Quoting Willy Gommel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> "Begin: Running Scripts/Init-bottom ...
> Done.
> run-init; /sbin/init: No such file or directory
> Kernel-panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!"
>
> Which, of course, puts an immediate and permanent stop to the proceedings.
Are there other mess
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.29
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
HTTP://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r1/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r1-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: 10-3-2007 all day.
Machine; Toshiba A20
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 416137 pending
Bug#416137: ITP: pyscrabble -- an online, multiplayer scrabble program
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 425885 pending
Bug#425885: apertium: Obsolete Build-D
If you're getting a bus error on sparc, then that's probably due to an
unaligned memory access. On sparc machines, you can only access memory
that is properly aligned. The buildds on ia64 are set with prctl to
have this behavior as well, because although (IIRC) the ia64 kernel can
fix up unaligne
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361568: fixed in libpam-chroot 0.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> severity 412138 serious
Bug#412138: lsh should be dynamically linked with libnettle
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431692: fixed in diff-ext 0.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431692: fixed in diff-ext 0.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On 10/3/07, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > [Note]: Apologize for the non-english readers...
> >
> > Hi all !
> >
> > While packaging SPIP for debian, I came across files that where extracted
> > from
> > the PEAR package HTMLSax3 [1]
> >
> > We have
Package: libgcc1-dbg
Version: 1:4.2.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libgcc1-dbg depends on libgcc1 (= 4.2.1-6) rather than (= 1:4.2.1-6)
and is therefore uninstallable; likewise for lib32gcc1-dbg, and
presumably also for lib64gcc1-dbg on i386.
-- System Information:
De
Romain Beauxis wrote:
[Note]: Apologize for the non-english readers...
Hi all !
While packaging SPIP for debian, I came across files that where extracted from
the PEAR package HTMLSax3 [1]
We have had some trouble with them for the following reasons:
* Licence headers claim they are
I think a variant of this bug is still outstanding in python-matplotlib
0.90.1-2
I have selected numerix: numpy in my matplotlibrc.
When I try to import pylab after installing python-matplotlib, I get the
error
The import of the numpy version of the nxutils module,
_nsnxutils, failed. This is i
Frank Habermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have talked with Lukas on the pear-dev list about that problem and he want
> to talk with Harry next week as you see here [0]. I hope he can clear this
> problem that we have a solution as fast as possible.
>
> Frank Habermann
>
> [0]: http://news.php.net/php
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:56:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#35: fixed in openssl 0.9.8c-4etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431590: fixed in newpki-server 2.0.0+rc1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gdc-4.1
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
Package: gtk+2.0
Severity: serious
I tried to build gtk+2.0 in my i386 sid chroot but it failed with the following
error.
creating autotestfilechooser
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link -o autotestkeywords
libtool: unrecognized option `-o'
Try `libtool --help' for more information.
make[3]:
Hi,
i have talked with Lukas on the pear-dev list about that problem and he want
to talk with Harry next week as you see here [0]. I hope he can clear this
problem that we have a solution as fast as possible.
Frank Habermann
[0]: http://news.php.net/php.pear.dev/48218
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> found 410686 0.22a-1
Bug#410686: numerix_0.22a-1(experimental/alpha/ds10): FTBFS
Bug marked as found in version 0.22a-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:13:01PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > numerix has been autobuild without problems in versions 0.22-3 and 0.22-4.
> > I am hence closing this bug.
>
> I'm not really sure for this one. The FTBFS is for the version 0.22a
> (please notice the small "a") which is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 410686
Bug#410686: numerix_0.22a-1(experimental/alpha/ds10): FTBFS
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stop
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:41:47PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Cyril Brulebois:
>
> > Forwarding the question to the (hopefully) appropriate persons.
> >
> > From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Bug#441122: cacao - FTBFS: undefined reference to
> > `__data_start'
> > To:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 06:04:12PM +, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > Since I can't reproduce it either, it makes it very hard for me to fix
> > it.
>
> Hmmhh, any ideas what could return 255 in the post-inst script?
The bug log shows that atleast the debconf message was displayed, which
means w
[Note]: Apologize for the non-english readers...
Hi all !
While packaging SPIP for debian, I came across files that where extracted from
the PEAR package HTMLSax3 [1]
We have had some trouble with them for the following reasons:
* Licence headers claim they are un der PHP licence versio
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 19:56 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:31:57PM +, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 19:25 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:08:34PM +, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > How is debconf con
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442968: fixed in pyqwt5 5.0.1.dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:31:57PM +, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 19:25 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:08:34PM +, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How is debconf configured? How did you run the upgrade?
> > >
> > > I manually ran
package azureus
severity 445134 important
tag 445134 moreinfo
thanks
Hello Roman,
You currently have three JVM installed (sun-java5-jre, sun-java6-jre,
and java-gcj-compat). Which are you using? Run these commands for me:
$ /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display java
$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/j
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:08:34PM +, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> >
> > How is debconf configured? How did you run the upgrade?
>
> I manually ran apt-get upgrade.
Can you reproduce it when downgrading the version, and then upgrading it
again?
> > Was this some automated upgrade with fronte
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package azureus
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: azureus
> severity 445134 important
Bug#445134: azureus: always crashes on starup
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tag 445134 moreinfo
Bug#445134: azureus: always crashes on starup
There were no
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 19:25 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:08:34PM +, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > >
> > > How is debconf configured? How did you run the upgrade?
> >
> > I manually ran apt-get upgrade.
>
> Can you reproduce it when downgrading the version, and then
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 19:00 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:43:52AM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > Package: libssl0.9.8
> > Version: 0.9.8e-9
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > This happened on todays upgrade of 2 independent etch based machines.
> >
> > # apt-get upgrade
> >
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:43:52AM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Package: libssl0.9.8
> Version: 0.9.8e-9
> Severity: grave
>
> This happened on todays upgrade of 2 independent etch based machines.
>
> # apt-get upgrade
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> (Reading database ... 31627 files and dir
* Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-28 14:51]:
> unfortunately, i don't have access to powerpc at the moment, so Martin,
> any help would be greatly appreciated.
I just tried to compile the current version of freebirth with the
current gcc (4.2) version in unstable, and it still segfaults
Your message dated Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:18:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:29:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430238: fixed in fftw3 3.1.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
> Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
>>> I've been thinking about Sune's suggestion, and I've ended up with the
>>> following temporary changelog:
>>> xine-lib (1
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438425: fixed in aolserver4 4.5.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444036: fixed in evolution 2.12.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:40:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440545: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:40:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443576: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:40:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443576: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:37:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432419: fixed in gpib 3.2.09-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:37:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424836: fixed in gpib 3.2.09-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:40:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440545: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:37:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417462: fixed in gpib 3.2.09-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:37:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423286: fixed in gpib 3.2.09-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:37:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375214: fixed in gpib 3.2.09-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:40:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441481: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:17:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440864: fixed in gambas2 1.9.51-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:26:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443903: fixed in poppler 0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Oct 3, 2007 at 10:58:12 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> My .xsession-errors ends in:
>
> X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
> Gdk-ERROR **: Fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server :0.0.
> X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or serve
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 432887 patch
Bug#432887: openslp-dfsg - FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
On October 3, 2007 at 3:16AM +0900,
nori1 (at dolphin.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp) wrote:
> * The online license page only says that the license for distribution
> is CC by-sa and does not specify its version. However, the license
> deed and full license code linked from that page is ones of CC by-sa
>
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
>
>> I've been thinking about Sune's suggestion, and I've ended up with the
>> following temporary changelog:
>
>> xine-lib (1.1.8-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
>> [Reinhard Tartler]
>> * use
Your message dated Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:36:24 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please close.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Package: bcm43xx-fwcutter
Version: 1:005-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-
severity 445133 grave
close 445133 1:006-2
thanks
Patrick wrote:
^
get a real name, please.
> Package: bcm43xx-fwcutter
> Version: 1:005-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: no longer builds from source
Aha. How does the package itself not bbuild from source anymore
another data point re: nvidia 100.14.11 and 100.14.19 drivers
i'm not sure if this is an nvidia-glx bug, an nvidia-kernel-* bug, or a
kernel bug. it certainly shouldn't be classed as a browser bug because
applications shouldn't be able to lock the system solid.
my very strong suspicion is that i
Package: dspam
Version: 3.6.8-5+b1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After an upgrade of mysql
ii mysql-client-5.0 5.0.45-1
MySQL database client binaries
ii mysql-common
and two more data points i forgot to mention in my last message.
i have two other machines here, also with nvidia cards.
1. "hex" is an ancient amd-2000 with an nv geforce 6200.
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV44A [GeForce 6200] (rev
a1)
it has been running without err
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 445133 grave
Bug#445133: bcm43xx-fwcutter: File wl_apsta.o not located at
http://boredklink.googlepages.com/wl_apsta.o
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
> close 445133 1:006-2
Bug#445133: bcm43xx-fwcutter: File wl_apsta.o not located at
Package: azureus
Version: 2.5.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Azureus crashes everytime when Im` tying to launch it. My current JVM is
sun-java6. I`ve got the same behavior with sun-java5.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
AP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> severity 445119 normal
Bug#445119: This package is two years old
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
tag 432887 patch
thanks
Hi,
Please find attached patch to fix this bug (openslp-dfsg - FTBFS: ***
No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.)
--
Cheers,
---
Kartik Mistry || GPG: 0xD1028C8D || IRC: kart_
kartikmistry.org/blog || kartik
I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
> I've been thinking about Sune's suggestion, and I've ended up with the
> following temporary changelog:
> xine-lib (1.1.8-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> [Reinhard Tartler]
> * use dh_listpackages instead of hardcoded list for dete
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> found 445090 0.9.8c-4etch1
Bug#445090: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255
Bug marked as found in version 0.9.8c-4etch1.
> notfound 445090 0.9.8e-9
Bug
> When I checked snort for testing migration, I saw that it did not build
> on a few archs (arm, hppa, ia64, s390 and sparc) and it always has this
> error message:
This seems to be a new bug. "Bus error" ?
Anyway, the FAQ and other documentation should be arch: all packages,
I will review why thi
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 02:49:55AM +0200, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.214-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
When upgrading from util-vserver 0.30.212-1 to 0.30.214-3 I'm unable to
enter my vserver, downgrading to 0.30.212-1 make
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 393368 2.12.0.dfsg-1
Bug#393368: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Bug marked as found in version 2.12.0.dfsg-1 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi,
> numerix has been autobuild without problems in versions 0.22-3 and 0.22-4.
> I am hence closing this bug.
I'm not really sure for this one. The FTBFS is for the version 0.22a
(please notice the small "a") which is only available in experimental.
Can you confirm that this precise version bui
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442259: fixed in pan 0.132-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: argouml
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The last offical version is the 0.24 and was launched the Feb 15, 2007.
The 0.19.8 have been released the Nov 8, 2005.
Is there a maintener for this package ?
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kern
Audacity crashes are now gone here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been thinking about Sune's suggestion, and I've ended up with the
following temporary changelog:
xine-lib (1.1.8-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[Reinhard Tartler]
* use dh_listpackages instead of hardcoded list for determining the
provided binary packages.
* Bug fix: "Depends->Recomme
This will be fixed in poedit 1.3.8, the patch is here if you want to
apply it in the meantime:
http://fisheye3.cenqua.com/changelog/poedit/?cs=1178
Vaclav
--
PGP key: 0x465264C9, available from http://pgp.mit.edu/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 9.0.48.0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
this is a clear upstream bug, but i'm still filing it here for us poor
debian users to have a "watchpoint".
this is a specialization of bug #440165, which should be closed wontfix.
--
To UN
Package: snort
Severity: serious
Hi
When I checked snort for testing migration, I saw that it did not build
on a few archs (arm, hppa, ia64, s390 and sparc) and it always has this
error message:
ps2pdf faq.ps
make[1]: *** [faq.pdf] Bus error
make[1]: *** Deleting file `faq.pdf'
rm faq.ps faq.dvi
Package: openser
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: serious
OpenSER currently doesn't build with the newer libxmlrpc version, due
to important and backward-incompatible changes in libxmlrpc.
Upstream is working on it, but I have no ETA and that code may not
even make it in the 1.3 version due in december
Your message dated Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:45:08 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#435803: wajig crashes immediately on startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444504: fixed in nsis 2.31-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: xscreensaver
Version: 5.03-2
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Ever since switching to a Dell flat-screen (2007FPb - I was previously
using a CRT) I've experienced a problem where:
* I lock my X session,
* I switch to a virtual console (Ctrl-Alt-F1, etc.), whic
Philippe Cloutier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:
> Doesn't xserver-xorg-core 1.4 conflict with current nvidia-glx?
I probably forgot to mention that I had to ignore that conflict to get
it installed. I apologize!
Anyway, the new package version
Your message dated Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:19:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
84 matches
Mail list logo
