Your message dated Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:33:51 +0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Ben Finney a écrit :
> Package: nscd
> Version: 2.6-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Package 'nscd_2.6-2_i386.deb' has 'Depends: libc6-amd64 (>= 2.6-1)'.
This is a bug of dpkg-dev
> This makes the package uninstallable, since the 'libc6-amd64' package
> cannot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 433723 normal
Bug#433723: nscd: on i386 arch, broken Depends: libc6-amd64
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 433716 normal
Bug#433716: file: File doesn't compile on Debian GNU/Hurd
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Package: nscd
Version: 2.6-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package 'nscd_2.6-2_i386.deb' has 'Depends: libc6-amd64 (>= 2.6-1)'.
This makes the package uninstallable, since the 'libc6-amd64' package
cannot be installed on 'i386' architecture.
-- System Information:
Debi
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432441: fixed in heartbeat 2.0.8-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2-20070707-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks glibc build
The glibc fails to build on ia64 with gcc-4.2:
gcc-4.2 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o
/home/aurel32/glibc/glibc-2.6/build-tree/ia64-libc/elf/sln
/home/aurel32/glibc/glibc-2.
6/build-tree/ia64-li
Package: gcj-4.2
Version: 4.2-20070707-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
>From my build log:
DEB_VERSION='4.2-20070707-1'; export DEB_VERSION; \
debian/patches/alpha-no-ev4-directive.dpatch -patch -d
/tmp/gcj-4.2-4.2-20070707/src
patching file gcc/config/alp
Package: file
Version: 4.21-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
File doesn't compile on Hurd due to a dependence on PIPE_BUF.
The patch uses pathconf to get _PC_PIPE_BUF which is unlimited
(-1) on Hurd.
Michael
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 08:22:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Horms,
>
> > This has been fixed upstream, I am expecting them to release shortly
> > and this bug should be closed in the subsequent upload.
>
> Is there any more definite ETA? This is currently the major issue holding
> the n
Hi Horms,
> This has been fixed upstream, I am expecting them to release shortly
> and this bug should be closed in the subsequent upload.
Is there any more definite ETA? This is currently the major issue holding
the net-snmp soname transition out of testing.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
found 432003 2.7.0-78
thanks
Hi Camm,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 10:28:12AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
...
> The issue appears to lie either with piuparts or common lisp
> controller. The latter is running some registration code for gclcvs
> before gclcvs itself has been configured. This is contr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 432003 2.7.0-78
Bug#432003: gclcvs: installation fails
Bug marked as found in version 2.7.0-78 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
On 7/19/07, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
found 427599 1.8.2-13
...
Hi,
linux-kernel-headers is build-essential, so you don't need to build-dep
on it. The problem is that it was superseded by linux-libc-dev, which
dropped some header files.
You need to either:
- modify the code so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 432378 pending
Bug#432378: octaviz: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425893: fixed in k3d 0.6.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 424343 pending
Bug#424343: petsc: FTBFS if built twice in a row
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 425998 pending
Bug#425998: petsc: new upstream
There were no tags set.
Tags
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428943: fixed in linux-atm 2.4.1-17.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my linux-atm 2.4.1-17.1 NMU.
diff -u linux-atm-2.4.1/debian/patches/00list
linux-atm-2.4.1/debian/patches/00list
--- linux-atm-2.4.1/debian/patches/00list
+++ linux-atm-2.4.1/debian/patches/00list
@@ -1,0 +2 @@
+20_missing_includes
diff -u linux-atm-2.4.1/debian/chang
> Try setting ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no in /etc/default/rcS. I'm currently
> talking to the initscripts maintainers to try to find a good solution;
> it seems like the fix in 1:1.1.0-10 introduced a race condition.
This doesn't work for me, it kinda makes things worse because now the
messages telling m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> fixed 433687 9.0.48.0.1
Bug#433687: flashplugin-nonfree: Security issue fixed upstream [CVE-2007-2022]
Bug marked as fixed in version 9.0.48.0.1.
> notfixed 444687 9.0.48.0.1
Bug number 444687 not found. (Is it archived?)
> thanks
Stopping processing
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:08:08AM +0200, Ji??í Pale??ek wrote:
> Hello,
hi,
> > > Boost library naming is described in the documentation [0].
> > >> [0]
> > http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started/unix-variants.html#library-naming
> >Which does not mean it is correct for libboost-*-dev to si
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423742: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.47.20070718-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423742: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.47.20070718-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395386: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.47.20070718-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395386: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.47.20070718-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> # no it wont
> tags 428932 - patch
Bug#428932: iptables: FTBFS: ip6_tables.h:25:28: error: linux/compiler.h: No
such file or directory
Tags were: patch sid lenny
Tags removed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> # no it wont
> tags 429002 - patch
Bug#429002: openam: FTBFS: /usr/share/openh323/include/ixjlid.h:277:28: error:
linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: sid lenny pat
found 427599 1.8.2-13
thanks
On 05/06/07 at 15:30 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> g++ -W -Wall -O2 -I. -DXOSVIEW_VERSION=\"1.8.2\"
>> -I/build/user/xosview-1.8.2 -I/build/user/xosview-1.8.2/linux
>> -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\
found 432341 2.7.0-77
thanks
On 16/07/07 at 17:04 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thanks for your report!
>
> 1) Cannot reproduce on up-to-date unstable
You mean "up-to-date clean unstable chroot", right? You use pbuilder?
> 2) log at http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/06/14/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 427599 1.8.2-13
Bug#427599: xosview: FTBFS: serialmeter.cc:48:30: error: linux/serial_reg.h: No
such file or directory
Bug marked as found in version 1.8.2-13 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 432341 2.7.0-77
Bug#432341: gclcvs: FTBFS: do_init is undefined
Bug marked as found in version 2.7.0-77 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> # no it wont
> tags 429001 - patch
Bug#429001: raidutils: FTBFS: ../include/linux/i2o-dev.h:27:28: error:
linux/compiler.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: sid lenny patch
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 428999 1.9-17
Bug#428999: svgatextmode: FTBFS: vga_prg.h:43:22: error: asm/io.h: No such file
or directory
Bug marked as found in version 1.9-17 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:18:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:05:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > * glademm is not a problem anymore (NMUed).
> > * patchage Buil-dep is useless (I see a bug is reported), could be
> > NMUed.
>
> > * fireflier FTBFS and
Hello,
> Boost library naming is described in the documentation [0].
>> [0]
http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started/unix-variants.html#library-naming
Which does not mean it is correct for libboost-*-dev to silently
change its interface (.so library naming).
Moreover, if you have carefully
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:38:05PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (Contributors to silo-installer BCC'ed.)
>
> We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer
> udeb did not include a copyright file. After checking with Ben Collins,
> the original author, I have added a copyri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> fixed 433685 9.0.48.0.1
Bug#433685: flashplugin-nonfree: Security issue fixed in unstable
[CVE-2007-3456]
Bug marked as fixed in version 9.0.48.0.1.
> fixed 444687 9.0.48.0.1
Bug number 444687 not found. (Is it archived?)
> thanks
Stopping processing
Jakob Bohm wrote:
> Package: flashplugin-nonfree
> Version: 7.0.25-5
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security, sarge, upstream, fixed-upstream
> Justification: user security hole (and won't install)
>
> Upstream for this package (Adobe) has released versions 7.0.70 and
> 9.0.48 as security updates for v
ire
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=6731&d=20070718
GNU gdb 6.6-debian
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433681: fixed in asterisk 1:1.4.8~dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 7.0.25-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security, sarge, upstream, fixed-upstream
Justification: user security hole (and won't install)
Upstream for this package (Adobe) has released versions 7.0.70 and
9.0.48 as security updates for version 7.0.25. Like Debian, Adobe
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 03:11:10PM +, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Integer overflow in the "file" program 4.20, when running on 32-bit
> > systems, might allow user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code
> > via a large file that triggers an overflow that bypasses an assert()
> > statement.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> # I have no idea why this bug is tagged as etch only. The version
> information seems to suggest otherwise.
> tags 425753 - etch
Bug#425753: maradns - important security upgrade
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> # Since the same version is in etch, lenny and unstable, I think tagging it
> etch is wrong.
> tags 420236 - etch
Bug#420236: tkvnc: dies with message "Tk::Error: Can't set height to
tags 432323 -unreproducible
thanks
These bugs are also easily reproducible. Just try to run aptitude, attach
debugger, stop, and continue. This will fairly likely interrupt the select
which will trigger error behaviour.
select_intr.patch
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 432323 -unreproducible
Bug#432323: aptitude: doesn't react to keys after viewing changelog
Tags were: patch unreproducible
Bug#431054: aptitude doesn't respond to keyboard after installing/upgrading a
package
Bug#431688: aptitude do not react to k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # libcorba-orbit-perl is about to be removed -- see #432380.
> tag 433683 wontfix
Bug#433683: libcorba-orbit-perl: empty package on alpha [sudo and $PWD]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 9.0.31.0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security, etch, upstream, fixed-upstream
Justification: user security hole (and won't install)
Upstream for this package (Adobe) has released version 9.0.48 as a
security update for version 9.0.31.
There is also an upstream se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 423585 + pending
Bug#423585: amaya: Please remove or lower dependency on ttf-freefont
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 431600 + pending
Bug#431600: amaya: Insecure use of temporary files allows arbitary file
trunaction/creation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 432376 pending
Bug#432376: semidef-oct: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 432420 pending
Bug#432420: matwrap: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Package: libcorba-orbit-perl
Version: 0.4.7-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The libcorba-orbit-perl was recently recompiled as a binNMU (0.4.7-4+b1),
but the package ended up empty on alpha. This happens because the files
are installed using the shell variable $(PWD), whi
Hello,
I have the exact same bug on my system. I can't boot with the version .21
but I have no problem with the .18
However, before getting the error message written by Stefan Schöttke, I have
that :
BEGIN: Waiting for root file system...
Done.
The system stays for a few minutes on the BEGIN l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> package asterisk asterisk-config asterisk-dbg asterisk-dev asterisk-doc
> asterisk-h323 asterisk-sounds-main asterisk-web-vmail
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: asterisk-web-vmail aste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 429064 + patch
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch
> reassign 429064 linux-libc-dev
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `linux-libc-dev'.
> thanks
tag 429064 + patch
reassign 429064 linux-libc-dev
thanks
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 10:17:23PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> linux-libc-dev should not directly export a kernel structure. Either
> >> remove it or use #ifdef __KERNEL__, but don't bother us
tags 433633 pending
thanks
Yes, I noticed this on two architectures: alpha and s390. The patch
is ready for upload, and should take care of all architectures where
this problem might appear.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 19:51 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Maybe Claudio is working on alpha or ia64, then he has to install
> libc6.1-dev
> instead (or use libc-dev to have no problem on any platform)?
Solved. The package was holded. I'm sorry to have missed that and made
more noise than needed. Than
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.4.0~dfsg-1
Tags: security
Severity: critical
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [asterisk-announce] ASA-2007-017: Remote crash vulnerability in STUN
implementation
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007
From: The Asterisk Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433633 pending
Bug#433633: gnat-4.2 - FTBFS: multiple definition of `convert_addresses'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Using netconsole
(http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt), I was
able to get some information out of the system when it froze. Here is what
appeared in the remote log:
Jul 18 12:24:13 faerun.local ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] ->
Jul 18 12:24:13 faerun.lo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 430691 + lenny
Bug#430691: hiki: [security] vulnerability that arbitrary files would be deleted
Tags were: etch sid security
Tags added: lenny
>
End of message, stopping processi
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 19:15 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > tags 422479 patch fixed-upstream
> Bug#422479: libemail-mime-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
> Tags were: sid lenny
> Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream
I've packaged 1.859 about a wee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.6
> tags 347933 + lenny
Bug#347933: 2.6.15-2-686: kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:252
Tags were: sid etch patch help
Tags added: lenny
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:05:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> * glademm is not a problem anymore (NMUed).
> * patchage Buil-dep is useless (I see a bug is reported), could be
> NMUed.
> * fireflier FTBFS and is not maintained upstream anymore (and I'm
> pretty sure it has way be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 422479 patch fixed-upstream
Bug#422479: libemail-mime-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
tags 422479 patch fixed-upstream
thanks
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:21:35PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: libemail-mime-perl
> Version: 1.857-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
> Usertags: grid5000 rebuild
> # Failed test in t/2.t
You will no doubt be delighted to know that the lock up is still
happening, despite my previous report.
It's definitely not tied to the particular 'g,g' sequence; I can trigger
it just by starting aptitude and then navigating (e.g. using '[', arrow
keys, etc.).
Multithreading sucks.
Steve
--
I never intended my contributions to silo-installer to be anything other
than GPLed. Version 2+ is fine.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer
udeb did not include a copyright file. This has now been corrected [1].
The new copyright statement is in line with those for other components of
the installer (gpl version 2 or later).
As this can be considered a licence c
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 18:48 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>> linux-kernel-headers does not exists, you have to install
>>> linux-libc-dev now. Maybe sth is not resolved properly by your apt for
>>> one
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:38:05PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer
> udeb did not include a copyright file. After checking with Ben Collins,
> the original author, I have added a copyright statement as in [1] in the
> D-I SVN repo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> (Contributors to silo-installer BCC'ed.)
>
> We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer
> udeb did not include a copyright file. After checking with Ben Collins,
> the original author, I have added a c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As this can be considered a licence change and as you have contributed to
> silo-installer in the past, please OK this licence change by replying to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a short statement of your agreement
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-18 19:38]:
> As this can be considered a licence change and as you have contributed to
> silo-installer in the past, please OK this licence change by replying to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a short statement of your agreement.
ok
--
Martin Michlmayr
http:/
(Contributors to silo-installer BCC'ed.)
We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer
udeb did not include a copyright file. After checking with Ben Collins,
the original author, I have added a copyright statement as in [1] in the
D-I SVN repository (gpl version 2 or
Thank you! Andrew.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 432323 +patch
thanks
Hello,
I've found out the bug was in fact caused by treating EINTR from
select as an error instead of retrying. The attached patch fixes it.
PS: reindent it as you wish. Your indentation style (spaces combined with
tabs)
is really awful.
Regards
Jiri Palece
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 432323 +patch
Bug#432323: aptitude: doesn't react to keys after viewing changelog
Tags were: unreproducible
Bug#431054: aptitude doesn't respond to keyboard after installing/upgrading a
package
Bug#431688: aptitude do not react to keys after runni
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427892: fixed in xinetd 1:2.3.14-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my xinetd 1:2.3.14-1.1 NMU.
diff -u xinetd-2.3.14/debian/xinetd.prerm xinetd-2.3.14/debian/xinetd.prerm
--- xinetd-2.3.14/debian/xinetd.prerm
+++ xinetd-2.3.14/debian/xinetd.prerm
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
#!/bin/sh -e
# xinetd prerm
-if [ -x /etc/init.d/xinetd ]; then
+if [
Package: silo-installer
Version: 1.10
Severity: serious
Tags: pending
Chris Andrews noticed that a copyright file is missing in the source
package for silo-installer. As Ben Collins is the original author of this
udeb, I have drafted a copyright file with the content as listed below
and asked h
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425320: fixed in gkrelltop 2.2.9-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
tags 425320 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my gkrelltop 2.2.9-1.1 NMU.
Cheers,
Julien
diff -u gkrelltop-2.2.9/debian/changelog gkrelltop-2.2.9/debian/changelog
--- gkrelltop-2.2.9/debian/changelog
+++ gkrelltop-2.2.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gkrelltop (2.2.9-1.1) unstable;
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433650: fixed in cmigrep 1.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 425320 + patch
Bug#425320: gkrelltop: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to generate shared library.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:55:42PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The problem is because of the deactivated spinlock code. The following
> > patch seems to fix the problem, but I'm unable to understand the
> > consequences properly (e.g
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:04:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line really fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:48:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Hi,
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is because of the deactivated spinlock code. The following
> patch seems to fix the problem, but I'm unable to understand the
> consequences properly (e.g. on a system where things using the old tdb
> library could still exist, and b
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:54:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Package: libpango1.0-common
Version: 1.16.4-1
Severity: serious
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libpango1.0-common_1.16.4-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/etc/defoma/config', which is also in package gs-common
This has been the case for a few days now. I don't see the bu
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:47:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428949: fixed in ocfs2-tools 1.2.1-1.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my ocfs2-tools 1.2.1-1.4 NMU.
diff -u ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/debian/changelog ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/debian/changelog
--- ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/debian/changelog
+++ ocfs2-tools-1.2.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ocfs2-tools (1.2.1-1.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintain
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 428949 - patch
Bug#428949: ocfs2-tools: FTBFS: include/ocfs2_fs.h:538: error: expected
expression before 'struct'
Tags were: sid lenny patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
tag 428949 - patch
thanks
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 12:37:05PM +0200, Michael Mende wrote:
> tags 428949 +patch
> thankyou
>
> Hello David,
>
> please add linux-kernel-headers to your build dependencies. This will
> solve the problem.
it wont, l-k-h is removed.
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
> Michae
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 425716 + patch
Bug#425716: tdb-dev: Fails to open "previous" databases
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tag 425716 + patch
thanks
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:14:44PM +0200, Ludovic Courtes wrote:
> Package: tdb-dev
> Version: 1.1.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The latest `libtdb' from SID fails to open databases created by the version
> previously ava
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 414068
Bug#414068: brltty: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: porting needed
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> fixed 428920
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
