Package: postfix
Version: 2.4.0~rc2-1
Severity: Serious
Tags: experimental
make: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/postfix-2.4.0~rc2/src/cleanup'
[src/smtpd]
make: Entering directory `/build/buildd/postfix-2.4.0~rc2/src/smtpd'
gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -DDEBIAN -DMAX_DYNAMIC_MAPS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26~bpo.1
notfound 413246 20040506-120040506-1
Bug#413246: kernel-patch-speakup: speakup outdated, broken with 2.6 kernels
Bug marked as not found in version 20040506-120040506-1.
found
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
After patching (no probs) and 'update-initramfs -u' and booting, I get
'PANIC: Circular dependency. Exiting.' from the functions script #167.
Could you provide me with the output from
grep PREREQ= /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/*
--
David Härdeman
Package: conquest
Version: 8.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
The loop starting on line 406 of meta.c does not do any bounds checking
when writing to a fixed-length buffer (buf).
If this is not exploitable, please downgrade untag.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: conquest
Version: 8.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
in client.c, in the case block starting at line 964,
no validation is done on the snum or unum values sent
by the server.
On line 968, you can see one place where an invalid snum
value could lead to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 413296 8.2-2
Bug#413296: conquest: buffer overflow in metaGetServerList
Bug marked as found in version 8.2-2.
found 413299 8.2-2
Bug#413299: conquest: memory corruption potential in processPacket
Bug marked as found in version 8.2-2.
kthxbye
Package: ocsigen
Version: 0.6.0~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Automatic build of ocsigen_0.6.0~rc1-1 on xenophanes by sbuild/amd64 98-farm
Build started at 20070303-2323
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:15:33AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
../../lib/libdns.a: undefined reference to `_info'
Well, that's a different error than I've seen on the mipsel buildd for
unstable... Which I also haven't been able to reproduce
Can you capture the failed build tree for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
submitter 401981 !
Bug#401981: cupsys: cupsd.conf no longer has Printcap /var/run/cups/printcap
line
Changed Bug submitter from Nathan Stratton Treadway [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
Nathan Stratton Treadway [EMAIL PROTECTED].
(By the way, that Bug is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 270187 kernel-image-2.6.8-3-sparc64-smp
Bug#270187: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-sparc64-smp: CONFIG_SMP=y breaks kernel when
connecting over nullmodem
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64-smp'
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 413090 important
Bug#413090: mldonkey-server (2.8.1-2etch1): fails to configure (on upgrade)
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
tags 413090 unreproducible
Bug#413090:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:43:29PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
tags 407361 patch
thanks
Please consider the following patches to fix this bug that i intent to NMU
soon.
--- libtowitoko2.postrm2007-03-02 12:30:58.0 -0300
+++ libtowitoko2.postrm 2007-03-02 12:41:02.0
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:49:53PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I have already encountered similar problems in the past, with GConf, and
they were triggered by a circular dependency.
It seems that APT is unable to deal with such dependencies correctly, as
it removes packages depending on
The description of this bug in the upstream changelog is:
- Security: dbclient previously would prompt to confirm a
mismatching hostkey but wouldn't warn loudly. It will now
exit upon a mismatch.
Why should it didn't warn loudly be a grave security bug? Isn't any sort
of prompt already a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
# missed control@
severity 409703 important
Bug#409703: CVE-2007-0667: sql-ledger: Arbitrary Code Execution
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
retitle 409703 SQL-ledger unsafe
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I talked to the release team -- they'd approve a freeze exception
for fixing the shlibs entry.
To the Debian-Release team,
Could you please confirm that you'd approve a freeze exception
to fix the shlibs entry for
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:50:54PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I talked to the release team -- they'd approve a freeze exception
for fixing the shlibs entry.
To the Debian-Release team,
Could you please confirm
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Attempting to do an upgrade produces the following error:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-11) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
The problem appears to be caused by unresolved dependencies when
tracking stable, but using kernel packages from testing or unstable. The
follwing steps are needed to get this situation straightened out:
1. aptitude remove linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
2. aptitude install coreutils/unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 410951 r-other-gking-matchit
Bug#410951: r-other-gking-matchit: sarge to etch upgrade fails
Bug reassigned from package `r-cran-matchit' to `r-other-gking-matchit'.
tags 410951 -pending
Bug#410951: r-other-gking-matchit: sarge to etch upgrade
reassign 410951 r-other-gking-matchit
tags 410951 -pending
thanks
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:19:15PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
reassign 410951 r-cran-matchit
tags 410951 pending
thanks
I've found that r-other-gking-matchit sarge to etch upgrade fails due
to the relaxed dependency on
Right, forwarding to the right bug, since the main bug moved out from under
me.
- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Härdeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#397973:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:18:05PM -0500, Stuart Anderson wrote:
After further Sarge-Etchupgrade testing, it seems that this problem is
not
an occasional fluke, but is at best non-deterministic. It needs to be
fixed
properly as described in #404159.
I don't understand what this has to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
# lose the obsolete tag, use proper v-t
tags 408944 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#408944: matplotlib: Missing Tk dependency
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Tags removed:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 411953 + confirmed
Bug#411953: emacs-lisp-intro: The package has an invariant section
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tag 411953 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
I emailed Richard Stallman (FSF) and Robert Chassell (the original
author). Robert replied that he considered the Preface to be a secondary
section because it described how he thought of his audience; but that
he didn't really care; Richard replied that he
FWIW, I've uploaded an NMU moving this to non-free. It'll need NEW
processing (by someone else) before hitting the archive.
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:51:15 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#413280: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
67 matches
Mail list logo
