Bug#509210: Can not purged

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, +22:00:09 EET (UTC +0200), Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com pressed some keys: * Juhapekka Tolvanen juht...@iki.fi [2008-12-19 20:42]: Package: mecab-naist-jdic Version: 0.4.3-20080917-1 This package is not in Debian. Where did you get it from? I think it is from

Bug#509176: sound card losing configuration (upgrade-reports) additional info

Package: upgrade-reports Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system [additional information] Upon rebooting Debian Etch which was upgraded on 12/16/2008 linux-image-2.6.18-6-486 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-23) to 2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1 sound is redirected to /dev/null. XMMS reporting following

Bug#508392: Handling of conflicting conffiles

found 508392 1.13.14 tag 508392 pending thanks Hi! On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 20:29:16 +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:33:11PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: Please use debian-d...@lists.debian.org in the future so other people might be able to help, thanks. OK. Mea

Processed: Re: Bug#508392: Handling of conflicting conffiles

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 508392 1.13.14 Bug#508392: Handling of conflicting conffiles broken Bug marked as found in version 1.13.14. tag 508392 pending Bug#508392: Handling of conflicting conffiles broken There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks

Bug#508823: marked as done (jspwiki: Package has a depenency which is not met and will likely never be)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:17:06 + with message-id e1le0lw-0005r1...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#508823: fixed in jspwiki 2.8.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #508823, regarding jspwiki: Package has a depenency which is not met and will likely never be to be marked

Bug#508828: marked as done (jspwiki: Installation script breaks on tar)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:17:06 + with message-id e1le0lw-0005r3...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#508828: fixed in jspwiki 2.8.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #508828, regarding jspwiki: Installation script breaks on tar to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#503532: Security vulnerability in dbus

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:39:18PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: Hi, I saw that you made an upload for bug #503532 and #508032 to experimental. Now I wonder if you plan to make an upload to unstable suitable for lenny? Unfortunately the situation is a little bit more complicated then

Bug#509260: Can not modify source (needs newer gob2)

Package: link-monitor-applet Version: 3.0-2 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, this is kind of a FTBFMS bug (Fails To Build From Modified Source). Since I know have a 16:9 screen, I really need to get rid of the icon. But when I try to compile it, I get: Type

Bug#508635: binNMUs scheduled

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:50:22PM +, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: Please check if my binNMUs fixed the problem if I forget about it Apparently so, you can see the .la file in the filelists for i386 and amd64 (for instance), where the binNMUs have already happened:

Processed: Re: Bug#507996: mazegaki conversion cannot be used

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 507996 important Bug#507996: mazegaki conversion cannot be used Severity set to `important' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#507996: mazegaki conversion cannot be used

severity 507996 important thanks On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 04:10:17AM +0900, Jonny wrote: Package: uim-tcode Version: 1:1.5.3-1 Severity: serious Using mazegaki conversion, the library of uim-skk and the dictionary of t-code are required. Please be dependent on these. Moreover, please

Processed: Re: Bug#508091: maintainer address bounces

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 508091 normal Bug#508091: maintainer address bounces Severity set to `normal' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#508091: maintainer address bounces

severity 508091 normal thanks On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:18:21PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: unfortunately, Philippe's mail seems to bounce: r...@users.sf.net: host mx.sourceforge.net[216.34.181.68] said: 550 unknown user (in reply to RCPT TO command) If this is transient, please

Bug#508443: [imagemagick] Any news

Any news of this bug? Regards -- ROUCARIÈS Bastien roucaries.bastien+bast...@gmail.com --- DO NOT WRITE TO roucaries.bastien+blackh...@gmail.com OR BE BLACKLISTED -- To

Bug#507317: marked as done (python2.4: CVE-2008-5031 multiple integer overflows)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:32:12 + with message-id e1le3ok-0003h8...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#507317: fixed in python2.4 2.4.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #507317, regarding python2.4: CVE-2008-5031 multiple integer overflows to be marked as done. This means

Bug#505270: themes in /usr not working if /usr is not mounted

Hi, I have /usr in it's own partition. So it would not work if splashy wants to use files in /usr if it is not there at boot time. I hard copied /usr/share/splashy/themes to /etc/splashy and edited the themes path in /etc/splashy/config.xml back to /etc/splashy/themes and it works again. --

Bug#453259: sfs hanging

I think this may have regressed slightly from rc7 to rc8. No, rc7, rc8, and rc9 are showing problematic behavior (compared to 2.6.18, which works fine), but not for the case described in this bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#505270: /usr/share/splashy/themes

I forgot: I needed /etc/directfbrc and early starting of splashy does not work with the hard copied /usr/share/splashy/themes - /etc/splashy/themes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Version 1.2.2-1 is not fixed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 509198 1.2.2-1 Bug#509198: rdiff-backup: 1.2.2 fails for listattr on symlinks, raises Too many levels of symbolic links exception Bug marked as found in version 1.2.2-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free

Package: afio Version: 2.5-5 Severity: serious the license for afio is non-free. see /usr/share/doc/afio/copyright: * -- * * License notice 1, covering part of this software package. * * [Covers the original 1985

Bug#509288: gnomad2: segfault on start up / vorbis comment headers

Package: gnomad2 Version: 2.9.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This is a repeat of a problem reported but not reproduced before: TagLib: Vorbis::File::read() - Could not find the Vorbis comment header. I am able to reproduce it and will attach the debugging output.

Bug#509289: gnomad2: This is a bug reported before which can be reproduced.

Package: gnomad2 Version: 2.9.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Gnomad2 segfaults at start with the message: TagLib: Vorbis::File::read() - Could not find the Vorbis comment header. Segmentation fault GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Processed: Re: Bug#509285: FTBFS Time expired during tests/mbr-4 and others

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 509285 serious Bug#509285: FTBFS Time expired during tests/mbr-4 and others Severity set to `serious' from `important' tags 509285 + patch Bug#509285: FTBFS Time expired during tests/mbr-4 and others There were no tags set. Tags added:

Bug#509285: Confirming bug #509285

As requested by Loïc, I tried building mbr 1.1.10-1 in an up-to-date cowbuilder environment, and I get exactly the same errors. So I'm letting the bug know :-) Roland. -- Roland Mas Meaning lies as much / In the mind of the reader / As in the haiku -- in Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal

Bug#508443: [imagemagick] Any news

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:16:25 +0100 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: Any news of this bug? Well, only that it's not a imagemagick one :) Joss, that svn is funny, it wants a gnome-autoconf.sh or so... Could you prepare me a debian source that I could just feed into my pbuilder and test? Regards Evgeni

Bug#507558: marked as done (ignores LockXLock yes setting in /etc/hibernate/common.conf (e.g. does not lock the screen))

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:59:26 +0100 with message-id 20081220225926.48425...@gmail.com and subject line Not really RC, not even a bug, closing has caused the Debian Bug report #507558, regarding ignores LockXLock yes setting in /etc/hibernate/common.conf (e.g. does not lock the

Bug#508259: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7: Local kernel panic exploit)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:01:18 +0100 with message-id 20081220220118.ga5...@galadriel.inutil.org and subject line Re: your mail has caused the Debian Bug report #508259, regarding linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7: Local kernel panic exploit to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#509292: rsyslog: random crashes with remote logging

Package: rsyslog Version: 3.18.5-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Hello, I have noticed that rsyslog randomly crashes with remote logging (client) enabled. This happens almost once a day and all log messages are lost until rsyslog is started again. I don't know if

Bug#507781: marked as done (libcap2: Must have priority standard)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:32:19 + with message-id e1leamt-0002vn...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#506152: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #506152, regarding libcap2: Must have priority standard to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#506152: marked as done (libept0 should have priority important)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:32:19 + with message-id e1leamt-0002vn...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#506152: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #506152, regarding libept0 should have priority important to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#507420: marked as done (Packages with incorrect priorities for standard system install)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:32:19 + with message-id e1leamt-0002vn...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#506152: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #506152, regarding Packages with incorrect priorities for standard system install to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: fixed 508907 in 0.12-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: fixed 508907 0.12-1 Bug#508907: merkaartor: crash with Object::connect: No such signal QWebFrame::loadDone(bool) Bug marked as fixed in version 0.12-1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#507797: marked as done (libisccc40 should have priority standard)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:47:55 + with message-id e1leabz-0003rv...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#507797: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #507797, regarding libisccc40 should have priority standard to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#507796: marked as done (libisccfg40 should have priority standard)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:47:25 + with message-id e1leabv-0003rd...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#507796: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #507796, regarding libisccfg40 should have priority standard to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#507801: marked as done (libpci3 must have priority standard)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:52:57 + with message-id e1leagr-0003jx...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#507801: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #507801, regarding libpci3 must have priority standard to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#507783: marked as done (libxml2 should have priority standard)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:42:06 + with message-id e1leawm-00033p...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#507783: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #507783, regarding libxml2 should have priority standard to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#507798: marked as done (libedit2 should have priority standard)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:49:37 + with message-id e1leadd-0003u7...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#507798: fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #507798, regarding libedit2 should have priority standard to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#508907: merkaartor: diff for NMU version 0.0.11~svn7913-2.1

tags 508907 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for merkaartor (versioned as 0.0.11~svn7913-2.1). I'm not going to upload it, please tell me if I need to do so. Regards, David Paleino diff -Nru merkaartor-0.0.11~svn7913/debian/changelog

Processed: merkaartor: diff for NMU version 0.0.11~svn7913-2.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 508907 + patch Bug#508907: merkaartor: crash with Object::connect: No such signal QWebFrame::loadDone(bool) Tags were: pending Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#503682: marked as done (network-manager-gnome: partial upgrade do not work)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:07:37 + with message-id e1leav3-0004g9...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#503682: fixed in network-manager 0.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #503682, regarding network-manager-gnome: partial upgrade do not work to be marked as done. This

Bug#508907: merkaartor: diff for NMU version 0.0.11~svn7913-2.1

Hi David! Thanks for your work! But just as hint for the future - if a bug is set to pending and it is fixed in the SVN of the package, you could save your time and work on a different package :) Cheers, Bernd David Paleino wrote: tags 508907 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, I've

Bug#505270: splashy: doesn't work anymore

Package: splashy Version: 0.3.12-1 Followup-For: Bug #505270 Since the last kernel update (2.6.26-12) and initramfs-tools update (0.92m), splashy doesn't work anymore (at boot and shutdown) = connection refused to the server. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing

Bug#509287: Please give opinion about Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free

Dear debian-legal folks, I got a Bug against package afio because of licence problems. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/509287. There was already a similar Bug 9 years ago that was closed, after one person from this list gave his OK. (http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/05/msg00162.html)

Bug#509300: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/ecs/Element

Package: jspwiki Version: 2.8.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dec 21, 2008 12:54:15 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log INFO: Assigning new engine to 1981891711 Dec 21, 2008 12:54:15 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log INFO: No

Bug#509210: Can not purged

* Juhapekka Tolvanen juht...@iki.fi [2008-12-20 12:47]: * Juhapekka Tolvanen juht...@iki.fi [2008-12-19 20:42]: Package: mecab-naist-jdic Version: 0.4.3-20080917-1 This package is not in Debian. Where did you get it from? I think it is from Hideki Yamane's own repository. He is