Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 453253 linux-2.6
Bug#453253: linux-2.6.18-5-xen-686: kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481!
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-2.6.18-5-xen-686'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6.18-5-xen-686' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 453254 linux-2.
Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:51:31 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ja-trans: removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 453167 by 453264
Bug#453264: libc6-dev: fails to define ptrdiff_t in malloc.h
Bug#453167: swi-prolog: FTBFS: /usr/include/malloc.h:85: error: expected ')'
before '__size'
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 453167 added: 453264
> kthxb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 453168 + patch
Bug#453168: renameutils: FTBFS: mbuiter.h:180: error: expected declaration
specifiers or '...' before 'ptrdiff_t'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
block 453167 by 453264
kthxbye
This is a bug in libc6-dev. See the blocking bug for details.
--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only
a typesetting engine: http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc/code/thwack
tags 453168 + patch
kthxbye
Attached is a patch to fix the problem by #including stddef.h.
--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only
a typesetting engine: http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc/code/thwack
Op
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks other packages
The following test program:
---
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE
#include
#include
---
results in a compile-time error:
In file included from foo.c:3:
/usr/include/malloc.h:85: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘__size’
/
Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453229: fixed in pyrad 1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 453187 libdebian-installer
Bug#453187: FTBFS when libdebian-installer4-dev is installed
Bug reassigned from package `miro' to `libdebian-installer'.
> severity 453187 important
Bug#453187: FTBFS when libdebian-installer4-dev is installed
Sever
reassign 453187 libdebian-installer
severity 453187 important
tags 453187 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package config error:
> pkg-config --list-all outputted the following error:
> Package 'libdebian-installer-extra' has no Description: field
>
> make: *** [p
package isdnutils
tags 453165 + patch
kthxbye
Attached is a patch to fix this bug.
--
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only
a typesetting engine: http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc/code/thwack
OpenPGP: R
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package isdnutils
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: isdnutils
> tags 453165 + patch
Bug#453165: isdnutils: FTBFS: capi20.h:65: error: expected declaration
specifiers or '...' before 'size_t'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> kthxbye
Stopping p
forcemerge 451434 453204
thanks
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> i386.
Merging with earlier similar report and reducing severity for reasons
explained there.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 451434 453204
Bug#451434: installation-guide: FTBFS: Failure on Russian pdf
Bug#453204: installation-guide: FTBFS: Error: build of pdf failed with error
code 1
Forcibly Merged 451434 453204.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 453215 + pending
Bug#453215: libdevel-repl-perl: FTBFS: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
t/load_core.t line 5.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 453219 + pending
Bug#453219: libmoosex-getopt-perl: FTBFS: t/001_basic failed
Th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 453215 libmoose-perl 0.26-1
Bug#453215: libdevel-repl-perl: FTBFS: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
t/load_core.t line 5.
Bug reassigned from package `libdevel-repl-perl' to `libmoose-perl'.
> reassign 453219 libmoose-perl 0.26-1
Bug#4532
reassign 453215 libmoose-perl 0.26-1
reassign 453219 libmoose-perl 0.26-1
reassign 453228 libmoose-perl 0.26-1
merge 45321 45321 45321 453218
tags 453218 pending
thanks
libmoose-perl fails tests cases when the 0.45-1 version of
libclass-mop-perl is used.
Anyway, the bug is solved with the newest
Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453217: fixed in libtm-perl 1.26-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452033: fixed in ingimp 2.4.2.20071119-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: linux-2.6.18-5-xen-686
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
When shutting down a Xen DomU, the following intermittantly happens:
mrstabby kernel: EIP: [] retrigger+0x1f/0x35 SS:ESP 0069:c039feb0
Nov 28 13:09:16 mrstabby kernel: [ cut here ]---
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: xscreensaver
> version: 5.03-3
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071106 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
> Is build-depending on
tags 453205 +patch
thanks
Hi!
Please find attached a patch which fixes this bug by depending on
docboox-xml, and using the local DTD present in that package.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
diff -u jfreereport-0.9.0-05/d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 453211 confirmed pending
Bug#453211: .la file references another .la file, but does not depend on it
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
> found 453211 0.6.21-1
Bug#453211: .la file references another .la file, but does not depen
tag 453211 confirmed pending
found 453211 0.6.21-1
thanks
Unfortunately I had just uploaded a new gnokii version with new binary
packages, so its on waiting on NEW.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 453205 +patch
Bug#453205: jfreereport: FTBFS: fetches stuff from www.oasis-open.org
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:47:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452724: fixed in kdeedu 4:3.96.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:12:38AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > But I just tried to reproduce the bug, and was unsuccessful. I just
> > purged the em8300 package and tried to reinstall it:
> >
> > irma:~# DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive aptitude install em8300=0.1
Hi,
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2007 à 23:16 +0200, Guillaume JAOUEN a écrit :
> Package: gnome-applets
> Version: 2.18.0-4+b1
> Followup-For: Bug #443792
>
> All applets crash at gnome session start with this message :
> OAFIID:(+name of the applet).
Does it still happen with gnome-applets 2.20 curr
reassign 452985 em8300
retitle 452985 em8300: Fails to install
tag 452985 + unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:44:21PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > why install em8300 if you only want em8300-source?
>
> freudian typo, sorry. i was looking at em8300-sourc
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> But I just tried to reproduce the bug, and was unsuccessful. I just
> purged the em8300 package and tried to reinstall it:
>
> irma:~# DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive aptitude install em8300=0.16.3-1
you're cheating, you're doing it noninteractive ;)
> Have you had an ol
Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:19:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453083: iscsitarget-source: Using m-a a-i iscsitarget
results in an empty package.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On 27/11/07 at 22:52 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Version: 0.5.15lorg3.2-4
Where is that version? It's not listed on the PTS.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 453211 libgnokii3-dev
Bug#453211: kdepim: FTBFS: /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libpcsclite.la: No
such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package `kdepim' to `libgnokii3-dev'.
> retitle 453211 .la file references another .la file, but does
reassign 453211 libgnokii3-dev
retitle 453211 .la file references another .la file, but does not depend on it
thanks
Hi!
I just got this ftbfs-report where kdepim because /usr/lib/libpcsclite.la
isn't available.
kdepim doesn't use it directly, but it is referenced by libgnokii.la in
dependency
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 452985 em8300
Bug#452985: em8300-source: Fails to install
Bug reassigned from package `em8300-source' to `em8300'.
> retitle 452985 em8300: Fails to install
Bug#452985: em8300-source: Fails to install
Changed Bug title to `em8300: Fails to ins
Package: libpam-heimdal
Version: 2.6-1+b1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The amd64 box is also the KDC, i386 box running as slave KDC, and i386
client boxen all are working fine with the same pam configuration.
removing pam_krb5 from both the account and session stack
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:32:41PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: em8300-source
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> em8300-source fails to install:
>
> [...]
> Setting up em8300 (0.16.3-1) ...
> dpkg: error processing em8300 (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> why install em8300 if you only want em8300-source?
freudian typo, sorry. i was looking at em8300-source, but completely
unrelated to that, i (tried to) installed em8300, which failed, and thus
this bug report.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-456
Package: gnustep-base
version: 1.14.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-27 20:12]:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 08:18 -0700 schrieb Wesley J. Landaker:
> > Subject: octplot: doesn't work at all
> > Package: octplot
> > Version: 0.4.0-3
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > octplot doesn't
On 30/10/07 at 15:06 +, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Source: libapache2-mod-rpaf
> Source-Version: 0.5-3
Hi Piotr,
There seem to be a problem here. There's now libapache-mod-rpaf
(orphaned) and libapache2-mod-rpaf both in the archive. I think that the
first one should be removed. Can you confirm
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453126: fixed in octplot 0.4.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 453214 -1
Bug#453214: redland: FTBFS: /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libgmp.la: No such
file or directory
Bug 453214 cloned as bug 453240.
> reassign -1 rasqal
Bug#453240: redland: FTBFS: /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libgmp.la: No such
file or
reassign 453178 libgtk2.0-0 2.12.1-2
thanks
Le mardi 27 novembre 2007 à 19:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Package: bug-buddy
> version: 2.20.1+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a reb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 453178 libgtk2.0-0 2.12.1-2
Bug#453178: bug-buddy: FTBFS: gnome-breakpad.cc:83: undefined reference to
`XUngrabServer'
Bug reassigned from package `bug-buddy' to `libgtk2.0-0'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hello Boud,
I checked every permissions which are set by the package wims at
post-install, from revision 3.62-9, they should match with the
requirements you list there.
I shall try to have this new revision uploaded soon.
Boud Roukema a écrit :
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
>
>
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:52:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453181: apt-rpm: FTBFS: E: Couldn't find package
libc6.1-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453171: fixed in slang2 2.1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453208: fixed in goffice0.4 0.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part:
> > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.41), debhelper (>= 5), docbook-utils,
> > gettext, libc6-dev (>= 2.6) | libc6.1-dev (>= 2.6), libc6-dev (<< 2.7~)
> > | libc6.1-dev (<< 2.7~), librpm-dev, quilt, rpm Check
On 27/11/07 at 22:07 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Relevant part:
> > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > > Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.41), debhelper (>= 5), docbook-utils,
> > > gettext, libc6-dev (>= 2.6) | libc6.1-dev (>= 2.6), libc6-dev (<< 2.
Your message dated Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:05:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453183: apt-rpm: FTBFS: E: Couldn't find package
libc6.1-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> package mpdcon.app
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mpdcon.app
> tags 270022 + pending
Bug#270022: mpdcon.app: should provide mpd-client
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
Hi Steve,
the 3.0.27a Samba package in unstable does not exhibit this problem.
Best,
Stefan
Am Montag, den 26.11.2007, 15:50 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 06:04:42PM -0500, Stefan Schmieta wrote:
> > Package: samba
> > Version: 3.0.24-6etch7
> > Severi
>From what I can tell, this ONLY affected CIFS connections. Our Macs
connected to our fileserver via smb://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sharename and
everything was fine. Windows (XP/Vista) folks had problems. I've
already done a rollback on the patch (samba_3.0.14a-3sarge9_i386.deb
-> samba_3.0.14a-3sarge
Package: ruby-defaults
version: 1.8.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-deb: building package `libxmlrpc-ruby' in
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:00:20PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:14:13PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
This file does trigger the bug. I am building gs-esp right now so that
I can explore the problem further.
fwiw building in -O0 let gs work. Though it probably hi
Package: ogle
version: 0.9.2-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/ogle-mmx/usr/lib/ogle/o
Package: libhtml-calendarmonth-perl
version: 1.18-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> ok
> 53/53 skipped: cal n
Package: openthesaurus
version: 20070408-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dh_compress
> dh_fixperms
> dh_installde
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:02:43PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > make[3]: *** [info-recursive] Error 1
Hmm:
WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if
you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file
indirectly affecting the aspect
Package: slgtk
version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/slgtk-0.7.2/s
Package: streamtuner
version: 0.99.99-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/streamtune
Package: libdevel-repl-perl
version: 1.001000-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> #. (defined($_[1]) ? (Scalar::
Package: libmoosex-getopt-perl
version: 0.05-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building libmoosex-getopt-
Package: libmoosex-object-pluggable-perl
version: 0.0005-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building libmo
Package: solfege
version: 3.9.3-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> config.status: creating topdocs/defs.texi
> config.
Package: pyrad
version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building pyrad in pyrad_1.1-1.dsc
> debia
Package: mingw32-binutils
version: 2.17.50-20070129.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory
Package: orpie
version: 1.5.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dh_installcron
> dh_installman
> dh_installinfo
> d
Package: missinglib
version: 0.4.10.debian-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/
Package: libtm-perl
version: 1.26-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building libtm-perl in libtm-perl_1.2
Package: libdatetime-format-strptime-perl
version: 1.0700-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> t/001_load...o
Package: redland
version: 1.0.6-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/usr/include/mysql
Package: libapache-mod-log-sql
version: 1.100-11.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplie
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:33:53PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
fixing 446819 is quite trivial, just add:
CFLAGS:=$(CFLAGS) -g $(if $(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),-O0,-O2)
before the
DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV := CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS) -fPIC" CPPFLAGS="$(FT_CPPFLAGS)" LDFLAGS="-lpaper $
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:58:59PM +0100, Markus Koller wrote:
> I'd like to know if this only affects SMB, or also CIFS?
These are two names for overlapping sets of technologies.
> FYI, SMB/NetBIOS is semi-officially deprecated by Microsoft in newer
> Windows versions starting with XP, and I al
found 453130 1:2.3.0.dfsg-1
close 453130 1:2.3.0.dfsg-3
tag 453130 + pending
Hi,
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1:2.3.1~rc1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> your package failed to build from source.
[...]
> | g++ -fmessage-length=0 -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 453130 1:2.3.0.dfsg-1
Bug#453130: openoffice.org_1:2.3.1~rc1-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error:
'GetSwapFloat' was not declared in this scope
Bug marked as found in version 1:2.3.0.dfsg-1.
> close 453130 1:2.3.0.dfsg-3
Bug#453130: openoffice.o
Hi,
I'd like to know if this only affects SMB, or also CIFS?
FYI, SMB/NetBIOS is semi-officially deprecated by Microsoft in newer
Windows versions starting with XP, and I also read somewhere that the Samba
team only tests for regressions with CIFS.
Cheers,
Markus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: gnat-gdb
version: 6.4+2006-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/gnat-gd
Package: goffice0.4
version: 0.4.2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dh_installdeb
> dh_gencontrol -v -- -VUpstream-V
Package: gtkorphan
version: 0.4.2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dh_testroot
> dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog
> d
Package: jfreereport
version: 0.9.0-05-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> javadoc:
> [mkdir] Created dir: /build/us
Package: lablgtk2-doc
version: 2.4.0v0.2tv-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building lablgtk2-doc in lab
Package: kdepim
version: 4:3.5.8-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> g++ -shared -nostdlib
> /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-g
Package: installation-guide
version: 20070319
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> Writing build.out/html/apds02.html for s
Package: gdb-avr
version: 6.4.90.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/gdb-a
Package: compiz-fusion-plugins-main
version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> for f in po/Makefile.in.in; do \
Package: gcj-4.1
version: 4.1.2-16
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[6]: Entering directory `/build/user/gcj-4.1-4.
Package: valgrind
version: 1:3.2.3-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
> checkin
Package: dballe
version: 3.6-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dh_md5sums -plibdballef3
> dh_builddeb -plibdballef3
Package: flute-1.3-jfree
version: 20061107-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building flute-1.3-jfree in
Package: eric
version: 3.9.5-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched
>
Package: gdb
version: 6.6.dfsg.90.20070912-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/
Package: gdb-m68hc1x
version: 1:6.4+3.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> cp ../../../src/gdb/doc/all-cfg.te
Package: twiki
version: 1:4.1.2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dh_installdocs -Xlicense.txt
> dh_installexamples
Package: ara
version: 1.0.20
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> File "gui.ml", line 1532, characters 10-23:
> Warning Y:
Package: swig1.3
version: 1.3.33-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> # quilt ex
Package: binutils-m68hc1x
version: 1:2.18-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/b
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
