Hi Jörg,
This bug has kept bootchart out of testing for 233 days so far. Now that I'm
looking at a KDM/X-Server startup problem, I would like to see bootchart enter
testing asap. Can you put some attention to this, helping this package along?
Thanks,
Jaap
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hi all
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:29:42AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Any update on this security issue?
There was an ongoing discussion about that, in [1] still. RedHat
Bugtracker has two proposed patches too [2,3,4].
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/2637
[2] htt
Le 28/05/2010 00:59, Craig Small a écrit :
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.7.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If I reboot my computer, the gdm login screen comes up eventually. I can
login to gdm and all the usual X things work fine.
If I logout of gdm, it sta
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2010 03:32:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#583114: fixed in dulwich 0.6.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #583114,
regarding dulwich: cannot import with python2.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2010 03:34:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#583062: fixed in pm-utils 1.3.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #583062,
regarding pm-utils: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: the Recommends field
contains an arch-specific dependency but the package is archi
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2010 03:32:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#572466: fixed in eiciel 0.9.6.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #572466,
regarding eiciel: Please build-depend on autopoint
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:51:47 +0200
martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: mdadm
> Version: 3.1.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: fails to build from source on ia64 (at least)
>
> Another one of these, which upstream will hopefully fix:
>
> gcc -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototype
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 22:11:01 -0400
with message-id <20100528021100.gf12...@onerussian.com>
and subject line is non-existent anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #574730,
regarding necpp: BD-Uninstallable on armel and alpha, build-depends on
libatlas-base-dev
to be marked as don
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2010 09:44:46 +0800
with message-id <1275011086.12112.1.ca...@localhost>
and subject line close ibus-table-easy bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #549724,
regarding ibus-table-easy: FTBFS: ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2010 10:31:40 +0900
with message-id
and subject line 566978-done FTBFS: segfault in uim-module-manager [ia64 s390]
has caused the Debian Bug report #566978,
regarding FTBFS: segfault in uim-module-manager [ia64 s390]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Any update on this security issue?
- Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ce: cia-clients
Version: 20100513
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debia
I straced the Xorg process and found lines and lines of this:
octl(9, 0xc0086464, 0x7fff9e995170)= -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy)
elmo:/opt/jffnms# ls -l /proc/24678/fd/9
lr-x-- 1 root root 64 May 28 09:20 /proc/24678/fd/9 -> /dev/dri/card0
elmo:/opt/jffnms# killall -KILL Xorg
elmo:/o
Package: python-greenlet
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Automatic builds of python-greenlet swiftly fail with the error
ImportError: No module named setuptools
I suspect adding python-setuptools to Build-Depends should clear that
up, but I haven't
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.7.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If I reboot my computer, the gdm login screen comes up eventually. I can
login to gdm and all the usual X things work fine.
If I logout of gdm, it starts off ok, I get a flicker of the f1 screen
Hi Christophe,
Sure, I can do that -- or rather, libhdf5-mpi-dev which depends on the
correct HDF5 libdev. Just pushed it to alioth.
-Adam
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 19:41 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> Adam
>
> could you petsc3.1 with a Depends on libhdf5-openmpi-dev
> for libpetsc3.1-dev
sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/build/user-libnet-https-any-perl_0.10-2-amd64-cAAOkr/
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
>
Hi Andreas,
Le Thursday 27 May 2010 12:22:37, vous avez écrit :
> Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to find and understand it!
Thank you for considering it!
> Could you provide your /etc/ssh/ssh_config and ~/.ssh/config file that we
> could try to reproduce it on our system.
My system c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 583485 important
Bug #583485 [live-initramfs] live-initramfs: debconf database is not filled
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583485: http://bugs.d
Good evening guys,
Christian PERRIER [Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:20:46PM +0200]:
> Are you still experiencing that bug? From your description, this is a
> very handicapping bug and you might either have found a
> workaround...or something else fixed the problemor maybe you are
> still experiencin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Err, wrong version...
> notfixed 580651 3.4-2+rm
Bug #580651 {Done: Jakub Wilk } [python-json] json-py: should
not be released with squeeze
There is no source info for the package 'python-json' at version '3.4-2+rm'
with architecture ''
Unable
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 23:17:21 +0200
with message-id <20100527211721.ga9...@jwilk.net>
and subject line json-py removed from unstable and testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #580651,
regarding json-py: should not be released with squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you
hey,
On 27/05/2010 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:13:01PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > but still the most recent update of libdevmapper broke cryptsetup build.
> > see the build logs at https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=cryptsetup:
>
> > make[3]: Entering directory
> > `
On 05/27/2010 09:52 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> So while there is a trivial fix - that is, reverting the 10adduser
> script to the previous version, we will have to wait for an alpha
> version that will be even more broken?
'alpha' doesn't mean 'experimental buggy software' here, but 'could
chan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 583462 + pending
Bug #583462 [src:libnet-https-any-perl] libnet-https-any-perl: FTBFS: tests
failed
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583462: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
tag 583462 + pending
thanks
Some bugs are closed in revision 58571
by Gregor Herrmann (gregoa)
Commit message:
Explicitly run only the non-network tests (closes: #583462).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
]] Jo Shields
| pkg-config should not escape : in calls to --libs either. It's broken
| building basically every Mono app or lib in the archive.
I have a 0.25 in the pipeline which should be released either tonight or
tomorrow which fixes this.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's ju
On Thu, 27 May 2010 19:14:44 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
> > make[1]: Entering directory
> > `/build/user-libdist-zilla-perl_2.101040-1-amd64-2OYRmd/libdist-zilla-perl-2.101040'
> > PERL_DL_NO
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 583418 + pending
Bug #583418 [src:libnet-z3950-zoom-perl] libnet-z3950-zoom-perl: FTBFS:
Nonexistent build-dependency: libyaz3-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583418:
tag 583418 + pending
thanks
Some bugs are closed in revision 58566
by Gregor Herrmann (gregoa)
Commit message:
* Remove transitional dummy package libnet-z3950-zoom-perl now that lenny is
released.
* Change build dependency from old libyaz3-dev to new libyaz4-dev
(closes: #583418).
--
To
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> forwarded 583460 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=57913
Bug #583460 [src:libmoose-policy-perl] libmoose-policy-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Set Bug forwarded-t
Package: libllvm-ocaml-dev
Version: 2.6-9
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The patch attached fix this bug.
Cheers
Sylvain Le Gall
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Lin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 583460 + confirmed upstream
Bug #583460 [src:libmoose-policy-perl] libmoose-policy-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed.
>
End of message, s
On 05/27/2010 09:43 PM, Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Welcome aboard... see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2010/05/msg00108.html
jup.. since your last mail, it's all waiting for ftp-masters. i
currently can't do more than upload the packages.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 583485 pending
Bug #583485 [live-initramfs] live-initramfs: debconf database is not filled
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583485: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
tag 583485 pending
thanks
On 05/27/2010 09:06 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> When booting a live USB key with the latest live-initramfs, no user is
> created upon boot. Upon investigation it seems that the 10adduser script
> doesn’t populate the debconf database in /root/var/cache/debconf at all.
>
Le jeudi 27 mai 2010 à 21:43 +0200, Jiří Paleček a écrit :
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:06:13 +0200, Josselin Mouette
> wrote:
>
> > When booting a live USB key with the latest live-initramfs, no user is
> > created upon boot. Upon investigation it seems that the 10adduser script
> > doesn’t popula
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 461643 grave
Bug #461643 [enigmail] please package version 1.0.1 for icedove 3 support
Severity set to 'grave' from 'wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
461643: http://bugs.debian.o
Package: mdadm
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to build from source on ia64 (at least)
Another one of these, which upstream will hopefully fix:
gcc -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -ggdb -fomit-frame-pointer -Os
-DSendmail=\""/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"\" -DCON
Le jeudi 27 mai 2010 à 23:25 +0400, Андрей Парамонов a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> I've tried and I've got the following backtrace. Please look at it and
> tell if more detailed info is needed. If so, which package should I
> rebuild with debug DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS?
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmen
On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:06:13 +0200, Josselin Mouette
wrote:
When booting a live USB key with the latest live-initramfs, no user is
created upon boot. Upon investigation it seems that the 10adduser script
doesn’t populate the debconf database in /root/var/cache/debconf at all.
Therefore user-s
Hi,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:24:54AM +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> thank you for your report. Do you really think, removing the manpage
> in one package might be clever? As both packages are using the same
> function under the hood, both packages need to have an appropriate
> manpage for this. B
Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
> Thanks, now it is bulding without problems, it is uploaded at
> mentors
IMHO it is useless to make an upload to sid fixing the current RC bug
now, because you'd need a sourceful upload for the transition anyway,
and the GNUstep stack (including gnustep-dl2) is not r
Hello!
I've tried and I've got the following backtrace. Please look at it and
tell if more detailed info is needed. If so, which package should I
rebuild with debug DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS?
p...@neo:~$ SANE_DEBUG_HPAIO=255 gdb flegita
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.0.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundati
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 19:20 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> First of all, let me add a disclaimer: I am *not* the maintainer of
> libnss-ldap nor do I have much clue about LDAP auth and even that
> package.
Let me then also add my comments (I'm also not the maintainer of
libnss-ldap but I'm the
Package: live-initramfs
Version: 1.236.2-1
Severity: grave
When booting a live USB key with the latest live-initramfs, no user is
created upon boot. Upon investigation it seems that the 10adduser script
doesn’t populate the debconf database in /root/var/cache/debconf at all.
Therefore user-setup f
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.48-1.2
Hi Alexander!
On Wed, 05 May 2010 11:07:25 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for clisp (versioned as 1:2.48-1.2) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thank you for the fix, but I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 583174 normal
Bug #583174 [predict-gsat] predict-gsat: Please rebuild against new
libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> reassign 583174 release.debian.org
Bug #583174 [predict-gsat] predict-gsat: Please rebuild a
severity 583174 normal
reassign 583174 release.debian.org
retitle 583174 nmu: predict
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 583174 + binnmu
thanks
Hi,
Peter S Galbraith writes:
> libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable. It's now possible to
> rebuild predict-gast for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 583175 normal
Bug #583175 [mancala] mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-dev (1.0.93)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> reassign 583175 release.debian.org
Bug #583175 [mancala] mancala: Please rebuild against new libforms-d
severity 583175 normal
reassign 583175 release.debian.org
retitle 583175 nmu: mancala
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 583175 + binnmu
thanks
Hi,
Peter S Galbraith writes:
> libforms-dev (1.0.93sp1) has reached unstable. It's now possible to
> rebuild mancala for libfor
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:32:00PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Well, the sponsoring is the blocker for me too ;)
>
> I am willing to sponsor uploads of enigmail.
>
> @Willi: may you provide a debdiff file, please?
Thanks Th
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:39:57PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 02:25 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Well, the sponsoring is the blocker for me too ;) ...
>
> Why is the sponsoring a blocker for you, Alexander?
>
> You appear to be a debian developer, according to
>
> http
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 18:47:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#581215: fixed in shiboken 0.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #581215,
regarding [shiboken] shiboken just segfaults or does nothing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 552873
> http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=17192&group_id=12
Bug #552873 [src:sformat] sformat: FTBFS: ../include/mconfig.h:44:70: error:
xconfig.h: No such file or directory
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http
On 05/27/2010 02:25 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Well, the sponsoring is the blocker for me too ;) ...
Why is the sponsoring a blocker for you, Alexander?
You appear to be a debian developer, according to
https://db.debian.org/search.cgi
What kind of sponsorship do you need?
--dkg
Hi,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Well, the sponsoring is the blocker for me too ;)
I am willing to sponsor uploads of enigmail.
@Willi: may you provide a debdiff file, please?
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pkg-config should not escape : in calls to --libs either. It's broken
building basically every Mono app or lib in the archive.
r...@osc-franzibald:/# pkg-config --libs monodoc
/r\:/usr/lib/mono/monodoc/monodoc.dll
r...@osc-franzibald:/# pkg-config --
Hi Laurent,
2010/5/26 Laurent Bigonville :
> Package: amsn
> Version: 0.98.3-1
> Severity: Serious
>
> Hi,
>
> aMSN shouldn't compile with v4l support on non linux archs.
> This prevents building on kfreebsd-*
>
Thanks for reporting, I am working on that from the message sent by
Peter Green.
Reg
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:10:21PM +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As Alexander Sack hasn't even answered any public request to do an
> enigmail upload, I've prepared an NMU based in asac's Ubuntu package. It
> is available from:
>
> http://wserver.wm1.at/~willi/debian/various/pool/main/e/enig
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Package: predict-gsat
> Version: 2.2.3-2
> Severity: grave
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping
> only one development version. So please rebuild predict-gsat against
> libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:13:01PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> but still the most recent update of libdevmapper broke cryptsetup build.
> see the build logs at https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=cryptsetup:
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/build/buildd-cryptsetup_1.1.1-1-i386-X7Uy0C/cryptset
same build failure on kfreebsd-386 buildd
- Forwarded message from Debian buildds -
From: Debian buildds
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 03:30:04 +
To: spr...@packages.qa.debian.org
Subject: failed kfreebsd-i386 build of spring 0.81.2.1+dfsg1-4
* Source package: spring
* Version: 0.81.2.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 583097 spring: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*, triggers internal error in gcj
Bug #583097 [spring] spring: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* (libjna-java unavailable)
Changed Bug title to 'spring: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*, triggers internal error in
gcj' from 'spring:
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2010 20:03:30 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#583014: vtk: FTBFS:
vtkBoostBiconnectedComponents.cxx:35:41: error: boost/vector_property_map.hpp:
No such file or directory
has caused the Debian Bug report #583014,
regarding vtk: FTBFS: vtkBoostBiconn
Hello Nico,
First of all, let me add a disclaimer: I am *not* the maintainer of
libnss-ldap nor do I have much clue about LDAP auth and even that
package.
I am indeed working on it as part as a genral action wrt rotting bugs
reports related to localization.
Still, I went on your bug report and n
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Package: mancala
> Version: 1.0.1-3
> Severity: grave
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a bump in the libforms soname from 1 to 2, and I am keeping
> only one development version. So please rebuild mancala against
> libforms-dev (1.0.93) as soon as it hits unstable. Your pac
Adam
could you petsc3.1 with a Depends on libhdf5-openmpi-dev
for libpetsc3.1-dev ?
Thanks a lot
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Funny, the two Adams confused me for a moment...
>
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 06:24 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> > Adam
> >
> >
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 582612 + pending
Bug #582612 [wdm] prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified
by the user
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
582612: http://bugs.debian.or
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 22:03 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Thanks, now it is bulding without problems, it is uploaded at mentors
[1]
[1]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-dl2/gnustep-dl2_0.12.0-3.dsc
>
> (The GSMethodList FTBFS is gnustep-base/1.20.x-specific so you can't
> noti
Package: libllvm-ocaml-dev
Version: 2.6-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The META file for the llvm package does not work. It does not appear
when I type ocamlfind list. However, if I do:
/usr/lib/ocaml/METAS# cp libllvm-ocaml-dev.META META.llvm
Then it appears. It may
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 572464 serious
Bug #572464 [ceferino] ceferino: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572464: http://bugs.debian.org/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 572468 serious
Bug #572468 [flex] flex: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 572470 serious
Bug #572470 [gregorio] gregorio: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572470: http://bugs.debian.org/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 572465 serious
Bug #572465 [e16] e16: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 572466 serious
Bug #572466 [eiciel] eiciel: Please build-depend on autopoint
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Source: cecil-flowanalysis
Version: 0.1~svn.128879-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /
Source: enna
Version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.1.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: amule
Version: 2.2.6+debian0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: cia-clients
Version: 20100513
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: libdist-zilla-perl
Version: 2.101040-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: clutter-1.0
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Enter
Source: gmorgan
Version: 0.27-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: libmoosex-types-varianttable-perl
Version: 0.04-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libmoosex-types-structured-perl
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libjboss-cache1-java
Version: 1.4.1.SP13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: libnet-https-any-perl
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: libmoose-policy-perl
Version: 0.04-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: gdata-sharp
Version: 1.4.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
hey,
On 27/05/2010 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:00:59PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > cryptsetup staticly links against libdevmapper,
>
> This is not allowed under normal circumstances. Does the security team
> know about?
>
> >
Source: nant
Version: 0.85.dfsg1-9
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: hipo
Version: 0.6.1-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
Source: drapes
Version: 0.5.2-3.2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
Source: ipod-sharp
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: docky
Version: 2.0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Enter
Source: monodevelop-debugger-gdb
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: mistelix
Version: 0.31-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Enter
Source: gsf-sharp
Version: 0.8-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
