Package: libgpmg1
Version: 1.20.3~pre3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBFS
Hi !
When building gpm from source, I get:
autoconf
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
make: execvp: ./configure: Permission denied
Building again solves the problem. Attached a very simple
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:29:49AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
And you unregistered the extension manually to have a clean state if it
failed before? Read the buglog...
OK, I removed it (forgot the --shared in the last attempt), and now the
package configures.
Package: newsbeuter
Version: 0.7-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
newsbeuter dies after today's unstable dist-upgrade:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ CHECK_MALLOC_=2 newsbeuter
Démarrage newsbeuter 0.7...
Chargement de la configuration...fait.
Vidage du cache...fait.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 467518 + patch
Bug#467518: git-core: builds defective package under umask 077
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 467518 + patch
quit
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:45:05AM +0100, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
Well, when starting the build from a umask 077 environment, numerous
files in the resulting package are 0600, which makes it mostly unusable.
I have not explicitly tested whether this applies to the
Hi Emilio,
I would also consider removing it from stable, as I think the security
team cannot support it.
The security team for stable often supports versions that are upstream
abandoned. The question is whether such a thing is feasible for a package.
In this case I see just one open security
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
package libgmp-ocaml libgmp-ocaml-dev mlgmp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mlgmp libgmp-ocaml-dev libgmp-ocaml
tags 464312 + pending
Bug#464312: mlgmp: FTBFS: dh_movefiles:
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#463360: fixed in proxy-suite 1.9.2.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #463360,
regarding proxy-suite: ldap_init, ldap_get_values implicitly converted to
pointers
to be marked as done.
Package: sun-java6
Version: 6-00-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security, upstream
The sun-java6 version in testing is vulnerable to CVE-2007-5689 :
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-5689
From http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-5689 :
Overview
The Java Virtual
Package: dlocate
Version: 0.94
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
dlocate actually depends on findutils ( 4.2.31-2).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # apt-cache show dlocate
Package: dlocate
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 88
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:50:19AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
dlocate actually depends on findutils ( 4.2.31-2).
no, it depends on 'locate | findutils ( 4.2.31-2)'
[...]
Depends: dctrl-tools | grep-dctrl (= 0.11), dpkg (= 1.8.0), locate |
findutils ( 4.2.31-2), perl
[...]
The version
NOKIA N'SERIES PROMOTION
TICKET NO: 1110008342
Ref : NKN/UK 110241/01
Batch: 4-13-7-37-1
We are delighted to inform you of your prize
release on the 23rd February, 2008 from the
NOKIA 'N' SERIES PROGRAM. Your e-mail was
attached to serial number 6028808.Your Email have won the
Sum of You hereby
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:39:54 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close
has caused the Debian Bug report #468487,
regarding allows unauthorized remote arbitrary code execution (CVE-2007-5689)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:29:49AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
And you unregistered the extension manually to have a clean state if it
failed before? Read the buglog...
OK, I removed it (forgot the --shared in the last attempt),
Package: egroupware-infolog
Version: 1.2.107-2.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
After upgrading to egroupware version 1.2.107, the day view in the
calendar does not work for single users anymore, only for groups. Week
and month views still
tags 468476 + confirmed
thanks
Hi Xavier,
* Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-29 12:33]:
Package: newsbeuter
Version: 0.7-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
newsbeuter dies after today's unstable dist-upgrade:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ CHECK_MALLOC_=2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 468476 + confirmed
Bug#468476: newsbeuter: segfaults at startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:44:55 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#468482: dlocate uninstallable in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #468482,
regarding dlocate uninstallable in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:24:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:29:49AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
And you unregistered the extension manually to have a clean state if
it
failed before? Read the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456708 normal
Bug#456708: xmms-liveice: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456708 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456708: xmms-liveice: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456717 normal
Bug#456717: xmms-speex: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456717 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456717: xmms-speex: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-speex' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 461740 normal
Bug#461740: xmms-skins: xmms is going away
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 461740 ftp.debian.org
Bug#461740: xmms-skins: xmms is going away
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-skins' to `ftp.debian.org'.
retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456753 normal
Bug#456753: xmms-rplay: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456753 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456753: xmms-rplay: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-rplay' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456693 normal
Bug#456693: qbble: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456693 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456693: qbble: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `qbble' to
Package: opensync-plugin-google-calendar
Version: 0.22-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Attempting to use package, sync dies with:
$ msynctool --sync test3
Synchronizing group test3
Member 1 of type google-calendar just connected
Member 2 of type kdepim-sync
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#468476: fixed in newsbeuter 0.7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #468476,
regarding newsbeuter: segfaults at startup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456712 normal
Bug#456712: xmms-musepack: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456712 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456712: xmms-musepack: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456757 normal
Bug#456757: xmms-wmdiscotux: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456757 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456757: xmms-wmdiscotux: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456704 normal
Bug#456704: xmms-infopipe: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456704 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456704: xmms-infopipe: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456729 normal
Bug#456729: xmms-shell: Please move to use bmpx
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456729 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456729: xmms-shell: Please move to use bmpx
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-shell' to `ftp.debian.org'.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456754 normal
Bug#456754: xmms-scrobbler: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456754 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456754: xmms-scrobbler: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456700 normal
Bug#456700: xmms-fmradio: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456700 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456700: xmms-fmradio: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#431745: fixed in libopensync-plugin-google-calendar 0.22-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #431745,
regarding opensync-plugin-google-calendar: Fails to sync with google calendar
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456746 normal
Bug#456746: xmms-blursk: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456746 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456746: xmms-blursk: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-blursk'
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#444375: fixed in libunicode-japanese-perl 0.45-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #444375,
regarding Broken on amd64 environment
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#464530: fixed in ftphs 1.0.4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #464530,
regarding libghc6-ftphs-dev: postinst failure (regex-compat-0.71.0.1 not found)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456752 normal
Bug#456752: xmms-ladspa: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456752 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456752: xmms-ladspa: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-ladspa'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456691 normal
Bug#456691: lirc-xmms-plugin: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456691 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456691: lirc-xmms-plugin: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456707 normal
Bug#456707: xmms-kde: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456707 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456707: xmms-kde: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-kde' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456711 normal
Bug#456711: xmms-msa: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456711 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456711: xmms-msa: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-msa' to
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:32:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#468562: fixed in libopensync-plugin-google-calendar 0.22-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #468562,
regarding Does not include google-cal-helper
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456731 normal
Bug#456731: modplugxmms: Please switch to an XMMS alternative
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456731 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456731: modplugxmms: Please switch to an XMMS alternative
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456710 normal
Bug#456710: xmms-mpg123-ja: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456710 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456710: xmms-mpg123-ja: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456709 normal
Bug#456709: xmms-mad: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456709 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456709: xmms-mad: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-mad' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456701 normal
Bug#456701: xmms is going away
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456701 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456701: xmms is going away
Bug reassigned from package `xmms-goodnight' to `ftp.debian.org'.
retitle 456701 RM:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456684 normal
Bug#456684: gkrellmms: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456684 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456684: gkrellmms: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `gkrellmms' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456681 normal
Bug#456681: gdancer: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456681 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456681: gdancer: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `gdancer' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456689 normal
Bug#456689: libxmms-perl: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456689 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456689: libxmms-perl: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456690 normal
Bug#456690: libxmms-ruby: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456690 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456690: libxmms-ruby: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 456692 normal
Bug#456692: pyxmms: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 456692 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456692: pyxmms: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `pyxmms' to
Hi Jim,
see this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379378
cheers,
Daniel
--
-
Daniel Hermann, Institut fuer Theoretische Festkoerperphysik
Universitaet Karlsruhe Tel: ++49 (0)721
Package: fvwm-crystal
Version: 3.0.3.dfsg1-0.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for orphan or removal from Debian, because:
* buggy.
* Maintainer appears inactive.
Package: runit
Version: 1.8.0-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Upgrading from runit 1.8.0-2 to 1.8.0-4 fails.
It seems to restart user processes, including the
one that is doing the upgrade. The first time it
kicked me out of X. It leaves dpkg/apt in an unusable
Package: gnump3d
Version: 3.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* buggy.
* no maintainer.
* Upstream has stopped development.
*
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Emilio,
I would also consider removing it from stable, as I think the security
team cannot support it.
The security team for stable often supports versions that are upstream
abandoned. The question is whether such a thing is feasible for a
I saw the note about this in the changelog, but can't find many other
signs of it. My menu.lst doesn't have a savedefault variable (the
changelog says it exists), perhaps because that only appears in newly
generated ones? And I don't see an indication in README.Debian.gz or
NEWS.Debian.gz about
Tags: + patch
Hello Daigo,
My package pound depends on libgoogle-perftools0. For entering lenny it
is necessary that you fix this bug.
Attached are the suggested changed/new files:
- debian/libgoogle-perftools0.docs
- debian/README.Debian
- debian/rules
--
Kind Regards,
Michael Mende
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Thanks. The manual says that if the old prerm fails, dpkg should try the
same operation with the new prerm, which you said is fixed. I didn't see
it try to do this.
The problem here might be that the prerm didn't actually fail in
the sense that it returned an
Sorry, one changed file was forgotten:
- debian/libgoogle-perftools0.manpages
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:02:23PM +0100, Michael Mende wrote:
Tags: + patch
Hello Daigo,
My package pound depends on libgoogle-perftools0. For entering lenny it
is necessary that you fix this bug.
Attached
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:17:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#468431: fixed in meta-gnustep 7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #468431,
regarding depends on gnustep-core which you dropped
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 464013 1.0.0.1
Bug#464013: libghc6-missingh-dev: Fails to install.
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.0.1 and reopened.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
found 464013 1.0.0.1
thanks
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:53:34PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: libghc6-missingh-dev
Version: 1.0.0.0
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to install with the following error:
Setting up libghc6-missingh-dev (1.0.0.0) ...
Reading package info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 404001 + patch
Bug#404001: file conflict between perftools0_tau and libgoogle
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thankyou
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi,
Emilio wrote:
In fact, I guess the package should be orphaned and removed from Debian
if a new maintainer doesn't step up, as Xavier Luthi (the original
maintainer) is not around (I didn't see him in mentors either).
While I agree that the package is in a pretty bad shape, I think
Hello!
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:47:33 +0100, Helmut Eller wrote:
* Liam Healy [2008-02-27 23:26+0100] writes:
Before I file a bug report with Debian I thought I'd ask here to see
if anybody knew about this, if there is a workaround etc.
Liam: please, either directly report it to Debian first
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 465733 important
Bug#465733: xfsprogs: xfs_check SEGV
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
tags 465733 upstream
Bug#465733: xfsprogs: xfs_check SEGV
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
tags 303388 upstream
Bug#303388:
forcemerge 468087 468429
thanks
Hello!
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:54:56 +0100, Liam Healy wrote:
I have found that the latest version of slime will not start up. I
posted to the slime mailing list and got this response from Helmut
Eller:
Liam, as I already suggested you at [1], before
Hi,
Just a quick note to say I'll be downgrading the severity on this bug - as
per
the previous email on the bug, xfs_repair can fix the FS damage. In the long
run, theres also discussion (upstream) of replacing xfs_check entirely by an
xfs_repair -n wrapper, which would resolve this issue
Package: claws-mail
Version: 3.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
today, suddenly [1], claws-mail started hanging, outputting a strange
message on the console:
---8---
Feb 29 21:15:54 pingu kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
pointer dereference at virtual
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:18:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#468184: fixed in xfsprogs 2.9.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #468184,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:18:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#465737: fixed in xfsprogs 2.9.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #465737,
regarding Can't mount XFS partition on /
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:18:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#468184: fixed in xfsprogs 2.9.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #468184,
regarding Can't mount XFS partition on /
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:18:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#465737: fixed in xfsprogs 2.9.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #465737,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: libmlt-data
Version: 0.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Unpacking libmlt-data (from .../libmlt-data_0.2.4-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmlt-data_0.2.4-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/mlt/profiles/svcd_ntsc_wide', which is also in
package
This happens also with a fresh configuration (still with 3.3.1).
I'll try to reproduce with other versions.
(I know my kernel is tainted -- see that G in the message I pasted
before -- but I currently don't have any non-free module loaded. I'll
investigate if this tainting might cause the Oops)
On Fri February 29 2008 1:59:34 pm Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I want to repeat that request. Atleast make sure that packages end up
in such a state that they can be removed.
Kurt
I have forwarded this, and an explanation, to the debian-haskell list so we
can discuss that and see if we can come
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:12:02 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Do you happen to have any idea what's going on here? AFAICS it's
something hppa specific ...
No specific idea, no. If you want to debug this I can offer you SSH
access to my HPPA machine.
Thanks for the offer, I'll contact you in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
submitter 468184 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#468184: installation-reports
Changed Bug submitter from Magnus Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(By the way, that Bug is currently
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:17:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#465036: fixed in ski 1.3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #465036,
regarding ski: FTBFS: checking for pkg-config... no
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:40:22 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel
has caused the Debian Bug report #468676,
regarding FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: kdesvn
Version: 0.14.2-2
Severity: serious
-snip-
[ 67%] Building CXX object
src/svnfrontend/CMakeFiles/svnfrontend.dir/editpropsdlg.o
/build/buildd/kdesvn-0.14.2/obj-arm-linux-gnu/src/svnfrontend/editpropsdlg.cpp:123:42:
warning: no newline at end of file
tags 407761 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Here is an NMU to fix this bug as well as update the build depends for
postgresql-dev.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
diff -Nru dak-1.0/debian/changelog dak-1.0/debian/changelog
--- dak-1.0/debian/changelog 2007-01-21 23:54:55.0 -0500
+++
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 407761 + patch
Bug#407761: Pressing return while configuring does not accept defaults
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 461974 normal
Bug#461974: pyxmms: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
reassign 461974 ftp.debian.org
Bug#461974: pyxmms: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `pyxmms-remote' to
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:00:58PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Thanks. The manual says that if the old prerm fails, dpkg should try the
same operation with the new prerm, which you said is fixed. I didn't see
it try to do this.
The problem here might be that
Your message dated Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:43:42 +1300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gengameng removed from the archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #450455,
regarding gengameng: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat
`/build/user/gengameng-4.1/debian/tmp/usr/include/gengameng/*.h': No such
tags 468664 unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:55:00 +0100
David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This happens also with a fresh configuration (still with 3.3.1).
I'll try to reproduce with other versions.
(I know my kernel is tainted -- see that G in the message I pasted
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 468664 unreproducible
Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#464665: fixed in maloc 0.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #464665,
regarding undefined references on arm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
reassign 468676 libqt3-mt-dev
Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel
Bug reassigned from package `kdesvn' to `libqt3-mt-dev'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
reopen 468676
Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
found 468676 3:3.3.8b-1
Bug#468676: FTBFS on arm, (armel) ,mips, mipsel
Bug marked as found in version 3:3.3.8b-1.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See e.g. http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
So, based on this, I have prepared a packages which does the
needful. Please do give
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
severity 468643 important
Bug#468643: gnump3d: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
severity 468644 important
Bug#468644: fvwm-crystal: should this package be orphaned or removed?
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hi Stefan,
thanks for the bug report.
The bug (and other ones related to newer postgres versions) are fixed in
the current release 1.4. The old version 1.2 is no longer supported by
the egroupware project.
Committing the fix is of cause easy, thought there would be no new 1.2
release, as 1.2
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.10-1+b2
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Tags: security
When a Recommends line in the package lists files does not have any packages
recommended, aptitude will not update the package lists.
For instance,
# aptitude update
works
# vi lists_file
97 matches
Mail list logo