Package: brasero
Version: 0.8.0-3
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I tried to build the package from source to get backtraces for bugs
showed up since the 0.8 upgrade .
apt failed to install the build-deps .
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> fixed 421924 18-2+lenny1
Bug#421924: segfaults at fresh amd64 etch install
Bug#502219: procinfo: Segfaults with large number of interrupts.
Bug marked as fixed in version 18-2+lenny1
You won 1,350GBP Contact Mr peter Roberts Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 22:58 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> On 08/10/15 13:04 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ...
> > On 08/10/11 21:51 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld said ...
> > > Hmm, if that bug affects many other packages it would probably better
> > > to get a fixed nant in lenny inste
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:33:07 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> clayton wrote:
> > You can correct this by either
> > installing the correct virtualbox-ose-modules package (if
> > available) through apt-get or by building it manually with:
> > module-assistant auto-inst
Hi Gerfried,
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 12:45 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Please find it attached. The packaging should receive a major cleanup,
> there are quite some issues brought up by lintian too, but I tried to
> keep the patch as tight as possible to make sure the release-team would
> accept
Your message dated Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:27:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#502375: virtualbox-ose: kernel modules and application
do not match
has caused the Debian Bug report #502375,
regarding virtualbox-ose: kernel modules and application do not match
to be
Package: virtualbox-ose
Version: 1.6.6-dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After yesterdays update to virtualbox-ose, whenever I try to run a
virtual machine I get the following error message:
The version of the VirtualBox kernel modules and the version of
VirtualBox
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I got a mail by Robert stating that he needs a few more days but is
> working on an upload.
I went ahead and fixed a couple of other bugs while I was at it. I
should be uploading either tonight or tomorrow night.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue
Can you try again with
export TEXMFCNF=/usr/share/texmf/web2c
luatools --generate --verbose
context --make
context foo.tex
This (based on /usr/share/doc/context/README.MarkIV) seems to work for
me. Not that I know anything about context really...
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Package: sqlite3
Version: 3.5.9-5
Severity: serious
SQLite3 doesn't return values for some divisions. 100/1.5, 100/3.1 returns
no output.
; sqlite3
SQLite version 3.5.9
Enter ".help" for instructions
sqlite> select 100/1.5;
sqlite> select 100/2.5;
40.0
sqlite> select 100/2;
50
sqlite> select
Contact Mr.Richard Carpenter([EMAIL PROTECTED])for the claims of £1,200,000.00
GBP in the UK Electronics Award 2008.Claims information:
Fullname,Occupation,Nationality,Resedential Address,Phone.
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
At Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:38:19 -0400,
Paul Cartwright wrote:
>
> It is now doing it again. It is also crashing when I try to create & run
> a filter on an IMAP account. I right-click a message in an IMAP inbox
> and select FORWARD. when the new forward message window appears I
> double-click the a
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#502219: fixed in procinfo 18-2+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #502219,
regarding procinfo: Segfaults with large number of interrupts.
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#502219: fixed in procinfo 18-2+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #502219,
regarding segfaults at fresh amd64 etch install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:49:19PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 06:12:23PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:16:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > It's for a Motorola 56000 (aka DSP56000 or DSP56K) processor, which is a
> > > different architect
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#501771: fixed in kipi-plugins 0.1.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #501771,
regarding PicaWeb export regression - unsuitable for lenny
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
severity 501822 important
thanks
Hello Saulo:
I can't see any reason in the report where I could conclude that the bug is
indeed grave. What data-loss are you suffering from this?
For the moment I'm lowering the severity to important, we could reconsider
severity if you have any news in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 501822 important
Bug#501822: dolphin: Dolphin crashes when back from crompressed files
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:24:04PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> --
> From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Michel Briand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#501241: Bug#501241: libdb4.6-dev: upgrade
> failure (unpack)
>
> On Tue, Oct
> I welcome input on this issue from people with more deep knowledge than
> myself about these Python cached files, and how we could best address it
> in this case. If there's a straightforward solution I think we can apply
> it for lenny.
The simplest solution might actually be to take the approa
version 1.16 of libio-socket-ssl-perl is in testing, and
libhttp-daemon-ssl-perl now builds without problems.
I suggest this bug can be closed.
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 501771 PicaWeb export regression - unsuitable for lenny
Bug#501771: kipi plugins - picasa bug
Changed Bug title to `PicaWeb export regression - unsuitable for lenny' from
`kipi plugins - picasa bug'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 23:39:52 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> This is reproducible on sperger.d.o.
>
> It's an alignment problem that only shows up with an optimization level
> of at least -O2.
>
> Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
> 0xf7ec1134 in decode_json (string=0x192280, json=0x39f18
Package: libpam-mount
Version: 0.48-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
I upgraded my Debian/Sid today and my pam-mount doesn't mount my loopback AES
encrypted home partition anymore. At login, it gives this error:
login: crypto.c:213: decrypted_key: A
Package: jhead
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
jhead fixes several unspecified security issues. Please see these
references for details:
http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/jhead/changes.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jhead/+bug/271020
http://article.gma
I guess my first message was missed because I posted only to debian-doc
On Wed,15.Oct.08, 20:53:35, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote:
[...]
> 3. If this solution worked. Login to your system, make a backup of the
> '/boot/grub/menu.lst' file. Then generate a new '/boot/grub/menu.lst'
> by issui
On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
Easy... the mount.nfs subcommand in nfs-utils-1.1.3 switches to
legacy
mode on old kernels (pre 2.6.23). What I meant by "you need to
force
the use of the legacy mount command" is that you need to force
the use
of the l
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:00:21PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: libjson-xs-perl
> Version: 2.23-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of libjson-xs-perl_2.23-1 on schroeder by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> > Build started
Package: gfax
Version: 0.7.6-8
Severity: grave
From:
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=gfax
Package has a Depends on libgnomeprint2.2-0 (<< 2.18.5) which cannot
be satisfied on arm. libgnomeprint2.2-0 (<< 2.18.5) 2.18.5-1 is
available.
Package has a Depends on libgnomepr
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:20:48 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#501241: Bug#501241: libdb4.6-dev:
upgrade failure (unpack)
has caused the Debian Bug report #501241,
regarding libdb4.6-dev: update manage fails to update the package
to
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:20:48 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#501241: Bug#501241: libdb4.6-dev:
upgrade failure (unpack)
has caused the Debian Bug report #501241,
regarding libdb4.6-dev: upgrade failure (unpack)
to be marked as done
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:12:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#502346: virtualbox-ose-modules package older than
virtualbox-ose
has caused the Debian Bug report #502346,
regarding virtualbox-ose-modules package older than virtualbox-ose
to be marke
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#501207: fixed in destar 0.2.2-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #501207,
regarding destar doesn't start, backtrace shown
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26+1.6.2-dfsg-4
Severity: serious
The virtualbox-ose has been updated recently to version 1.6.6, but the
kernel-modules package for VBox (virtualbox-ose-modules) hasn't.
This makes VBox unusable - when trying to start a virtual machine,
Hi,
Here is the NMU that I uploaded for this.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
diff -u destar-0.2.2/debian/patches/00list destar-0.2.2/debian/patches/00list
--- destar-0.2.2/debian/patches/00list
+++ destar-0.2.2/debian/patches/00list
@@ -6,0 +7 @@
+python25.dpatch
diff -u destar-0.2.2/debian/changel
Chuck Lever wrote:
So where have I gone wrong in reproducing this?
>>>
>>> What happens when you don't specify a sec= option at all?
>>
>> 'touch /mnt/home/tmp/foo && rm /mnt/home/tmp/foo' works as expected...
>
> I'm out of ideas then.
Me too... :(
>
> The problem was with the mount comman
On Oct 15, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
Ok... The client has the nfs-utils-1.1.3 mount.nfs binary using an
FC-7 (2.6.21) kernel. New text mount interface with old binary
kernel
interface.
I have two servers:
ServerA has the nfs-utils-1.1.3 rpc.mountd binary usin
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:32:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#501041: fixed in wmibam 0.0.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #501041,
regarding wmibam uses old ibam.* files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Please, find below an updated version of the procedure. I have included the
remarks and proposition of W. Martin Borgert and Vincent McIntyre.
Title : system boot hangs on 'Waiting for root file system'
Title : procedure to recover from "/dev/hda became /dev/sda"
Some users have reported that a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 501041 + pending
Bug#501041: wmibam uses old ibam.* files
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Seems like I doo need a test case for you reproducing this problem. I
tried with:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use YAML;
use Flickr::API;
use Flickr::API::Request;
my ($key, $username, $api, $req, $res);
$key = "this_is_not_my_real_key";
$usernam
Chuck Lever wrote:
>> Ok... The client has the nfs-utils-1.1.3 mount.nfs binary using an
>> FC-7 (2.6.21) kernel. New text mount interface with old binary kernel
>> interface.
>>
>> I have two servers:
>> ServerA has the nfs-utils-1.1.3 rpc.mountd binary using an F-9
>> 2.6.26 kernel
>> Serve
Hi,
Here is the nmu I uploaded for ibam to fix this bug.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
diff -u wmibam-0.0.1/debian/rules wmibam-0.0.1/debian/rules
--- wmibam-0.0.1/debian/rules
+++ wmibam-0.0.1/debian/rules
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
- -$(MAKE) clean
+ [ ! -f Makefile ] |
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 502312 + upstream, forwarded
Unknown tag/s: forwarded.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-
tags 502312 + upstream, forwarded
found 502312 0.09-1
found 502312 1.01-1
thanks
I have submitted your bug report to the CPAN tracker:
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40074
I will check your patch and prepare a fixed version - As I am not a
regular user of Flickr::API, would you care t
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 06:12:23PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:16:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It's for a Motorola 56000 (aka DSP56000 or DSP56K) processor, which is a
> > different architecture but maybe with some similarities. I doubt we
> > have any of the n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 494010 - patch
Bug#494010: binary firmware in drivers/char/dsp56k.c
Tags were: patch fixed-upstream help
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 496431 + patch
Bug#496431: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 501412 nant
Bug#501412: ikvm: FTBFS in lenny: Illegal characters in path
Bug reassigned from package `ikvm' to `nant'.
> severity 483073 serious
Bug#483073: nant: race condition on SMP systems
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> forc
tags 496431 + patch
thanks
Hi!
Please find attached an UNTESTED patch which backports the symlink
fixes. If someone is willing to test the patches, then I'd request an
upload.
James, could you please check if the attached patch works as
intended, and prepare a Lenny upload?
Thank you.
Kumar
di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 496431 + patch
Bug#496431: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On 08/10/15 13:04 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ...
> On 08/10/11 21:51 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld said ...
> > Hmm, if that bug affects many other packages it would probably better
> > to get a fixed nant in lenny instead. Upstream claims that it is fixed
> > in a newer version, so it would be h
Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Easy... the mount.nfs subcommand in nfs-utils-1.1.3 switches to legacy
>>> mode on old kernels (pre 2.6.23). What I meant by "you need to force
>>> the use of the legacy mount command" is that you need to force the use
>>> of the legacy binary mount interface.
>> I have trie
I have and use uim-qt (1:1.5.3-1). No problem here.
Maybe some uim particular plugin could be triggering the issue, but it's
not uim itself. I have uim-anthy, uim-canna, and uim-skk as input
modules for uim.
--
--Kris
叶ってしまう夢は本当の夢と言えん。
[A dream that comes true can't really be called a dream.]
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:16:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It's for a Motorola 56000 (aka DSP56000 or DSP56K) processor, which is a
> different architecture but maybe with some similarities. I doubt we
> have any of the necessary tools but the code is short enough to hand-
> assemble.
I fou
I'm acknowledging receipt of bug 502102, CVE-2008-4482 against
xerces-c2. I'll investigate and upload a fix as soon as possible.
--
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> fixed 502314 0.8.1.svn20050314-1sarge3
Bug#502314: vlc: CVE-2008-4558 code execution via crafted xspf playlist file
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8.1.svn20050314-1sarge3.
>
End o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> found 502314 0.9.2-1
Bug#502314: vlc: CVE-2008-4558 code execution via crafted xspf playlist file
Bug marked as found in version 0.9.2-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> found 502314 0.9.2-1
Bug#502314: vlc: CVE-2008-4558 code execution via crafted xspf playlist file
Bug marked as found in version 0.9.2-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> notfound 502314 0.8.6.h-4
Bug#502314: vlc: CVE-2008-4558 code execution via crafted xspf playlist file
Bug no longer marked as found in version 0.8.6.h-4.
>
End of message, stopping
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
On Oct 9, 2008, at Oct 9, 2008, 11:48 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Unfortunately, I'm failing miserably on reproducing this... Here is
what I've done:
Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi Steve-
As I understand it, the documented bug refers
Hi,
forgot the patch.
http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc.git;a=commit;h=6d3c22f29e650b0d10b2116fe3145194d20b8b56
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpjgOsRTm7AG.pgp
Description: PGP sign
Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2008, at Oct 9, 2008, 11:48 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I'm failing miserably on reproducing this... Here is
>> what I've done:
>>
>> Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Hi Steve-
>>>
>>> As I understand it, the documented bug refers to running nfs-utils 1.1.3
>>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:31:27PM +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Heinrich Langos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Now lets try again with more sane vfat options:
> >
> > # mount | grep vfat
> > /dev/sda1 on /mnt type vfat
> > (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,uhelper=hal,flush,uid=1000,shortname=lower,ch
Package: eterm
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Eterm unexpectedly dies when repeatedly sending visual bell signals.
This bug is difficult to reproduce but Eterm can die when flashing
rapidly for example as a consequence of holding the Tab key pressed
for a
Package: vlc
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for vlc.
CVE-2008-4558[0]:
| Array index error in VLC media player 0.9.2 allows remote attackers to
| overwrite arbitrary memory and execute arbitrary code via an XSPF
| p
Package: libflickr-api-perl
Version: 1.01-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When the execute_request function parses the XML response from Flickr,
it calls
the function _find_tag which checks for tags of type 'element' whereas
it should
be checking for type 'tag'.
The
Package: glibc
Version: 2.8+20080809-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of glibc_2.8+20080809-2 on alkman.ayous.org by sbuild/ia64
> 98-farm
> Build started at 20081014-2333
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
>
Hi,
this bug is apparently caused by uim-qt
(/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/inputmethods/libuiminputcontextplugin.so).
Removing the package resolved this issue for me.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Adam,
* Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-15 09:43]:
> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 22:28 -0700, Rob Browning wrote:
> > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > > * Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-21 14:23]:
> [...]
> > >> Thanks for the report. I'll look i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: kxstitch
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kxstitch_0.8.1-1 on alkman.ayous.org by sbuild/ia64 98-farm
> Build started at 20081014-0400
[...]
> ** Using build
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:13:06AM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> I prepared an upload for tpu, and I'm waiting an ack from release-team [0]
Excellent.
> You can find a preliminary package for lenny [1], let me know if it fixes this
> issue.
>
> [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 05:15 -0400, Paul Wise wrote:
> Does bind crash if you remove the ACL? Are you able to narrow down which
> part of the ACL causes crashes?
Were you able to look into either of these possibilities?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: T
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#502055: fixed in hplip 2.8.6.b-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #502055,
regarding File conflict with hplip-gui
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495235: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.26-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #495235,
regarding tomcat5.5 doesn't recognize openjdk-6-jre for running
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#502055: fixed in hplip 2.8.6.b-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #502055,
regarding hplip tries to overwrite xpm files which are in hplip-gui (missing
Replaces)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495235: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.26-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #495235,
regarding tomcat5.5 fails to install in postinst script stage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Adam D. Barratt schreef:
> Tim Dijkstra wrote, 2008-10-15 12:38 +0200:
>> Bradley Smith schreef:
>>> tags 501997 +patch
>>>
>>> I've tested this and it does indeed fix the problem.
>>>
>>> I have attached a patch with the actual changes needed.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you would like an NMU.
>>
>> I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 502275 502294
Bug#502275: (no subject)
Bug#502294: pdnsd does not randomize source ports by default
Forcibly Merged 502275 502294.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Paul Cartwright wrote:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:50:24 -0300
> From: David Bremner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bug#500807: (no subject)
>
>
> Dear Paul;
>
> Yes, this is your bug report. It seems that the bug is likely specific
> to
Tim Dijkstra wrote, 2008-10-15 12:38 +0200:
Bradley Smith schreef:
tags 501997 +patch
I've tested this and it does indeed fix the problem.
I have attached a patch with the actual changes needed.
Let me know if you would like an NMU.
I would first want to know why we need that header. Why do
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Followup-For: Bug #494374
This bug is fixed on my ASUS L2000D, too. Great.
Karsten
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.26-1-686 (Debian 2.6.26-8) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23)) #1 SMP Thu Oct
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 499433 -1
Bug#499433: pdnsd: Version 1.2.7-par has been released (security related and
bug fix)
Bug 499433 cloned as bug 502294.
> retitle -1 pdnsd does not randomize source ports by default
Bug#502294: pdnsd: Version 1.2.7-par has been released
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#499643: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #499643,
regarding mdadm: mdadm segfaults on superblock detection
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496334: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496334,
regarding Segmentation fault when attempting re-assembly of a failed RAID5 via
"mdadm -v -A --run --force"
to be m
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#498505: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #498505,
regarding Segmentation fault when attempting re-assembly of a failed RAID5 via
"mdadm -v -A --run --force"
to be m
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#498505: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #498505,
regarding mdadm: mdadm segfaults on superblock detection
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496334: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496334,
regarding mdadm: mdadm segfaults on superblock detection
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#500309: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #500309,
regarding mdadm thinks disk is not large enough to be added, but it is (v1
superblock)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#498505: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #498505,
regarding mdadm segfault on --assemble --force with raid10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496334: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496334,
regarding mdadm segfault on --assemble --force with raid10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Bradley Smith schreef:
> tags 501997 +patch
>
> I've tested this and it does indeed fix the problem.
>
> I have attached a patch with the actual changes needed.
>
> Let me know if you would like an NMU.
I would first want to know why we need that header. Why does it only show
up if you try to buil
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#499643: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #499643,
regarding Segmentation fault when attempting re-assembly of a failed RAID5 via
"mdadm -v -A --run --force"
to be m
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#499643: fixed in mdadm 2.6.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #499643,
regarding mdadm segfault on --assemble --force with raid10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
It should be noted that in my run, the test suite completed with only
two failures.
Michael
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/10/08 at 04:16 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
>> Working with lucas, I've successfully been able to build ruby1.9. The
>>
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#502275: fixed in pdnsd 1.2.6-par-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #502275,
regarding (no subject)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:27:16 +0200
"Thibaut VARENE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> こんにちは みんなさん
:-)
> We can certainly provide access to hppa machines, see
> http://www.parisc-linux.org/cluster.html, especially to someone
> willing to help making things work ;-)
Okay, thanks Thibaut! That sounds
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:27:16 +0200
"Thibaut VARENE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> こんにちは みんなさん
:-)
> We can certainly provide access to hppa machines, see
> http://www.parisc-linux.org/cluster.html, especially to someone
> willing to help making things work ;-)
Okay, thanks Thibaut! That sounds
On 15/10/08 at 04:16 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> Working with lucas, I've successfully been able to build ruby1.9. The
> issue is related to NPTL support in the kernel. NPTL on HPPA is
> extremely unstable it seems, and currently causes anything that uses
> to threads to go boom under some c
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
