On Sat, 19 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
can you please do a binNMU of package libblitz0 to close #424644.
Are you sure that amd64 is the only architecture affected by this problem?
I'm absolutely unsure because I have no idea how to verify this failsafe.
Do you have a reasonable proposal,
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:23:04PM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote:
> another thing to do would be to have it managed via debconf?
I'm reluctant to do this as it means more questions for everyone who
installs it to answer (there have been grumbles on the lists about
'debconf proliferation'), plus work f
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 05:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423936: fixed in sword 1.5.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 04:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424449: fixed in spfmilter 1.99+0.97-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 04:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423758: fixed in dkim-milter 0.8.0.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 04:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423759: fixed in dk-milter 0.5.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tag 422772 patch
thanks
I encountered this while merging 0.8.0-3 into Ubuntu. Here's a patch
that fixes it.
diff -u qgis-0.8.0/debian/control qgis-0.8.0/debian/control
--- qgis-0.8.0/debian/control
+++ qgis-0.8.0/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
U
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 422772 patch
Bug#422772: qgis - FTBFS: link: `/usr/lib/libhdf5.la' is not a valid libtool
archive
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 423818 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#423818: opensp: FTBFS: install: cannot stat `./releasenotes.ps': No such
file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Package: jruby0.9
Version: 0.9.9-2
Severity: serious
As the subject says: the source package's Build-Depends on
"sun-java5-sdk | sun-java6-sdk | java2-compiler" cannot be satisfied using
packages from main.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Hello Frans,
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 02:02:33PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>The $OPTIONS at the end of the start-stop-daemon call looks suspicious.
$OPTIONS is set in either /etc/default/portmap or /etc/portmap.conf
What's the content of the two files or the one file that you have?
Best Regards,
A
Hi, Steve
Humm, I forgot to put this patch again, because it wanst working.
I will look at it again and will upload VBA with this patch.
Thanks.
Regards
Jose Carlos
2007/5/19, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Package: visualboyadvance
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi José Carlos,
vis
Package: visualboyadvance
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi José Carlos,
visualboyadvance 1.8.0-1 has a regression versus 1.7.2-6, resulting in a
build failure on 64-bit archs:
[...]
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/visualboyadvance-1.8.0/src/prof'
alpha-linux-gnu-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAM
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 00:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417138: fixed in uw-imap 7:2002edebian1-13.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 00:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416780: fixed in uw-imap 7:2002edebian1-13.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi Jonas,
Ok, the previous version of uw-imapd had a broken build-dependency line that
ftp-master is now rejecting at upload time, so here is an updated patch
fixing this line.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
Package: libgtk2.0-cil
Version: 2.10.0-2
Severity: serious
I got the following error when building my lat package. My mono isn't
superb but it looks like it's complaining that gtk-sharp needs cairo to
be present. And indeed adding libcairo2.0-cil to my build dependencies
does the trick. But it sou
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 12:56:04AM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> thanks for your report. Maybe, you can help me with this bug or should I
> ask on d-mentors/d-devel?
I think Norbert's follow-up explains this pretty accurately.
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debh
tags 416780 patch
tags 417138 patch
thanks
Hi Jonas,
I've prepared an NMU to fix these two RC bugs. In addition to the postrm
changes, I've replaced the dependency on netbase with update-inetd &&
inet-superserver, for the recent split of this interface into separate
packages.
The diff is attach
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 416780 patch
Bug#416780: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added: patch
> tags 417138 patch
Bug#417138: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added: patch
> tha
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 23:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416917: fixed in sfs 1:0.8-0+pre20060720.1-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Hello Steve,
thanks for your report. Maybe, you can help me with this bug or should I
ask on d-mentors/d-devel?
Steve Langasek schrieb am Fri 18. May, 20:19 (-0700):
> reopen 424976
> thanks
>
> Hi Jörg,
>
> xindy is still failing to build with the same error as before.
?-) I don't understand
Package: sfs
Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20060720.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my sfs 1:0.8-0+pre20060720.1-1.1 NMU during the
current BSP which I'll upload to delayed-0.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 386367 387847
Bug#386367: firefox: Newest Firefox fails to start on PowerPC
Bug#387847: [powerpc] firefox fails to start
Bug#386593: firefox: doesn't start anymore. corrupted display
Bug#386742: Firefox won't start and puts up empty dialog
Bu
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 22:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424831: fixed in libphp-phplayersmenu 3.2.0rc-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 22:47:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421786: fixed in php-imagick 2.0.0a2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 22:47:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424823: fixed in php-services-weather 1.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 22:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424784: fixed in acidlab 0.9.6b20-21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 22:47:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424686: fixed in zoo 2.10-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 22:47:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418309: fixed in php-imagick 2.0.0a2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 22:47:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424825: fixed in php-xml-util 1.1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 22:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424821: fixed in php-log 1.9.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Unfortunately, a new bug was discovered along with a issue introduced by this
NMU.
gcc-mulilib is only needed on some archs.
and readlink has changed with newest libc to return ssize_t instead of int.
Attached patch between 1.2 and 1.3 nmu.
/Sune
--
I'm not able to unlink the connection, how
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 04:13:28PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> can you please do a binNMU of package libblitz0 to close #424644.
Are you sure that amd64 is the only architecture affected by this problem?
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:25:21 -0400
> From:
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 21:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416743: fixed in ejabberd 1.1.2-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hallo Norbert,
Norbert Preining schrieb am Sat 19. May, 14:57 (+0200):
> Package: xindy
> Version: 2.2~beta2-2.1
> Severity: serious
>
> There is another build problem on some archs:
> maybe-successfull:
> amd64, mips, powerpc
> maybe-failed:
> s390, ia64
And it will fail on arm, hpp
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 21:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423978: fixed in nose 0.9.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 20:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423749: fixed in cherrypy3 3.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 20:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423825: fixed in ruledispatch 0.5adev-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 20:32:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424440: fixed in pyprotocols 1.0a0dev-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Can you please start icedove in -safe-mode and see if it still
happens?
# icedove -safe-mode
I'm having the same problem and yes, it still happens with -safe-mode:
$ icedove -safe-mode
/usr/lib/icedove/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 9497 Segmentation fault
"$prog" ${1+"$@"}
$ uname -a
Linux zoid
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 19:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417015: fixed in privoxy 3.0.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
tags 422617 + patch
tags 422617 + pending
thanks
gregor herrmann dijo [Sat, May 19, 2007 at 08:25:44PM +0200]:
> On Mon, 07 May 2007 13:23:00 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
>
> > # Error: Can't locate Locale/Maketext/Simple.pm in @INC (@INC
> > contains: t/lib /tmp/buildd/libapp-cli-per
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 422617 + patch
Bug#422617: FTBFS: Failed test 'use MyApp;'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 422617 + pending
Bug#422617: FTBFS: Failed test 'use MyApp;'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 423274 grave
Bug#423274: check incorrectly considered as checkmate
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> retitle 423274 pouetchess: check incorrectly considered as checkmate
Bug#423274: check incorrectly considered as checkmate
Changed Bu
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 16:16:47 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in already uploaded version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 16:16:47 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in already uploaded version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, 07 May 2007 13:23:00 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> # Error: Can't locate Locale/Maketext/Simple.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> t/lib /tmp/buildd/libapp-cli-perl-0.07/inc
> /tmp/buildd/libapp-cli-perl-0.07/blib/lib
> /tmp/buildd/libapp-cli-perl-0.07/blib/arch /etc/perl
> /usr/
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:13:50 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> Unhandled Exception: System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not find file
> "/usr/lib/pkgconfig/../../share/gapi-2.0/art-api.xml".
> File name: "/usr/lib/pkgconfig/../../share/gapi-2.0/art-api.xml"
[..]
/usr/share/gapi-2.0/art-ap
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:19:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > (cd dev && /dev/MAKEDEV std ptmx)
> The makedev package themself only provides /sbin/MAKEDEV
And changing /dev/MAKEDEV to /sbin/MAKEDEV in Makefile lets me indeed
build a package.
HTH,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/
On Thu, 03 May 2007 13:14:04 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> cimg currently fails to build from source in sid [1]:
>
> --- 8< ---
> g++ -o CImg_demo CImg_demo.cpp -Wall -W -ansi -pedantic -ffast-math -lm
> -lpthread -O3 -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -Dcimg_strict
> -Dcimg_use_xshm -
> The samba team just sent me the attached patch which supposedly fixes
> #424629 for 3.0.24-6etch1 (in short, it fixes that RC bug in etch's
> samba).
OK, I succeeded building a test case.
On an etch samba server running 3.0.24-6etch1, as this to smb.conf:
[test]
comment = Test
path=/va
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 17:02:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417007: fixed in phppgadmin 4.0.1-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: phppgadmin
Version: 4.0.1-3.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my phppgadmin 4.0.1-3.2 NMU during the current
BSP which I'll upload to delayed-0.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F99
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 16:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417005: fixed in perlindex 1.502-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: perlindex
Version: 1.502-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my perlindex 1.502-2.1 NMU during the current
BSP which I'll upload to delayed-0.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E5
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:13:24PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #425061
>
Can you please start icedove in -safe-mode and see if it still
happens?
# icedove -safe-mode
thanks,
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Deb
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 16:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424834: fixed in opendb 0.81p20-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 16:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417025: fixed in opendb 0.81p20-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #425061
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMP
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424801: fixed in netmrg 0.18.2-14.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417011: fixed in netmrg 0.18.2-14.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 15:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424838: fixed in nanourl 0.1-7.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 15:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417008: fixed in nanourl 0.1-7.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Tobias Rundström wrote:
> Could you supply more information? Missing files seems to denote that
> it didn't compile. Please paste the full log of dpkg-buildpackage.
looking at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=xmms2;ver=0.2DrHouse-3.1%2Bb2;arch=amd64;stamp=1179193578
it seems that somehow t
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 15:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420954: fixed in nagios-plugins 1.4.5-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 15:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417023: fixed in nagios 2:1.4-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: nagios
Version: 2:1.4-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my nagios 2:1.4-3.1 NMU during the current BSP
which I'll upload to delayed-0.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5
> close 421060 1.4.5-2+b1
Bug#421060: nagios-plugins - FTBFS: Build-depends against unavailable package
libsnmp9-dev
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#clo
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 14:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405192: fixed in mova 4.0-4.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 425091 + confirmed
Bug#425091: fuse-umfuse-iso9660: FTBFS: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416948: fixed in mediamate 0.9.3.6-4.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 14:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424796: fixed in mediamate 0.9.3.6-4.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 425091 + confirmed
thanks
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:32:39PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> ...
> checking whether i486-linux-gnu-gcc accepts -g... yes
> checking for i486-linux-gnu-gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
> checking for style of include used by make... GNU
> checking dep
severity 405851 normal
thanks
The package is usable when you set JAVA_HOME in /etc/default/jetty so
I downgrade the severity of the bug.
Also, a patch is already available.
On 5/19/07, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> And now that you set it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 405851 normal
Bug#405851: jetty: Jetty start script doesn't find Sun JDK moved to /usr/lib/jvm
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Hi,
can you please do a binNMU of package libblitz0 to close #424644.
Many thanks
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:25:21 -0400
From: Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 14:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416735: fixed in couriergraph 0.25-3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: couriergraph
Version: 0.25-3.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my couriergraph 0.25-3.3 NMU during the current
BSP which I'll upload to delayed-0.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F
hmm.. attached patch is reversed. I try once more.
/Sune
--
Genius, I'm not able to log from a periferic, how does it work?
The point is that you neither should ever digit on the memory, nor must send
to a button over a icon for renaming a CPU to a mousepad.
diff -u fakechroot-2.6/debian/contro
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416730: fixed in clamsmtp 1.8-5.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: clamsmtp
Version: 1.8-5.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my clamsmtp 1.8-5.2 NMU during the current BSP
which I'll upload to delayed-0.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 D
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 13:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422586: fixed in fakechroot 2.6-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi!
Attached is the patch for the nmu to 2.6-1.2 which hopefully fixet is the
correct way.
/Sune
--
Man, do you know how to cancel the kernel from Office?
From the control drawer menu inside MkLinuxPPC NT you should save a mail to
the CPU to a ethernet board over the GPU, this way you neither
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 13:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425074: fixed in dc-qt 0.2.0.alpha-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 13:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416932: fixed in linesrv 2.1.21-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: linesrv
Version: 2.1.21-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my linesrv 2.1.21-4.1 NMU during the current
BSP which I'll upload to delayed-0.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 15:09:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line depends on libcurl3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 13:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416930: fixed in lirc 0.8.0-9.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 13:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416771: fixed in icecast2 2.3.1-5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 13:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423778: fixed in icecast2 2.3.1-5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: xindy
Version: 2.2~beta2-2.1
Severity: serious
Hi Jörg!
There is another build problem on some archs:
maybe-successfull:
amd64, mips, powerpc
maybe-failed:
s390, ia64
In the maybe failed it is always the same problem:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/xindy-2.2~
tags 416930 patch
thanks
Hi mate
Enclosed you will find the NMU patch I just uploaded during the BSP in order
to fix this issue.
Cheers
Steffen
diff -u lirc-0.8.0/debian/lirc.postrm lirc-0.8.0/debian/lirc.postrm
--- lirc-0.8.0/debian/lirc.postrm
+++ lirc-0.8.0/debian/lirc.postrm
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 416930 patch
Bug#416930: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:23:57PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Sounds like broken device.map. What contents does it have?
> >
> > It is empty.
>
> Then run grub-mkdevicemap and see if it generates a proper one.
It does generate a proper map, and that fixes the problem.
Thanks!
--
Yann.
On Sat, May 19, 2007, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> And now that you set it to one of your jdk installed, is it working?
> Can I close the bug?
Uh, the bug is about the facts that Jetty doesn't start in the default
install, even when people install the most common JVMs. This seems to
be due to a har
I've tested this issue today and rebuilt rpm in a clean chroot.
The path to bzip2 was absolutly correct in the macro file.
I can only reproduce the issue when building on my original system..
then the path to bzip2 is /usr/bin/bzip2 as you describe.
I'll try to figure out now why there is a differ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 425074 patch
Bug#425074: dc-qt: FTBFS with new boost libraries
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
tag 425074 patch
thanks
It seems that the various boost libraries now have separate -[sm]t
variants. Here's a patch to link against them instead.
--- dc-qt-0.2.0.alpha.orig/backend/SConscript
+++ dc-qt-0.2.0.alpha/backend/SConscript
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Import('env')
## Copy the parent environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Guys, I want to double check the patch to 3.0.24
> (thanks, Jerry, for it) but I need a test case...
> Given that I have to coordinate that update
> with Debian's security team, I better have
> to be triple secured..:-)
>
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
