Package: sql-ledger
Version: 2.6.22-2
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
This may not directly be a sql-ledger problem but I don't know what other
package to file it under.
The latest version of testing that came out a few days ago has a very large
number of
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:02:25AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:42:55AM -0400, Rene Mayorga wrote:
Either we just admit that the package has changed, and warn about
that in debian/NEWS.
Sounds nice for me, but I also think that we should add the notice in
Package: exim4-base
Version: 4.69-5+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: 6
Updating exim4 fails because the exim init script refuses to start the daemon.
From the changelog, I'm guessing this might be related to the quoting problems
encountered in a few recent bugs (476987 is one). This release
Package: synergy
Followup-For: Bug #449255
Dunno what's different in my setup, but it is not crashing here, with
both systems being 32 bit Debian testing PCs.
I suggest lowering severity to important as it seems it's not completely
unusable (at least for me).
Best regards,
-- System
severity 482158 normal
thanks
On Wed, 21 May 2008, John Tait wrote:
Package: sql-ledger
Version: 2.6.22-2
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
This may not directly be a sql-ledger problem but I don't know what other
package to file it under.
The latest
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 482158 normal
Bug#482158: [sql-ledger] dependency problems in testing release
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: gupnp-tools
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of gupnp-tools_0.4-1 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
Build started at 20080520-0934
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:12:50AM -0400, Rene Mayorga wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:02:25AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Actually I missed that html2wiki binary pokes the user about this
change (yes, I was one despite user too :))
So I'm only
forcemerge 20471 481823
thanks
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Using dpkg -i I was able to upgrade a package to a newer version,
introducing a dependency break on a Provides-ed package.
This is nothing new and it's not serious, it has always been so. Merging
with the other
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Package libsoup-2.4 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libsoup-2.4.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'libsoup-2.4', required by 'gupnp-1.0', not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
The ATT search_engines.pm (478968) bug is probably a bit inflated in
severity, but since it's so trivial to fix I'd rather do that then
downgrade it (and leave it to rot).
The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
found 481965 bugzilla/2.22.1-2
Bug#481965: bugzilla: Bugzilla fails to run with perl 5.10
Bug marked as found in version bugzilla/2.22.1-2.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 143307 important
Bug#143307: [ASSERT] main/packages.c:191: process_queue: Assertion `dependtry
= 4' failed
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
severity 143307 important
thanks
On Mon, 05 May 2008, Gunter Ohrner wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #143307
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.18
When trying to upgrade my SID system as I do every few days, dpkg crashed
with the above mentioned assertion failure.
AFAIK, this error message happens when
Your message dated Wed, 21 May 2008 07:52:15 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426224: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-38+etchnhalf.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #426224,
regarding /sbin/shutdown fails to properly spindown drive
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 21 May 2008 07:52:15 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426224: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-38+etchnhalf.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #426224,
regarding Please update shutdown
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 21 May 2008 07:52:15 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426224: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-38+etchnhalf.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #426224,
regarding Please update shutdown to support libata drivers in newer kernels
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 21 May 2008 09:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#482160: fixed in gupnp-tools 0.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #482160,
regarding gupnp-tools_0.4-1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS, missing build-deps
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
how do we continue here? Is the issue just that the headers are being
moved twice? This bug blocks testing migration of python2.5 and epiphany
which is a precondition for getting gcc-4.3 and gcc-defaults moved.
The fix in the easy
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080521 12:13]:
that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers
later.
In case Thiemo agrees (or doesn't disagree) - do you plan to upload it?
Should I NMU it? ...?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To
that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers
later.
Matthias
Arthur Loiret writes:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:26:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
how do we continue here? Is the issue just that the headers are being
moved twice? This bug blocks testing migration of
Package: ttfm
Version: 0.1-1.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of ttfm_0.1-1.1 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
Build started at 20080521-0956
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I have no objections to you NMU'ing.
Or even better: How would you like to join our little team maintaining
awstats?
I don't have any deeper awstats knowledge, and I'm not even a perl guru,
but sure.. I've been running
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
#
# gnugk (2:2.2.7-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Remove useless help2man call for addpasswd.1
#- gnugk - FTBFS: Segmentation fault obj_linux_s390_r/addpasswd --
#help 2 /dev/null (Closes: #478502)
#
package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27
#
# gnugk (2:2.2.7-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Remove useless help2man call for addpasswd.1
#- gnugk - FTBFS: Segmentation fault obj_linux_s390_r/addpasswd --
#
Andreas Barth wrote:
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080521 12:13]:
that looks ok for now, we can work on the unification of the headers
later.
In case Thiemo agrees (or doesn't disagree) - do you plan to upload it?
Should I NMU it? ...?
I disagree, because I was confused about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I have no objections to you NMU'ing.
Or even better: How would you like to join our little team
maintaining
Package: compizconfig-backend-gconf
Version: 0.7.4-2
Severity: serious
Heya,
Building your package failed due to missing build-deps:
| Automatic build of compizconfig-backend-gconf_0.7.4-2 on lebrun by
sbuild/sparc 98
| Build started at 20080521-1326
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# compizconfig-backend-gconf (0.7.4-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add build-dep on libxml2-dev (closes: #482192).
package compizconfig-backend-gconf
tags 482192 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
#
# compizconfig-backend-gconf (0.7.4-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Add build-dep on libxml2-dev (closes: #482192).
package compizconfig-backend-gconf
Ignoring bugs not
Package: compizconfig-settings-manager
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/ccsm
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/ccsm, line 38, in module
import compizconfig
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/compizconfig.so:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 14:23:59 +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
Package: compizconfig-settings-manager
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/ccsm
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/ccsm, line 38, in module
import compizconfig
python-compizconfig is still at an old version but then we should
introduce a version dependency ...
--eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 14:23:59 +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
Package: compizconfig-settings-manager
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/ccsm
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/ccsm, line 38, in module
Or even better: How would you like to join our little team maintaining
awstats?
I don't have any deeper awstats knowledge, and I'm not even a perl guru,
but sure.. I've been running awstats for a long time and I have no plans
to stop using it anytime soon, so I'm interested in seeing it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 472106 0.79.0-4
Bug#472106: sugar: Segfaults after initially entering name
Bug no longer marked as found in version 0.79.0-4.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
notfixed 472106 0.79.0-4
Bug#472106: sugar: Segfaults after
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Severity: serious
Package: courier
Version: 0.59.0-1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc
Hi!
This source package contains the following files that claim to be
released under the non-free IETF license in RFC 2026:
Package: shibboleth-sp
Version: 1.3f.dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: motion
Version: 3.2.9-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: kwave
Version: 0.7.10-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: python-tempita
Version: 0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: liblog-agent-rotate-perl
Version: 0.104-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc
Package: gupnp-tools
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: kdesdk
Version: 4:3.5.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: mlt
Version: 0.2.4-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: moc
Version: 1:2.5.0~alpha3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: gupnp-ui
Version: 0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: soprano
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: libwibble
Version: 0.1.16
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: serf
Version: 0.1.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: libept
Version: 0.5.17
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: libavg
Version: 0.7.0-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: evince
Version: 2.20.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: opencv
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: librpc-xml-perl
Version: 0.60-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: libio-zlib-perl
Version: 1.09-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: freej
Version: 0.9.1+dl0-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: ktoon
Version: 0.8.1-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: rhythmbox
Version: 0.11.5-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: qwtplot3d
Version: 0.2.7+svn191-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: ruby-gnome2
Version: 0.16.0-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: libgnomedb3
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: pyspi
Version: 0.6.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: tdb
Version: 1.1.2~git20080520-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: libparse-debcontrol-perl
Version: 2.005-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc
Package: libmodule-build-perl
Version: 0.2808.01-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc
Package: mixxx
Version: 1.6.0~beta2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: fslview
Version: 3.0+4.0.2-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: qimageblitz
Version: 1:0.0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: brltty
Version: 3.10~r3715-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: apache2
Version: 2.2.8-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: ffmpeg2theora
Version: 0.19-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: kdesvn
Version: 0.14.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: subversion
Version: 1.4.6dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: plplot
Version: 5.9.0-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: xtrkcad
Version: 1:4.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: qantenna
Version: 0.2.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: synfig
Version: 0.61.08-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: screenkast
Version: 0.1.4-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: libapreq2
Version: 2.08-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: kmchart
Version: 1.2.6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: soqt
Version: 1.4.1-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
Package: camlp5
Version: 5.07-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: librra
Version: 0.11-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: gnusound
Version: 0.7.4-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: xmms2
Version: 0.4DrKosmos-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: libinstrudeo
Version: 0.1.4-4.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: rapidsvn
Version: 0.9.6-0.2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: gtk-qt-engine
Version: 1:0.8-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: speedy-cgi-perl
Version: 2.22-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg
Version: 0.10.3.3-1
Severity: serious
File: /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so
Trying to play an avi file with totem, I get:
(totem:5495): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin
'/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so':
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
merge 482261 482160
Bug#482160: gupnp-tools_0.4-1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS, missing build-deps
Bug#482261: gupnp-tools: FTBFS: Package requirements (gupnp-1.0 = 0.10) were
not met
merge 482232 479193
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: shibboleth-sp
Version: 1.3f.dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
close 482261
Bug#482261: gupnp-tools: FTBFS: Package requirements (gupnp-1.0 = 0.10) were
not met
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed,
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:27:25AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Package: xfsprogs
: Version: 2.8.11-1
: Severity: critical
: Justification: breaks the whole system
:
: XFS on 32bit Linux cannot mount filesystems 16T see:
: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00124.html
:
: xfs_grow
Package: libqt4-ruby
Version: 1.4.10-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: opensaml
Version: 1.1b-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: apache2-mpm-itk
Version: 2.2.6-01-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: ttf-cjk-compact
Version: 1.12
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080520 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
