tags 414292 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is a patch to fix the postinst and postrm for this package
to use, firstly to use /bin/sh, since you don't use any bash-specific
features, secondly to make use of set -e, and thirdly to utilise
getent group to test if the group exists. In other news, I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 414292 + patch
Bug#414292: list: postinst failure because of improper group creation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:51:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416021: ufraw: Depends: libexiv2-0.10 (>= 0.10) but it is
not installable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> tags 416021 sid
Bug#416021: ufraw: Depends: libexiv2-0.10 (>= 0.10) but it is not installable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Package: ufraw
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The subject pretty much summaries the problem. This package is not
installable. It appears that the dependance should be switched to
libexiv2-0.12.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers uns
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> found 415960 0.12.2-7
Bug#415960: Missing Replaces: pilot-link (<< 0.12.2-7)
Bug marked as found in version 0.12.2-7.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> # does not happen with fastjar, must be a missing b-c with a non-free jar
> severity 416001 important
Bug#416001: gcj-4.1: does not build with apt-src
Severity set to `important' from
Package: libembperl-perl
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi Angus,
I imagine you've seen that Gunnar NMUed libembperl-perl for bug #395870.
Unfortunately, that NMU has failed to autobuild on all architectures with
this error:
[...]
#258 epform.htm...ok
All tests have been passed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 416001 - unreproducible
Bug#416001: gcj-4.1: does not build with apt-src
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> tags 416001 + confirmed
Bug#416001: gcj-4.1: does not build with apt-src
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirme
Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 415954 serious
> quit
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:10:08AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>> Package: imapproxy
>>> Version: 1.2.4-10
>>> Severity: serious
>>>
>
>
>> This doesn't break unrelated software.
>>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 415954 serious
Bug#415954: imapproxy: fails to start if already running
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #415954 important
Bug#415954: imapproxy: fails to start if already running
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
severity #415954 important
thanks
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Package: imapproxy
> Version: 1.2.4-10
> Severity: serious
>
This doesn't break unrelated software.
> This happened during an upgrade just now:
>
> Starting IMAP proxy: /etc/init.d/imapproxy: line 56: [: too many arguments
> Failed to
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328362: fixed in pmk 0.10.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> found 412799 2.7-0exp1
Bug#412799: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot!
Bug marked as found in version 2.7-0exp1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> severity 416001 normal
Bug#416001: gcj-4.1: does not build with apt-src
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tags 416001 unreproducible
Bug#416001: gcj-4.1: does not build with
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415669: fixed in wmsysmon 0.7.7-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:06:39PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> > Obviously, it's not reasonable to enable IPv6 support at the *expense of*
> > IPv4 support.
> Uhm, by default on linux if you listen on the IPv6 wildcard address, you'll
> get
> IPv4 automagically too. For example my output for ss
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416000: fixed in gtk+extra2 2.1.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
> > > libpisock9 0.12.2-7 has a "Conflicts: pilot-link (<< 0.12.2-7)"
> > > to avoid this problem.
> > >
> > /usr/udev/rules.d/60-libpisock.rules is a conffile, so a Conflicts
> > isn't enough. Conflicts only ensures that pilot-link is removed,
> > not purged.
>
> What is the correct way to move a
This should solve the problem:
$ dpkg -S libgtkextra-x11-2.0.so
libgtkextra-x11-2.0-1: /usr/lib/libgtkextra-x11-2.0.so.1
libgtkextra-x11-2.0-1: /usr/lib/libgtkextra-x11-2.0.so.1.0.0
libgtkextra-x11-2.0-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgtkextra-x11-2.0.so.1.0.0
libgtkextra-x11-2.0-dev: /usr/lib/libgt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> tags 416000 + pending
Bug#416000: libgtkextra-x11-2.0-dev: Missing /usr/lib/libgtkextra-x11-2.0.so
symlink
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> tags 414843 + pending
Bug#414843: kdepim: FTBFS: Template errors in kpilot
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:33:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line grub-install doesnt install on /dev/cciss/c0d0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:59:23 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libgtkextra-x11-2.0-dev
> Version: 2.1.1-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 8.4
>
> Since version 2.1.1-4 libgtkextra-x11-2.0-dev does not provide the
> /usr/lib/libgtkextra-x11-2.0.so symlink anymor
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415601: fixed in agave 0.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Though installs seem to work fine on the machines we've tested, Matt
Taggart and I can both reproduce the symptoms. Here's the fix in diff
form, in case that helps remove ambiguity.
I can happily provide an NMU if desired.
--- /usr/sbin/grub-install.orig 2007-03-23 06:55:59.0 -0600
+++ /u
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Like already said in subject
apt-src install gcj-4.1
apt-src build gcj-4.1
does not work. I get after some time the following output:
-
Package: libgtkextra-x11-2.0-dev
Version: 2.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.4
Since version 2.1.1-4 libgtkextra-x11-2.0-dev does not provide the
/usr/lib/libgtkextra-x11-2.0.so symlink anymore.
It prevents dynamic linking with this library.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
The root problem is integer overflow in the multiplication at
line 292 of graphicsmagick-1.1.7/coders/xwd.c. With the appended
patch, the two test cases result in the following on my amd64 sid
box:
$ gm convert broken.xwd test.png
gm convert: Memory allocation failed (broken.xwd).
$ echo $?
1
$ g
Daniel -
For both the broken.xwd and broken2.xwd files in bug #414045,
the offending operation is in libx11-1.0.3/src/ImUtil.c:505
dst++ = *src++;
and in fact it's the src pointer that is out of range.
This suggests it's "only" a DOS problem, or at worst an
information leak problem, but no dire
Hi Brian,
On Fri, 23 Mar, 2007 at 05:25:37PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> Actually, I apologize, it does not work now. It still produces the same
> error.
I have fixed it now. I have asked my sponsor to upload it. Should be
fixed in a day or two.
Thanks for the report.
Varun
--
.''`.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 04:23:04PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:34:13PM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> > I am not able to reproduce this bug.
>
> It seems to work now. You are welcome to close the bug if the problem
> is gone, as far as I care, but it seems Steve La
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:34:13PM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> Hi Brian,
Good day,
> On Tue, 20 Mar, 2007 at 05:15:16PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > Preparing to replace agave 0.4.1-0 (using .../agave_0.4.2-1_amd64.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement agave ...
> > dpkg: error processing /
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:05:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed binary-only upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Hi,
I've upgraded this bug to `serious', but see below.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:38:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:30:58PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> > Release managers,
>
> > I wrote this for request binNMU for the packages below:
> > pcmanfm_0.3.2.2-1, Rebuild
Le 23.03.2007, à 13:59:49, Julien Cristau a écrit:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 13:49:15 +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > libpisock9 0.12.2-7 has a "Conflicts: pilot-link (<< 0.12.2-7)" to avoid
> > this problem.
> >
> /usr/udev/rules.d/60-libpisock.rules is a conffile, so a Conflicts isn't
> enoug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 412557
Bug#412557: audacity: Seems to be built with -msse, causing SIGILL on crusoe
Bug#409255: audacity - FTBFS: error: unrecognized command line option "-msse"
Disconnected #412557 from all other report(s).
>
End of message, stopping processi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403247 serious
Bug#403247: thunar: No more automatic refresh since last gamin update
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'
> severity 410929 serious
Bug#410929: pcmanfm-nohal: no refresh of current directory
Severity set to `serious' from `no
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:23:53AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ok -- the IPv6 support in jabber *is* a problem; loading ipv6 support in the
> kernel is not an adequate workaround, because when IPv6 support is compiled
> into jabber, it *only* listens on IPv6:
>
> $ sudo lsof -p 2918|grep TCP
>
reassign 415960 libpisock9
retitle 415960 Missing Replaces: pilot-link (<< 0.12.2-7)
thanks
> > libpisock9 0.12.2-7 has a "Conflicts: pilot-link (<< 0.12.2-7)" to avoid
> > this problem.
> >
> /usr/udev/rules.d/60-libpisock.rules is a conffile, so a Conflicts isn't
> enough. Conflicts only ensur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 415960 libpisock9
Bug#415960: pilot-link: 60-libpisock.rules is contained in two packages
Bug reassigned from package `pilot-link' to `libpisock9'.
> retitle 415960 Missing Replaces: pilot-link (<< 0.12.2-7)
Bug#415960: pilot-link: 60-libpisoc
Actually, I'm not really sure if this bug is really solved.
It's supposed to detect at runtime if your CPU supports mmx or sse and use it
only then.
Please re-open this bug if this is still an issue.
Greetings, Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Please ignore the last comment, it was for bug 412557, not this one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 412799 +experimental
Bug#412799: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot!
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: experimental
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On 3/22/07, peter green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
someone familiar with getopt will be required to provide a patch for nbsmtp
that provides similar functionality.
Surely it can't take that much complexity to get nbsmtp to throw
away any -o options that are passed in on the command line? Thi
Actually, I'm not really sure if this bug is really solved.
It's supposed to detect at runtime if your CPU supports mmx or sse and use it
only then.
Please re-open this bug if this is still an issue.
Greetings, Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 412799 +experimental
Bug#412799: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot!
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
"Lex Spoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The best would be if anyone knows a set of JDK5 stubs that Scala can
> compile against. An implementation is necessary, [...]
Sorry, an implementation is *not* necessary. They are just needed for
type checking. -Lex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 13:49:15 +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Le 23.03.2007, à 12:46:30, Norbert Preining a écrit:
> > Preparing to replace libpisock9 0.12.2-6 (using
> > .../libpisock9_0.12.2-7_i386.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement libpisock9 ...
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/a
Le 23.03.2007, à 12:46:30, Norbert Preining a écrit:
> Preparing to replace libpisock9 0.12.2-6 (using
> .../libpisock9_0.12.2-7_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libpisock9 ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libpisock9_0.12.2-7_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 412799 cpio
Bug#412799: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot!
Bug reassigned from package `yaird' to `cpio'.
> severity 412799 serious
Bug#412799: Linux-image-2.6-18-686 does not boot!
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> Tags: experi
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409255: fixed in audacity 1.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409255: fixed in audacity 1.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: pilot-link
Version: 0.12.2-7
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.6
Preparing to replace libpisock9 0.12.2-6 (using
.../libpisock9_0.12.2-7_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libpisock9 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libpisock9_0.12.2-7_i386.deb
(--unpack):
tr
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415636: fixed in lyx 1.5.0~beta1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Ralf Treinen wrote:
> These files are not lost, they are never built on architectures that do not
> support compilation of ocaml to native code. This seems to be a bug in the
> upstream Makefile:
Yes, it is the usual I-didn't-think-of-non-native-archs bug in the
Makefile. This will get corrected b
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:34:13PM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Tue, 20 Mar, 2007 at 05:15:16PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > Preparing to replace agave 0.4.1-0 (using .../agave_0.4.2-1_amd64.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement agave ...
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache
Kenshi's description is accurate.
I would not call it "depending on a package in non-free" when (a) the
dependency is *optional* and (b) the software in question is open source
now, even though Debian has not reacted yet.
http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/java/faq.jsp
I have been lo
Hi Brian,
On Tue, 20 Mar, 2007 at 05:15:16PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> Preparing to replace agave 0.4.1-0 (using .../agave_0.4.2-1_amd64.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement agave ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/agave_0.4.2-1_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415753: fixed in mp3cd 1.25.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: imapproxy
Version: 1.2.4-10
Severity: serious
This happened during an upgrade just now:
Starting IMAP proxy: /etc/init.d/imapproxy: line 56: [: too many arguments
Failed to start imapproxy. Check logs for details.
invoke-rc.d: initscript imapproxy, action "start" failed.
The problem is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 405270 important
Bug#405270: machine hangs after loading ipw3945d
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
63 matches
Mail list logo
