Package: xmms2-plugin-wma
Version: 0.2DrHouse-3.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
this package depend on two unavailable packages:
libavcodec0d (>= 0.cvs20060823)
libavformat0d (>= 0.cvs20060823)
-- System Information:
Deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Extract for my searches on problem with package including dcraw.
Silently others programs have by-passed this problem as digikam /
ufraw / rawstudio.
Can authors/maintainers tell us which version of dcraw is oncluded ?
Or confirm that :
ufraw 0.11 us
brian m. carlson wrote:
> A corrected patch is attached. The problem was that I forgot to add a
> #define which is necessary to use the C99 macros. I've just tested it
> and determined it works with gcc-4.2 -m32 on amd64.
hmm, on i386, it doesn't build.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgu
Package: exaile
Version: 0.2.10+debian-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Exaile cannot import gtkmozembed if python-gnome2-extras is not
installed and fails to execute.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'exp
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430750: fixed in labplot 1.5.1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:46:18PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Both dkim-milter and libdkim builds libdkim-dev, and libdkim0 and libdkim2
> conflict too, even though the names aren't completely identical. As I
> explained when dkim-milter was first packaged, I'm not compl
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:46:59PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks a lot for your patch. However, it doesn't compile with the same
> error message when the patch is applied. Maybe you can have a look again
> at it?
A corrected patch is attached. The problem was that I forgot to add
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 435957 serious
Bug#435957: snd: not binNMU safe
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 440589 important
Bug#440589: cupsys: Most browsers can't access web interface, but some do fine.
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 440589 + fixed-upstream pending
Bug#440589: cupsys: Most browsers can't access web interface, but
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 23:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439976: fixed in srtp 1.4.2.dfsg-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 23:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438792: fixed in srtp 1.4.2.dfsg-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.3.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When accessing http://localhost:631 cupsys via konqueror or iceweasel (or
iceape), cups returns a "404 not found" error message. With links2 it seems
to work fine, at least on the main page. A traffic captur
Source: dkim-milter
Severity: serious
Both dkim-milter and libdkim builds libdkim-dev, and libdkim0 and libdkim2
conflict too, even though the names aren't completely identical. As I
explained when dkim-milter was first packaged, I'm not completely foreign to
dropping Alt-N's libdkim altogether
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440411: fixed in debian-goodies 0.34
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420044: fixed in etoken 0.3.9-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> block 438885 with 440574
Bug#440574: memlockd postinst starts twice, doesn't use invoke-rc.d
Bug#438885: Mass bug filing: must use invoke-rc.d
Was blocked by: 341413 341415 348259 348
Package: memlockd
Version: 0.03
Severity: serious
I just installed memlockd and saw the following output:
Selecting previously deselected package memlockd.
(Reading database ... 113626 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking memlockd (from .../memlockd_0.03_amd64.deb) ..
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 12:42:19PM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> The checkrestart program from debian-goodies (both latest 0.33 and
> stable 0.27) allows arbitrary command execution with root privileges.
Thanks. I was not aware of this bug.
> Since this program is likely launched as
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 11:16:44AM +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Good Morning Gentlemen,
>
> please find attached the debdiff to fix this FTBFS.
Thanks. I'm using this to fix the bug and will upload new packages right
away.
Javier
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
One individual has had his debian WordPress blog hacked; it may have
been affected by this bug:
http://www.phfactor.net/wp/2007/08/25/fnord-updates-downtime-themes/#comment-73174
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420342: fixed in papaya 0.97.20031122-5.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400597: fixed in cdcover 0.9.1-6.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
thanks a lot for your patch. However, it doesn't compile with the same
error message when the patch is applied. Maybe you can have a look again
at it?
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: ht
Package: wordpress
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The use of the variable $file in /etc/wordpress/wp-config.php
overrides $file in many of the upstream package's base files (list
below).
This can lead to unintended security holes, as the included file
(/etc/wordpress/config-<$serv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 437330
Bug#437330: starts and then shuts
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to David Roguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> tag 440488 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#440488: frets
close 437330
tag 440488 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Sun Sep 02 20:49, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I'm running on pure amd64 sid here. The new version (fretsonfire
> 1.2.451.dfsg-2) works fine for me.
OK, I've now made sure my system is up to date on sid, sorry for jumping
the gun; it works
Package: gappletviewer-4.2
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> * Florian Weimer:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> retitle 437148 "svn", "svnserve", "unison", "rsync" passthrough is unsafe
Bug#437148: Security Hole in scponly, due to svn support
Changed Bug title to `"svn", "svnserve", "unison",
* Florian Weimer:
retitle 437148 "svn", "svnserve", "unison", "rsync" passthrough is unsafe
thanks
> svn checkout (write arbitrary files)
> svn export (write arbitrary files)
These two are non-issues because scponly relies on UNIX permissions to
restrict write access.
> Your example shows th
severity 439203 normal
quit
Hi Sune,
I still doubt that this is a bug of rng but rather a problem with users
assigning too high severities by default.
Anyways, I leave the bug open but downgrade it to normal.
Cheers,
Bastian
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> reopen 439203
> kthxbye
>
> On Sunday 02 Se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439203 normal
Bug#439203: Doesn't give any explanations of the severities and what they mean
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
reopen 439203
kthxbye
On Sunday 02 September 2007, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #439203: Doesn't give any explanations of the severities and what they
> mean, which was filed against the reportbug-ng package.
Hi!
Try look at th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 439203
Bug#439203: Doesn't give any explanations of the severities and what they mean
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not chan
Fixed for the moment with 2.25b-2 with a conflict; will do it properly
in 2.25b-3 or 2.25b-4 later.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:51:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
retitle 437148 "svn", "svnserve" command passthrough is unsafe
thanks
* Joachim Breitner:
>> So what? You still need a second channel to access that repository
>> using the Subversion protocol. scponly access alone is not
>> sufficient.
>
> It is, as you can run “svn” in the scponly shell, in D
On sön, 2007-09-02 at 19:04 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> reopen 437330
> thanks
>
Hi!
I'm running on pure amd64 sid here. The new version (fretsonfire
1.2.451.dfsg-2) works fine for me.
> I am seeing this on amd64 too. The error I get after upgrading
> python-opengl to the one in sid (making
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> severity 331277 important
Bug#331277: guile-gnome-platform: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: cast from pointer to
integer of different size
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> severity 331277 serious
Bug#331277: guile-gnome-platform: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: cast from pointer to
integer of different size
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of
On 02.09.2007, at 18:29, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Joachim Breitner:
This is an unfortunate interaction between scponly and
Subversion, but
not a real bug in any of the programs. The same problem arises
when a
scponly-restricted user uploads any form of executable contents.
CGI
scripts
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 02.09.2007, 20:27 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer:
> * Joachim Breitner:
>
> >> You need write permission on the Subversion repository. I think it's
> >> pretty obvious that you can change the Subversion hook scripts once
> >> you've got them.
> >>
> >> There are tons of progra
* Joachim Breitner:
>> You need write permission on the Subversion repository. I think it's
>> pretty obvious that you can change the Subversion hook scripts once
>> you've got them.
>>
>> There are tons of programs which will lead to a similar
>> situation--basically anything that reads a user-
Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:24:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old sauce bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 02.09.2007, 18:29 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer:
> * Joachim Breitner:
>
> >> This is an unfortunate interaction between scponly and Subversion, but
> >> not a real bug in any of the programs. The same problem arises when a
> >> scponly-restricted user uploads any form of exec
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438152: fixed in thttpd 2.25b-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
... oops, here is the actual attachment
--
Matthew Johnson
Binary files 1/usr/share/doc/fretsonfire-game/changelog.Debian.gz and
2/usr/share/doc/fretsonfire-game/changelog.Debian.gz differ
diff -urN 1/usr/share/doc/fretsonfire-game/copyright
2/usr/share/doc/fretsonfire-game/copyright
--- 1/usr/s
reopen 437330
thanks
I am seeing this on amd64 too. The error I get after upgrading
python-opengl to the one in sid (making it more verbose, the same error
happens on the etch version) is:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/games/fretsonfire/game/GameEngine.py", line 348, in ru
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 437330
Bug#437330: starts and then shuts
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> close 377180 0.1.15-1.2
Bug#377180: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: C/C++ linkage declarations conflict
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixe
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429740: fixed in openssl 0.9.8e-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 440538 + unreproducible
Bug#440538: openssl: FTBFS with gcc-4.2: sect239k1 testsuite failure.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
tags 440538 + unreproducible
thanks
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 05:37:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: openssl
> Version: 0.9.8e-7
> Severity: serious
>
> While building openssl on i386 with gcc 4.2 I get the following error:
> sect239k1: .. failed
>
> ECDSA test failed
> 8348:error:0D0
* Joachim Breitner:
>> This is an unfortunate interaction between scponly and Subversion, but
>> not a real bug in any of the programs. The same problem arises when a
>> scponly-restricted user uploads any form of executable contents. CGI
>> scripts are more common (and their so-called "PHP shel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package reprepro
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: reprepro
> fixed 440535 2.2.4-1
Bug#440535: reprepro: Not properly checking signatures of repositories updating
from
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.2.4-1.
> tags 440029 + pending
Bug#440029: reprepro:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 05:33:14PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> reopen 429740
> thanks
>
> During the build log it's still showing things like:
> ocsp_ext.c:447: warning: function called through a non-compatible type
> ocsp_ext.c:447: note: if this code is reached, the program will abort
> ocsp_ext
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440519: fixed in ivtv 1.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Joachim,
On 10.08.2007, at 19:54, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Package: scponly
Version: 4.6-1
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi Thomas Wana,
messing around with some friends here, I tried to access his computer
with only a scponly protected account. I discovered
reopen 429740
thanks
During the build log it's still showing things like:
ocsp_ext.c:447: warning: function called through a non-compatible type
ocsp_ext.c:447: note: if this code is reached, the program will abort
ocsp_ext.c: In function 'OCSP_accept_responses_new':
ocsp_ext.c:476: warning: funct
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.8e-7
Severity: serious
While building openssl on i386 with gcc 4.2 I get the following error:
sect239k1: .. failed
ECDSA test failed
8348:error:0D0680A8:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_CHECK_TLEN:wrong
tag:tasn_dec.c:1294:
8348:error:0D06C03A:asn1 encoding routines:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 429740
Bug#429740: openssl: FTBFS with gcc-4.2: Test failures
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 387989 + lenny sid
Bug#387989: FTBFS: are no arguments to 'cur' that depend... (gcc regression)
Tags were: sid fixed-upstream lenny patch
Bug#423823: retchmail: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that
depend on a template parameter, so
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429740: fixed in openssl 0.9.8e-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Le 02.09.2007 16:18, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Nicolas STRANSKY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (02/09/2007):
>> vlc-fbx fails with any .avi file on my system with the same error.
>> vlc-fbx is not able to produce a MPEG-2 stream because (I guess) of a
>> policy change with vlc/ffmpeg and MPEG-2 ?
>
> Not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> forcemerge 439827 440520
Bug#439827: grep -vw segfault on word matches in UTF-8 locales
Bug#440520: grep -vw segfault in UTF-8 locale
Bug#439931: grep: Enormous slowdown on AMD64
Bug#
Hi!
I'm going to be working on this bug. But since there are a number of bugs in
thttpd, I'm going to try and fix a bunch of them, not just this one.
Daniel, is it ok if I do an NMU that includes the new upstream release?
If I don't get your approval, I'll upload it to the 10-day delayed queue,
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85h
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Running kernel 2.6.16 on stable, root/boot on raid 1 on scsi devices,
rest of system is lvm on raid 1 on same scsi devices.
Upgrading from initrd-tools to initramfs-tools results in the error message
Nicolas STRANSKY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (02/09/2007):
> vlc-fbx fails with any .avi file on my system with the same error.
> vlc-fbx is not able to produce a MPEG-2 stream because (I guess) of a
> policy change with vlc/ffmpeg and MPEG-2 ?
Not that I know of, see #439897, which is still open, so I be
Le 02.09.2007 15:21, Vincent Danjean a écrit :
> Can you read your .avi with vlc ? (ie on the local computer ?)
Yes, I can read any file with vlc on the local computer.
> If yes, can you try to find a small .avi that exhibit the problem
> and send me the exact commands you use.
vlc-fbx fails wi
Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
> Package: freeplayer
> Version: 20070531+dfsg.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi,
>
> When trying to read a .avi file with the freebox and the freeplayer,
> vlc-fbx gives the following output :
> [0579] ffmpeg encoder error: cannot
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> built ivtv modules using module-assistent.
You need to
rm /usr/src/modass/usr_src/modules/ivtv/driver/Module.symvers and then
force a rebuild using module-assistant (using the -f flag). This is
because old versions of this file can persist and get picked up by t
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386099: fixed in magnus 20060324-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 430250 pending
Bug#430250: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 12:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385521: fixed in langdrill 0.3-6.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: ivtv-source
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I'm running a selfcompiled kernel which is built from unstables most
recent linux-source-2.6.22 (2.6.22-4), and built ivtv modules using
module-assistent.
Both ivtv-fb and saa717x are built fine,
Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:19:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440160: sysklogd uses /var/log/mail.log .err .info instead
of /var/log/mail/mail.log .err .info
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: sysklogd
> Version: 1.5-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> I don't really know if it is new sendmail config, proftpd config or new
> sylogd config, but many of my log files have been deactivated and replaced by
> others in o
Package: freeplayer
Version: 20070531+dfsg.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
When trying to read a .avi file with the freebox and the freeplayer,
vlc-fbx gives the following output :
[0579] ffmpeg encoder error: cannot find encoder MPEG-2 Video
[0558] stream_
found 419035 1.0-4
severity 419035 important
thanks
Dear ROTTers,
I am lowering the severity of this bug to a non-RC level:
rott (1.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/patches/10-32bitisms.dpatch:
+ New patch to lower the severity of #419035.
Thanks, Dmitry V. Rutsky <[EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 419035 1.0-4
Bug#419035: rott is rotten - riddled with 32bit-isms
Bug marked as found in version 1.0-4.
> severity 419035 important
Bug#419035: rott is rotten - riddled with 32bit-isms
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing #433299
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:27:46PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The failing arches are mips, mipsel, alpha and sparc.
>
> At first I thought it was something related to aolserver4's version, but
> after checking the versions for failing and non-failing arches, that doesn't
> seem to be the
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 07:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409473: fixed in anon-proxy 00.02.39-8.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2007 07:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424601: fixed in anon-proxy 00.02.39-8.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forcemerge 423755 440501
Bug#423755: dict-jargon: FTBFS: 4 out of 63 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to
file jargon-4.4.4.rej
Bug#440501: dict-jargon: FTBFS
Forcibly Merged 423755 440
84 matches
Mail list logo
