Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> # All our python bugs are not belong to us
> reassign 418200 python-central
Bug#418200: blender: fails in pre-removal scripts with "UnboundLocalError:
local variable 'config'"
Bug re
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2007 12:52:01 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418175: Texts of the licenses missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
The latest version of hs-plugins in upstream's darcs repository
supports GHC 6.6. You may want to consider uploading it to
experimental or sid (though it probably should not be allowed to
progress to testing until there's a proper release).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Your message dated Sat, 7 Apr 2007 15:23:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418200: blender: fails in pre-removal scripts with
"UnboundLocalError: local variable 'config'"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/04/2007):
> Package: blender
> Version: 2.42a-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hello,
Hi,
> The new pre-removal script seems buggy ! But i am not a python expert.
please provide a log...
Anyway, did you check python-central
Package: blender
Version: 2.42a-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
The new pre-removal script seems buggy ! But i am not a python expert.
Regards
Sylvain Le Gall
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'
Your message dated Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:52:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dupe of 418108
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Package: python2.4-minimal
Version: 2.4.4-3
Severity: critical
Package post-install fails with:
Setting up python2.4-minimal (2.4.4-3) ...
Linking and byte-compiling packages for runtime python2.4...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1373, in ?
main()
File
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> forcemerge 418108 418132 418182 418193
Bug#418108: python-central: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'config'
referenced before assignment
Bug#418132: python-uno: Upgrade fails: Unbo
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418108: fixed in python-central 0.5.13-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> reassign 418162 python-central
Bug#418162: dpkg --configure fails for 'python2.4-minimal'
Bug reassigned from package `python2.4-minimal' to `python-central'.
> forcemerge 418108 418
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 418162 serious
Bug#418162: dpkg --configure fails for 'python2.4-minimal'
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Hi Matthias,
Well, this one-line bug is causing us quite a bit of trouble in unstable
right now, so I've prepared a 0-day NMU to fix it on the grounds that it
would be nice to not have all new python package uploads failing to build on
the buildds. Patch attached, NMU on its way to incoming.
Tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 418182 python-central
Bug#418182: Failure of python-uno to install on Sid system during upgrade
Bug reassigned from package `python-uno' to `python-central'.
> forcemerge 418108 418132 418182
Bug#418108: python-central: UnboundLocalError: loca
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:04:29AM +1000, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> The attached patch stolen from
> http://patches.ubuntu.com/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.1ubuntu3.patch
> fixes #417673 for me.
Thanks for finding this. I can confirm that this patch is what I expected
the proper fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> reassign 418152 python-central
Bug#418152: python-numeric: Post-installation failed
Bug reassigned from package `python-numeric' to `python-central'.
> forcemerge 418108 418152
Bug#4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 418182 python-uno
Bug#418182: Failure of python-uno to install on Sid system during upgrade
Bug reassigned from package `python-uno' to `python-uno'.
> reassign 418132 python-central
Bug#418132: python-uno: Upgrade fails: UnboundLocalError: lo
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 01:03:33AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:08:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > There was a commit log message that said:
> > "Added some suggestions provided by Osam
severity 406835 important
thanks
This bug report has *nothing* to do with the serious bug in python-central.
Please do not co-opt unrelated bug reports!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 413901 - etch-ignore
Bug#413901: "SORRY" [...] "Please uninstall the LiSt client."
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags removed: etch-ignore
> tags 414292 - etch-ignore
Bug#414292: list: postinst failure because of improper group creation
Tags were: etch-i
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 02:33:00PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> If this is not enough for you, then at least I believe this could be
> tagged as `etch-ignore' according to point number one in
> `etch_rc_policy.txt' [1]
> [1] http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
There is no re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> tags 413901 - etch-ignore
Bug#413901: "SORRY" [...] "Please uninstall the LiSt client."
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: etch-ignore
> # no reason for these tags
> tags 414292 -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> forcemerge 418108 418177
Bug#418108: python-central: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'config'
referenced before assignment
Bug#418177: python-gnome2-desktop: Problems with postrm
B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 406835 important
Bug#406835: python2.4-minimal dist-upgrade fails
Bug#406836: python2.4-minimal dist-upgrade fails
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> forcemerge 418153 418177
Bug#418153: python-cairo: Post-installation failed
Bug#418177: python-gnome2-desktop: Problems with postrm
Bug#418108: python-central: UnboundLocalError: loca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
License is referenced in /README as well in
/debian/copyright. I believe there's no violation of policy here.
Original tarball doesn't have the copy of the license. Must *-perl
packages doesn't have the COPYING or LICENSE file since they let you
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:42:15PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hmm... as for names and e-mail addreses I think we need to dig that
> > information first. Years would be 1999-2007, they seem to have been first
> > written for slink (http://www.es.debian.org/releases/slink/#release-notes).
> > The D
Your message dated Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:21:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418157: #!/bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package list
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: list
> tags 413901 etch-ignore
Bug#413901: "SORRY" [...] "Please uninstall the LiSt client."
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
> tags 414292 etch-ignore
Bug#414292: list: postinst failure becau
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 406835 grave
Bug#406835: python2.4-minimal dist-upgrade fails
Bug#406836: python2.4-minimal dist-upgrade fails
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> tags 406835 + patch
Bug#406835: python2.4-minimal dist-upgrade fails
Tags were: unreprodu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> reassign 418177 python-central 0.5.13
Bug#418177: python-gnome2-desktop: Problems with postrm
Bug reassigned from package `python-gnome2-desktop' to `python-central'.
>
End of messag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign python-central 0.5.13
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> severity 418177 grave
Bug#418177: python-gnome2-desktop: Problems with postrm
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 01:03:33 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino
> Peña wrote:
[...]
> > IIRC they all come from the patch you provided at #401317.
>
> I see. Thanks.
If I read the CVS-diffs[1][2] and the patch[3] by Osamu correctly, that
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 22:08:57 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:17:20AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > So far, it seems that many people want *me* to do lots of work...
>
> Yes. I really do not undersand your thought on the volunteer project.
>
> Do you expect others to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 418132 python-central
Bug#418132: python-uno: Upgrade fails: UnboundLocalError: local variable
'config' referenced before assignment
Bug reassigned from package `python-uno' to `python-central'.
> forcemerge 418108 418132
Bug#418108: python-c
Package: libclass-trait-perl
Version: 0.22-2
Severity: serious
The complete texts of the licenses (GPL and Perl Artistic) are not in
the original tarball.
This package has been rejected from the Ubuntu NEW queue because of
that.
--
Adrien Cunin aka Adri2000
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: python-central
Version: 0.5.13
Followup-For: Bug #418108
Hello,
in file pyversions.py:
--- pyversions.py 2007-04-06 18:06:09.0 +0200
+++ /usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py 2007-04-07 17:26:19.0
+0200
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
_defaults = config
$ ls -l /bin/sh /bin/bash
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 625228 2004-12-20 05:53 /bin/bash*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2006-10-19 06:40 /bin/sh -> bash*
On 08/04/07, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2007 at 00:26:10 +1200, Alexander McPhail wrote:
> The foll
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:08:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > So far, I could not be able to find any code or text marked with my
> > account. Javi, how did you come up with my name? May be it was just
> > your gu
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:08:57PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> So far, I could not be able to find any code or text marked with my
> account. Javi, how did you come up with my name? May be it was just
> your guess. Current checking script for translation version is now
> completely yours. Some t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Reassigning 418153 to python-central
> severity 418153 serious
Bug#418153: python-cairo: Post-installation failed
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> reassign 418153 python-central
Bug#418153: python-cairo: Post-installation failed
Bug reassigne
This one time, at band camp, Alexander McPhail said:
> On 08/04/07, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 8, 2007 at 00:26:10 +1200, Alexander McPhail wrote:
> > > The following script, chmod'ed to 755:
> > > #!/bin/sh
> > >
> > > echo "Hello, World!"
> > >
> > > results in:
> >
Package: bash
Version: 2.05b-26
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The following script, chmod'ed to 755:
#!/bin/sh
echo "Hello, World!"
results in:
-bash: ./testme: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied
The same error occurs when trying to execute "configur
I'm copying your entire message, since it's not clear to me that it went
to the BTS.
This one time, at band camp, Alexander McPhail said:
> I was never at band camp!
heh.
> The file was on /dev/sda2 (mounted user, noauto)
>
> Is this the problem? I checked and the scripts run on /dev/hda1 (roo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 418108 patch
Bug#418108: python-central: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'config'
referenced before assignment
There were no tags set.
Bug#418109: Python upgrade bug
Bug#418149: python2.4-minimal: dist-upgrade fails with UnboundLocalError
except
tag 418108 patch
thanks
Forwarding to the bug tracker... thanks!
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Bug#418108: python-central: UnboundLocalError: local
variable 'config' referenced before assignment
Date: Saturday 07 April 2007 08:04
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Andrew Vaughan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070407 16:05]:
> Release team is this too late for etch r0?
It is too late, but it would be great if someone could make packages
available based on this patch, so that we can test them for r1 and
upload them to proposed-updates soon.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http:
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:14:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416678: fixed in file 4.12-1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:17:20AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 23:42:15 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > For the record, I sign up any DSFG compliant copyright notice.
>
> Thanks.
> I take it as an agreement to the licensing proposed in the final part of
> http://lists.debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 417673 + patch
Bug#417673: /sbin/fsck.vfat: Incorrectly truncates files of 4294966784 bytes
length during boot.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
tags 417673 + patch
thanks
Hi
The attached patch stolen from
http://patches.ubuntu.com/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.1ubuntu3.patch
fixes #417673 for me.
Release team is this too late for etch r0?
Andrew V.
diff -pruN 2.11-2.1/debian/changelog 2.11-2.1ubuntu3/debian/changelog
--- 2.11-2.1/
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:14:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416678: fixed in file 4.12-1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:14:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415362: fixed in file 4.12-1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:14:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415362: fixed in file 4.12-1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2007 at 00:26:10 +1200, Alexander McPhail wrote:
> The following script, chmod'ed to 755:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> echo "Hello, World!"
>
>
> results in:
>
> -bash: ./testme: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied
>
>
can you send the output of "ls -l /bin/sh /b
Package: hiki
Version: 0.8.6-1
Severity: grave
When trying to run hikisetup, I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ hikisetup
INFO: hiki basedir is /home/kurt
Please input data_path [/home/kurt/data]:
Error: private method `makedirs' called for File:Class
hikisetup failed!
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
found 409687 0.8.8
thanks
Version 0.8.8 still fails to build in unstable with this error. The
changes in 0.8.7 were probably undone for the upload to t-p-u.
I think this doesn't affect etch, so it should probably be tagged as
such.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 409687 0.8.8
Bug#409687: FTBFS: Could not find module `MissingH.Logging.Logger':
Bug marked as found in version 0.8.8.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417848: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-67
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 418149 python-central
Bug#418149: python2.4-minimal: dist-upgrade fails with UnboundLocalError
exception
Bug reassigned from package `python2.4-minimal' to `python-central'.
> merge 418149 418108
Bug#418108: python-central: UnboundLocalError:
in file "/usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py", line 22, in read_default is
value = config.get('DEFAULT', name)
where should be
value = _defaults.get('DEFAULT', name)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: python2.4-minimal
Version: 2.4.4-3
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Same here. This bug prevents reportbug-ng from building :/
Cheers,
Bastian
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 unstable
Package: python-cairo
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I got this when installing from a fresh etch install :
8<
Setting up python-cairo (1.2.0-1) ...
Traceback (most recent call l
Package: python-numeric
Version: 24.2-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I got this when installing package on a fresh etch install.
8<---
Setting up python-numeric (24.2-7) ...
Traceback (most recent
found 416731 3.00
thanks
The version in testing (3.00) also has the same problem.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 416731 3.00
Bug#416731: depends on non-essential package initramfs-tools in postrm
Bug marked as found in version 3.00.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:16:59PM +0200, Cheli Pineda Ferrer wrote:
> It works properly with banshee (0.12.0+dfsg-2) from Experimental.
> Thanks a lot.
>
Can you also say if the version from testing (0.11.2+dfsg-1) works or
not?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Package: python2.4-minimal
Version: 2.4.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to install
Note: upgrading from version 2.4.4-2 (current unstable).
dist-upgrade fails with UnboundLocalError exception in read_default in
/usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py:
hardknott% sudo apt-get dist-upgr
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:02:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418031: fixed in firebird1.5 1.5.4.4910rel-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: libx11-6
Version: 2:1.0.3-6
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
my opera didnt even start after upgrading to 3.7, after a bit oft surfing
on opera forums, they told me to downgrade again to 3.6, and everything
works fine again :)
--- System information. ---
Architectu
Package: python2.4-minimal
Version: 2.4.4-3
Followup-For: Bug #418109
Others already reported this bug, downgrading to python-central/testing
fixes it (temporarily)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 's
Package: libsmbios1
Version: 0.13.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks other software
Hi,
libsmbios1 is no longer linked against libstdc++, which causes interesting
breakages for packages linked against it (runtime & compile time failure).
libsmbios1 0.12.1-3:
% ldd /usr/lib/libsmbios.so.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, I send the wrong patch. This is the correct diff.
- --- pyversions.py.orig 2007-04-07 09:39:28.0 +0200
+++ pyversions.py 2007-04-07 09:39:42.0 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
_defaults = config
if _defaults and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
The following patch resolves the problem for me. And this is what i
think was intended by the developer.
- --- pyversions.py 2007-04-07 09:39:42.0 +0200
+++ pyversions.py.orig 2007-04-07 09:39:28.0 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @
82 matches
Mail list logo
