Processed: tagging 487204

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 tags 487204 + pending Bug#487204: ruby1.8: object allocation during garbage collection phase There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#481378: marked as done (Guile-1.8 FTBFS on mips (and other architectures))

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:17:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#481378: fixed in guile-1.8 1.8.5+1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #481378, regarding Guile-1.8 FTBFS on mips (and other architectures) to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: your mail

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 492531 -l10n Bug#492531: network-manager-gnome: network-manager failed to connect invisible accesspoint Tags were: l10n Bug#492631: network-manager-gnome: network-manager failed to connect invisible accesspoint Tags removed: l10n thanks Stopping

Processed: forcibly merging 493643 480855

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 forcemerge 493643 480855 Bug#493643: kcontrol: The laptop battery option dosn't work in 2.6.25 Bug#480855: klaptopdaemon - battery applet refuses to start up with recent kernels

Bug#493505: marked as done (log_warning_msg: -1 is not a valid return value)

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#493505: fixed in lsb 3.2-17 has caused the Debian Bug report #493505, regarding log_warning_msg: -1 is not a valid return value to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#493407: marked as done (lsb-base: bashism in init-functions + kills networking on reboot on systems where /bin/sh = /bin/bash)

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#493505: fixed in lsb 3.2-17 has caused the Debian Bug report #493505, regarding lsb-base: bashism in init-functions + kills networking on reboot on systems where /bin/sh = /bin/bash to be

Bug#493437: marked as done (libbot-basicbot-perl: FTBFS: Test failure)

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#493437: fixed in libbot-basicbot-perl 0.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #493437, regarding libbot-basicbot-perl: FTBFS: Test failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#493409: simutrans-pak64: FTBFS: Invalid image width

2008-08-03 Thread peter green
I have managed to fix it up so it doesn't error out but it produces different output on the two platforms. and i'm finding the code very hard to follow. The first issue was a relatively simple one. in utils/dr_rdpng.c some tweaking is required, replace the call to png_get_IHDR with

Bug#489840: marked as done (libxcrypt_3.0-2(sparc/unstable): FTBFS, crypt.c:64: error: cast increases required alignment of target type)

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:55:52 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#489840: fixed in libxcrypt 1:2.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #489840, regarding libxcrypt_3.0-2(sparc/unstable): FTBFS, crypt.c:64: error: cast increases required alignment of target

Bug#493475: marked as done (libgda2-freetds builds against obsolete lib; replace with libgda2-sybase)

2008-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:01:57 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#493475: fixed in libgda2 1.2.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #493475, regarding libgda2-freetds builds against obsolete lib; replace with libgda2-sybase to be marked as done. This

Bug#492657: epiphany-webkit: not ready to be included in a stable release

2008-08-03 Thread Michael Gilbert
I don't know if it is possible to ignore a sole binary package or if it would be necessary to re-upload epiphany to t-p-u without the webkit package. Frankly, I'd like to avoid the latter. i think you can ask the release manager to remove specific binary packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

<    1   2